OpenVPN Access Server (50 Connected Devices) / Self-Hosted VPN

My main use case for OpenVPN Access Server is for establishing a connection between my location and a remote server. When I was on tour in 2023 and 2024, I used OpenVPN Access Server to remotely connect my endpoint or my workstation on my system to my laptop while I was traveling. I would connect using OpenVPN Access Server to my workstation, and then my workstation would allow me to do my activities and tasks while I was traveling.

This allowed me to have my own private but secure remote VPN connection to my work system.

The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers include being easy to set up, efficient, and cost-effective. I think it cost about two and a half dollars or five dollars, though I cannot remember exactly. It was cost-efficient, useful for small teams, and it is always on and reliable.

The feature I rely on with OpenVPN Access Server is simply its ability to provide a VPN connection. It basically ensures that you have security between point A and point B. One feature I would highlight about it is because of its self-hosted nature, it is pretty efficient and mostly reliant on your internet speed and connection.

OpenVPN Access Server positively impacts my organization by securing my connection between my traveling system and my remote workstation, which helped a lot in terms of security, data privacy, and maintaining trust and reliability for the clients that I was working with at that time.

OpenVPN Access Server could probably improve by including an AI functionality on the web access that helps guide users and troubleshoot issues quickly. I had a little bit of a challenge setting it up initially, but it was quickly resolved after I read through the documentation.

I would describe the user interface of OpenVPN Access Server as good; it could do with a little bit of improvement, but it looked pretty straightforward. I did not have much problem navigating the UI, although I did notice a little bit of lag in provisioning accounts, but after refreshing a couple of times, the control sticks.

I have been working in my current field for the past eight years.

Once OpenVPN Access Server is set up, its scalability is pretty easy, as it is basically creating accounts and sending out the credentials to specific users alongside the installation kit.

Customer support is good, as I think their response time for when I had an issue was well under 12 hours. I would rate the customer support of OpenVPN Access Server a 10 out of 10.

I previously tried different VPNs, including Turbo and ExpressVPN, but they did not really seem to have great speeds at that time nor match up my use case for needing a self-hosted VPN. OpenVPN Access Server was able to solve that problem for me.

Installing and setting up OpenVPN Access Server within my environment was pretty easy, as I set it up within about 30 minutes to an hour. Once payment was confirmed, it was really straightforward.

All setup actions and activities looked straightforward when I used it.

In terms of return on investment, I saved money, especially when I saved about 80 percent of the cost I would have used in setting up other VPNs that were not private or self-hosted. Having OpenVPN Access Server personally set up and self-hosted in my environment was cheaper and, in my opinion, more secure.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as it was pretty cheap. I think I paid about two and a half dollars or five dollars, though I cannot really remember the price. It was really cheap for what I needed, especially since it is self-hosted and allowed me to set up my own personal VPN.

I utilized the access control feature of OpenVPN Access Server for users, especially when I was working.

I did not notice any measurable improvements, but it was however efficient for the task that it was set up for. If you are looking for a self-hosted VPN service for your small enterprise, organization, or team, OpenVPN Access Server would solve your challenge. I would rate this review a 9 out of 10.

OpenVPN Access Server is our main solution to ensure that the VPN is properly connected at the client's location so that they are able to access our system, as we have a platform for inventory invoice management.

Just as there are typical firewalls in a system, such as Cloudflare 1.1.1.1, I use OpenVPN Access Server to allow access from specific IPs and block access to specific IPs in my invoice management platform.

OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted my organization by helping us design a reliable infrastructure and even providing definite SLA metrics to our clients.

We have different SLA levels such as L0, L1, L2, and L3 in a typical IT scenario. Some clients need immediate access within 24 hours, while other clients, depending on their SLA levels, need support within one to two days. There are also some clients who are low priority and need support within five days or a week. This is how we organize our SLA structure. The high-priority clients who are hosted on our private server need immediate resolution, or a penalty is applied.

The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers are the secure access to the portal and the ability to stop irrelevant IPs from accessing our system.

The secure access feature and blocking irrelevant IPs help my team on a day-to-day basis by protecting us. The unnecessary load on the servers is avoided in the first place. The regular backups that are taken are also easily available for our clients. Even the support team feels updated with all such features.

OpenVPN Access Server needs improvement as it requires definite marketing in the East Africa region so that many people have access to it. It should also be available offline and not always dependent on the internet. It should have AI-based observability metrics as well.

