
Overview

Product video
GitGuardian is an end-to-end secrets security platform that empowers software-driven organizations to enhance their Non-Human Identity (NHI) security and comply with industry standards.
With attackers increasingly targeting NHIs, such as service accounts and applications, GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability. This dual approach enables the detection of compromised secrets across your dev environments while also managing legitimate secrets and their lifecycle.
The platform supports over 450+ types of secrets, offers public monitoring for leaked data, and deploys honeytokens for added defense
Trusted by over 600,000 developers, GitGuardian is the choice of leading organizations like Snowflake, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom for robust secrets protection.
Highlights
- With Secrets Security, GitGuardian aims to eliminate leaks and sprawl, detecting compromised or misused secrets across both public and internal environments. This foundation of NHI security is strengthened by monitoring for incidents, policy violations, and illegitimate use of secrets.
- GitGuardian's Secrets Detection tackles internal secrets sprawl by identifying sensitive data in source code and productivity tools. The platform supports over 450 types of secrets, including API keys, private keys, and database credentials. With a robust policy engine, security teams can enforce rules across major Version Control Systems ( like GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, and Azure DevOps, CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Travis CI as well as tools like Slack, Jira, container registries, and more.
- To expand visibility beyond internal systems, GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub repositories, detecting sensitive information in both organizational and developers' personal repos. This is crucial, as 80% of corporate secrets leaked on public GitHub stem from personal accounts.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Trust Center
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Security credentials achieved
(2)


Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
25 developers | Business Plan, per 25 contributing developers (annual contract) | $5,500.00 |
Vendor refund policy
Please contact sales@gitguardian.com to learn more about GitGuardian's refund policy.
Custom pricing options
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Support
Vendor support
Explore our guides to use the GitGuardian Platform https://docs.gitguardian.com or submit a support request at
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.


