Aviatrix Enterprise Contract

Aviatrix Systems, Inc.

Reviews from AWS customer

6 AWS reviews

External reviews

15 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    Chaheti Jha

Daily port forwarding has streamlined local-to-production testing and improved team productivity

  • May 14, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Aviatrix is for port forwarding. Whenever I have to make a project on my own local machine and also test that it would work in production, then I use Aviatrix for forwarding the port of my local machine. Then I integrate that with my company's product, and then I see if it's hitting the Aviatrix requests.

Day-to-day, whenever I open the terminal, first I'll start with the HTTP port number, which helps me connect that with my local Visual Studio editor code so that whatever goes through that port will be transported to the Aviatrix terminal. Then I connect this Aviatrix URL address with my company's product, and then I test it. Whenever I run the code, an ideal request should hit the Aviatrix server.

The scope of Aviatrix use is that everyone uses it in my company, and I also use it solo.

What is most valuable?

I think the best features of Aviatrix include port forwarding, which would be the most highly used feature. I have used that, and all my fellow seniors and teammates have used that only. The free tier which we are using is free. It's very easily integrable, and there's no setup guide needed for using that.

Aviatrix has actually impacted my organization significantly; it is actually pretty important to use Aviatrix daily. I think it has contributed significantly to our workflow. Without that, if we had used some other local code editor and then tested it manually every time, it would have taken a lot more time. I think it has improved the efficiency almost by fifty percent. Productivity obviously has increased so much.

What needs improvement?

A suggestion I would make for Aviatrix is to maybe make the terminal more user-friendly. I use Windows, so it's not a problem, but I don't know how it would work in a Linux or Ubuntu-based system. It works more efficiently in a Mac system versus a Windows, so I think they should improve on the Windows one. Other than that, I don't have any suggestions at this time; it's a good product.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

When I first implemented Aviatrix, it took a bit of time as the first issue was that I was facing a problem due to the terminal not opening. That was an issue on my PC since I had not put the correct address for that. After that, I haven't faced any Aviatrix issues and it's pretty stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Adoption of Aviatrix has been widespread; I think everyone in our company who is working in the tech domain, especially the full-stack developers, are using it in the same manner for the port transfer. I don't think anyone is a super user. Everyone is using it in the same, casual manner.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before I landed on Aviatrix, I was manually using my own Visual Studio code editor, which is a local code editor. I was a college student, so I hadn't pushed anything in production, so I didn't need port transfer.

How was the initial setup?

My team did not need formal training on Aviatrix as it was very easy. We just had to download it and use it as we use our local Studio code editor.

What other advice do I have?

There may be features that came up during implementation that I'm not actually using, but we didn't have any use case for other features. The only concern for us was the port forwarding; that's why we were using Aviatrix. I would rate this product nine out of ten.


    reviewer2839314

Hybrid cloud networking has improved multi-cloud visibility and still needs simpler onboarding

  • May 13, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

Aviatrix is the multi-cloud support function, which is why I am using transit for multi-cloud networking. Aviatrix can provide multi-cloud provider networking support that you can combine with your infrastructure.

For multi-cloud networking management, centralized cloud visibility and control, site-to-cloud, and enterprise connectivity, Aviatrix offers comprehensive solutions. I can use public cloud, private cloud, and on-premises environments with this platform.

What is most valuable?

Aviatrix has multi-cloud provider support, which is really useful. Aviatrix is a good platform with multi-networking capabilities that can support everything, and it looks good overall.

The centralized cloud networking visibility and control is why I wanted to advise this solution. Aviatrix can provide multi-cloud provider networking support that you can combine with your infrastructure.

For multi-cloud networking management, centralized cloud visibility and control, site-to-cloud, and enterprise connectivity, Aviatrix offers valuable features. I can use public cloud, private cloud, and on-premises environments, which is useful.

What needs improvement?

From my experience with the lab and training environment, one area where Aviatrix could improve is making the platform more beginner-friendly for users who are new to cloud networking.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Aviatrix for just a few months.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There is no solution for multi-cloud at this time.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used previous solutions.

What was our ROI?

I save time with the multi-cloud functionality that Aviatrix provides.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The setup cost is a little bit expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Azure could be an alternate solution.


