Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Amazing observability platform!
What do you like best about the product?
Groundcover is so simple to implement and use!
we built our obsevability around it and are very happy with it!
logs ,metrics, dashboard - everything!
the pricing is great and simple and their slack community and tech team is very responsive and helpful!
we use it on a daily basis and it has proved itself as the best solution for a startup in our size!
we built our obsevability around it and are very happy with it!
logs ,metrics, dashboard - everything!
the pricing is great and simple and their slack community and tech team is very responsive and helpful!
we use it on a daily basis and it has proved itself as the best solution for a startup in our size!
What do you dislike about the product?
more slice and dices option will be great and maybe additional dashboards and templates , but the product keeps improving and those features are already showing up.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
bringing all monitoring aspects to the same place
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Very simple installation and all data is stored locally in the company's infrastructure.
What do you like best about the product?
All data is stored locally, with very simple plans so it is very easy to calculate costs. You have full control over all retention without incurring extra costs as it is running on your infrastructure. Also, the Groundcover team is very quick to help and even provides suggestions/best practices and status updates on how to fetch data from the internal Clickhouse database that is deployed as part of the service. This also includes information related to upcoming internal changes that might affect your custom-developed services that use groundcover data, that is going above and beyond!
It is very easy to install using in our case, their helm charts. And their UI is very simple and intuitive when it comes to reading logs, traces and metrics.
It is very easy to install using in our case, their helm charts. And their UI is very simple and intuitive when it comes to reading logs, traces and metrics.
What do you dislike about the product?
Their built-in eBPF plugins are still limited, but that is a very small downside as they support oTEL and Prometheus out of the box.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Observability for our microservices and our Kubernetes infrastructure.
Great eBPF Product
What do you like best about the product?
the product is very simple to use and has a clear interface
What do you dislike about the product?
It is leveraging eBPF under the hood so you are not able to run it on every machine yet
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It filters and pulls all relevant information from the kernel
Groundcover is effortless
What do you like best about the product?
The application just works out of the box. It provides a tremendous amount of value for very little effort.
The app can be installed with minimal effort in minutes, the documentation is fairly solid, and the team is super responsive.
All of my customers who have Implemented groundcover on my advice have had nothing but positive things to say about it, often surprised based on the sheer volume and quality of data vs investment.
The app can be installed with minimal effort in minutes, the documentation is fairly solid, and the team is super responsive.
All of my customers who have Implemented groundcover on my advice have had nothing but positive things to say about it, often surprised based on the sheer volume and quality of data vs investment.
What do you dislike about the product?
The documentation can be a little sparse on some topics, but with the groundcover team very present and engaged, it has never been an issue for me.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Low effort, low budget & high impact observability
Groundcover: zero effort observability
What do you like best about the product?
Groundcover has significantly impacted our small team, offering immediate insights into our EKS cluster within just 10 minutes. Its GitOps-compatible configuration seamlessly integrates into our workflow. The support via the Slack channel is outstanding, with the team being highly responsive and patient, consistently providing replies in under an hour.
What do you dislike about the product?
The current dashboards and alerts in Groundcover, which utilize an embedded Grafana, certainly deliver impressive functionalities. However, exploring a unique approach developed by Groundcover itself could potentially improve the product.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We utilize Groundcover for our infrastructure's observability. The cost-benefit tradeoff has been remarkable. With minimal effort, we've gained a comprehensive understanding of our infrastructure's inner workings, significantly enhancing our knowledge of the cluster's activities. Additionally, we've configured security-related alerts using NGINX logs as the data source, further bolstering our monitoring capabilities.
Working with groundcover
What do you like best about the product?
Liked how native groundcover is with EKS, can be installed in a couple of minutes and provides a full observability platform.
It’s also low on resources and take an a minimal additional footprint on the infrastructure.
It’s also low on resources and take an a minimal additional footprint on the infrastructure.
What do you dislike about the product?
groundcover’s bread and butter is still K8s. for outside K8s they support a lot of intergrations but the experience is not as immediate as inside out EKS environment
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Full stack observability from infrastructure monitoring all the way to APM. It improved our coverage and reduced costs
showing 1 - 6