Seemplicity Exposure Management & Response

For us, the main use case for Seemplicity is to get vulnerability findings in order to remediate the issue, and then some of our teams need to automatically check the vulnerability based on our automation setting.

Whenever we find or identify new findings in Seemplicity, we set up the vulnerability rule on our end, which identifies what the previous rule setting was, and the auto-fix is based on what we configured and what we want to mitigate, using this automation setting for these vulnerabilities.

The best features that Seemplicity offers include the risk finding, rule setting, and the analytics in the dashboard, where we can identify all types of vulnerabilities.

Out of those features, I find myself using the analytics in the dashboard most often because in some cases, I need to investigate the findings, while the second one is the rule setting based on the team request.

Seemplicity has a huge positive impact on our organization because once we have a vulnerability, it acts as a great assistant with its auto-mitigate feature, which can be used for a variety of different types of vulnerabilities, supporting our cybersecurity analysis.

The positive outcomes from using Seemplicity include saving our human effort, and while I cannot calculate the exact hours, it usually saves over five hours per employee, and our security posture is always up-to-date with the standard framework based on all of the vulnerability findings.

Seemplicity can be improved because sometimes the rule setting can be a little complicated, and for instance, filtering out the criteria may not be useful at times, as it can be too complicated based on the business requirements.

If we can have more metrics in Seemplicity dashboard, it could be very useful and helpful for us, as some parts of the dashboard just look to require a template, suggesting that more widgets would greatly enhance it.

I have been using Seemplicity for less than one year.

Seemplicity is stable.

Its scalability is great because once we set up new teams, their risk and vulnerability finding process is very scalable.

Customer support for Seemplicity is great because whenever I open a ticket and chat with support, the admin responds right away.

Seemplicity contributes significantly to our organization's readiness for regulatory audits because most of our InfoSec team uses it when investigating vulnerabilities.

I would rate Seemplicity an eight out of ten. I choose eight out of ten because overall, Seemplicity is a great tool, but it sometimes has a sync issue between other applications and itself, such as Twist or some other inventory data or sources of data, indicating a need for improved functionality for synchronizing data.

While I do not quite use Seemplicity's AI capabilities a lot, I was recently informed about them and have utilized the AI for problem-solving by chatting with it to get an immediate solution or instant message, which proves to be useful.

I cannot measure the accuracy of Seemplicity's AI, but I think its reliability is around eighty percent, as I feel a bit doubtful about the accuracy since my usage has mainly been through the chat feature.

My advice for others looking into using Seemplicity is that it would be beneficial since you can clearly see the vulnerability findings. My review rating for Seemplicity is eight out of ten.

My main use case for Seemplicity is providing vulnerability data to customers via tools like Qualys. Seemplicity helps us run vulnerability data to customers by allowing us to filter all of the data from Qualys directly into the customer's ITSM platforms, enabling them to manage their remediations.

Seemplicity has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to provide a single viewpoint into vulnerability management and pen testing for our customers. That single viewpoint has changed things for our customers and team by allowing for better updates in terms of vulnerabilities and pen test results, enabling them to better organize how they resolve those challenges and issues.

Seemplicity has contributed to our organization's readiness for regulatory audits by being beneficial for our customers.

The best features Seemplicity offers are phenomenal aggregation that reduces the total count of vulnerabilities down by a huge amount, and SEMA, the AI, is very good as well. When it comes to aggregation reducing the total count of vulnerabilities, SEMA stands out to me for its ability to troubleshoot issues directly within the platform while allowing the AI to also query things internally, providing good and accurate responses without having to use guides or third-party solutions. Depending on how it's set up with the customer and their goals, you can reduce total counts from hundreds into under ten tickets that need to be raised very quickly.

Seemplicity has a great library of integrations. Seemplicity's AI capabilities tick all the boxes of what we need it to do in terms of governance and security. In terms of accuracy and reliability of output, I have mainly used Seemplicity for troubleshooting and querying if things are possible within the platform, and it has given good outputs that have worked, so I have no issues with it.

If I had to think of one thing that could be even better, it would be auto-remediation for vulnerabilities, specifically the ability to link into solutions that can handle the auto-remediation, translating Qualys's information to another tool that can then do the auto-remediation. The support is great, and I do not see any main reasons or main things for improvement off the top of my head.

I have been using Seemplicity for two and a half years.

Seemplicity is stable.

I have not seen any issues with the scalability of Seemplicity.

The customer support has been phenomenal, with Alon getting responses as quickly as possible, solving issues, and getting on calls if we need them for priority issues. I rate the customer support a nine on a scale of one to ten.

We did not previously use a different solution that handled what Seemplicity does.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing and setup costs were not in my area. The setup itself was reasonably smooth. Licensing is also not my area, as I am more of the technical, hands-on person.

Seemplicity is deployed in my organization via Seemplicity themselves, and we manage the platform configuration. I am not sure if it is public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, or on-premises.

I have not seen a return on investment since financial figures are not my area. I am a technical person.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing and setup costs were not in my area. The setup itself was reasonably smooth. Licensing is also not my area, as I am more of the technical, hands-on person.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Seemplicity. That was not in my area, as I was just given the tool to utilize.

