AI For Work

Kore.ai

Reviews from AWS customer

7 AWS reviews

External reviews

479 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    Pablo Lugo

Automation has transformed customer service and now drives major cost savings and new revenue

  • May 20, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Kore.ai at the beginning was automations for machine learning, but right now they are implementing agentic solutions, and they are doing it really well. Other companies have some small issues, but in broad terms, the most common use case is to automate the entire customer attention process of contact centers in several companies.

For banks, we use Kore.ai to automate the entire customer attention process, such as giving access to statements, providing balance information, activating credit cards, blocking cards, locating branches, and developing transactions. When the bot has no capability to solve a question, it can escalate and move to a human agent with the contact center solution. This normally gives banks the capacity to reduce between 30 to 45% of the traffic that would normally go to human agents. With this capability, they can lower the volume of human agents and focus those people on selling or other areas to be more productive for the bank.

Kore.ai has many other use cases, but I believe that is the most important.

How has it helped my organization?

Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization because we are implementors, and I would say that approximately 80% of our income comes from developed projects with Kore.ai. We are Platinum partners of theirs, and we have many banks, financial institutions, and big retail companies, as well as innovative FinTech companies that are using this solution right now and having really good results.

What we normally see is that we guarantee almost between 30 to 45% of budget reduction in contact centers. Because of the containment rate that the agents generate, companies are not going to need so many people giving attention to their end customers, and they can move these people to other areas such as sales or other areas that they need internally in their company.

What is most valuable?

The best features Kore.ai offers include a really low-code solution. If you are not an expert in building agents, it is going to be easy for you to understand how it works and start deploying solutions. It is not a highly specialized platform and is more focused on resolving or giving value in a short time to develop something that could start to give you results. I think that is one of the most important things about Kore.ai. The other one is that it is an agnostic platform, so you can integrate all types of different LLMs in one single app, allowing you to work with your budget. This is something that right now with the agentic solution is really important to understand and handle.

The low-code aspect helped my team because you do not have to be an expert technician or an expert in the field to understand how to build an agentic solution. If you know your business, you can start to build something really nice with Kore.ai.

Regarding agnostic integration, Kore.ai lets you use different LLMs together in one app, which is important because imagine that you need to perform several activities such as receiving documents, analyzing those documents, and then preparing an email or handling a lot of data to understand a statement. You are going to need different types of LLM models. For example, if you are going to communicate straightforwardly to your customer, you are not going to need a really big and complex LLM. Maybe something mini or flash will help you move forward. But when you are going to analyze a complete statement and you want to give the right answer to your customer, you are going to need bigger models. The good thing about Kore.ai is that it allows you to have integration with commercial models, open-source models, or you can host it internally in their platform. Having that capacity, you are going to be able to push forward and develop a solution without any hassle.

What needs improvement?

Right now, many other companies face this issue because they are looking to be on top of the technology every single day, and Kore.ai is managing short times of delivery of new versions of their products. This is nice, but the QA process sometimes is not quite the best. You can have releases with several bugs in the middle that affect the behavior of your cloud customers. If you are in an on-premises environment or a private cloud environment, it is different because your version is not going to be affected every single sprint. But if you are in the public cloud, that could happen, and that is something that maybe you need to take into measure if you are going to develop something really delicate for your company. Normally, I highly recommend to our customers to start with something really simple and helpful, and then we are going to be escalating in the meantime. This gives the customer time to be prepared and the platform to be more solid in the features that we are going to be using in the future.

In support, the team is not the greatest, but it works. I would say that having multilingual support would be helpful because you have customers that normally are a little bit desperate to have an answer back. Because support is focusing on just one language and one time zone specifically, gathering attention 24/7 immediately is something that maybe takes a little bit more time than usual.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kore.ai since they started in 2014.

How was the initial setup?

It is really easy to upgrade your company and put it into the new era of agentic attention in a short time. Normally, the time it takes us to deliver a solution is between two and a half and five months, which is normally what we have taken to move forward and develop a full solution for an end customer.

What about the implementation team?

We are the partner of Kore.ai.

What was our ROI?

Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization because we are implementors, and I would say that approximately 80% of our income comes from developed projects with Kore.ai. We are Platinum partners of theirs, and we have many banks, financial institutions, and big retail companies, as well as innovative FinTech companies that are using this solution right now and having really good results.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You can purchase Kore.ai through the AWS Marketplace, but normally the best way is to talk to a partner of Kore.ai and they can help you with the whole process.

What other advice do I have?

The advice I would give to others looking into using Kore.ai is to look forward to having a really nice implementor, for example, someone like us. Because the solution is really easy, but to understand all the different scopes and all the different features that you can use takes time. My recommendation is to be in touch with partners like us in order to maximize your efficiency in a short time. Normally, the implementation is not going to cost you so much money, so it is something that if you look at it, it is going to be more of a benefit than trying to do it directly by yourself at the beginning. After you have a first release and you understand how the whole process works, it is going to be easier for the company to take hands on that and maintain and develop new products by themselves. I give this product a rating of 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


    reviewer2843637

Chatbot AI has streamlined customer detail retrieval and supports flexible data input

  • May 20, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Kore.ai is customer support automation, where I have been using it to fetch customer details and to add or update customer details. For example, I receive a call from a customer requesting his current details that are present in the system, and if the customer provides his phone number, I can retrieve that information efficiently. Using Kore.ai, I initiate the task through the chatbot, and then based on the response, I can proceed with the needed actions.

What is most valuable?

The best feature Kore.ai offers, in my experience, is the AI assistant, which allows me to query user details in any way so that it gets fed into the system effectively. The AI feature in Kore.ai stands out for me because it is particularly useful in a specific chatbot context; for simpler cases, querying and getting details is fine, but for complex tasks where a user feeds data into the system in any format, AI is very helpful in retrieving and inputting those details. Compared to other tools, Kore.ai provides a well-organized chatbot experience that others do not offer.

What needs improvement?

If Kore.ai can implement UI automations and similar features, it will be very helpful. I rated Kore.ai eight out of ten because of the potential for these additional improvements.

For how long have I used the solution?

In my current field, I have been working for around seven years.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using Kore.ai is that if you are looking for chatbot solutions that are easily configurable by drag and drop and you are ready with your business scenario, then you can easily use Kore.ai to configure your chatbot effortlessly. I rate this product an 8 out of 10.


    reviewer2842821

Building enterprise chat agents has reduced support effort but has highlighted platform issues

  • May 18, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Kore.ai is developing and deploying enterprise-grade AI agents and chatbots, which includes designing conversational flow, setting up intent testing, and evaluating LLMs that can integrate to automate customer interaction and streamline internal support workflows.

One specific example involved developing a demo virtual assistant designed to optimize internal support workflows and customer interaction testing. A key part of our workflow was evaluating how well different LLMs integrated with the platform and also rigorous intent testing implemented in that.

What is most valuable?

I think the best features about Kore.ai are how easy it is for a developer to use. For example, the drag-and-drop dialog builder is exceptional. Also, NLU and intent testing are also good.

When comparing it to other software, I think it is easy for a developer to build the agents, which helps significantly reduce time-to-market while keeping the architecture clean.

In terms of integration and flexibility, Kore.ai provides a significant advantage that makes it highly adaptable for complex enterprise environments. For example, API and back-end integration, authentication handling, and data mapping, etc. Also, multi-channel deployment flexibility is a feature as it is an omni-channel agent.

Kore.ai helps in operational efficiency and faster time-to-market, which is development velocity. Although it has had its cons, such as the platform being buggy and support not being that great.

What needs improvement?

One thing I have learned is the unpredictability of LLMs and how buggy Kore.ai is as a software. We had a lot of issues with Kore.ai, and now we are trying to shift to other software.

Kore.ai has many cons, especially in that the platform needs to focus on stability as it is buggy. It is hard to find mistakes, as it is difficult for debugging, and it also slows down during heavy training.

Better guides would help, as the manuals explain what buttons do, but they lack good examples. It would help to have simple step-by-step guides showing how to write custom code or fix errors. Additionally, it would be better to have good support since the platform has serious technical glitches, and the customer support takes too long to fix them. The first reply usually offers basic tips instead of quickly sending the problem to senior engineers. Furthermore, I think the platform is expensive and is geared towards massive corporations. I think it needs to have cheaper basic pricing options so smaller teams can test out quick ideas without spending too much money.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kore.ai for around one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Currently, I do not think Kore.ai is stable because previously it was.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Kore.ai has one of the best scalabilities in terms of handling massive growth in both user traffic and conversational complexity.

