External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
My main use case for Dell APEX is that I have some data for a project, and I wanted some data in-house. I was looking to purchase a server for that, but then I learned about Dell APEX, which helped me implement in-house data. The pay-as-you-go model is very beneficial.
A specific example of how I have used Dell APEX for my project is that it serves as an in-house file server for a project only.
I am currently using Dell APEX as a file server and am not using it for other projects.
The best features Dell APEX offers for my file server project are the ability to share files across the team using that server.
This feature has made my workflow and collaboration easier because all my data is in a central database and central server. I can access all the files, and the entire team can access all the files from a central server.
Dell APEX has positively impacted my organization by making things easier. Instead of having to purchase a server and implement it, we subscribe to Dell APEX and everything is handled by the Dell team, which is a very easy and efficient process.
I have been working in my field for one year in my current organization.
Dell APEX is stable.
The scalability of Dell APEX is very good.
I have seen a return on investment in terms of money saved.
My advice for others looking into using Dell APEX is that if you want a pay-as-you-go model or if it is for a small project for a limited time, you can use it instead of purchasing hardware, which would be very beneficial. I give this product a rating of 10 out of 10.
I typically use Dell APEX for my in-house data, as I had rented it and taken it out for that purpose.
We have some data that we want to store in-house, so we are using Dell APEX. We had taken the subscription of that and the Dell team implemented it.
The main use case for Dell APEX is for cost cutting, as we have done many cost cuts on purchasing hardware. Instead of now using Dell APEX, we pay as per a pay-as-you-go model, which is the best option, as we have to pay only as we use.
The best features Dell APEX offers, in my experience, include the pay-as-you-go model, as we do not need to purchase all the hardware; we subscribe to them instead. This is the best feature, and it supports a multi-cloud environment and connects with Azure, which is very beneficial for us.
The multi-cloud environment support and Azure connectivity are beneficial for us, as I can also connect with Azure and AWS.
Dell APEX positively impacts my organization by solving many hardware costs, as we are paying a pay-as-you-go model, which is very beneficial for us and saves a lot of money.
I have been using Dell APEX for one year.
Dell APEX is stable.
Dell APEX's scalability is very good.
The customer support for Dell APEX is very good.
I rate the customer support for Dell APEX an 8 out of 10, as I got all the solutions from them.
Previously, we did not use any solution; we had a requirement for the on-prem server for some time, so instead of purchasing, we subscribed to that.
There is a return on investment with Dell APEX.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing will be handled by my CEO, so I don't know about that.
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Dell APEX; I only evaluated some rented servers and found that Dell APEX fit our requirements well, so I went ahead with it.
If you want an in-house server for some time, you can go ahead with Dell APEX, as it will be very beneficial for you; you can subscribe to it and use it. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.
My main use case for Dell APEX is for rapid development in our company, and we have been using it for that purpose for the past six to eight months. We can develop something in as little as a week or two weeks. We can also use it for extreme scalability because it gives us storage and cloud capabilities.
A specific example of a project where Dell APEX helped me develop something quickly or scale efficiently is when we are building something in our company. What cloud platforms such as Dell APEX do is deploy pre-configured clusters or integrate with software such as Microsoft Azure, fast-tracking our work by 90 percent. A traditional setup takes so much time to install, boot up, and do everything else. This allows us to develop something in as little as seven to ten days. Dell APEX also has extreme scalability. Whenever we are developing something and there is a massive increase in users, we can do on-demand scaling. If users are coming quickly, it can scale automatically.
Dell APEX has positively impacted my organization by enabling massive and fast development, and we are not worrying about scalability right now. We also increased efficiency, with the IT staff's efficiency up to 50 percent higher, and we can also go to market faster now. We can save so much money, up to 40 to 50 percent.
The best features Dell APEX offers include massive and fast development and massive scalability. It also has an Instant On feature. We can initially pay, and Dell installs more hardware into our systems. We also love the 14-day guarantee period because some companies will not offer it. If we do not want it, we can directly get out of it. They also have a tool called APEX Navigator. We can add more storage power to the computer.
The Instant On feature has helped my team significantly because Dell will install more hardware on the system that we are using than what we actually pay for, and when we get a sudden spike in traffic, it automatically auto-scales things, so nothing will break or anything else. APEX Navigator works for us by allowing us to directly navigate to it whenever we want more storage or more computer power, so with a single click, we can do it, adding storage to your phone or changing the RAM, ROM, or something else.
