I have been using Hyperglance for the past two to three years. I use Hyperglance primarily for cloud management and FinOps platform management. Additionally, I use it for the unified multi-cloud view where it provides a single plane where I can manage my different types of Kubernetes clusters in a single interface.
Hyperglance: Custom Resources (BYOL)
HyperglanceExternal reviews
69 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Clear Real-Time Cloud Cost Visibility with Actionable Optimizations
What do you like best about the product?
Hyperglance gives clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and resource usage.
It identifies waste and suggests actionable optimizations automatically.
Best suited for multi-cloud or complex environments where cost and security insights need to be unified.
It identifies waste and suggests actionable optimizations automatically.
Best suited for multi-cloud or complex environments where cost and security insights need to be unified.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hyperglance can feel like overkill for smaller setups with limited cloud usage. There’s also a bit of a learning curve before you can fully take advantage of all its features. Pricing can be on the higher side as well, especially when compared to native cloud cost tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance provides clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and overall resource usage. It helps pinpoint waste and automatically recommends practical, actionable optimizations. In my experience, it’s best suited for multi-cloud or more complex environments where you want cost and security insights brought together in one unified view.
Interactive Cloud Visualizations and Cost Optimization Insights
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Hyperglance is its visualization of complex cloud architecture through interactive diagrams. It makes our infrastructure much easier to understand. Also, the cost optimization feature is very good—its insights help us identify and terminate unused resources, which helps us save on our cloud costs.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I didn’t like about Hyperglance is that the platform feels complex, and I think there’s a learning curve for new users when they first start using it. Also, the initial setup took some time to get everything configured correctly. On top of that, I think pricing can be a concern for small teams that are just starting out.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem it solves is understanding complex cloud architectures by providing a clear visual view of all resources and their relationships. It also helps with cost management: using Hyperglance, I can identify unused, untagged, and zombie resources that can be terminated, which saves a lot of cost.
Unified multi-cloud view has improved cost control and strengthened self-hosted security
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The best features Hyperglance offers in my experience are real-time 3D visualization, FinOps and cost optimization, no-code automation, and unified cloud view.
I find myself relying on the unified multi-cloud view the most, as it helps us to manage and keep monitoring on our different types of Kubernetes and other clusters at a single platform.
Hyperglance has impacted my organization positively in many ways; we got a single view of our multiple cluster managements, and it also improved our security. It helped us with our self-hosted security as many software-as-a-service tools cannot. Hyperglance provided a self-hosted own cloud where we can manage our self PVC and virtual network, so that our data never leaves our environment.
What needs improvement?
From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design.
They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it.
The reason I did not give it a 10 is that they also need some improvements like resource handling; they can effectively manage environments, and also for licensing purposes.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Hyperglance is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Hyperglance's scalability is good, but some users report that it has a lag and slow loading time when visualizing a large resource count.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Hyperglance, as we have been using Hyperglance from the start.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Hyperglance, I did not evaluate any other options.
What other advice do I have?
If others are looking into using Hyperglance, my advice is that they can switch. I gave this review a rating of 9.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Excellent Real-Time Cloud Visibility with Intuitive Topology & Dependency Views
What do you like best about the product?
HyperGlance provides excellent real-time visibility into our cloud infrastructure and makes it simple for us to understand complex situations through visualization. We can simply relate resources and follow their service relationships inside the system thanks to the topology and dependency views. Compared to other methods, it helps us comprehend dependencies, misconfigurations, and affect areas in our system more faster, which in and of itself saves us operational time in numerous ways. Because it presents our infrastructure data in an organized and easy-to-navigate format, the tool also facilitates our daily practice of cloud system observation and troubleshooting.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside is the initial setup and configuration. The UI could also be improved, and the pricing feels high.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
One of the biggest obstacles in managing modern cloud infrastructure is the lack of visibility and the sheer complexity involved, and Hyperglance helps BlockMosaic tackle both. When you’re working across multiple cloud platforms—such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud—it can be difficult to maintain a clear view of resources, dependencies, and overall system health. By providing a single, visual map of the entire infrastructure, Hyperglance simplifies monitoring and makes it easier to understand what’s connected to what.
