Sold by: Amazon Web Services
Deployed on AWS
AWS Free Tier
Please use the following Marketplace listings instead for the latest versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux for SAP with HA and Update Services provided directly by Red Hat 1. For NA/Global regions https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-j2e5nsixxix6y and 2. For EMEA regions https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-5bjwaigf4p424.
Tailored to the needs of S/4HANA, SAP HANA, and SAP Business Applications, Red Hat Enterprise Linux for SAP with High Availability and Update Services provides reliability, scalability and performance to the heart of your business.
4.5
Overview
Built on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system (OS), Red Hat Enterprise Linux for SAP expands existing capabilities so you can get the most out of SAP's powerful analytics and data management portfolio. Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (HA) provides all the necessary packages for configuring pacemaker based cluster that provides reliability and availability for critical production services. Extended Update Support (E4S) provides support on specific minor releases for 4 years from General Availability. Red Hat Insights can now be deployed for users with existing, cloud marketplace-purchased Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) system managed by Red Hat Update Infrastructure (RHUI).
Highlights
- High Availability solutions for S/4HANA, SAP HANA, and SAP Business Applications and 4 years Extended Update Support (E4S) from General Availability
- SAP specific technical components to support S/4HANA, SAP HANA, and SAP Business Apps
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux for SAP with HA and Update Services' cost is 0.10 $/hour for a small Instance type (.06 in infrastructure costs and .04 in software cost). and 0.225 $/hour for a large instance type (.13 in infrastructure costs and 0.095 in software cost). For information about reserved instance pricing, refer to to this URL: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/reserved-instances/pricing/
Details
Sold by
Categories
Delivery method
Delivery option
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Latest version
Operating system
Rhel 9
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide
Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Pricing is based on actual usage, with charges varying according to how much you consume. Subscriptions have no end date and may be canceled any time.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
If you are an AWS Free Tier customer with a free plan, you are eligible to subscribe to this offer. You can use free credits to cover the cost of eligible AWS infrastructure. See AWS Free Tier for more details. If you created an AWS account before July 15th, 2025, and qualify for the Legacy AWS Free Tier, Amazon EC2 charges for Micro instances are free for up to 750 hours per month. See Legacy AWS Free Tier for more details.
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
m7i.large Recommended | $0.016 |
t3.micro | $0.016 |
i4i.12xlarge | $0.02 |
r4.16xlarge | $0.00 |
r5n.4xlarge | $0.087 |
m7i.24xlarge | $0.00 |
r7a.32xlarge | $0.00 |
m4.large | $0.016 |
r5a.12xlarge | $0.02 |
r5b.24xlarge | $0.00 |
Vendor refund policy
We do not currently support refunds, but you can cancel at any time.
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
Latest Updates
Additional details
Usage instructions
To connect to the operating system, use SSH and the username ec2-user. All application controls are available via the command line by typing "commands /help".
Resources
Support
Vendor support
Getting Started
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Updated weekly
By Amazon Web Services
By SUSE (EMEA)
By Red Hat Limited
Top
25
In Operating Systems
Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
Functionality
Ease of use
Customer service
Cost effectiveness
Positive reviews
Mixed reviews
Negative reviews
AI generated from product descriptions
High Availability Clustering
Pacemaker-based cluster configuration for reliability and availability of critical production services
Extended Update Support
4 years of Extended Update Support (E4S) on specific minor releases from General Availability
SAP Application Optimization
SAP-specific technical components designed to support S/4HANA, SAP HANA, and SAP Business Applications
Systems Management Integration
Red Hat Insights deployment capability for systems managed by Red Hat Update Infrastructure (RHUI)
Enterprise Linux Foundation
Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system with expanded capabilities for SAP workloads
Multi-Product Bundling
Single agreement providing access to multiple SUSE offerings including SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES), SLES for SAP, SUSE Liberty Linux, SLE Micro, SUSE Manager, Rancher, and NeuVector
Scalable Compute Capacity
Ability to adjust compute consumption and capacity alignment with business needs through flexible subscription management
Integrated Support Services
Direct support and maintenance provided by SUSE experts with assistance throughout deployment and operational phases
Multi-Year Agreement Terms
Multi-product and multi-year subscription agreements enabling stability and predictability across SUSE solutions on AWS infrastructure
Separated Billing Model
Distinct billing structure where SUSE subscriptions are billed separately from AWS infrastructure services, allowing independent budget allocation and software subscription adjustments
SAP-Specific Optimization
High-performance profiles, runtime libraries, and file system add-ons optimized for SAP HANA, SAP NetWeaver, and SAP S/4HANA solutions
High Availability Infrastructure
High Availability Add-On enabling in-place upgrades and live patching for critical and important security issues without system downtime
Lifecycle Management
Red Hat Satellite for automated provisioning, maintenance, and upgrades across physical, virtualized, and cloud environments from a single console
Extended Support Services
Update Services for SAP Solutions providing Critical and Important impact security updates and urgent-priority bug fixes for up to four years from general availability
Proactive Monitoring and Compliance
Red Hat Insights collecting deployment analytics to proactively identify issues and provide guidance for fixing security and compliance problems
Standard contract
No
No
No
Customer reviews
Akash Chaudhary
Years of cluster work have become smoother as I provision nodes and manage servers with confidence
Reviewed on Feb 11, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
I am a RHCE certified and RHCSA certified professional. I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) to deploy the OS for node provisioning across any make of clusters. I work with the HPC cluster team and receive clusters on RHEL-based systems. Over the last seven years, I have been working with RHEL 7, RHEL 8, RHEL 9, and currently RHEL 10. I primarily work with HPC clusters.
