
Overview
Kubernetes is an open-source platform for scaling containerized workloads across a fleet of machines. It can intelligently schedule work only onto hosts that have the CPU and memory resources needed to run a given container. The challenge is that containers within a Kubernetes cluster typically communicate over a private overlay network. How should you expose services within the cluster to external clients? The answer is to bring the power of HAProxy to Kubernetes. The HAProxy Ingress Controller is the most efficient way to route traffic into a Kubernetes cluster.
Highlights
- Simplify your infrastructure by routing ingress traffic using one IP address and port. Requests are routed to the correct pod based on the Host header and request path
- Balance traffic among pods using any of HAProxy's load-balancing algorithms including round-robin, least connections, URL hash and random.
- Secure your cluster with built-in SSL termination, rate limiting, and IP whitelisting
Details
Unlock automation with AI agent solutions

Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Quick Launch
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/month |
|---|---|---|
hap_ic_instance | One instance of HAProxy Enterprise Ingress Controller | $366.00 |
Vendor refund policy
We do not refund monthly or annual subscription.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Deploy Helm v1.46.2
- Amazon EKS
- Amazon EKS Anywhere
Helm chart
Helm charts are Kubernetes YAML manifests combined into a single package that can be installed on Kubernetes clusters. The containerized application is deployed on a cluster by running a single Helm install command to install the seller-provided Helm chart.
Version release notes
Changelog from kubernetes-ingress-1.45.0: https://github.com/haproxytech/helm-charts/compare/kubernetes-ingress-1.44.1...kubernetes-ingress-1.45.0Â
Additional details
Usage instructions
Please, refer to the official documentation available at https://www.haproxy.com/documentation/kubernetes-ingress/enterprise/Â
Support
Vendor support
9am - 6pm | Critical Issue Target Response Time: 8 hrs | Email, Phone and Web | Prompt Maintenance and Updates | 24x7 support, significantly shorter SLAs, and consultative support available contact@haproxy.com Please activate your support license at https://www.haproxy.com/amazon-support-activation or contact us at contact@haproxy.comÂ
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
Has simplified load distribution across services and centralized configuration management
What is our primary use case?
I have been using HAProxy for about a year.
My main use case for HAProxy is mostly forwarding public traffic into internal services over a Proxmox HA cluster. I get traffic from Keepalived VIP and forward it to HAProxy, and from there to internal services. I monitor and track port 80 and 443.
I am also using HAProxy for Redis and RabbitMQ traffic. I have three dedicated servers right now, with each server having one Redis node and one RabbitMQ node. Based on the traffic, for example, if an API is running on host one, HAProxy forwards traffic from this API host one to host one Redis node or RabbitMQ node one, internally making them use the same host to prevent latency.
What is most valuable?
The best features HAProxy offers for my setup are easy configuration, as I don't need to set up many things; I just installed it and write configurations based on my needs. Traffic flows easily, and it's easy to manage all the internal services in one place, in one file.
The configuration is easy for me because the syntax is straightforward; it's easy to catch paths and domains. It seems simpler than NGINXÂ , and the load balancing is very good on HAProxy. The load balancing is easy on HAProxy, and I appreciate that.
HAProxy has positively impacted my organization by making it easier for me to manage configurations. I put configuration files on the Ceph storage shared across the whole cluster, allowing me to write my configuration, change it easily in one place, and reload it. I wrote a reload script that reloads all the configurations on all the cluster nodes, allowing them to run smoothly.
I don't know how much time I save, but it made my setup stable, which is the most positive aspect. There are months when I don't even touch it as long as I don't add a new service on my cluster.
What needs improvement?
HAProxy is very easy for me to use. I installed it easily and configured it after checking the documentation, which was clear. I wrote as described, and it worked well, but an easier desktop interface to connect to a remote server and make changes on my PC would be beneficial.
An alerting system would be better as I need to check log files if any backend is down. Integrated Telegram alerts or WhatsApp or different channels would make it better.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
HAProxy is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
HAProxy's scalability is easy for me as I'm using it on dedicated servers with a cluster, but I haven't used it for Kubernetes or any other cloud platforms, so I cannot comment on that.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I was using NGINXÂ before switching to HAProxy.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up HAProxy didn't cost anything for me.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Setting up HAProxy didn't cost anything for me.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing HAProxy, I discussed it with ChatGPT, found it convenient, tried it, tested it, and it was fine, so I didn't bother to try anything else.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using HAProxy is to dive straight into it; there's nothing to lose and many things to gain. I would rate this product an 8.
Outstanding Performance and Excellent Support in an Open-Source Load Balancer
Easy Implementation and Outstanding Support from HAProxy Team
Powerful, Consistent, and User-Centric Solutions with Outstanding Support
The company mindset itself is incredibly user-centric, with an amazing support : whether I am facing an issue, raise a security concern or have an improvement suggestion, I always feel confident my voice will be heard, and in a very efficient way. This probably comes from the open-source mindset of the team!
However, this difficulty is appeased by all the support the HAProxy team is able and willing to provide : it can be difficult at times, but I never feel lonely behind my laptop when I need to work on my infrastructure.
It has also given us a very efficient way to log the flows.
And also, with HAProxy we've been able provide a very strict frame to handle our server outgoing flows.
Stable, Versatile, and Backed by Excellent Support
- The wide range of possibilities
- The extremely good manufacturer support
- Centralized management
- Good documentation
- The diverse and long-standing community
- Feature requests are implemented quickly