AWS Marketplace: AttackIQ Reviews

AttackIQ

Reviews from AWS customer

1 AWS reviews

5 star

1
4 star

0
3 star

0
2 star

0
1 star

0

External reviews

2 reviews

from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.

reviewer2783439

Continuous offensive testing has transformed our cloud security and prioritizes critical fixes

March 07, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

We use AttackIQ for automated, continuous testing and offensive testing. We use their scaled offensive testing module in AttackIQ, which continuously validates your environment and cloud environment, then identifies exposures that we take and try to fix them.

I'm the security person on the team, so AttackIQ has become really useful for us to automate this continuous testing because before we would only have point-in-time testing. We would only be able to get a scan at a single point in time, but now it's useful because it provides continuous monitoring.

We use public cloud for AttackIQ.

What is most valuable?

The continuous testing and continuous offensive testing are among the best features that AttackIQ offers, and being able to categorize it based on criticality such as very critical, emergency, high, medium, and low is valuable.

AttackIQ allows us to resolve issues much quicker because these issues come in categories, enabling us to prioritize them and fix the emergency issues first.

It has definitely reduced response time and improved our discoverability of these issues in the first place.

What needs improvement?

I can't think of anything right now about how AttackIQ can be improved because I probably need to use it for a little bit more before I can understand what needs to be improved. So far I don't have anything that I could identify.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AttackIQ for four and a half months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AttackIQ is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

AttackIQ's scalability has been good and we have had no issues with it so far.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for AttackIQ is pretty quick and we have no issues.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This is our first time using a solution like AttackIQ.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AttackIQ was pretty easy. We didn't have any issues and it was pretty straightforward.

What was our ROI?

It's hard to say about money saved because it has only been four and a half months with AttackIQ, but definitely a lot of time has been saved. I would say approximately 15% of our time.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Pentera as well before choosing AttackIQ.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate AttackIQ a 10 out of 10 because so far I have no issues with it. AttackIQ is solving a lot of the problems that I had before or that we as an organization had before, even the security team, so it's solving all my issues. I would say definitely make sure you know your use case before you purchase AttackIQ. I give this product a rating of 10 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

reviewer2797743

Continuous attack simulations have improved real-world threat detection and response skills

January 19, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for AttackIQ is conducting breach and attack simulation or any kind of new ransomware simulation, basically for executing particular real-world attack scenarios.

Regarding my main use case, I have used AttackIQ Ready, Flex, and Enterprise, which are the main three product types I have utilized most.

What is most valuable?

The best features AttackIQ offers include being a cybersecurity platform specializing in breach attack simulation and AEF validation, as it tests the organization's defenses by simulating real-world attack behavior, which are aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework, providing a platform where I can run real-world attack scenarios and identify and mitigate them.

AttackIQ is well-aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework and has strong continuous validation. The platform is built to run continuous and automation tests, which helps during point-in-time checks or reduces blind spots.

AttackIQ positively impacts my organization as most of my colleagues and seniors have been using it to understand real-world attack scenarios and how to cope with those situations, benefiting the company, colleagues, and team.

After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things. It has definitely benefited the organization in terms of faster risk identification and faster response times.

What needs improvement?

AttackIQ can be improved by implementing more of a security training platform focused on real-world scenarios, simulating real-world attack behavior aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK and NIST frameworks, which would help further on this prospect.

It can also improve in terms of identifying control gaps.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AttackIQ for almost close to two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, AttackIQ is stable with no issues regarding downtime or reliability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of AttackIQ is good and on the brighter side, as it can handle increasing workloads and more complex simulations as my needs grow without any problem.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for AttackIQ is quite quick to resolve issues, and my experience with their support team was positive.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used any previous vendor other than AttackIQ, as I focused on simulation rather than in-hand company usage.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AttackIQ is that since I was using the free version, I did not purchase it initially and was only utilizing the platform, doing lab simulations that were free in that environment.

The value of AttackIQ is good; while it is not extremely high, it is on the good side where you can save money on AttackIQ, irrespective of the product you are going for.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing AttackIQ, I evaluated other platforms like ARCx, Codecademy, and AWS Skill Builder.

What other advice do I have?

In my current organization, we are not using AttackIQ; in my previous organization, I have used AttackIQ, and it was more of hands-on training rather than being deployed as a typical tool for improvement or knowledge enhancement.

In my previous experience with AttackIQ, it was all on-premises and training; we have not used any private cloud vendor.

My advice for others considering using AttackIQ is that people can utilize it since it offers free training on purple teaming and pre-simulation, which are useful for professional growth and skills development, even for those with limited industry certifications. I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

Shah F.

Great Cybersecurity platform

December 17, 2024
Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?

Best part is that it is easy to use and packed with many features

What do you dislike about the product?

More advertisement of product is needed to ensure people are aware about the services

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

It protects my firms and employees security and ensure we focus on other tasks while this system handles all cybersecurity related concerns

showing 1 - 3