Since creating HPC clusters is not part of my responsibilities, I focus mainly on installation, node provisioning, password management, SSH proxies, and NGINX and web server configuration.
What is most valuable?
There are several valuable features I appreciate. I can obtain any versions, software, or RPM packages easily through the subscription manager or without it. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is very hands-on for me and runs smoothly. It even runs on just 1 GB of RAM, which is excellent for my needs. The installation process is very easy compared to other distributions. Since I work with clusters, this simplicity is invaluable.
When comparing the installation process of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) to other distributions, I find that a non-technical person can easily follow the prompts. The installation guides are clear and documented step-by-step. For example, the first prompt asks for language, keyboard, and installation preferences, and each step is straightforward. In contrast, Ubuntu and other distributions require creating disks and involve more complex UI elements that are not as user-friendly. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has a clean interface that allows even non-technical people to install the OS easily.
I have only studied from the direct books provided by Red Hat for RHCSA and RHCE certification, and every detail is available in their documentation and website. I appreciate the clean and detailed information provided in their resources.
What needs improvement?
I encounter pain points when trying to add patches for certain versions I need for RHEL purposes. While creating HPC clusters on RHEL 9, I sometimes need EPEL repositories for RHEL 7 or 8. Adding patches from these repositories is very painful because Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 9 does not easily support these older package versions. This is a recurring problem I always face.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) since I started my career, which is 6.7 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have not experienced stability issues. I have used multiple OEMs including HP, Dell, Exatron, and NVIDIA servers. I always prefer recommending Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) to my customers because it is very stable. I have only experienced one server crash in all my years, and that was due to an OEM issue, not Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) itself. I have never encountered data problems or server crashes from Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is not an issue. I can easily add more nodes to clusters. The installation is very fast, which allows me to scale quickly. I use Ansible and PXE servers to facilitate this process, and I can scale to many servers very quickly with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
How are customer service and support?
When I was working for a customer and faced an issue while installing a package, I requested Red Hat support and they helped me resolve it.
I have raised requests in the morning around 11:00 AM and received responses within one to two hours. They ask for logs and version information, and then provide a response within approximately 30 minutes. I give Red Hat support a nine out of 10 rating. I would give a full 10 if they could push their support to be slightly faster. When someone is on-site conducting installations and encounters an issue, that person needs to wait at least one or two hours for a response. Red Hat could improve by responding a bit more quickly.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Regarding the pricing of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) subscription, I believe the pricing is fair. The support that Red Hat provides is very good. Whenever I encounter issues, Red Hat always provides fast resolution. The pricing is justified given the quality of support offered.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have used Ubuntu as an alternative distribution. However, I always choose Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) over every other distribution. I started my career learning from Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), which is the main reason I prefer it. Additionally, Ubuntu and other distributions have many dependencies that require adding different packages and configurations. When troubleshooting on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), I find solutions easily. With Ubuntu, troubleshooting requires digging much deeper.
What other advice do I have?
I have been working with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for approximately seven years.