    Pavan Javed

Centralized visibility has simplified multi-cloud security and reduced troubleshooting effort

  • April 26, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Aviatrix is primarily in cloud networking and secure multi-cloud architecture projects.

In one project, I used Aviatrix to set up secure connectivity between AWS and Azure environments using its transit gateway architecture and centralized firewall policies. This helped us simplify routing, enforce security, and get better visibility across our multi-cloud setup.

In addition to connectivity, Aviatrix also gave us centralized visibility and control, which made troubleshooting, monitoring, and enforcing consistent security policies across clouds much easier.

How has it helped my organization?

Aviatrix has positively impacted our organization by helping us simplify multi-cloud operations, improve security posture, and reduce troubleshooting time.

With Aviatrix, we saw around a 30 to 40% reduction in troubleshooting time due to better visibility, and deployment time improved by nearly 50% with automation.

What is most valuable?

The best features of Aviatrix are centralized multi-cloud control and the built-in security, zero trust, firewalling, and deep network visibility.

The deep network visibility feature gave us end-to-end traffic insights across clouds, including flow-level data and real-time monitoring, helping us quickly identify bottlenecks, detect misconfigurations, and troubleshoot issues much faster.

Another standout is how Aviatrix combines networking and security in a single platform.

What needs improvement?

Aviatrix can improve by simplifying its UI or UX for new users, enhancing documentation for complex setups, and reducing the learning curve so that juniors can understand it better.

One additional area is better cost optimization insights and reporting. While Aviatrix is powerful, more built-in recommendations for cost efficiency and resource usage would help teams manage budgets more effectively.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Aviatrix for approximately 1.5 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Aviatrix is highly stable and reliable in production environments.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Aviatrix is highly scalable. It supports multi-region and multi-cloud expansion with ease using its transit gateway architecture and hub-and-spoke design.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support of Aviatrix has been strong and responsive.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously relied on native cloud networking tools such as AWS VPC and Microsoft Azure Networking. We switched to Aviatrix for better multi-cloud consistency, centralized control, and enhanced security features, which were harder to achieve with native tools alone.

How was the initial setup?

We onboarded Aviatrix through the AWS Marketplace, which made procurement and deployment much faster.

What was our ROI?

Using Aviatrix, we saw a clear ROI through approximately a 30 to 40% reduction in network management effort, which meant fewer resources were needed for operations, along with faster deployments of around 50% improvement, and reduced downtime, translating into cost savings and better productivity.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

With Aviatrix, pricing is on the higher side but justified by the features and performance. Setup costs were moderate, especially when deployed via AWS Marketplace, and licensing is flexible but can feel complex initially, requiring some time to fully understand.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Aviatrix, we evaluated native solutions from AWS and Microsoft Azure, along with third-party options such as Cisco and VMware networking solutions.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend clearly understanding your multi-cloud architecture upfront and investing time in learning the core concepts of Aviatrix. Start with a small deployment or POC and leverage the documentation and support to reduce the learning curve and maximize value quickly. I gave this review a rating of 8.


    reviewer1469877

Centralized console has streamlined multi‑cloud management and supports automated operations

  • February 03, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Aviatrix is for managing our multi-cloud environment. We have our environment on Azure cloud, AWS, or GCP. We are in a hybrid or multi-cloud environment. To have centralized console or control to manage all of those cloud environments through a single console, we are using Aviatrix to manage it. It becomes very easier to manage from the centralized console from an administration point of view.

What is most valuable?

Apart from the centralized management console, Aviatrix gives the additional advantage or simplifies the way we manage the cloud environments. When it comes to troubleshooting or more networking-related issues, the native cloud solution has limited options available within the cloud environment. Aviatrix provides those additional benefits to manage effectively when managing troubleshooting or issues.

Aviatrix is making our day-to-day job easier and also saving a lot of time because it gives options for cloud-to-cloud peering, as well as a transit hub and spoke architecture. It simplifies how we manage the multi-cloud environment through the single console, and the connectivity options become very easier.

Aviatrix supports the automation platform. It supports Infrastructure as Code (IAC), which makes deployment faster with automation. This reduces operational overhead.

