
Overview
As businesses increasingly rely on data and AI to power digital products and drive better decision making, it's mission-critical that this data is accurate and reliable. Monte Carlo's Data + AI Observability Platform is an end-to-end solution for your data stack that monitors and alerts for data issues across your data warehouses, data lakes, ETL, business intelligence, and AI tools. The platform uses machine learning to infer and learn your data, proactively identify data issues, assess its impact, and notify those who need to know. By automatically and immediately identifying the root cause of an issue, teams can easily collaborate and resolve problems faster. Monte Carlo also provides automatic, field-level lineage and centralized data cataloging that allows teams to better understand the accessibility, location, health, and ownership of their data assets, as well as adhere to strict data governance requirements.
Highlights
- Detect: Detect data quality issues before your stakeholders at each stage of the pipeline
- Resolve: Resolve data issues with out-of-the-box root cause and impact analysis, including end-to-end field-level lineage
- Prevent: Prevent data downtime proactively across your stack
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months | Overage cost |
|---|---|---|---|
Monte Carlo Credit | Monte Carlo's Data Observability Platform Credit | $50,000.00 |
Vendor refund policy
All fees are non-cancellable and non-refundable except as required by law.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.



Standard contract
Customer reviews
Data Lineage and AI That Proactively Flags Freshness Issues and Abnormalities
Smart Data Observability and Lineage That Saves Hours of Debugging
Proactive Data Observability That Catches Issues Early
Seamless Monte Carlo + Databricks Integration with Powerful ML Anomaly Detection
Improved data health and incident reduction have revealed issues while AI direction still needs work
What is our primary use case?
My organization relies on Monte Carlo for data observability, such as whether tables were loaded on time and whether the load met expectations regarding volume. We also use it for observability into our data transformation pipelines. We use it to trigger alerts to our respective product and engineering teams if loads are delayed or the volume of loads does not meet expectations. In essence, we use Monte Carlo to gain observability into our data.
We have encountered scenarios where a particular data load would not have generated any alerts if Monte Carlo had not been in place, since the data load went through successfully. However, the volume of the data loads in that case was below the threshold volume that triggered a volume anomaly alert from Monte Carlo. We were able to go back, fix the data, and report it to the upstream source.
We also use Monte Carlo to catch long-running queries. We have monitors set up for that purpose as well. We have an in-house solution developed to catch long-running queries on Snowflake in real time, something that is not currently available in any other SaaS providers for Snowflake .
What is most valuable?
The volume monitors and the anomaly monitors regarding volume, freshness, and data consistency are the best features Monte Carlo offers in my experience. These are the best features because they help flag issues that are more abstract and difficult to measure. While a data load that did not happen is an easier thing to track, a data load that happened but the volume was not in a particular range is a very tricky metric to monitor. That is a great feature.
It is mostly a combination of volume, freshness, and consistency monitors that I find myself relying on the most. The specific monitors I use depend on the business and use case we are catering to, the tables, and the data involved. It is difficult to point out one monitor as the most useful, but we use all three of them in different combinations very extensively.
Monte Carlo has had a major impact on my organization in terms of data health for the downstreams and for all the engineering teams that depend on our data. We are now getting timely alerts around the quality of the data, the volume of the data, and the health of the data. We are able to get that visibility more granularly into every single table. We are able to draw the data lineage to understand failures faster. Overall, Monte Carlo has had a very positive impact in terms of having healthier data and being able to trace through the data lineage to understand where exactly in the data life cycle things are going wrong.
What needs improvement?
Monte Carlo needs to stop their reliance on AI, as it is not going well and is degrading the entire product. They need to find their way back, establish a product roadmap, and have real engineers work on improvements rather than heavily push AI down users' throats. They need to stop relying on AI as heavily as they have been doing, as this has really degraded the user experience. The overall direction they are taking with AI needs to be examined, as at some point it seems they have simply stopped making any improvements.
We have not used Monte Carlo's AI capabilities significantly. We primarily use it for investigating alerts from time to time. However, we do not use it extensively, so I do not think it is fair to comment comprehensively on it.
Their incident tracking and incident debugging bot is useful for new analysts who are starting onboard. It helps them debug incidents, get a clearer picture, and achieve a clear head start to reach the root of the problem faster. Regarding accuracy and reliability, I would rate it at eighty to eighty-five percent. Given the current inherent non-reliability of AI models, every single thing that Monte Carlo says needs to be validated.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Monte Carlo for the last three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Monte Carlo is a fairly stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Monte Carlo is robust and scalable for our data needs. We have not encountered any issues or challenges with the scalable platform.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not previously use any other solutions.
What was our ROI?
Time has been saved in reporting errors, SLAs, and performing reloads because we have been able to catch data errors faster. We estimate approximately eight to ten percent time savings, but regarding money savings and fewer employees needed, I do not think we can achieve that.
What other advice do I have?
We have seen a reduction of incidents in approximately seven to eight percent in production scenarios, which has definitely been positive. I recommend checking out Monte Carlo to see if it fits your data-related needs. Conduct a thorough proof of concept, review the licensing and contract agreements, and if it meets your requirements, proceed with it. I would rate this review at seven out of ten.