Hygraph
HygraphReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
710 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Easy to Implement, Easy to Use, and Packed with Features
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of Implementation, Ease of Use, Number of Features
What do you dislike about the product?
The limited bandwidth inters of scheduling
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its help publishing new pages we efficiently
User-Friendly Design, Easy Integration, and a good generous plan
What do you like best about the product?
User friendly design, easy integration and generous plan
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be really nice to not just have GraphQL API, but of course REST APIs as not all backend services want to use Graph QL.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
No need for a database for content management, easy set up and handover for non-technical individuals. Very fast set up.
Highly Adaptable and Easy to Tailor to Our Needs
What do you like best about the product?
how adaptable it is. Changing things is very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
index organization. Organizing lists takes time and effort.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Managing my portfolio
Dynamic Data management for Vibe Coded Digital Products
What do you like best about the product?
The user experience was good and the information is well delivered with the nuances.
What do you dislike about the product?
I do not have any complaints about Hygraph for now.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am primarily a product design with some coding knowledge and my use case is to create a scaleable workflow to showcase my work. I build with cursor and am using the Hygraph to facilitate different asepcts of my portoflio. I am benefited by the simplicity and structured way of organising content for my website and i do not have to keep vibe coding static websites.
Effortless Content Management with Room for Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ease of use of Hygraph and having a repository of content. Working with content blocks is simpler because I don't have to think in pages or templates. I can publish, unpublish, or update content without waiting on engineering, which is really convenient. Being able to reuse messaging across different channels or campaigns without worrying about inconsistencies is another great aspect of Hygraph. The initial setup was quite easy, which I appreciated.
What do you dislike about the product?
Setting up models, schemas, and integrations is not something marketers can do by themselves. Hygraph could offer guided model templates for common use cases.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Hygraph to structure content once and reuse it anywhere, work with content blocks instead of pages, and update content independently. It eases content management by providing a repository and ensuring consistent messaging across channels.
Great Web Asset Management with Some Backend Mysteries
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Hygraph is pretty fluid for our use, and I don't really see any obvious problems with it. All the asset uploading functionalities are really good for our business. It makes it a very simple process to upload and transfer the data to our beautiful-looking website that we get to see every day. The decision to use Hygraph was the greatest decision we've ever made. I'm absolutely likely to recommend Hygraph to a friend or colleague, giving it a ten.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes things are broken on our front end, and Hygraph isn't able to easily tell us why. It's a bit of a guessing game of why something isn't working.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Hygraph as the back end for uploading assets, creating a visually appealing and engaging website. Its asset uploading functionalities simplify our process, making it easy to transfer data to our site.
Powerful Headless CMS With a Pricing Model That Scales Quickly
What do you like best about the product?
Hygraph’s API-first approach and performance are what stand out the most. The GraphQL API is fast, well-documented, and predictable, which makes integration with our frontend stack straightforward. Our developers can query exactly the data they need, which keeps the codebase cleaner and improves performance on the client side
What do you dislike about the product?
The main downside of Hygraph for us is the cost structure. As our usage and number of projects grow, the pricing can increase quickly, which makes it harder to justify compared to other headless CMS options in the market. We feel that some features that are essential for growing teams could be more accessible in lower tiers
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
For us, Hygraph solves the problem of managing content for multiple client projects in a scalable way. We can create flexible schemas and environments per project, while still keeping everything under one platform. This makes it easier to maintain, update, and evolve content structures without rebuilding from scratch every time
Easy Team Collaboration & Clear Structure, but Missing AI Translation
What do you like best about the product?
- Very easy to use with a team
- Clear structure
- Integrated very easily with Vercel
- Clear structure
- Integrated very easily with Vercel
What do you dislike about the product?
- No AI translation for other languages
-
-
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- Making our website structure clear
- Making it easy to change things fast
- Translating into other languages
- Making it easy to change things fast
- Translating into other languages
Easy Content Editing in Minutes—Perfect for Non-Technical Marketing Teams
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of use with editing content within minutes. Perfect for a marketing team with little background knowledge in web development tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
It is limited from the variations you can apply to each page. Also in some cases the preview of the page layout doesn't work.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As an internally built website, Hygraph allows for our marketing team to edit pages without the need to get product or eng involved.
Efficient, Developer-Friendly CMS with Room for Documentation Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
I like the way Hygraph makes things easier for developers. The ability to write GraphQL queries directly is a big plus, and it sometimes even allows me to avoid having an API. I appreciate the way you can manage data securely, especially with how you can set up specific permissions for tokens. The draft and publish features are great for previewing content deployments and display. I love that the platform is very user-friendly and easy to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
I guess the documentation could be improved. Maybe? I had a lot of issues writing GraphQL queries on the JavaScript site. Sometimes I struggle with the models and the relations I have to do to catch data from different tables together. Maybe the documentation could be something more step by step, ready to go. I was a bit lost in the beginning, and the docs were not helped me that much even because English is not my first language. It could be improved, especially for the onboarding of new users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Hygraph to quickly create and manage databases and APIs, ensuring the platform is interactive and secure. It simplifies managing event data, real-time updates, and controlling user access, making it easy and fun to engage with users.
showing 1 - 10