Overview
Experience Cisco's industry leading Layer 3 and Layer 4 firewall in a virtualized form factor to protect your cloud environment. You can now take advantage of:
High performance security:
Dynamically scale resilient remote access to meet demand with AWS Route 53 Leverage site-to-site VPN, clientless remote access, and remote access VPN Integrate with AWS Transit Gateway for scalable inter-VPC traffic
Protection for your dynamic environments:
Ingress and egress traffic protection across your cloud environments Advanced inspection, including voice and video protocols Micro-segmentation capabilities for east-west traffic
Cloud-delivered management:
Consistently manage policies with our cloud-delivered management solution, Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO) Increase efficiency with low-touch provisioning for faster firewall deployments Supports REST API, an HTTP-based interface for appliance management, security policies, status monitoring, and enables multiple cloud management solutions
For supported AWS instances, please see the data sheet.
Highlights
- Deploy remote access in as little as 20 minutes with Cisco ASAv RA-VPN on AWS Quick Start guide.
- Ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments that require secure, scalable, and resilient remote access options.
- Consistent policy management in the cloud with Cisco Defense Orchestrator.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Vendor refund policy
Please contact your Cisco Sales Team for refund or cancellation policy information
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Resources
Support
Vendor support
BYOL: Cisco TAC provides support based on purchased licenses and support contract from Cisco or an authorized Cisco Reseller
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products

Customer reviews
Unified security policies have protected hybrid workloads and support zero trust access
What is our primary use case?
I have been working with Cisco Secure Firewall for almost nine years, and I want to share my experience with this solution.
I have been working with both the on-premises and cloud versions of Cisco Secure Firewall.
The choice between deployment models depends on the use cases. For on-premises use cases, I deploy an on-premises firewall, but for workloads that are based on the cloud, I use the cloud-based firewall.
What is most valuable?
Cisco Secure Firewall has very good IDS and IPS capabilities, as well as excellent threat intelligence features, which are some of the best aspects of the product that I appreciate.
It actually helps with integration by allowing me to integrate different solutions within one platform.
What needs improvement?
I am not currently experiencing many drawbacks with Cisco Secure Firewall. However, since things are migrating to the cloud, the product needs to be more optimized for cloud environments.
Recently, AI-initiated threats have emerged, so Cisco Secure Firewall should have enhanced capabilities to counter AI threats.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have 22 years of overall experience working in the software field.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment for the product was not quite simple, but it was acceptable. I received support from Cisco during the process, so the overall experience was good.
I would rate the technical support from Cisco at an eight out of ten, with ten being the best.
What about the implementation team?
I was assisted by a third party with the deployment.
I handle both the deployment and operations, so I personally participated in the deployment process.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price for Cisco Secure Firewall is a bit high compared to other vendors.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Cisco Secure Firewall helps with a Zero Trust security model, and I am implementing a ZTNA access model. I have already implemented Zero Trust. Other vendors besides Cisco also provide ZTNA solutions. Fortinet and Palo Alto are all working with ZTNA and have moved into the ZTNA platform.
What other advice do I have?
I would assess Cisco Secure Firewall's ability to unify different policies across my environment.
Zero-trust security has protected critical banking applications and supports AI-driven incident response
What is our primary use case?
As a bank, I serve as the Chief Technology Officer at one of the largest banks in Pakistan, UBL, United Bank Limited, and we have Cisco Secure Firewall deployed at the bank in the data center. We apply unified policies across the environment because we have two data center core firewalls running at the production as well as DR site.
What is most valuable?
Cisco Secure Firewall, especially the next generation FTD firewalls, offers application visibility, the intrusion prevention system, advanced malware protection, Snort rules, and threat intelligence feed from Cisco's Talos cloud, which I find very useful.
Cisco Secure Firewall has provided us the ability to go a long way towards zero-trust architecture, which is useful in implementing because zero-trust architecture has many more features such as multi-factor authentication, encryption, and segmentation. We have integrated Cisco's ACI, the Application Centric Infrastructure, the software-defined networks with Cisco Secure Firewall to achieve micro-segmentation and a good, fair bit of zero-trust architecture.
We are using Cisco's XDR platform, which was previously labeled as Cisco SecureX. We have been using the Cisco XDR, Extended Detection and Response platform for the last two years, integrating Cisco Secure Firewall, Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Umbrella service for secure DNS, as well as Cisco endpoints with the XDR platform. We have onboarded Cisco's MDR service, Managed Detection and Response service onto the XDR platform.
