
Hyperglance: Custom Resources (BYOL)
Clear Visibility, Steeper Learning Curve.
Beyond visibility, it helps with cost control — its cost optimization insights help identify and terminate unused resources, contributing to cloud cost savings — and with security/compliance, since it runs real-time scanning and automated compliance monitoring to surface misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and excessive IAM access
Intuitive UI, Smooth Onboarding, and Reliable Performance
Hyperglance the most useful tool.
Revolutionized Cloud Visualization and Management
Intuitive Dashboard and Clear Cloud Visibility with Hyperglance
Powerful Cloud Diagrams and Compliance Checks, but Setup and UI Take Time
Live, Interactive Diagrams for Our Azure Multi-Cloud Environment
Improved cloud visibility has simplified monitoring while reporting and alerts still need refinement
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use Hyperglance for cloud infrastructure monitoring, resource visualization, and identifying performance or configuration issues across Azure and AWS environments.
How has it helped my organization?
Hyperglance has improved visibility into our cloud environment by making resources and dependencies easier to understand. It helped us identify configuration issues faster, reducing troubleshooting time and improving overall operational efficiency.
What is most valuable?
The interactive infrastructure maps, dependency visualization, and cloud inventory dashboards have been the most valuable. They provide a clear view of the environment, making it much easier to troubleshoot issues and optimize resources.
What needs improvement?
The UI could feel more modern, and report customization could be more flexible. I would also like to see deeper cost optimization insights, richer alerting options, and more integrations with DevOps and ITSM tools in future releases.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for 1 year.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously relied on the native cloud management tools, but they lacked a unified view across environments. We switched to Hyperglance for its centralized visualization, dependency mapping, and easier infrastructure monitoring.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Compare the pricing with your infrastructure size and monitoring needs before purchasing. The value is strong for medium to large cloud environments, but smaller teams should evaluate whether they'll use the advanced features enough to justify the cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not consider alternate solutions.
What other advice do I have?
Spend some time configuring dashboards and alerts based on your environment to get the most value. Once it's properly set up, Hyperglance becomes a very effective tool for monitoring, troubleshooting, and understanding complex cloud infrastructure.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Unified multi cloud estates have simplified cost control and architecture visibility
What is our primary use case?
I am managing multi-cloud environments such as AWS, Azure, and GCP estates to consolidate cost optimization, architecture visualization, and security compliance into a single pane of glass.
How has it helped my organization?
Before bringing Hyperglance on board, managing our sprawling multi-cloud footprint was an exhausting, fragmented process. Our platform engineers and finance teams were wasting dozens of hours every week jumping between different native vendor dashboards.
What is most valuable?
Codeless Automation & Compliance Rules: We can catch open storage buckets or excessive IAM access privileges. Tag-Based Cost Allocation Engines: Features like the Tagged Cost Explorer and customized FinOps Dashboards make tracking easier. Live Interactive Architecture Diagrams: The ability to instantly auto-generate cross-cloud maps with deep metadata overlays is invaluable.
What needs improvement?
The platform's interface is technically dense and features a steep learning curve. New analysts and engineers on our team frequently feel completely overwhelmed by the filter-heavy dashboard widget layouts.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for two years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We originally leaned on native tools such as AWS Config, CloudWatch, and Azure Advisor. However, they entirely lacked cross-cloud context.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My biggest advice regarding pricing is to carefully audit your overall asset footprint before requesting a quote. Unlike many competitors that skim a variable percentage off your total monthly cloud bill, Hyperglance uses a flat pricing model based on the number of ingested cloud resources.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I considered Finout and Cloudcraft. We ultimately chose Hyperglance because it combines deep financial metrics with advanced, deep-dive visual infrastructure mapping, something the others couldn't replicate in a self-hosted format.