Real-Time Infrastructure Cost Insights Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
I like how I can get all the information of the cost of my infrastructure in real time
What do you dislike about the product?
Not much, it does my work accordingly to what I need
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As we were experimenting and our size of cluster grew observation and keeping track of cost became difficult and Hyperglance solved our exact same problem
Real-Time Dashboards That Make Key Insights Easy to Grasp
What do you like best about the product?
Visualize real time dashboards
At one glance, displays all effective information in a simpler manner, automated diagram for easy understanding
At one glance, displays all effective information in a simpler manner, automated diagram for easy understanding
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing is too high and the security is limited. Not too flexible for operational purposes
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Crisp and consize real time data
Robust Real-Time Data Control with Automated Compliance Triggers
What do you like best about the product?
As it is just the starting phase of the usage, what I have liked about Hyperglance is the robust control over data utilization in a real time, which makes the user to catch the and rectify over dependency, moreover the automated compliance trigger makes it is to identify the threat.
What do you dislike about the product?
well as being the starting phase the add on cost on the additional features increases the budget allocation. Modification should be based on team size and users base
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is currently easing the usage and optimum usage and UI view, that is currently supporting our micro departments, Moreover the Insight based on the data insight which is eventually help in re-establishing of static efforts of our organization within a server less environment.
Powerful Hyperglance for Cloud Infrastructure Management
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Hyperglance is its ability to provide clear visibility into cloud infrastructure through interactive diagrams and dashboards. It helps monitor resources, optimize cloud costs, and maintain security compliance across multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, making cloud management easier and more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside of Hyperglance is that the initial setup and configuration can take some time, especially for users who are new to cloud infrastructure management. The interface is powerful but may feel slightly complex for beginners, and some advanced features require a learning curve. Improved documentation and tutorials could help new users get started more quickly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance helps solve the challenge of managing and visualizing complex cloud infrastructure. It provides clear diagrams and real-time insights into resources across different cloud environments, which helps our team quickly identify issues, monitor performance, and optimize cloud costs. This improves operational efficiency and makes cloud management easier.
Cloud visualization has clarified resource relationships and has improved cost control
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for Hyperglance on the Up to 3,000 Resources Pay as You Go plan is cloud infrastructure visualization and cost management.
We use it to get a clear, visual overview of all our resources, understand how they’re connected, and identify underutilized or misconfigured services.
It also helps us track costs and optimize spending across our cloud environment without having to dig through multiple dashboards or reports.
How has it helped my organization?
Hyperglance on the Up to 3,000 Resources Pay as You Go plan has improved our organization by giving us a much clearer visibility into our cloud infrastructure.
It makes it easy to see how resources are connected, identify unused or underutilized services, and track spending across teams.
This has helped reduce waste, improve cost efficiency, and speed up troubleshooting when issues arise.
Overall, it has made managing our cloud environment more straightforward and less time-consuming.
What is most valuable?
The features I have found most valuable in Hyperglance are the visual mapping of resources, the dependency tracking, and the cost insights.
The visual maps make it easy to see how everything in our cloud environment is connected, which saves a lot of time when troubleshooting or planning changes.
Dependency tracking helps us understand relationships between services so we can avoid accidentally affecting other systems.
The cost insights are also very useful for spotting underutilized resources and optimizing spending, which has helped us manage our cloud budget more effectively.
What needs improvement?
In terms of new features, it would be useful to see deeper automation capabilities, such as proactive alerts or automated suggestions for cost optimization.
Better role-based access controls with more granular permissions could also help larger teams manage visibility and actions more securely.
Finally, a mobile-friendly interface or companion app would be a nice addition for reviewing cloud health and alerts on the go.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for 1 year.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used another cloud management tool, but we switched to Hyperglance because it provides a much clearer visualization of our infrastructure.
The previous tool required checking multiple dashboards and reports to understand resource relationships, which was time-consuming.