It has a very useful impact on productivity because when we integrate our ecosystem with the XDR platform, it operates on the AI algorithm, correlating and analyzing incidents for severity level by the AI algorithm, which gives the severity of the incident as well as eliminates false positives and provides it to the SOC level two analyst to contain or remediate the incident. This is a good feature and has automated somewhat the first level of incident response.
What needs improvement?
I am looking forward to Cisco for providing AI detection capability so that we have defenses against AI-assisted cyber attacks.
As I mentioned, I am looking forward to Cisco for providing AI-assisted defenses because nowadays there is a lot of AI-assisted attacks. Traditional or even next-generation firewalls would not go a long way as far as defense is concerned, and I think every other vendor such as Palo Alto, Fortinet, and Sophos are working on improving the firewall with respect to AI-assisted attacks, which is what I expect from Cisco as well.
Presently, I am looking for AI features. I do not see any other feature because we are already using advanced malware protection and IPS and application visibility, threat intelligence feeds, and AI would probably be a good addition to the portfolio.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been dealing with Cisco Secure Firewall for quite some time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I am satisfied with Cisco Secure Firewall in our organization.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
As the organization grows year by year, I believe it is scaling very well concerning the growth of the organization, the number of branches, the number of users increasing, and the applications scaling out. It is scaling out as per the requirement.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support by Cisco as eight or nine.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I included Palo Alto and Fortinet firewalls in our RFP process before opting for Cisco, but I believe for data center firewalling, Cisco is best suited amongst its competitors.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment was very seamless because we have our own team in the bank for deployment, and we also took professional services when we deployed Cisco Secure Firewall. I do not think that we faced any challenges or hiccups during the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
We have a team of ten to twelve people, but they are not only looking after Cisco Secure Firewall; they are looking at the security posture of the bank, including endpoints and file integrity manager, and MDR. I think two people would be the right, appropriate number looking after Cisco Secure Firewall.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is reasonable and it is competitive and affordable. It is from Cisco's authorized partners in Pakistan.
What other advice do I have?
The deployment was very seamless because we have our own team in the bank for deployment, and we also took professional services when we deployed Cisco Secure Firewall. I do not think that we faced any challenges or hiccups during the deployment.
Whenever the traffic comes to the server farm and whenever a user accesses the application, we have one hundred twenty-five applications behind Cisco Secure Firewall, and it is almost all the bank which is using Cisco Secure Firewall. If I can give an exact number, probably we have thirty-one thousand employees in the bank, and all their applications are hosted behind Cisco Secure Firewall. I rate this product nine out of ten.
Security policies have supported complex integrations and now manage diverse global access
What is our primary use case?
Regarding the implementation of Cisco Secure Firewall, I imagine that my colleagues from the security department and networking have a lot of complex configurations based on the requirements that we need.
We have an EVID ecosystem, and this implies very different kinds of configurations and rules.
There are general rules, and then there are some specific rules based, for example, on users that are in different geographies, accessing different applications, and with different needs and requirements in terms of security.
There are the back-end applications that must communicate between them and with external partners. There is also another integration complexity that my colleagues must face.
Currently, I am working with some multivendors, for example, with Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics, EVM DataPower, OpenAI, and Anthropic. I think I could miss other providers, but basically, these are the ones.
What is most valuable?
My organization benefits from utilizing Cisco Secure Firewall. I do not know the details of everything, but I hope my colleagues do a great job and Cisco Systems could help us to identify any of these constraints that could exist.
What needs improvement?
I cannot tell you about any drawbacks, downsides, or weak points of Cisco Secure Firewall which I would eliminate because I cannot respond with clarity.
I know there are known vulnerabilities in every system that we know, but I do not know in particular one that I could specify. If I worked with it on a daily basis, I could be more clear. Right now, I do not know.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my organization with Cisco Secure Firewall for a long time; I started on this project ten years ago, then I returned in two thousand and twenty-one. It has been Cisco since then.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not tried or used the solution within the last twelve months period because I use Apache but I'm not using it now.
I have used it for a long time, three or four years, but now I am not using it. Since, I think, three years, four years approximately.
What other advice do I have?
I believe I am not familiar with the product Secure Cloud Protection for Salesforce. I don't know because I am working with the integration and also with the Salesforce component integrations between Salesforce and billing and invoicing platforms.
In terms of security, I must comply with the guidance of the corporation that I am in.
In terms of security, it is another area. We need to only comply and be compliant with the guidance and requirements that they demand.
I would rate this review an eight out of ten.
Central management has unified security policies and supports consistent enterprise protection
What is our primary use case?
I work with both the on-premises and cloud versions of the solution, as well as the SaaS version, for clients.
