Debian 13 Minimal (Debian 13) | Support by ProComputers

I have been using Debian  for around 10 years now.

My main use case for Debian  is that it's a regular Linux operating system with many use cases and system servers.

One specific example of how I use Debian is running the LAMP stack, including NGINX  or other tools.

I have many use cases for Debian, but it does not make sense to share each one because there are too many of them.

Debian offers excellent stability and reliability as its best features.

What stands out to me about Debian's stability is its reliability.

Debian has positively impacted my organization as it leads to much more stable workloads. For example, if things were running worse a long time ago, with Debian it is now better.

I can share specific outcomes, such as downtime reduction and positive changes related to that.

Debian is already really great, so there is nothing to complain about regarding improvements. I do not have anything else to add about needed improvements.

I have been working in my current field for five years.

Debian is very stable.

Debian's scalability is not something that is applicable here because this is an operating system.

I found the customer support to be good, but I did not use it because there was no need.

I previously used Ubuntu  before switching, and I have switched to Debian in some places.

I have seen a return on investment as I have saved time, which is the most important part.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that Debian is free, so there is no price.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Debian.

I do not have advice to give to others looking into using Debian other than to be confident in what you are doing.

My main use case for Debian  is that a lot of my infrastructure resources are running on Debian , and many in-house tools are hosted on Debian servers.

A specific example of how I am using Debian in my infrastructure is that we are running our application servers, we have a Postgres database hosted on Debian, and we have some customized monitoring tools hosted on Debian.

In addition to my main use case, I was using Debian for ETL jobs.

The best features Debian offers include very good support and a huge library with support for various packages we can install to customize our workloads.

Compared to CentOS , we are using Debian for many things; what we can achieve with Red Hat and CentOS , we can achieve on Debian itself, so I have been using Debian for a while.

Debian has positively impacted my organization in that most of our applications are running on Debian.

I do not have a specific answer for how Debian can be improved. Nothing stands out to me regarding the needed improvements at this time.

I have been using Debian for seven years.

Debian is pretty stable.

Debian's scalability is good.

If I had to rate the customer support on a scale of one to ten, I would give it a ten.

Before Debian, we used Red Hat as a different solution.

I have definitely seen a return on investment as it has reduced our cost.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that, compared to the other Linux operating systems, Debian will be affordable.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Debian.

When it comes to specific outcomes or metrics, I would stick with improved performance and reduced downtime.

My advice to others looking into using Debian is to prioritize stability. I would rate this review a nine overall.

My main use case for Debian  includes numerous applications, ranging from running web applications on AWS  EC2  instances using Debian 12 , and Debian 12 being the bedrock of Linux Mint, which I run on a personal Mac that is really old. Because of using Linux Mint, it has brought the laptop back to life and it is quick enough to use in a modern way even though the laptop is over a decade old.

I use Debian 12 for building a web application which runs on EC2  instances, and since Debian 12 is free on AWS , I believe it was made to be optimized for EC2 usage. Debian is one of the biggest and oldest Linux distributions, so it is one that came to mind when I was deciding which machine image to run.

Debian is deployed in my organization through the public cloud. I use Debian through the AWS Marketplace , but it is actually used on EC2 instances in AWS, which you would purchase through the EC2 page of the AWS console.

In my opinion, the best features Debian offers include its stability. The stable branch really is stable because once it is configured, I understand you can run it for a very long period of time without needing to reboot or update any of the components. That is really good when you want an application to be extremely stable and not go down, and you are happy using slightly older components. I also value the fact that Debian is open source, so it is free. That is very useful, and it has a big development community that builds it. I understand there are tens of thousands of software libraries which work with Debian from the apt package manager, APT, and also it is very lightweight, which I find to be good as well because that helps with cost savings.

Debian's lightweight design benefits my organization because it does not come with bloatware, minimizing RAM usage. Because of that, we can choose cheaper EC2 instances. You do not have to have as powerful RAM, which makes things cheaper, and also because it does not come with all this bloatware, it also makes it faster. So it is very efficient.

Debian positively impacts my organization by allowing us to utilize a much more lightweight operating system with Amazon EC2 instances, which greatly reduces costs because we can use EC2 instances with lower RAM. Cost savings are good. Debian is very well known across the industry, so different engineers from different teams know how to use it. Using the APT package manager is a common skill for cloud professionals, which makes it good, especially if you are hiring individuals into the company, because at least you would expect they have some type of background using Debian.

I do not know exact measurements, but I would expect we could save at least 10% of costs with EC2 instances just because our memory and CPU requirements would be lower because Debian is lightweight. So it would save cost to some degree.

I do not really think there are any improvements that need to be made. Debian is a very well-known distribution contributed to by tens of thousands of individuals, developers, and engineers, which makes it well optimized. The stable kernel because it is going to be older and naturally stable does not always support brand new components such as CPUs or specialized GPUs out of the box, which can make it difficult to use there. However, that is not much of a problem because Debian has different branches, including the testing and unstable branches.

I have been using Debian for maybe five years.

Debian is highly scalable because we can run it on AWS EC2 instances, so we could have zero or we could have tens of thousands of instances running it if we wanted to.

My experience with customer support is that I use Debian on AWS, and Amazon's enterprise support is amazing. They get back to you extremely quickly and they are highly experienced. I have not needed help from the Debian community for assistance, but I would imagine that would be brilliant because the user community is massive for Debian.

I previously used Ubuntu . The reason for switching to Debian was that I found it a little more lightweight, and the stable branch is extremely stable, which is something I wanted for this particular web website project that I was working on.

It is very difficult to find an exact metric for return on investment because Debian is really a bedrock from which everything else is built upon. However, I would say that using Debian compared to other distributions which have more bloatware would be cheaper because we can run it on less powerful hardware. In terms of cost savings, we might see a cost of at least 10% reduction compared to distributions with more bloatware.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is free to use because Debian is open source, so there is no cost at all.

I did evaluate other options before choosing Debian, but there is nothing more to add.

I did not realize before starting to use Debian that there are different branches, which allows you to choose how stable or how up to date you want it to be. The stable branch, which is what I use, has features that are heavily tested. The software is older, but it does not break often at all because you have to manually update different components if you want them to do so. However, if you did want to use state-of-the-art components, you could consider the unstable version, which I have not personally used, but if I ever did want to do active development for the newest features, then I would be able to do that.

Debian is deployed in my organization through the public cloud. Using the APT package manager is a common skill for cloud professionals, which makes it good, especially if you are hiring individuals into the company, because at least you would expect they have some type of background using Debian.

I rate Debian a 10 because it is extremely stable, lightweight, fast, and open source, so it is free. The only real downsides are that there might be a learning curve because installing it requires a bit more technical experience than Ubuntu , and the hardware compatibility does not always work out of the box with the newest hardware. However, those things are to be expected if you are trying to configure something which is world-class and also highly stable. So I do not really see them as drawbacks; they are more considerations to be aware of.

My advice to others looking into using Debian is that I recommend using the stable branch if they want to make sure their application would be extremely stable, as it is a good way to go. Because it is so lightweight, it is very efficient to run Debian. There is a slight learning curve to it, which might make it a little harder to use than Ubuntu, but if experienced engineers are deploying it, I do not think that is a reason not to use it. I would recommend going for it.