Hyperglance consolidates everything into a single, easy-to-navigate interface, making it faster to troubleshoot, optimize costs, and manage resources efficiently.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My advice on pricing is to evaluate your cloud resource footprint first and plan accordingly.
Since the cost increases with resource count, it helps to understand how many resources you will be monitoring and whether you will need to scale soon.
If your environment is growing, budget for the next tier ahead of time so you are not surprised by a jump in cost later.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did consider other options such as CloudHealth and CloudCheckr, but ultimately chose Hyperglance because it provided a more intuitive interface and stronger visualization features.
The ability to quickly see resource relationships and identify inefficiencies made it the best fit for our team.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, Hyperglance on the Up to 3,000 Resources Pay as You Go plan has been a solid tool for us.
My advice for others would be to take full advantage of the free trial to explore all the visualization and cost tracking features.
It is especially helpful if you are managing a complex cloud environment and want to quickly understand resource relationships and optimize spending.
While there is a bit of a learning curve at first, once you are familiar with the interface, it becomes a valuable part of cloud management.
Unified cloud views have improved visibility and now streamline cost and security management
What is our primary use case?
Cloud Inventory & Visualization: I can visualize my cloud environment, such as AWS, Azure, or GCP, with up to 5000 resources mapped in an easy-to-understand topology. Cost & Resource Optimization: I am able to identify unused or under-utilized cloud resources to reduce waste and lower costs. Multi-Cloud Management: I bring all of my cloud service providers’ resources under one view, instead of using each provider’s separate consoles.
How has it helped my organization?
Common ways organizations say it improves their operations include offering clearer visibility across cloud assets, which helps reduce manual audits and the risk of misconfigurations. It strengthens security and compliance posture, which is especially valuable for regulated industries. Cost optimization with up to 5000 resources can meaningfully impact medium environments, and troubleshooting and collaboration are faster.
What is most valuable?
The cloud topology visualization is particularly valuable because this visual map dramatically reduces time spent tracking interdependent services. Security posture and risk insights help reduce security risk and ease audit preparation. Cost and resource optimization are useful for teams looking to lower monthly cloud bills without guesswork. Alerts and continuous monitoring actively keep teams informed instead of relying on regular manual checks.
What needs improvement?
There are areas that users often want improved. Deeper automation and remediation reduce manual effort and accelerate the resolution of common problems. More contextual and actionable topology maps improve clarity and make maps genuinely actionable for teams with mixed workloads. Customizable dashboards and reporting are needed because teams have different priorities, such as security versus cost versus uptime, and want dashboards tailored to them.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for 2 years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used native cloud tools, like AWS Config and Azure Security Center, before. There was limited cross-cloud visibility because many teams start with native tools per cloud provider but struggle to get a unified multi-cloud view. Switching provides centralized visibility across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Some platforms provided lists and reports but not intuitive relationship maps. Teams switch for better visualization of how resources connect.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
To estimate the setup cost, I consider my current billable resource count, including instances, databases, and network resources, plus expected growth over the next 12 months. I choose a tier that comfortably covers that without frequent upgrades. Often the ROI from visibility, security posture, and cost insight outweighs raw licensing costs. TCO gives a better picture than monthly fees alone.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated native cloud provider tools because they are free or low-cost and built into each cloud provider. However, users find limitations because they are siloed per provider and do not offer strong cross-cloud visualization or consolidated insights. I also evaluated Cloud Management Platforms (CMPs) for full multi-cloud governance, cost, and security features. Users consider feature breadth versus complexity and pricing, as some are more expensive or harder to set up. Security-focused tools were evaluated for their focus on security posture management. Often, they are stronger in security depth but weaker in visualization and cost insights.
What other advice do I have?
It is important to clarify whether your priority is security, cost optimization, architecture visibility, or operational efficiency. Hyperglance provides all these, but the configuration and use depend on your goals. I advise being realistic about resource growth and investing in good onboarding. A thoughtful setup, including account connections, tagging strategy, and alerts configuration, pays off quickly because early misconfigurations can delay value.
showing 1 - 10