What is most valuable?
What makes Cisco Secure Firewall appealing to customers is that all the features are the same across all firewalls, but customers appreciate that it is a stable solution and more secure. There are not as many security breaches as with Fortinet, and that is the reason why they often choose Cisco firewalls because of the stability of enterprise-level cybersecurity protection and overall position in the market.
I have used new features recently in Cisco Secure Firewall, including AI support and AI central management, which is the latest feature from Cisco central management that allows me to manage all those appliances and firewalls centrally, also with some AI agents and chats and some additional regression features.
The integration of the SecureX feature has helped my productivity and response time, but I need to ask colleagues about this since they are more involved in this.
I assess the product's ability to unify and consolidate policies across my environment as quite straightforward and easy to do with this central management console.
What needs improvement?
In Cisco Secure Firewall, I have come across some drawbacks, downsides, or weak points, specifically that for some of the solutions or services, the user interface is not as great or lately updated as it should be; it looks old-school.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have known Cisco Secure Firewall for more than five years, but it is not my top product. I am partially working with it.
How are customer service and support?
Regarding Cisco technical support, I have communicated with them, and they are helpful and responsive. I rate them eight out of ten. It is a standard procedure, and I do not have any problems with it.
How was the initial setup?
The implementation of Cisco Secure Firewall is more or less straightforward. I have not encountered any problems lately or at all.
It takes a couple of days, I would estimate, usually to deploy the product. However, this depends on the configuration.
What about the implementation team?
I need more or less one or two people involved in the implementation process, depending on some additional services. When I am talking about the firewalls only, I could do it with one person, but if there are some additional cybersecurity services connected, then I could add some additional specialists.
What other advice do I have?
I am using Cisco SecureX with Cisco Secure Firewall in some cases.
My evaluation of Cisco Secure Firewall in helping my organization implement a Zero Trust security model is that it functions more or less as a marketing abbreviation, but Cisco has all the features and configuration possibilities to implement Zero Trust out of the box. We have seen some cases when we combine it with Cisco Duo to achieve the highest level of Zero Trust access to devices and also to firewalls.
In terms of price, Cisco Secure Firewall is appealing for many in the enterprise segment, though for many customers it is too expensive. However, for customers in enterprises or at large corporations, the price is acceptable, depending on whether the customer is a small-medium business or enterprise. It is positioned more for enterprise customers.
I rate this product eight out of ten overall.
Secure access has protected company data and supports fast VPN work from office and home
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Cisco Secure Firewall is as a security program, and I am using it to establish VPN connections. We are logging into this system to protect all information.
For a quick specific example of how I use Cisco Secure Firewall in my daily work, we log into this program every day using a specific network. I use my company email and a password to access this program, allowing us to use all the systems and programs in the credit and collections area.
Cisco Secure Firewall serves as the main security tool I use nowadays, primarily to protect information, the systems, and all the facts about the company.
What is most valuable?
In my opinion, the best features Cisco Secure Firewall offers are its speed, as it is one of the quickest and most secure systems I have used during the pandemic period. I have had the opportunity to try different systems to protect or log in at work, and this is one of the quickest and greatest systems available.
Cisco Secure Firewall has positively impacted my organization by providing a quick and easy program to log into the VPN, which is very effective. I do not have troubles or issues with the connection, and I believe that is the most important aspect of this program.
What needs improvement?
I think the system is quick with two steps to log into the security program. I am satisfied with how it works right now, and I have not noticed things that I want to be different with Cisco Secure Firewall.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Secure Firewall for one full year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I think Cisco Secure Firewall is very stable. I have experienced one or two issues during my usage this year.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Cisco Secure Firewall's scalability is good for my organization right now. We have a hybrid mode to work, and it is a very efficient program for the company.
How are customer service and support?
I have not needed to reach out for help regarding Cisco Secure Firewall. I believe the issues are more about the network or internet connections than Cisco Secure Firewall itself.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Cisco Secure Firewall.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not have a clear idea about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Cisco Secure Firewall, as I am not an IT employee and do not have information about licensing. I am only a user.
What other advice do I have?
I think the end-to-end visibility from Cisco optimizes the experience in a hybrid setup.
I face specific challenges with hybrid and distributed enterprise networks, particularly feeling a little insecure when working from home. Cisco Secure Firewall is a great option because it provides a quick and secure program, allowing me to confidently access the company's systems.
My advice for others looking into using Cisco Secure Firewall is that it is a quick security program, helping you connect from various places, such as the office, coffee shops, or home. You could try other methods to access the security system, like voice approval or other specific options.
I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.