My main use case for EMQX is for communicating with ESP32 devices and sharing messages from one device to another device at the central level.

Our company is a fuel automation company, and we will have dispenser units where we connect one ESP32 for each dispenser unit. We get all the data from the dispenser unit and share it to the server via EMQX.

One of the best features EMQX offers is the ability to share data via topic-wise distribution.

Topic-wise data sharing helps my team and our workflow because each ESP32 has a different MAC ID, and using the MAC ID, we filter the data in the server, determining which ESP32 sends which message for a particular dispenser unit.

I would like to add that we are using TLS security for EMQX, and we have created one server where we can use a certificate for security purposes. The speed is really high, and even if there is a large number of incoming data, EMQX handles it very smoothly and quickly.

EMQX has positively impacted our organization by significantly increasing speed compared to other technologies we used before. After using EMQX, we can now handle a large amount of data within a fraction of seconds, which makes it very easy for us to pass the data and store it in our database, and we can easily visualize it in our UI.

The outcomes from using EMQX are very cost-saving for us because we previously used the MQTT Mosquitto broker, and when I compare Mosquitto with EMQX, EMQX is far better than Mosquitto and other protocols.

I do not have any suggestions for improvement in EMQX.

As I have worked with EMQX, I do not feel much improvement is needed. Whatever is available till now is working great and is very efficient for us. Perhaps I need to explore more to add new features or other functionalities, but as of now, it is great for us.

I have been using EMQX for 14 months.

EMQX is much more stable.

EMQX's scalability is really great.

We have not faced any need for customer support from EMQX since we can handle everything on our end.

We previously used the Mosquitto broker, which had latency issues and could not handle a large amount of data, and it was very slow. That is why we searched for an alternative option and found that EMQX is better.

We have not deployed EMQX to a large extent yet, so I cannot provide specific metrics, but we are optimistic about the return on investment.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for EMQX is good.

Before choosing EMQX, we evaluated other options, including HiveMQ.

My advice for others looking into using EMQX is that if they want to manage a large amount of data with more speed, reliability, and security, they can easily switch to EMQX compared to other brokers. I give EMQX a rating of 10.