Aviatrix has positively impacted my organization by making management and administration easier, allowing us to manage all the cloud infrastructure from a single console. There is less overhead on operations due to automation support, and cloud network segmentation has become more advanced.

What needs improvement?

I have seen some cosmetic bugs with Aviatrix, particularly with the console. Although the Aviatrix team releases versions to address these concerns, I have personally observed that the console can be slower to respond at times.

One area I would like to highlight for needed improvements is the documentation. The technical documents available on the platform are not very in-depth. If Aviatrix provides more detailed documentation on the technical infrastructure, it would be more helpful for customers to evaluate, learn, and gain knowledge about the platform.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Aviatrix for around four years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Aviatrix is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Aviatrix is highly scalable. As your cloud environments increase, and you add additional cloud environments, such as from AWS to Azure or OCI, it scales effectively. It is scalable across different cloud environments and within a single cloud environment.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for Aviatrix is pretty good. They are responsive, and their core technical team sometimes participates on calls when we need support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Negative

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use a different solution previously; it was a natively managed cloud environment. Therefore, we did not consider any other solution apart from Aviatrix.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment primarily through the time saved for our engineers, allowing them to focus on other productive tasks. Additionally, management has become significantly easier through Aviatrix controller.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I find that the pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Aviatrix are on the higher side.

What other advice do I have?

One important point is that if you are already using Aviatrix and wish to revert to your native cloud management solution, it is not easy to roll back to the previous setup. This is something to take into consideration.

The advice I would give to others considering using Aviatrix is that its high licensing cost makes it more suitable for large or medium-scale environments. When you have a multi-cloud environment, it becomes easier to justify the platform's cost. However, for very small environments or those using only one cloud platform, it may not justify the expense. Nevertheless, if your organization can afford it, you should go for it because it is a very stable, centralized solution that simplifies managing cloud operations. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    reviewer2739843

Enhancing connectivity with zero trust application and detailed network insights

  • July 15, 2025
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

I am leveraging additional connectivity features, applying zero trust within the cloud network, simplifying cloud network management, and gaining more insights into what is happening within the environment.

How has it helped my organization?

It has enhanced the way I can deploy and manage VPCs and other connectivity services. It has provided valuable insights into latency, ports used, and top talkers, and it has offered effective troubleshooting tools.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are real-time topology, uniform Terraform modules across all public clouds, and troubleshooting tools such as Flightpath and packet capture.

What needs improvement?

One area that could use improvement is IPv6 support.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used the solution for one year.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There were no deployment issues.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I did not encounter any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I did not face any scalability issues.

How are customer service and support?

I have not interacted with customer service.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use a previous solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation was handled internally by our team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost should be compared to the pricing of native services, which often include a data processing component.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not consider any alternate solutions.

What other advice do I have?

I do not have any additional advice.


    MOHAMMAD S.

Aviatrix simplified our cloud networking in a way that saved us hours

  • July 10, 2025
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Honestly, the most impressive aspect I’ve noticed while using Aviatrix is how it simplifies complex cloud networking across different platforms. Our team previously faced challenges with VPC peering and managing routes between multiple clouds. Aviatrix provided us with a unified control plane, allowing us to handle everything from a single dashboard. Additionally, the interface is clean and not overwhelming—even a mid-level engineer on our team was able to pick it up quickly.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area that could use improvement is the initial learning curve. While the documentation is solid, it tends to be quite theoretical at times. More practical, step-by-step video guides or interactive sandbox labs would be especially helpful for beginners. Additionally, the pricing structure isn't particularly accessible for small teams or startups; offering a more flexible plan could make it easier for newcomers to get started.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
At Applligent Technology Pvt Ltd, we use Aviatrix to manage a complex multi-cloud environment that includes both AWS and Azure. Previously, our small DevOps team relied on native cloud tools like Transit Gateway and Azure VPN, but we struggled with limited visibility and found it extremely challenging to maintain consistent security policies across platforms.

Since adopting Aviatrix, our operations have become much more streamlined. CoPilot provides us with real-time traffic monitoring and automatically generated topology diagrams, which have been invaluable for troubleshooting network issues. FireNet has also made it easier to enforce security policies across all our VPCs, reducing the likelihood of errors. The most significant improvement is that our four-person team can now efficiently manage over a dozen VPCs with less stress and improved uptime.