From the user experience perspective, OpenVPN Access Server should be more user-friendly in the East Africa market where I am located. It should be easy to use and compliant with local norms. From the technical perspective, it should not be heavily dependent on the resources of the PC.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for the past three years.

Others who are looking to use OpenVPN Access Server should evaluate the proper feature benefits and costing as per their use cases.

From the user experience perspective, OpenVPN Access Server should be more user-friendly in the East Africa market where I am located. It should be easy to use and compliant with local norms. From the technical perspective, it should not be heavily dependent on the resources of the PC.

I found this interview to be good, but it can be improved with a more manual touch. My overall review rating for this product is 9 out of 10.

My main use case for OpenVPN Access Server involves managing secure remote access for our internal teams and technical engineers who need to connect to our private cloud infrastructure. We rely heavily on established secure connections so the team can certainly access the database, internal applications, server dashboards, and the web admin UI makes it straightforward to manage user cases and integrates well with our existing authentication setup, which gives us significant time savings on the IT support side.

A quick specific example of how my team uses OpenVPN Access Server day to day includes the admin web UI being at the top of the list because it makes managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to use the command line. Another standout feature is the built-in client portal that allows users to log in and download their configured profile, saving our IT team considerable manual setup work. Lastly, the authentication flexibility helps us regularly, specifically how smoothly it integrates with our Active Directory and multifactor authentication, which enhances our IT support experience on a daily basis.

OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by providing a high, reliable, stable environment, especially for remote work. We handle critical infrastructure, and having a secure gateway that does not drop connections unexpectedly is a huge win, greatly improving our security posture without adding administrative headaches, as engineers and technical teams can securely connect to private cloud resources and databases from anywhere without a hitch, ensuring that our operations workflow runs smoothly around the clock and offering total peace of mind regarding remote access security.

Regarding specific outcomes, the clear impact of OpenVPN Access Server has been a massive drop in VPN-related support tickets. We previously handled profile issues, broken connections, and credential setups manually which used to be a daily headache for the IT team. Those tickets have now dropped by seventy percent to eighty percent, roughly because of the self-service client portal. It saves significant time on user onboarding as it used to take administration about twenty to thirty minutes to generate and securely send configuration files, but now, thanks to Active Directory integration, it takes hardly two to three minutes, resulting in considerable hours saved weekly and monthly.

The main feature of OpenVPN Access Server that stands out to me is the admin UI, and it is very well integrated with the Active Directory multifactor authentication, which provides the kind of enterprise-grade security we have been looking for, and we are very happy with that.

The admin web UI makes managing user access and subnets incredibly simple without having to use the command line. Another standout feature is the built-in client portal that allows users to log in and download their configured profile, saving our IT team considerable manual setup work. The authentication flexibility helps us regularly, specifically how smoothly it integrates with our Active Directory and multifactor authentication.

The main area for OpenVPN Access Server improvement is its pricing model, as the concurrent user license gets expensive quickly as the organization grows, so more flexible pricing options would be a huge plus for AVIARC. Another area I would specify is the configuration disconnect, as the admin UI handles about ninety percent of what you need, but when it comes to advanced routing customization, tweaking specific variables requires dropping back into the command line interface. It would be great to see those deeper configurations integrated into the web portal for ease of use, along with support for newer, lighter protocols like WireGuard built straight into the platform for better performance and efficiency.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for about three and a half to four years.

OpenVPN Access Server demonstrates absolute stability with no issues regarding its reliability, scalability, or other concerns.

OpenVPN Access Server scales very well from a technical standpoint. You can easily upgrade the underlying hardware resources or spin up additional nodes in a cluster configuration to handle a massive surge in concurrent users. The only real constraint to its scalability is financial, as the concurrent user licensing model leads to expenses increasing quickly as you scale up to support larger teams, meaning while the software handles growth seamlessly, your budget is the main thing you need to plan around.

I would rate customer support nine out of ten. The ticketing system is responsive, and the technical team knows the product inside and out. Moreover, due to the massive community around VPNs, you can almost always find immediate answers in their forum documentation without needing to open a ticket.

