
Hyperglance: Up to 2000 Resources
Automated cloud mapping has replaced manual diagrams and now saves hours every sprint
What is our primary use case?
I use Hyperglance for multi-account AWS infrastructure mapping, network dependency visualization, and compliance hygiene. I use it to maintain live topology diagrams across client member accounts and catch orphaned resources such as unattached EBS volumes and idle Elastic IPs.
How has it helped my organization?
Before Hyperglance, my team at Accenture India spent hours every sprint manually redrawing architecture diagrams in Visio or Lucidchart for client reviews. Those diagrams were outdated the moment our CI/CD pipelines deployed changes. Hyperglance runs in our shared-services VPC and maps everything automatically across 40+ AWS member accounts using IAM cross-account roles. It completely removed the manual diagramming chore and helped us spot misconfigured route tables and security groups before client audits.
What is most valuable?
The self-hosted deployment is the biggest advantage for us. Because the appliance runs entirely on an EC2 instance inside our VPC, no configuration data or credentials leave our boundary, which made InfoSec sign-off easy with strict banking clients. The graph visualization is also great. Clicking an EC2 instance to immediately trace its ENIs, security groups, route tables, and connected VPC endpoints makes network troubleshooting much faster than clicking around the AWS console. Linking AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) directly to visual nodes is also very handy for tagging audits.
What needs improvement?
The web canvas gets sluggish when rendering large accounts with 5,000+ resources simultaneously unless I apply account or VPC filters first. Also, the embedded PostgreSQL database on the appliance can fill up disk space quickly in environments with heavy autoscaling, so I had to manually expand our EBS volume. Having built-in disk retention alerts in the UI and a more intuitive visual builder for custom rules would be great improvements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for 1-2 years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used manual tools like Lucidchart and Visio alongside custom Python/Boto3 scripts and AWS Config. I switched because manual diagrams couldn't keep pace with fast cloud deployments, and maintaining custom scripts across dozens of accounts became an unnecessary overhead.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Make sure to factor in the underlying EC2 compute and EBS storage costs alongside the Marketplace license. For multi-account workloads, don’t run it on the smallest instance. Give it at least an m5.xlarge and 100 GB gp3 volume so the database runs smoothly. The license cost usually pays for itself quickly once you use the waste-detection rules to delete idle IPs and abandoned snapshots.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated Lucidscale and a few SaaS-based CSPM platforms. I chose Hyperglance because our enterprise client policies strictly prohibited external third-party SaaS engines from scanning their environments. Hyperglance’s self-hosted, agentless model was the cleanest fit.
What other advice do I have?
Deploy your cross-account IAM roles using CloudFormation StackSets across your AWS Organization from day one instead of adding accounts manually. Also, keep the appliance in a private subnet behind an internal ALB or VPN since it holds a full map of your cloud architecture.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Clear Visibility, Steeper Learning Curve.
Beyond visibility, it helps with cost control — its cost optimization insights help identify and terminate unused resources, contributing to cloud cost savings — and with security/compliance, since it runs real-time scanning and automated compliance monitoring to surface misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and excessive IAM access
Intuitive UI, Smooth Onboarding, and Reliable Performance
Revolutionized Cloud Visualization and Management
Intuitive Dashboard and Clear Cloud Visibility with Hyperglance
Powerful Cloud Diagrams and Compliance Checks, but Setup and UI Take Time
Live, Interactive Diagrams for Our Azure Multi-Cloud Environment
Improved cloud visibility has simplified monitoring while reporting and alerts still need refinement
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use Hyperglance for cloud infrastructure monitoring, resource visualization, and identifying performance or configuration issues across Azure and AWS environments.
How has it helped my organization?
Hyperglance has improved visibility into our cloud environment by making resources and dependencies easier to understand. It helped us identify configuration issues faster, reducing troubleshooting time and improving overall operational efficiency.
What is most valuable?
The interactive infrastructure maps, dependency visualization, and cloud inventory dashboards have been the most valuable. They provide a clear view of the environment, making it much easier to troubleshoot issues and optimize resources.
What needs improvement?
The UI could feel more modern, and report customization could be more flexible. I would also like to see deeper cost optimization insights, richer alerting options, and more integrations with DevOps and ITSM tools in future releases.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for 1 year.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously relied on the native cloud management tools, but they lacked a unified view across environments. We switched to Hyperglance for its centralized visualization, dependency mapping, and easier infrastructure monitoring.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Compare the pricing with your infrastructure size and monitoring needs before purchasing. The value is strong for medium to large cloud environments, but smaller teams should evaluate whether they'll use the advanced features enough to justify the cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not consider alternate solutions.
What other advice do I have?
Spend some time configuring dashboards and alerts based on your environment to get the most value. Once it's properly set up, Hyperglance becomes a very effective tool for monitoring, troubleshooting, and understanding complex cloud infrastructure.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Unified multi cloud estates have simplified cost control and architecture visibility
What is our primary use case?
I am managing multi-cloud environments such as AWS, Azure, and GCP estates to consolidate cost optimization, architecture visualization, and security compliance into a single pane of glass.
How has it helped my organization?
Before bringing Hyperglance on board, managing our sprawling multi-cloud footprint was an exhausting, fragmented process. Our platform engineers and finance teams were wasting dozens of hours every week jumping between different native vendor dashboards.
What is most valuable?
Codeless Automation & Compliance Rules: We can catch open storage buckets or excessive IAM access privileges. Tag-Based Cost Allocation Engines: Features like the Tagged Cost Explorer and customized FinOps Dashboards make tracking easier. Live Interactive Architecture Diagrams: The ability to instantly auto-generate cross-cloud maps with deep metadata overlays is invaluable.
What needs improvement?
The platform's interface is technically dense and features a steep learning curve. New analysts and engineers on our team frequently feel completely overwhelmed by the filter-heavy dashboard widget layouts.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for two years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We originally leaned on native tools such as AWS Config, CloudWatch, and Azure Advisor. However, they entirely lacked cross-cloud context.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My biggest advice regarding pricing is to carefully audit your overall asset footprint before requesting a quote. Unlike many competitors that skim a variable percentage off your total monthly cloud bill, Hyperglance uses a flat pricing model based on the number of ingested cloud resources.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I considered Finout and Cloudcraft. We ultimately chose Hyperglance because it combines deep financial metrics with advanced, deep-dive visual infrastructure mapping, something the others couldn't replicate in a self-hosted format.