Overall, Aviatrix has made our multi-cloud setup more secure, stable, and far easier to manage.


    KlavsThaarup

A stable solution that can be used for automation and to get rid of manual jobs

  • November 15, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We use Aviatrix for automation and to get rid of manual jobs.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Aviatrix is that it saves us a lot of time.

What needs improvement?

Aviatrix should include more integrated security features like intrusion detection and lateral movement detection.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Aviatrix for more than ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Aviatrix is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Aviatrix is a scalable solution. Most of our customers for Aviatrix are medium and enterprise businesses.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support is fine, and we don't have any problems with it.

How was the initial setup?

The solution’s initial setup is very easy.

What about the implementation team?

You can get Aviatrix up and running in a day or two.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Aviatrix is a pretty expensive solution. Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution and the support. You can't buy the product without support.

What other advice do I have?

Aviatrix's maintenance includes a normal upgrade, which one person can do.

Overall, I rate Aviatrix a nine out of ten.


    Jeff Hazel

A cloud-agnostic solution that simplifies multi-cloud connectivity and enhances security

  • October 18, 2023
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

It felt like a dual approach: on one hand, we were learning, and on the other hand, it helped organizations simplify and optimize their cloud networking, security, and operations.

What is most valuable?

One of the aspects I found most valuable is its ability to make changes and roll them back quickly. In an AWS context, you could connect a couple of virtual private clouds, even if they weren't originally meant to be linked. What I particularly appreciated was that it was cloud-agnostic, so it didn't matter if you were working with AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud; it seamlessly operated across different cloud providers. Within the Aviatrix ecosystem, you could connect different clouds, and the intricacies of low-level commands and configurations were abstracted away. 

What needs improvement?

There can be a steep learning curve for users who are not familiar with it or multi-cloud networking concepts. Training and support may be necessary to fully leverage its capabilities.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have worked with it for approximately two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I found it to be a stable product.

How are customer service and support?

Occasionally, I had to consult the Aviatrix online forums for guidance when things didn't go as planned. Its community was helpful during these troubleshooting moments.

How was the initial setup?

I encountered some issues during the initial setup, largely because I didn't follow the step-by-step instructions diligently. I made changes directly within my AWS account, which led to some complications with the scripts provided for setting up and tearing down lab environments. This approach caused the script to break at various points, and I had to manually troubleshoot and debug the issues. Overall, it is generally straightforward, but it requires precise adherence to the provided steps.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It operates on a consumption-based model and the expenses depend on factors such as the number of virtual machines you use and the resources consumed. The basic license costs were reasonable.

Besides being a consumption based model, the license cost for the Aviatrix software is high, so it could be a significant financial challenge.

What other advice do I have?

In the realm of multi-cloud networking, I would suggest conducting a search for "multi-cloud networking" to explore the landscape of available solutions. Instead of investing significant time in writing scripts and manually establishing these connections, Aviatrix offers a more streamlined approach to join these diverse cloud environments, so I would recommend it.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    Aditya Gandhi

Enables efficient cloud connectivity and security features

  • October 13, 2023
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

We use the product to manage cloud connectivity and security for multiple cloud solutions like Azure, AWS, etc.

How has it helped my organization?

The product has greatly improved our organization by saving costs for multiple direct connections and simpler cloud configurations.

What is most valuable?

Aviatrix’s most valuable feature is firewalls. We can secure any cloud solution using it.

What needs improvement?

There could be an easy availability of multiple features in the profile.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Aviatrix for six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the product’s stability a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the platform’s scalability a seven or eight out of ten.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Azure Connect before. Later, we switched to Aviatrix for multiple cloud connectivity.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup process may have a few challenges as you are working with it for the first time.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Aviatrix an eight out of ten. It is a good product. I advise others to make purchase decisions based on their business requirements.


    Azeez Afolabi

Offers seamless connectivity and helps to connect networks

  • October 12, 2023
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We use Aviatrix to connect our network together.

What is most valuable?

The connections are seamless, and we can access the static clouds on the platform itself. We are also able to trace the issues. The most valuable features of the solution are security, user interface, and performance.

What needs improvement?

The solution needs to improve the onboarding architecture.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution an eight out of ten.