FedRAMP
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO/IEC 27001
PCI DSS
SOC 2 Type 2
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Seamless GitHub Secret Scanning with High Signal-to-Noise Alerts
The automatic scanning of commits and real-time alerts for potential threats are the standout features, and the integration with GitHub is seamless, slotting into our existing workflow without requiring developers to change how they work. That last part matters more than it sounds. Security tools that demand behavioral change from developers tend to get worked around, GitGuardian just sits in the background and does its job.
Software Finder
The true positive rate is impressively high, and the smart alert grouping helps reduce fatigue by consolidating related incidents rather than flooding your inbox with noise. For a lean startup team that can't have someone dedicated to triage all day, that signal-to-noise ratio is genuinely important.
Real-time incident detection and reporting also increase confidence that potential leaks are caught quickly, minimizing the window between a secret being exposed and someone acting on it.
False positives are the most consistent frustration, some alerts are overly sensitive, flagging things that aren't actual secrets, which clutters the dashboard and creates extra manual review work. For a small team already stretched thin, spending time validating whether an alert is real or a false flag is friction you didn't budget for.
The UI could be more intuitive, especially in high-stress moments when you've just received an alert and need to quickly understand what leaked and exactly where to fix it. That's precisely the moment you need clarity, and the interface doesn't always deliver it fast enough.
Pricing is another sticking point, it's not always clear upfront what features sit at which price tier, which makes planning and budgeting harder than it needs to be. For a startup watching every dollar, vague pricing tables create unnecessary friction before you've even committed.
TrustRadius
The purchasing process itself can also be convoluted, getting a quote and finalising payments has been known to take longer than expected, which feels out of step with a product aimed at developer teams who expect things to just work.
GitGuardian mitigates sensitive data exposure by detecting credentials early, reducing security-related bugs, and bridging the gap between development speed and security discipline, without requiring heavy manual intervention from a security team.
For a small startup without a dedicated security engineer, that kind of automated safety net is genuinely valuable. It catches mistakes before they become incidents and nudges developers toward better habits without being heavy-handed about it.
Bottom line: GitGuardian is worth having in your security stack, especially at startup scale where developer speed and security rigour are constantly in tension. Just go in prepared for some alert tuning, a UI that rewards patience, and a pricing conversation that takes longer than it should.
GitGuardian Helps Catch Secrets and PII Before They Reach Remote Repos
User-Friendly, Responsive, and Reliable—Highly Recommended
Very natural interview
Continuous secret detection has strengthened DevSecOps and improves real-time incident response
What is our primary use case?
GitGuardian Platform is used to detect exposed secrets such as API keys, AWS credentials, database passwords, SSH keys, and tokens across the Git repository before they become a security incident.
What is most valuable?
GitGuardian Platform offers secret detection across repositories, real-time alerts, broad account support for cloud credentials and API keys, easy integration with GitHub , and incident tracking.
Real-time alerts and incident tracking features help significantly by enabling immediate alerts after credentials are committed rather than discovering leaked credentials during periodic audits. In real time, monitoring and remediating exposed credentials is very helpful.
GitGuardian Platform positively impacts the organization by strengthening the DevSecOps process, reducing the risk of credential exposure, and increasing developer awareness around secure coding practices.
Specific outcomes from using GitGuardian Platform include faster detection of exposed credentials, reduced manual repository reviews, improved developer awareness of secret management, and better compliance with internal security policies.
Regarding GitGuardian Platform's AI capabilities, security is clearly the platform's main focus as it provides strong visibility into secret exposure and helps organizations establish better governance around credential management.
GitGuardian Platform's AI detection engine is accurate, and relatively few false positives are experienced. The alerts are actionable and easy to investigate, and the accuracy and reliability are strong.
What needs improvement?
GitGuardian Platform can be improved with better integration with enterprise ticketing platforms, enhancing the dashboard for executive reporting, and providing more automation for remediation.
Needed improvements for GitGuardian Platform should focus on enhancing the detection capabilities, reporting, workflow automation, and enterprise integration.
What other advice do I have?
GitGuardian Platform should be integrated early into the development lifecycle and secret detection should be made part of the pull request and CI/CD process. It works best as a preventive control rather than something that is only used during periodic security audits, making it valuable for teams currently dealing with security audits and frequently exposed secrets. I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.
Automated secret scanning has protected our code and prevents accidental credential exposure
What is our primary use case?
GitGuardian Platform serves as a security shield for our organization to prevent API keys and database credentials from being pushed to GitHub . Although we know we should not push credentials, anyone can make mistakes. GitGuardian Platform has a CLI tool called gg shield, which we have set up on our laptops. Since we already use Git version control with GitHub , the process is straightforward. Whenever we push code to GitHub, it scans the code and checks for API keys and database credentials. Even if credentials are commented out, GitGuardian Platform flags them because commented credentials remain readable on GitHub and can still be caught by bad actors.
The most problematic situation occurs when a developer pushes credentials to GitHub and then attempts to remove them by pushing again. The issue is that Git does not work that way. The credential still remains in our GitHub repository history. GitGuardian Platform rescans our GitHub repositories for API keys to address this situation.
I also use GitGuardian Platform in my CI/CD pipelines with GitHub Actions . Although we store credentials in GitHub secrets, sometimes people hardcode credentials by mistake. Once the CI/CD pipeline is working properly, we do not edit it much, so if someone hardcoded credentials and everything is functioning well, no one may even review it. That credential could remain exposed for months. Even though our GitHub repositories are private, we still use GitGuardian Platform as a security measure. As a backend engineer, DevOps engineer, and AWS cloud engineer at my small company, I understand what situations could occur and these are real scenarios we face. We must use this solution even though we all know we should not do these things. However, no one knows what can happen in the future.
What is most valuable?
The public leakage detection feature of GitGuardian Platform influences my data security positively. This addresses a problem that could happen to anyone. Since we have this feature, we have peace of mind that our credentials will not be leaked or pushed somewhere by an employee.
Sometimes, I have faced a specific problem. I work in the cloud and have cloud credentials. Our developers asked me to give them credentials for debugging on their local devices. If they push credentials somewhere and cannot communicate with me since I am the admin, that time gap becomes dangerous. GitGuardian Platform provides a good security measure for any company using it, though you cannot give it a specific percentage impact on the company.
What needs improvement?
GitGuardian Platform might work on their false positives. Sometimes it flags credentials that are not actually credentials, but this does not happen frequently since we always remove our credentials before pushing anywhere. We do not really encounter these flags.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using GitGuardian Platform for around one year. I have been working at my company for one and a half years, and we started using GitGuardian Platform after approximately ten months of my tenure.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
GitGuardian Platform has good stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
GitGuardian Platform has pretty good scalability. Based on our usage, it is working well. Even our code repository works well with it, and I could say it is pretty scalable for us.
How are customer service and support?
I have not ever contacted the technical support or customer support for GitGuardian Platform. We do not need to contact them since the platform is simple to install. It is just there for precaution. We do not need it every day since it is simply for the rare chance that someone will accidentally push credentials and then it flags them.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not ever used any similar solutions to GitGuardian Platform that I can compare it with. We simply use it and it is working well for us, so we did not switch from another solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment of GitGuardian Platform is pretty easy. GitGuardian Platform has a YouTube channel with three to four-minute introduction videos that show step-by-step how to install it. They also have documentation, so the setup is simple and easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are on the free tier of GitGuardian Platform. They offer a free tier, so we are using it for now.
What other advice do I have?
The effectiveness of GitGuardian Platform's automated severity scoring in incident management is good. When an incident happens, the incident manager receives an automated severity score based on the credential type. In my case, we mostly have development environment credentials, so the severity is not much, perhaps around six or seven.
I did not use the automated playbooks of GitGuardian Platform.
GitGuardian Platform does not require any maintenance on our end.
I rate this review an 8 out of 10.