I believe Dell APEX can be improved because it is very complex for people who do not know it or are very new to it, so they need to simplify their UI or UX. They also need some good software updates because it sometimes uses older technology. It should also have good ecosystem integration with APEX Navigator or something similar.
I have been using Dell APEX for four years.
Dell APEX is stable; sometimes it may crash, but it is average or sometimes below average.
Dell APEX has very good scalability.
Customer support for Dell APEX is inconsistent; I cannot tell you exactly, but it is average.
I did not use anything before because I have only been using Dell APEX for the past six to eight months. I joined this team recently, so I do not know which tool they were using previously, but they told me they started using it recently.
We started using Dell APEX with Microsoft Azure, and it is a multi-cloud design. I think we are getting it from AWS, but I am not the one paying for it, so I do not know exactly.
I purchased Dell APEX through the AWS Marketplace.
We have seen a return on investment with Dell APEX. We are pushing to market faster now, and we are in a rapid deployment or development stage. It helps us because we are spending less time on each project. Efficiency has also improved because we are not wasting time. We also have good scalability now, so we do not need to worry about more people coming in and more people going out or anything else.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a long-term expense; we may feel it is expensive after a five or ten-year period. The setup is a zero upfront cost for us because we are using the cloud, and regarding the license, it is all-inclusive in the price, so we do not have to pay anything extra for licenses, up to an extent. It also provides us with hybrid licensing.
We did not evaluate other options before choosing Dell APEX.
My advice for others looking into using Dell APEX is that it is good. They can start using it, and they can also save money and time. They can also enter the fast-deploying world. I would rate this review a six overall.
Dell APEX is what we use for handling traffic. Our product Hire-HQ has an application in EU regions. Whenever clients want to conduct campus drives or bulk hiring, we experience sudden spikes of candidates applying simultaneously, which is three to four times the normal load. Our traditional setup cannot handle this kind of traffic volume. We implemented Dell APEX to move to a pay-as-you-go infrastructure model. I have used it in the back end with Node.js APIs, and we have also used Dell APEX storage services to handle the large volume of resumes and candidate data.
In one of the cities in a European country, there was a hiring campaign happening for a university. The client expected around three times more than the normal load. At that time, we successfully handled the situation using Dell APEX, which also reduced our infrastructure cost by around 20 to 25 percent. The API was triggered multiple times by multiple people at the same time, and we had to maintain factors like latency and everything. It improved the response times, so the latency was less.
Dell APEX provides secure candidate data management, which is essential for us because we have sensitive data related to candidates, such as their resumes and personal information. We need to protect that, and Dell APEX provided that as well.
Dell APEX secured candidate data, as I mentioned. It has a controlled environment that is a hybrid setup instead of a public cloud, and it has implemented access control and secure storage. This improves data security and compliance because EU regions have GDPR, which is one of the important regulations. The data of candidates should not be shared without their consent, making data management and security a must in European regions. Dell APEX has this functionality, making it very good for security. Another standout feature is the pay-as-you-go structure, which automatically increases and decreases as our load changes.
Cloud flexibility is there with Dell APEX, allowing it to efficiently maintain data while still scaling whenever needed. Since it is a hybrid setup, it automatically scales up whenever we need more data storage, which is very good.
Dell APEX has positively impacted my organization by reducing our infrastructure cost by 25 percent. At peak times, when our load was more than three to four times the normal load, it scaled efficiently with Dell APEX. There are multiple cases where, if a client needs less latency, we can manage the resources accordingly since we have our own control. That aspect is very good.
We measured the infrastructure cost reduction by using Dell APEX to dynamically scale our back end and storage during campus drives, which helped us manage traffic that was three times the initial load without any downtime. During off-seasons when there are no hiring drives, we scale down the resources, optimizing costs accordingly.
User interface improvement is also needed in Dell APEX. The recruiters using Hire-HQ are not very technical and struggle to interpret metrics to the extent of IOPS. We could streamline the interface to make it more understandable for end users. Implementing real-time monitoring visualization is a key feature we want because seeing how Dell APEX performs in real-time would be very beneficial.
Dell APEX can be improved with a better auto-scaling strategy. I have used AWS, which has features to the extent of HPA, horizontal pod auto-scaling that increases the number of servers when there is an increase in API calls. Vertical scaling is limited to some extent, and automatic scaling can improve to avoid delays, transitioning from manual to semi-automatic. Additionally, smarter resource planning for cost optimization can still be refined, as resources sometimes get over-allocated, causing prices to rise unnecessarily.
