Redgate Flyway Enterprise
Seamless Database Migrations
Redgate Flyway Makes Database Version Control a Breeze
User-Friendly Deployment Automation, Though ADO Pipeline Setup Can Be Tricky
Full Control Over Deployments with Flyway
Saves DBAs Time by Streamlining Promotions
Intuitive UI, Seamless Azure DevOps Integration, and Excellent Support
SQL-First, Version-Controlled Migrations That Fit CI/CD Effortlessly
Collaboration has improved with consistent database versioning but mid-project adoption needs care
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Redgate Flyway is to maintain the database structure, especially when coding with other developers, and I view it as a version control system for databases, similar to Git.
A specific example of how I have used Redgate Flyway to maintain the database structure is in starting out a project, where I have used two flavors of it, writing raw SQL queries and also using the Java class version of SQL queries. I started from scratch because we needed to ensure that other teams see the update of the database since we are all coding differently. Once you pull, you notice there is a new migration and have to run that migration to maintain the update of the database. We built it from scratch and used the raw SQL queries.
Redgate Flyway is used at every level of the project. If there is a new column added, I have to update the SQL query migration. If there is any constraint change, table creation, or indexing to add, I have to include that in the Redgate Flyway migration. Once that is pushed, our database team gets a notification that the tables or the database have a new entry, and they also do reviews. Once anybody pulls the code, that person also gets the new migration change.
What is most valuable?
The best features Redgate Flyway offers are its usefulness when working with other people, as it maintains consistency in database changes, and it is helpful when shifting databases because Redgate Flyway provides the migration script that can be run in different environments without needing to rely on Spring auto updates to create those tables. It is a well-structured tool for managing table creations.
Managing migrations across different environments has been quite easy for my team to adapt to and use Redgate Flyway without any challenges. We recently moved from a Docker database to an actual database in a different environment, and it was easy for us to share the migrations. Once they were done running them, we shifted connectivity to their environment and everything worked without issues.
Redgate Flyway has positively impacted my organization by maintaining consistency among developers. One real added feature is using migration tools, which allows rollbacks although I think rollback has some bottlenecks. I acknowledge that Spring Boot does not have a migration tool by default unlike Entity Framework in C#, but having Redgate Flyway is becoming a default tool for migration in Spring.
What needs improvement?
Redgate Flyway can be improved by looking at all circles of software development so that if someone did not start with Redgate Flyway from the beginning, they should not experience issues starting in the middle or end of the project. A review on that cycle for people using Redgate Flyway would be beneficial.
I rate Redgate Flyway seven out of ten mainly because of some issues when introducing Redgate Flyway in between projects instead of from inception. Sometimes, errors with migrations can be very disappointing, as often it requires deleting everything and starting over. Additionally, maintaining the versioning of the scripts must be done very carefully, which requires some experience when using a specific pattern such as date-time to prevent clashes when another person is updating the database. This necessitates a learning curve.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Redgate Flyway for approximately four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I consider Redgate Flyway stable to an extent, around eighty to ninety percent.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Redgate Flyway is good.
How are customer service and support?
I have not had any issues with customer support at Redgate Flyway, so my database team would be better equipped to answer that.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Liquibase and switched to Redgate Flyway because I had to follow the company's requirements, as most companies I have worked with use Redgate Flyway.
How was the initial setup?
Regarding maintaining consistency and rollbacks with Redgate Flyway, I have luckily not had many issues. In the past, I sometimes had to delete all migrations trying to recreate them. I do not think it is really smooth when you have already started the project and want to now introduce Redgate Flyway halfway through. While I cannot remember the exact scenario, I know it was not smooth. It is usually better to use it from the beginning of the project, though it is a bit more complicated in between projects.
What about the implementation team?
We have independent work with a separation of roles. We have those maintaining things concerning databases and a team that manages pricing, while my job role is primarily focused on writing code.
What was our ROI?
I see a return on investment with Redgate Flyway, as it is leading compared to Liquibase and others, and most teams I have worked with utilize Redgate Flyway, which is definitely pointing in the right direction.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that we have independent work with a separation of roles. We have those maintaining things concerning databases and a team that manages pricing, while my job role is primarily focused on writing code.
What other advice do I have?
Redgate Flyway is a tool that works, and I have not had many issues with it. My advice to others looking into using Redgate Flyway is that it is a good tool, especially when the development team is large and you want to maintain database integrity, consistent updates, and also handle migrations, as Redgate Flyway has become a default tool to use.
Regarding Redgate Flyway's artificial intelligence capabilities, I have not really examined artificial intelligence with Redgate Flyway. Security is a general issue, but I have not faced any security issues with Redgate Flyway and have not looked into Redgate Flyway's artificial intelligence capabilities. I have not actually looked at it or its accuracy and reliability of output recently, but it is something I would like to explore.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Streamlined Migrations with Seamless CI/CD Integration
Versioned migrations have streamlined our deployments and accelerated database modernization
What is our primary use case?
Redgate Flyway is a migration tool that we use for our SQL migration. We have several customers' databases that must be migrated to the new schema, and we use Redgate Flyway scripts to migrate from the older schema to the newer schema. This approach helps us keep different versions of the schema without losing data simultaneously.
What is most valuable?
Redgate Flyway provides versioning as a primary benefit, allowing us to have numbered versions and easily switch from one version to another. We write the script once, and it performs most of the manual tasks such as version control and rollback in case of any errors independently.
Redgate Flyway's version control of database changes has significantly helped in ensuring repeatable deployments. As we continuously develop and migrate schema changes while verifying that the migration is working correctly, we progressively create new versions and keep our front-end and API teams informed of changes.
Redgate Flyway streamlines the process of database migration and significantly reduces the time for data migration from twenty to twenty-five days down to five to seven days, thanks to the initial time we took for learning. Now we can complete migrations in two or three days, which is a substantial impact.
Redgate Flyway has played a critical role in accelerating our software development cycle by helping us implement continuous deployment through the creation of different schema versions and their sequential deployment, which would be very difficult with traditional methods.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see improvements in Redgate Flyway for compatibility with new agentic AI, which could provide support in writing scripts.
Apart from the AI aspect, I do not have anything in mind for improvement or missing features in Redgate Flyway at this time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Redgate Flyway for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I find Redgate Flyway mostly stable for our work, although conflicts are a different matter. Overall, it is a very stable and mature product with a simple execution model and predictable behavior.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Redgate Flyway works well for small teams but presents conflict issues with larger teams due to version control. While it generally scales well, there are some limitations with longer script run times, suggesting that some parallelization could improve scalability.
How are customer service and support?
We generally use resources such as Stack Overflow for support and have not escalated any questions to technical support during our database migrations with Redgate Flyway.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Some teams were using different migration tools previously, but I do not know their names exactly. Since we migrated to a newer version of SQL, those tools were not working efficiently.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Redgate Flyway was challenging because we had to integrate a database without any history and establish the initial version. This was difficult due to multiple tables and the need for environment setup, alongside the team needing to learn it, and version conflicts arising when multiple people were working.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Redgate Flyway, we evaluated options such as Liquibase and Alembic, among others.
We decided to go with Redgate Flyway because it uses plain SQL scripts without complex XML or YAML, has version control for database changes, and works well with CI/CD. Although the cons include the absence of automatic rollback and potential merge conflicts, the versioning control was the major factor for our decision.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for organizations considering Redgate Flyway is to look for agentic AI support for regular tasks, particularly in writing basic scripts, as such assistance could be very beneficial. I rate Redgate Flyway overall as an eight as a product and a solution.