Installing and setting up OpenVPN Access Server is very easy, especially compared to the community edition of OpenVPN. In our environment, we deployed it without a manual script or built-in installation from scratch, simply pulling a pre-configured image directly onto our virtual machine. The initial setup wizard guided us through core settings like admin password configuration and a primary network interface through the terminal, from where we immediately transitioned to the web UI to handle the rest of the configuration, which included setting up routing paths and subnets. It took less than an hour for the fully functional server to be up, which is a massive time-saver for our engineering team.

My advice to others looking into using OpenVPN Access Server is to map out your user access groups and routing subnets before configuring the server, as the tool makes enforcing least privilege incredibly easy, but it is smoother with clearly defined access policies on paper first. I would also recommend taking full advantage of the two free concurrent connections to test out the SAML or Active Directory integrations completely before purchasing licenses, allowing you to prove the workflow and see how much time it can save your IT team before making a financial commitment. I would rate this product an eight out of ten overall.

One of the main use cases for OpenVPN Access Server is managing secure remote access for our internal teams and technical engineers who need to connect to our private cloud infrastructure and staging environments.

We rely heavily on it to establish stable and secure connections so the team can access the database, internal applications, and server data safely from the server dashboard anywhere in the world.

The web admin UI makes it straightforward to manage user access and it integrates well with our existing authentication setup, which saves us a lot of time on the IT support side.

Our main way of using OpenVPN Access Server is primarily for security, where it saves us from hacking and prevents data from going outside of our secure connection by using this VPN.

The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers include security, which protects our data so that no one can access our connection.

We have one secure connection which we are using with OpenVPN, and providing secure remote access for our technical teams to connect to our infrastructure is definitely the main way that we use it in day-to-day life.

The admin web UI is at the top of the list because it makes managing user access incredibly simple without having to use the command line.

Another best feature is its built-in client portal where users can log in and download their own pre-configured profiles, which saves the IT team a ton of manual setup work.

Lastly, the authentication flexibility, specifically how smoothly it integrates with Active Directory and multi-factor authentication, gives us exactly the kind of enterprise-grade security we need.

The web UI and the authentication integration have massively improved our team's daily productivity.

On the IT management side, we do not have to waste time manually writing configuration files or handling complex command line setups just to onboard someone into the company.

Since it syncs seamlessly with our existing authentication and multi-factor setup, user management is basically automated.

For the rest of the team, they can log in to the portal, get what they need, and connect in seconds.

It has cut down on connection-related support tickets, letting everyone focus on their actual work without any technical issues.

OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by giving us a highly reliable, stable environment for remote work.

Since we handle critical infrastructure, having a secure gateway that does not drop connections unexpectedly is a huge win.

It has greatly improved our security posture without adding administrative headaches because our engineers and technical teams can securely connect to private cloud resources and databases from anywhere without a glitch.

It ensures our support and operational workflows run smoothly around the clock, giving us total peace of mind regarding work access security.

An area for improvement is the pricing model. The concurrent user licenses get expensive pretty quickly as your organization grows, so more flexible pricing options would be a huge plus.

Another area is configurational disconnect. While the admin web UI handles about 90% of what you need, the moment you have to do deep, advanced routing customization, you still have to drop back to the command line interface to make those changes.

It would be great to see those deeper configurations completely integrated into the web portal.

Lastly, it would be awesome to see native support for newer, lighter protocols through WireGuard built straight into the platform alongside standard OpenVPN for better performance efficiency.

I have been working in the current field for 2.8 years.

I have never faced any network or internet connection speed issues when I am connected to OpenVPN Access Server compared to other VPN solutions. I feel that it is highly stable and perfectly fine for day-to-day corporate work.

For tasks involving accessing databases, managing server infrastructure, or using our internal applications, I really do not notice any lag.

Compared to older VPN protocols through IPsec, it feels much smoother and establishes connections faster.

I do not feel any connection speed issues when using OpenVPN Access Server. Everything looks simple and smooth, and I have not encountered any issues.

OpenVPN Access Server is 100% stable in my experience.

The scalability of OpenVPN Access Server is very natural and incredibly stable. In my experience, we rarely ever deal with unexpected service drops.

It just sits there and does its job, which gives us a lot of peace of mind when our teams are accessing critical infrastructure.

From a purely technical standpoint, it scales very well. You can easily upgrade the underlying hardware resources or spin up additional nodes in a cluster configuration if you need to handle a massive surge in concurrent users.

The only real constraint to its scalability is not technical; it is financial because of the concurrent user licensing model.