Pricing-wise, it can be a bit costly because at times it allocates more resources than necessary, which increases costs. The consumption model can improve by fine-tuning it according to our needs to ensure it remains affordable for end users. It operates on a subscription-based model, which is beneficial as we track monthly consumption.
I have been using Dell APEX for one or two years in my organization.
Dell APEX is quite stable because it is associated with a reputable brand to the extent of Dell, and so far, we are satisfied with it.
The scalability of Dell APEX is exceptional; it has an as-you-go structure that efficiently accommodates spikes in API calls, so it works very well.
We have not had any need for customer support so far. However, as far as I know, it is good, since we can raise queries and receive replies within 24 hours, and we can email them as well.
We have not used any different solution before Dell APEX.
The initial setup can be complicated even for technical users. Services to the extent of AWS are easier to use due to better documentation and support, which is something that Dell APEX can improve upon.
Dell APEX is deployed in our organization using both scalable and cost-efficient infrastructure to handle fluctuations. It operates as a flexible as-a-service model. My role involves supporting deployment, configuring resources, integrating back-end services, and setting up monitoring to help us scale efficiently during peak hours. While I am familiar with these aspects, I do not have complete knowledge of the entire architecture, but it is utilized as a public cloud with control.
We have seen a return on investment with Dell APEX. As I mentioned, latency has decreased and hiring times are much smoother than before. The P95, which measures average response time from an API, has improved significantly.
Dell APEX has positively impacted my organization by reducing our infrastructure cost by 25 percent. At peak times, when our load was more than three to four times the normal load, it scaled efficiently with Dell APEX. There are multiple cases where, if a client needs less latency, we can manage the resources accordingly since we have our own control. That aspect is very good.
We measured the infrastructure cost reduction by using Dell APEX to dynamically scale our back end and storage during campus drives, which helped us manage traffic that was three times the initial load without any downtime. During off-seasons when there are no hiring drives, we scale down the resources, optimizing costs accordingly.
Pricing-wise, it can be a bit costly because at times it allocates more resources than necessary, which increases costs. The consumption model can improve by fine-tuning it according to our needs to ensure it remains affordable for end users. It operates on a subscription-based model, which is beneficial as we track monthly consumption.
I do not have much previous experience with options, but we have considered EC2 instances, EKS instances, Kubernetes, Docker, and Microsoft Azure. Azure offered scalability and a mature ecosystem, but we encountered cost spikes during peak hiring, which led us to choose AWS.
If your application starts at one level and may grow to three or four times that during peak times, then Dell APEX is a great platform. It is especially useful when you need to adjust services according to your needs, allowing for uptime and downtime as required. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.
The product is an on-demand service used for IT infrastructure, similar to HPE GreenLake, allowing the purchase of on-premise solutions, such as servers and storage, where users pay based on their consumption. It provides flexibility to handle varying demand in business environments.
I found this product to be beneficial due to its consumption model, which allows businesses to acquire infrastructure that supports peak demand scenarios while only paying for what is used. This model makes the purchasing process easier and more efficient.
In Latin America, they need to add more services to complement the solution and provide more options for managing the environment as some customers prefer not having responsibility for infrastructure.
The stability of the solution depends on the products that are part of the entire environment. It is essentially a sensor that provides visibility into the environment's health.
Scalability is integrated into the solution's design. If unexpected growth occurs, additional hardware can be added, adjusting the billing accordingly.
I have rated their customer support 8.5 out of 10, though I have not directly interacted with their support before.
I have used public cloud solutions like AWS and noted that they lack the capped billing provided by APEX, which assures knowing the maximum possible bill.
The initial setup involves configuring a virtual host to track resource usage and billing. The other installations are standard, like storage and backups. It is not complex to set up.
The installation is handled by Dell specialists, potentially with support from engineers with Dell certifications.
The pricing is appealing because customers can compare the advantages of different financial models like investment, leasing, or APEX on Demand. Many customers, including those in the finance industry, find APEX on Demand to be a viable solution.
I rate APEX nine out of ten. It prepares businesses for their worst scenario while providing financial predictability.
Dell APEX has provided peace of mind by safeguarding our data. Though there hasn't been a noticeable impact yet, it offers a security backup for endpoint users.
The most valuable feature of Dell APEX for us is data availability, ensuring data resiliency and offering protection in case of data loss.
Dell APEX needs a dedicated support channel to raise support tickets easily. I also feel the support tab should be integrated into the APEX dashboard.