My advice to others looking into using Seemplicity is to be aware that you will get more information from support than from the documents themselves, and it can take a bit of time after feeding in data to show meaningful results. However, it does show meaningful results in the end. I rate Seemplicity a seven on a scale of one to ten.

My main use case for Seemplicity is unified vulnerability management. I use Seemplicity for unified vulnerability management by aggregating the detections from various sources which we use for performing the scans, and this provides a view for our stakeholders and for the mitigation team as well to cut the tickets and work on the process.

The interesting challenge that is solved with Seemplicity is aggregating the detections and then showcasing it according to our requirement based on our prioritization framework.

The best features Seemplicity offers include the aggregation logic, the way it is simplified to view and access, and the ability to have a view in a simpler way.

The aggregation logic in Seemplicity stands out for me because it made the features simpler for the team and the aggregation logic and other features are something useful for us in speeding up the things for the mitigation activities.

Seemplicity has positively impacted our organization, as we are still in the phase of production for all the zones, so we don't have feedback yet, but for now, it's all good.

To improve Seemplicity, I would suggest having more knowledge base and more threat intel. Adding the threat intel features will improve much, such as having its own threat intel source which is covered from the third-party sources and then converted, that will help.

I have been using Seemplicity for more than a year now.

Seemplicity is stable.

Seemplicity's scalability is good.

The customer support for Seemplicity is amazing.

We did not previously use a different solution.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that earlier we felt it was too pricey, but I think it's worth it.

We use AWS, Azure, and GCP, and right now we have Seemplicity on a private cloud.

I have seen a return on investment with Seemplicity, as we are saving money, so it's worth it.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that earlier we felt it was too pricey, but I think it's worth it.

Before choosing Seemplicity, we evaluated other options, including Nucleus and Armis.

My advice to others looking into using Seemplicity is that it is highly recommended. Regarding Seemplicity's AI capabilities in terms of governance and security, I think it's all good. Regarding Seemplicity's AI capabilities, I think its accuracy and reliability of output are good for now.

My main use case for Seemplicity is aggregating all the security findings across the application security from SAST, secrets finding, vulnerability scanning, or cloud CSPM finding, and deduping them, as well as using rules to categorize based on the risk according to our custom policies, and then using the remediation workflow to assign it to the right folks and track those Jiras, making sure SLAs are mandated.

In my day-to-day work, I use Seemplicity to track each product's vulnerabilities, such as upstream vulnerabilities discovered. As they are discovered, they are scanned by one of the tools, and then that finding is passed on to Seemplicity to evaluate the true risk of that finding. Once that is done, if it's not something that we need to work on, Seemplicity's rule set autonomously identifies whether the issue needs action or not, and if it does, it gets routed to the right team to ensure it does not get dropped and we minimize the response time from security risk to remediation.

The best features Seemplicity offers are the data integrations, the ability to redefine rules, the custom rules to categorize or prioritize findings, and the remediation workflows that can pass the findings to the right folks.

The custom rules feature in Seemplicity helps us prioritize findings and makes my job easier by allowing us to recategorize security findings to meet our environment-specific or deployment-specific risks, ensuring that of the 100 issues found, maybe only one or even less needs action, which helps prevent being overwhelmed by alerts.

Seemplicity provides a variety of integrations covering most of the well-known security tools, so all the data can be easily aggregated.

Seemplicity has positively impacted my organization by helping to reduce the meantime to resolution of security issues by categorizing the right risks, ensuring the highest risk ones are addressed first and routed to the correct team, thus avoiding delays during assignment.

Seemplicity has contributed to my organization's readiness for regulatory audits by helping in vulnerability management SLA tracking, although we are not using it specifically for regulatory requirements.

As the account is growing, some of the dashboards are slowing down, so optimizing that could be one area for improvement.

I found some pauses between responses where it took about 30 seconds to move to the next action, which could save time.

I have been using Seemplicity for two months.

Seemplicity is stable.

Seemplicity's scalability is pretty good for us. We have one of the large deployments and issues, and it scales well for all the use cases we are adding on top of it.

Customer support for Seemplicity is pretty good with weekly calls and regular support for any change requests that are prioritized immediately.

I would rate the customer support a perfect 10 because they have consistently taken care of all requests from day one post-deployment.

This was the first solution we evaluated and used.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been pretty good.

Seemplicity has helped us see a return on investment by reducing the need for an L1 analyst for AppSec findings through its categorization, deduplication, and automatic remediation assignments, which has significantly decreased the headcount required for initial analysis.

My advice to others looking into using Seemplicity is to give it a try if they have a large application security backlog, as it can definitely assist in the first level triage, prioritization, and help the security team shift left and move tasks to the corresponding owners easily.

I have not used Seemplicity's AI capabilities much other than summarizing issues and some of the aggregated findings, and the governance of that is well within the boundary with no issues observed.

In my usage, Seemplicity's AI accuracy is pretty good. It captures the critical and high issues needing attention effectively when summarizing a large number of issues into one aggregated issue.

I give this review an overall rating of 9 out of 10.