Scaling up to support much larger teams gets expensive quickly. So while the software handles growth seamlessly, the budget is really the main thing that we have to plan around as we scale.

It is very easy to raise a ticket with them. We also have email support and a direct help desk we can contact via their service desk number and email, and we can raise tickets using their website portal. It is very easy.

I would definitely rate customer support 10 out of 10. They really respond to our queries so fast and help us in resolving issues.

Installing and setting it up is very easy, especially compared to the community edition of OpenVPN. For example, when we deployed it in our environment, we did not have to build it from scratch or manually script out the installation.

We just pulled a pre-configured image directly onto our virtual machine, and the initial setup wizard walked us through the core settings including setting up the admin password and configuring the primary network interface right in the terminal.

From there, we immediately transitioned over to the web UI to handle the rest of the configuration including setting up our routing paths and subnets.

It took less than an hour to get the fully functioning server up, which is massive time saved for our engineering team.

We use a local authentication method, which is primarily using SAML authentication integration to tie everything into our primary identity provider. We also utilize local authentication for emergency administrator backup accounts.

In terms of effectiveness, I would rate the SAML integration a solid 9 out of 10. It makes mapping user roles and enforcing multi-factor authentication incredibly smooth, meaning our users get a seamless single sign-on experience.

The only tiny friction point is that setting up the initial attribute mapping for custom security groups can be a little tedious in the interface, but once it is logged in, it runs flawlessly and completely automates our lifecycle management for access easier.

I have utilized the access control features of OpenVPN Access Server, and I would rate it 9.5 out of 10.

Instead of letting everyone onto the entire network once they connect, we can use the access control list to restrict access strictly by group or user roles.

Our engineering groups are given precise routing rules so they can hit specific staging subnets and databases, while other teams are restricted to only the internal applications they need for daily work.

It allows us to implement the zero trust principle very effectively at the network level without making the configuration overly complicated for our administrators.

We definitely see a clear return on investment from using OpenVPN Access Server, mostly driven by operational time savings and efficiency.

From a technical administrative perspective, the biggest metric is the reduction in manual onboarding time.

It used to take our engineers around 20 to 30 minutes per user to generate keys and distribute profile configurations manually.

Now, with the SAML and Active Directory integration, the process is down to under two minutes, which frees up our senior staff to focus on critical infrastructure tasks instead of managing access tickets.

Additionally, the client portal is so user-friendly that we have seen a massive reduction in routing IT support tickets related to connection drops or profile issues.

While the user licensing cost can add up, the savings in engineering hours and reduction in overhead for support make it a net positive investment for our organization.

I use it for a client, so I do not have much information regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing.

But from what I have gathered, the pricing and setup costs are a little more expensive compared to any other VPN solutions, according to some of my seniors who have been working on this tool for the last five to six years.

The only thing I can advise is that the licensing cost is quite expensive, but it saves a lot of time for our IT engineers so that your senior IT engineers can focus on other ongoing IT issues in the company culture or any other tools they have.

It mainly saves time in configuring user profiles, as everything is automated. It is very easy to configure the rules of our organization, and it blindly follows them in order to create user profiles.

The user-friendly interface allows everyone to understand it easily, and it is easy to install.

We purchase it from AWS Marketplace.

We use the role-defining features, and it has had a huge impact on how we enforce least privilege. Because it integrates so well with our identity provider via SAML, users are automatically placed into their respective groups based on their actual roles the moment they authenticate.

This makes enforcing least privilege practically effortless on our end. Instead of an administrator having to manually assign permissions to individual users every single time, the server reads the group role and immediately locks down or opens up access to a specific subnet based on the profile.

It ensures our security policy is strictly followed without creating any extra manual work or friction for our IT team or support team.

The user interface for OpenVPN Access Server is very user-friendly, very easy to understand, very easy to configure, and very easy to install in our virtual machines.

On the end-user side, the client web portal is completely foolproof. It is incredibly simple, allowing users to log in, see exactly what they need, and download their pre-configured connection profiles without any confusion.

On the administrative side, the admin web UI is highly organized and straightforward. It moves away from complex command-line configuration and lays out user management, routing rules, and authentication settings in a very logical menu system.

My only real critique is that it looks a bit traditional or dated compared to some modern SaaS dashboards, but from a purely functional perspective, it gets the job done cleanly and makes managing an entire team really intuitive.

Regarding AI capabilities, OpenVPN Access Server does not actually have built-in AI features right now. It is primarily a straightforward core networking and security tool.

