CrowdStrike, Inc. [Private Offer Only]

CrowdStrike Falcon 's main use case is endpoint security and threat detection, which are the primary purposes for which we are using it.

A day-to-day example of using CrowdStrike Falcon  for endpoint security detection occurs when a user downloads suspicious files. The system detects this activity and triggers an alert to the administrator. CrowdStrike Falcon detects abnormal behavior of the system, and an alert is generated in a console. When I log into the console, I can see that some users are trying to access malicious files which are harmful for the organization. The security team isolates the endpoint based on this judgment. We can investigate using process trees and logs in CrowdStrike Falcon. Additionally, USB device control helps sometimes with USB blocking and data access via external storage.

The best features CrowdStrike Falcon offers are endpoint detection and response, cloud-native lightweight agent, AI-powered threat detection, threat hunting, and Falcon  Overwatch.

The feature I use the most is endpoint detection and response, which you can call EDR. EDR makes the difference in this case because it provides real-time alerts for suspicious activity and full process tree visibility showing what ran, what spawned, and what is happening inside the LAN on the endpoint. It allows for quick investigation of endpoint logins and quick host isolation to stop the spread.

Using CrowdStrike Falcon typically leads to faster threat detection, quicker response, and better visibility across the endpoints. This means I can understand, or an administrator can understand the logs and situation, what is happening with the endpoint, and what suspicious behaviors are occurring inside the endpoints. It has reduced false positives and has a lightweight performance impact, resulting in no heavy use or heavy scans of the agent. User productivity is also increased on the endpoint side.

Regarding improvements in reports, when I try to pull a custom report, there are some mismatches, or it does not look professional. I hope CrowdStrike will improve their custom report or inbuilt report to look professional rather than appearing like just adding numbers. Based on the requirement, they should improve their custom reports.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for around one year.

CrowdStrike Falcon is very stable.

The scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon is very good and very positive.

Customer support is also appreciated as it is very good. I have raised multiple tickets with technical support, and every time I have received a good response from customer support.

We did not use any kind of solution previously.

Before CrowdStrike Falcon, there were 40 to 50 alerts per day with many antivirus detections and time wasted validating non-issues. When we installed the CrowdStrike Falcon agent on the endpoint, there are now 10 to 15 meaningful alerts that we can work on and isolate the system. There is a 60 to 70 percent reduction in false positives, allowing us to disregard those. Additionally, higher quality behavioral detection based on pattern analysis is justified. The investigation time has been reduced from three to four hours to one to two hours, and per user, we used to take around 10 to 15 minutes, but now with the reduced false positives, we can troubleshoot or inspect users within five minutes.

The pricing is very straightforward and negotiable. The license is thoughtful and very fruitful. The licensing is pretty simple, so it has a very good impact with the licensing, setup cost, and pricing with respect to CrowdStrike Falcon.

Money is saved because if a user is receiving spam alerts or spam emails which are damaging the organization's privacy, the number of alerts, data threatening, DLP , data extraction, and everything has been reduced. There is a big impact on the organization's security posture as well as time saved while doing troubleshooting, allowing us to monitor that alert via one single console. The positive impact is significant, and the money saved is a very good effect for the organization.

We have not evaluated another option before choosing CrowdStrike Falcon.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon  because I want to secure my end-user devices.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon  because it works on signature-based and signature-less technology, which will prevent me from outside attackers and outside malware.

CrowdStrike Falcon will protect me from ransomware, and after the installation of CrowdStrike Falcon, I get full control on my endpoints and I am secure from outsiders.

CrowdStrike Falcon features are robust and reliable.

There are multiple features including real-time detection, real-time prevention, ATP, and IPS.

CrowdStrike Falcon makes my job easier because it will prevent me from outsider attacks and outsider detection; for example, if I want to stop any types of pen drive block or allow, it will prevent me from that as well.

It will impact my organization positively because if anybody wants to try to hit something, wants to take access, wants to perform CNC attacks, wants to do DOS attacks, CrowdStrike Falcon will protect me regarding real-time protection, PUA detection, scanning, and scheduler scanning.

I have seen on my portal, as the owner, that last week there were some detections about Trojan malware and some detections about CryptoGuard crypto malware. There are many detections, and I have seen that Trojans and malware have been blocked by CrowdStrike Falcon.

As of now, CrowdStrike Falcon does not have application control and web control. If CrowdStrike Falcon applies those types of features, it will be more reliable and stronger than any other antivirus or next-gen antivirus in the world or in the industries.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon from last two years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable right now.

It is good; I can increase it any time.

Customer support is good for CrowdStrike Falcon; they have the best support.

I have used Seqrite, but I have switched because Seqrite does not have signature-less technology.

CrowdStrike Falcon has saved me money because if any attacker attacks, they can borrow money to decrypt the file, so it is the money saved and time saved.

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very good for CrowdStrike Falcon based on what I have seen.

I have evaluated Sophos.

As of now, I think CrowdStrike Falcon is better and it is working fine. I rate it 10 out of 10 because it is lightweight, it has real-time detection, and it has the more powerful signature-based and signature-less technology. I can advise others that if there are any opportunities, they should use CrowdStrike Falcon because it is a very lightweight agent with signature-based and signature-less technology. CrowdStrike Falcon has real-time scanning, real-time prevention, and multiple other features. My overall rating for this product is 10 out of 10.

I deal with endpoint security, firewall, and XDR  solutions. I use Sangfor and work with Trend Micro and CrowdStrike. I use CrowdStrike Falcon  for enterprise companies, which is what I typically recommend.

CrowdStrike Falcon  has helped my customers predict and prevent potential breaches because of its proactive approach.

The most valuable features in CrowdStrike Falcon are its AI capabilities. The lightweight agent has a positive impact on system performance and visibility through ease of use. I utilize its Threat Graph for threat hunting.

To improve my recommendation to a perfect score, I would focus on better selling skills and improved integration with different vendors.

I have been working with CrowdStrike Falcon for approximately five years.

I have previously worked with a Total Information Management Corporation solution.

I work with competitors as well, and there is good competition to Sangfor at the moment.

I have experience with these products from prior use. I work with security vendors and some of my customers use Trend Micro and CrowdStrike as well. My experience has been positive and I have been satisfied. The pricing might be a little expensive, but I find it cost-effective. I do not find CrowdStrike Falcon to be the most expensive when comparing pricing with competitors. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.