Regarding updates and maintenance, I only need maintenance time when upgrading the OS. When upgrading the kernel version or transitioning from RHEL 8 to RHEL 9, I only need to install the RPMs and reboot the server once. Maintenance primarily involves patching and the subsequent reboot requirement.
Every time a cluster issue occurs, Red Hat never requests high downtime or suggests data loss scenarios. They maintain very low risk and require very low downtime.
Piyush K.
Stable, Secure, But Complex for Beginners
Reviewed on Feb 04, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux mainly for running servers and managing enterprise-level applications. It's great for hosting databases, web services, and virtual machines, and it gives me a stable and secure environment that's reliable for long-term projects. The support and documentation are really helpful when troubleshooting or setting up complex systems. What I like most about Red Hat Enterprise Linux is how stable and reliable it is. I don’t have to worry about unexpected crashes, and it handles heavy workloads really well. I appreciate the support and documentation—whenever I run into a problem, there’s usually a clear solution available. It just makes managing servers and enterprise systems a lot less stressful. My experience integrating Red Hat Enterprise Linux with other tools has generally been positive, and I've found certain integrations really helpful—like using monitoring tools to keep track of server performance and automated backup solutions to protect data.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that could be improved with Red Hat Enterprise Linux is that it can feel a bit complex for beginners, especially when setting up or configuring advanced features. There are a lot of commands and configurations to learn, and the documentation, while thorough, can sometimes be too technical for someone. For beginners, setting up the system and managing software packages can be confusing at first, so simpler installation guides or wizards would help. Basic system administration tasks, like configuring users, networks, or security settings, could be made more intuitive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux solves stability and security issues for me. It keeps servers running reliably, handles heavy workloads without crashing, and simplifies managing updates and patches.
Nabin P.
A Stable, Secure Foundation for Enterprise-Grade Software Infrastructure
Reviewed on Feb 04, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
What we like most about Red Hat Enterprise Linux is its stability and enterprise-grade support. The predictable release cycle, strong security updates, and wide ecosystem compatibility make it well suited for long-running, mission-critical production workloads. The initial setup is straightforward, with clear documentation and reliable installation and package management tools, allowing teams familiar with Linux to deploy systems quickly and confidently.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some limitations of Red Hat Enterprise Linux include licensing costs and the overhead of subscription management. It can be less flexible than community-driven distributions for rapid experimentation, and access to the latest software versions may lag behind upstream releases.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux addresses the need for a stable, secure, and fully supported operating system in production environments. It reduces downtime and security risks through reliable updates, certified software, and enterprise-grade support, making it well suited for critical enterprise and cloud workloads.
Zilong W.
Reliable, Secure, and Enterprise-Ready
Reviewed on Feb 02, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate that Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the market leader for Linux operating systems. It's reliable, flexible, and cost-effective. I find it strong in security and suitable for enterprise-grade applications, making it a great replacement for some legacy Unix systems. The initial setup is rather easy, and one of the benefits is that it's based on open source, which makes it more customizable and user-friendly.
What do you dislike about the product?
Since Red Hat Enterprise Linux is now owned by IBM after its acquisition, there are concerns about its cost effectiveness, the freedom of open source development, and the quality of customer support.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux for enterprise applications, solving issues from support functions to cybersecurity management. It's reliable, flexible, cost-effective, and strong in security, suitable for enterprise applications and replacing legacy Unix systems. It's customizable and user-friendly due to its open-source base.
Financial Services
Mature, Stable, and Security-First: RHEL Keeps Surprises Out of Prod
Reviewed on Feb 01, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
See, I'm more into ethical hacking and security stuff so for that the only distro I primarily used is redhat. RHEL doesn’t chase shiny features. It ships mature, well-understood components. That means fewer surprise attack surfaces and fewer “oops, upstream broke prod” moments. Most distros ship SELinux and tell you to disable it. RHEL treats it as a first-class citizen.
What do you dislike about the product?
As a security guy, I dislike RHEL because it’s overly conservative. Backported patches complicate vuln validation, packages are outdated, SELinux is painful to manage, and the locked subscription model slows labs and automation. Great for defense, frustrating for real security testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
RHEL solves the problem of running secure, stable systems at scale without surprises. It gives me predictable patching, long-term support, strong defaults like SELinux, and built-in compliance alignment, so I spend less time firefighting and more time actually improving security. The benefit to me is simple: fewer production incidents, cleaner audits, and an OS I can trust to stay hardened and stable over time.