However, looking at its overall governance and traditional security, it is exceptionally solid. The platform excels at access control, encryption standards, and secure logging, which gives us great oversight and compliance tracking for who is accessing our network infrastructure.

Regarding the accuracy and reliability of its output, OpenVPN Access Server does not actually have any native or built-in AI capabilities right now.

It is strictly a dedicated virtual private network and secure routing platform.

But if we look at the accuracy and reliability of its output from a pure networking standpoint, meaning connection stability, correct routing rules, and steady traffic management, it is incredibly reliable.

When you configure an access rule or subnet mapping, it works exactly as intended without bugs or random drops.

The platform is rock-solid on performance and does exactly what it is configured to do. It does not use artificial intelligence to get that done.

I would rate this product an overall 8 out of 10.

In my day-to-day work, we deal with customer tickets related to VPN access, such as VPN password resets, regardless of the region they are from.

Beyond user support, we typically handle these tickets with a single request every three days, provide secure encrypted options, give remote access, and utilize multi-factor authentication, along with cross-platform support that includes Windows, Linux, and macOS, while also implementing split tunneling to manage company traffic through the VPN.

For example, if an employee is working from home, they need OpenVPN Access Server to connect to the office network, which allows them to handle database servers and other resources securely while working from anywhere in the country, improving security through encrypted access.

OpenVPN Access Server governs secure and compliant VPN access through centralized user management, allowing admins to manage user accounts, monitor activity, and enforce access policies efficiently.

In my organization, OpenVPN Access Server is deployed as a centralized VPN gateway in my Azure cloud, which is a public cloud environment, enabling secure access to company resources.

The best features OpenVPN Access Server offers include the ability to grant employees access to office applications quickly; without OpenVPN Access Server, employees would need to travel, but once access is granted, they can reach all office resources within a minute, reducing the resolution time from one to two hours to just one minute.

We reduce VPN bandwidth consumption by providing OpenVPN Access Server connection access based on specific geographical regions, with separate VPN access for West, Central, and Canada, ultimately lowering our overall bandwidth usage.

I find the verification of credentials against Active Directory crucial; if credentials are not verified, access policies should define user groups, IP restrictions, and route-based access meticulously.

Regarding other features, I believe we can improve OpenVPN Access Server by implementing high availability through load balancing between multiple servers, which increases access control and user administration capabilities, while also adding stronger multi-factor authentication and continuous monitoring using tools like Splunk.

While it is easy to use, I would suggest regular updates to OpenVPN Access Server software, particularly before SSL certificate expirations or OS upgrades to protect against vulnerabilities while optimizing split tunneling for efficient bandwidth usage.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for four years in my current company, PowerSchool.

The setup process in my organization was straightforward as it was already pre-set up when I joined, and I experienced no complex issues during installation.

In terms of cost savings, there are tangible benefits, although specific numeric values were not specified.

OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted our organization by enabling remote issue resolution in minutes where previously critical alerts required hours of travel to fix, alongside improved productivity as employees can quickly access internal resources, file servers, and collaborate with teams.

I would rate OpenVPN Access Server as a 10 out of 10 because it significantly reduces downtime, enabling employees to address issues promptly.

For instance, if each engineer saves one hour daily on commuting, granting access with OpenVPN Access Server leads to significant productivity gains of around 300 hours saved monthly for the organization.

My overall review rating for this product is 10 out of 10.

I use the solution for higher education resources.

The solution does its job and it is easy to customize.

The core VPN functionality is reliable and relatively easy to administer once it is deployed.

The licensing and purchasing workflow needs serious improvement. OpenVPN should provide clear documentation for customers who need multiple Access Server instances, different connection counts, AWS Marketplace subscriptions, PAYG licensing, and BYOL licensing under the same organization. Support and sales also need a clearer internal escalation path. We received guidance that pointed us back to AWS, then AWS clarified that OpenVPN needed to amend or handle the agreement, then OpenVPN proposed BYOL, then the BYOL setup ran into another account conflict. This was embarrassing for a paid enterprise product.

The product should include clearer in-app and portal-level guidance explaining what account types, billing models, and subscription models are compatible. Customers should not have to discover these limitations through a long email chain.

I have been using the solution for 7 months.