There have been instances where some users complained about storage issues, indicating potential stability problems.
Currently, we are using Dell APEX for over 100 users, primarily for endpoint backup at the executive level, with plans to expand for server and SAP data backups.
Though I'm pleased with Dell's overall services, I faced challenges with Dell APEX support. The support system for APEX lacks a dedicated portal, and it sometimes takes time to connect with the right person.
The pricing for Dell APEX is not reasonable. The value is realized primarily during a data breach, which we have not experienced, so it is still an expenditure for management.
While I would recommend Dell products to others, I have no specific companies in mind that I would not recommend.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
I use the solution in my company to store and offer some services associated with emails.
The most valuable features of the solution are that the support is really good and the deployment is really easy. There are a lot of good things about Dell APEX.
There needs to be some improvement in the response time of the tool's support team.
I have been using Dell APEX for two years. My company has a partnership with Dell.
It is a really great and stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
The tool's scalability is really good. You can do deployments in a few seconds, and it uses Amazon as a base so that the deployments can be made easy and quick.
The solution's technical support is better than what VMware offers, especially when you want to change to an on-premises environment due to the security in the cloud offered by Dell.
If ten means it is really easy to set up the tool, I rate the product's initial setup phase as an eight.
The solution is deployed on the cloud.
You don't have to deploy people to support the tool, and it is really very clean and easy to manage with the support, which is really good. The tool saves more than 50 percent of our company's time.
The product's prices are great. Right now, I don't have the details of the tool's cost, but the price depends on the size of the company and what kind of services you want from the solution. There are some additional costs attached to the tool. Some aspects of the tool are less expensive, while others are almost the same price as the other solutions in the market, so it is fairly comparable to the competition.
For our company's clients, the AI-driven part of the tool is good. Our company uses AI in reporting. The product provides automatic reports about what is happening with your system and what you can improve if there are some problems in the solution.
I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
We use it to handle our internal storage needs across the organization.
The two key factors are ease of deployment and flexibility in utilizing and configuring storage as needed.
They all need to work on their pricing because you always want to get more for less.
I have been using Dell APEX for four to five years.
Dell APEX offers scalability by enabling cloud utilization and providing a subscription-based solution. You can have Dell manage everything, whether the infrastructure is in the cloud or on-premises. They handle all the patching, updates, and maintenance, freeing up your team to focus on more strategic projects. The main challenge is often cost—comparing the total cost of ownership to purchasing and managing on-prem hardware yourself. However, recent price reductions have made it more competitive. With APEX, maintenance costs are built into the monthly subscription, so your team doesn't need to spend time on operational tasks, allowing them to concentrate on engineering, architecture, and design.
I haven't had any real issues that they have been unable to address.
At this stage, NetApp currently offers more options across its environment than Dell. However, Dell could change that, depending on how it continues to develop its offerings.
The initial setup was straightforward and without complexity and offered flexibility in configuring the available options. This allowed us to use it with various systems we have acquired over the years, accommodating different types of data and presenting it in the way we wanted, providing the flexibility we needed.
A couple of guys are working with the Dell folks.
Dell engineers helped us to deploy it within a week, and we had it up and running.
Dell APEX includes maintenance as part of the solution, so you don't need a separate maintenance agreement or worry about renegotiations. It's an all-in-one service where you pay for what you use. There's no need to overprovision storage upfront since it's available on demand—request more when needed, and you'll be billed accordingly. This approach avoids paying for capacity during acquisition, leading to better pricing per gigabyte over time. While other vendors also offer similar on-demand capacity solutions, Dell APEX now provides pricing comparable to traditional CapEx investments, making it a viable option for reducing operational costs and simplifying management through automation and vendor responsibility.
I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
It depends on the use cases. Different technologies are suited to different needs. Dell APEX is a niche product used primarily for specific storage needs in our labs. While we rely on NetApp for most of our storage and Data Domain for backups, Dell APEX fills a unique gap by providing the flexibility we need at a reasonable price point.
Dell does maintenance.
From a security perspective, our data is encrypted, but Dell APEX doesn't handle our audits or manage our data setup. Those responsibilities lie with us. However, we are confident that the platform is secure and our data is adequately protected and encrypted.
There are many capacity-on-demand solutions available, including Dell APEX. Whether it's a good solution depends on your specific use cases and budget. It's a great option if it meets your needs at the right price. However, it might be worth waiting for better pricing before committing if the pricing isn't favorable.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.