Overview
Cisco Secure Access makes life better for users, easier for IT, and safer for everyone. It addresses cybersecurity challenges driven by the rapid software as a service (SaaS) adoption and the expansion of hybrid work.
Cisco Secure Access is a cloud-delivered Security Service Edge (SSE) solution that fundamentally reduces risk, radically simplifies IT operations, and eliminates remote access complexity for end users. With Secure Access, IT and security teams can effectively protect and defend their users from fast-moving internet-based attacks while providing them secure connectivity to the public and private applications they need, all in a single platform.
Cisco Secure Access is a full SSE solution, with ZTNA, SWG, DLP, CASB, RBI, and FWaaS with further differentiated capabilities including VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS), AI Assistant for policy creation help, and AI Access for visibility, control, and exclusive guardrails for third-party AI applications. Further, Secure Access is the only SSE which includes a recursive DNS-layer security service for lower latency, Experience Insights monitoring by Cisco ThousandEyes, and much more, in one license and management platform, all delivered with a single client.
Highlights
- Deliver unified and secure end user access to AWS apps.
- Simplify IT operations via a single console, with a single policy construct, featuring aggregated reporting across datacenter-hosted and AWS environments.
- Reduce business risk with advanced cybersecurity protection, zero trust, and granular security policies.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Custom pricing options
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Support
Vendor support
You can reach for the Cisco Secure Access support at: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/web/tsd-cisco-worldwide-contacts.html
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products
Customer reviews
Seamless, Always-On Security That Simplifies Remote Work
Easy & Reliable Corporate Network Connection with Smooth Troubleshooting
Cisco ACI: Intent-Based Workload Isolation with Whitelist Security
Strong Zero Trust Platform, but Latency and Complex Policy Design Hold It Back
Secure access has strengthened endpoint control and supports reliable remote connectivity
What is our primary use case?
I have been using Cisco Secure Access in my company only. The primary use cases for Cisco Secure Access include VPN, posturing, Dot1x authentication, and AAA. I am using VPN as a service in Cisco Secure Access. We are not using ZTNA, but we are using the legacy VPN.
What is most valuable?
All the features of Cisco Secure Access are valuable, but in terms of endpoint health security, posturing is a good feature, and VPN is also a good feature. That is a feature of Cisco Secure Access that I did not explore. My experience with the Experience Insights feature, digital experience monitoring powered by ThousandEyes, is limited as I don’t have knowledge about that one.
I am not using the AI Assistant feature in Cisco Secure Access. That is also a feature we are not using in Cisco Secure Access. Integrating Cisco Identity Intelligence with Cisco Secure Access is also not something we are using. We use policy verification on the FTD to help reduce policy misconfigurations.
What needs improvement?
Cisco Secure Access is basically a good product, but nowadays, there are more competitive vendors available in the market with friendlier interfaces and technical features, so people are moving to those solutions instead of preferring Cisco Secure Access. The interface of Cisco Secure Access is more complex; for example, upgrading a security product for Cisco ICE takes more than eight hours, while other security products take only thirty minutes to one hour. That is a drawback.
Overall complexity is the main drawback of Cisco Secure Access that I see. I have mentioned the problems with configuration, interface, and overall complexity.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Cisco Secure Access for more than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Policy misconfigurations have caused slowdowns or blocked access for users in the past.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In my company, approximately 600 plus users are using Cisco Secure Access, and we have only three or four maximum administrators. As of now, I don’t have the headcount to increase usage in the future; it is already under 600, but maybe we will onboard some expected new employees. I have faced issues with scaling it up.
How are customer service and support?
Usually when I am raising a case, I am getting proper support from Cisco. I rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before Cisco Secure Access, I worked with other vendors, which can be considered other partners.
How was the initial setup?
Deployment of Cisco Secure Access is not going to be very easy, but somehow it can be manageable. The implementation time for Cisco Secure Access depends upon the scenario and what we are going to implement.
What about the implementation team?
I have deployed Cisco Secure Access by myself and with the help of a third party; both methods were used. Basically, I am enough for the deployment, but if I want to take help from another partner, one person is enough to work with me.
What was our ROI?
I have seen return on investment with Cisco Secure Access. It took about three years for me to see ROI approximately with Cisco Secure Access.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing-wise, it is reasonable for Cisco Secure Access. I did not purchase Cisco Secure Access directly from the vendor; I got it from a partner. I am a customer of Cisco, and we used to purchase through the partner only, not directly from Cisco.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
FortiGate and Palo Alto are currently the competition that I see taking the lead in the market against Cisco Secure Access. The advantages of FortiGate and Palo Alto over Cisco Secure Access include their easiness; people configure them very easily, and they have a vast feature set to control them, along with more granular options for making policies and other features.
What other advice do I have?
I am planning to stay with Cisco Secure Access because our complete infrastructure is Cisco dependent, so we will keep it as it is; changing it would mean removing everything from the access layer to the core layer. My organization is not a partner or reseller of Cisco; we are customers. I would rate Cisco Secure Access an eight out of ten overall.