We have used OpenVPN Access Server previously and were trying to expand our existing deployment. The issue was not that we were switching from another vendor. The issue was that expanding an existing OpenVPN setup became unexpectedly difficult.

Do not assume the pricing or purchasing path will be straightforward, especially through AWS Marketplace. Confirm in writing whether your intended setup requires PAYG, BYOL, a Marketplace amendment, a separate AWS account, or a separate OpenVPN account. Also, budget staff time for the licensing process itself. The sticker price may look clear, but the real cost includes the time spent untangling subscription limitations, account conflicts, sales handoffs, and unclear guidance.

We considered continuing with OpenVPN because we already had operational familiarity with it and expected the expansion path to be simple.

The technical product is usable. The purchasing and licensing experience was the problem. Our organization needed a simple answer to a simple question: how do we run one 10-connection server and one 50-connection server? Instead of a clear path, we got days of back-and-forth, repeated explanations, conflicting assumptions, AWS/OpenVPN finger-pointing, delayed responses, and a final BYOL path that still ran into account conflicts. For an infrastructure product, that is not acceptable.

Customers should not need to coordinate between vendor sales, vendor support, AWS Marketplace, AWS account teams, and internal billing just to buy more capacity. OpenVPN should make this process dramatically clearer, faster, and more accountable.

My use case for OpenVPN Access Server is infrastructure VPN for internal company usage. The main reason we use it is because of the user management UI and the visual representation of all the data related to it.

Overall, my best feature of OpenVPN Access Server is the user management, which is very nice because OpenVPN can be quite painful and not very visible. This tool gives absolute visibility and full control over the users, their access, and provides them with some dashboards. The administrator can see everything related to the VPN system.

I primarily utilize OpenVPN Access Server access control features for personal working desktops to access the infrastructure. We provide the key pair generated automatically, which I control, but I know that it has other features to deliver those credentials as well.

I find that connection speed with OpenVPN Access Server loses in comparison to WireGuard, which is very fast. However, compared to any other solution, they are pretty much the same, and they do not require a lot of system resources for encrypting traffic, so it's average—not bad.

I think speed has room for improvement in OpenVPN Access Server. If they can make adjustments to the protocol for better speed, identical to WireGuard for example, that would be really good.

I have been using OpenVPN Access Server for about a month, but with OpenVPN products in general, I have worked for several years.

I would rate the stability of OpenVPN Access Server about an eight or nine; it is pretty stable.

Our size of organization did not allow us to discuss scalability for OpenVPN Access Server, but one server handles everything, especially since it's for internal traffic. It is hard to say, but I doubt it should have any issues with this.

I would rate technical support for OpenVPN Access Server as not applicable because I have never talked with them. The documentation was absolutely fine for me; it was well-structured, and I did not have any difficulties with this solution, so I did not need the support.

I have tried other solutions including Cisco, FortiGate, and native IPsec solutions from Windows platforms, as well as an open-source version of OpenVPN without dashboards and the WireGuard open-source solution.

I find it extremely easy to install and set up OpenVPN Access Server.

As far as I remember, it takes about 10 or 15 minutes maximum to have a server ready.

OpenVPN Access Server requires really minimal maintenance, as it is basically dockerized and everything is automated, so it is even updated. It's absolutely simple to install.

Regarding pricing for OpenVPN Access Server, I don't remember all the details exactly, but I believe it is really flexible and even provides something like free trials, so anyone can try it. It was reasonable as far as I remember.

I compare OpenVPN Access Server to other solutions by noting that it is extremely easy to set up. Even someone who is non-technical or possesses technical knowledge will be able to install it and use it in a few minutes, which is almost not possible with any other solution, as they are much more complicated.

I do not use any role defining features because it is a really small organization, so it wasn't required, but it is there if needed.

I have seen OpenVPN Access Server integrations such as LDAP, RADIUS, PAM, and SAML, but again, due to the size of the company, it wasn't necessary and we didn't have it inside the company. However, it was nice that it is already embedded inside.

We haven't used much in terms of integrations with OpenVPN Access Server, so it's hard to say. We only used basic features there.

My advice for others looking to implement OpenVPN Access Server is that it is at least worth trying if you need a fast and easy implementation solution without technical overhead and you just need VPN access, which is supported by all operating systems and mobile operating system vendors. It is definitely worth a try.

OpenVPN Access Server was purchased directly from the website, not on the AWS marketplace or through a partner purchase. I would rate this product an overall eight out of ten.