How are customer service and support?

I think the customer support needs to improve, as it is inadequate right now. They do not resolve issues quickly and they do not forward it to senior engineers. Rather, basic support is provided.

What other advice do I have?

I think there is a reduction in fallback rates. By fine-tuning hybrid NLU, the bot's ability to correctly understand user intent has increased significantly. I think it led to an approximate thirty to forty percent reduction in unhandled fallbacks.

I think people should focus on hybrid NLUs and not just use any large LLMs for everything. You can use a standard visual builder for important transactions to keep them accurate. Save the LLM features for unexpected questions or conversational fallbacks, and also prepare for the learning curve, as the platform is easy to learn for basic setups but hard for advanced coding.

My overall review rating for Kore.ai is six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


    Shubham Das

Chatbots have automated travel support and now save time and costs across customer journeys

  • May 04, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

I develop chatbots using Kore.ai.

I developed a travel assistant using Kore.ai that books tickets, cancels tickets, or modifies journeys.

I also integrate API data in Kore.ai so that it can fetch data from the API and display it directly to users.

What is most valuable?

The best features Kore.ai offers in my experience are that the user interface is very easy to use, the performance is excellent, and everything runs very smoothly.

When I say the interface of Kore.ai is easy to use, I mean the tools and everything are very useful and intuitive. When I mention performance, I mean the platform does not lag at all, and its response time is also good.

Kore.ai has impacted my organization positively because most companies are switching their IVR systems to chatbot systems, making Kore.ai a truly good platform for chatbot development.

The best feature of Kore.ai is that it is a cost-saving tool. For example, when we use IVR, we have to assign agents at the backend, but using Kore.ai, we can automate all of those functions.

What needs improvement?

Kore.ai could be improved by adding more features, such as call flow automation in addition to chatbots, which would also be helpful.

I rated Kore.ai an 8 out of 10 because additional features could be added to it.

The platform is excellent, and if more features can be added in the future, it will be truly great.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kore.ai for one and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kore.ai is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Kore.ai's scalability is good.

How are customer service and support?

Kore.ai's customer support is good.

I can rate the customer support of Kore.ai a 9 out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, most companies were using the IVR platform, but nowadays, they are switching to chatbot systems, which is why I switched.

Before choosing Kore.ai, I did not use any chatbot development system.

What was our ROI?

As of now, Kore.ai is working very well for the vendors and has also saved their time and money.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Kore.ai is that the price is low, and the licensing is also not costly.

What other advice do I have?

I advise others to use Kore.ai because it is a beginner-friendly platform. I rated this product an 8 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


    reviewer2835378

Automated document checks have reduced verification errors and save our agents many work hours

  • May 03, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

The main use case for Kore.ai was building a chatbot for one of our insurance clients who required a chatbot to allow agents to directly ask about documents uploaded for verification. The chatbot checks if documents exist at a particular link that contains the personal documents of clients and then sends the status back to users or agents. If the document is present, agents may request to read it and check if certain conditions are fulfilled in the document. This is essentially a document validation agent created using Kore.ai as the front end, coupled with Teams channels for the agents.

Kore.ai helped our team specifically in building the document validation chatbot by serving as the front end of the entire development. Using Kore.ai, we connected with the Teams channel and leveraged features such as API connections and API calls to easily retrieve the status of documents.

What is most valuable?

The best features Kore.ai offers include a very user-friendly interface, making it easy for agents who are not comfortable with technology to navigate it. This is the main aspect I would highlight.

The user interface of Kore.ai is so user-friendly because it is a no-code platform that provides drag-and-drop tools for building chatbots or agents without needing to write code. Kore.ai also offers excellent connectors with different services, and in our case, we built a microservice that was called directly from Kore.ai through API calls. Additionally, it offers popular application integrations such as SAP, ServiceNow, and Salesforce. These features have significantly improved the customer experience and made it scalable enough to manage millions of interactions, which suits large enterprises.

Kore.ai has positively impacted our organization by reducing error rates from around fifteen to twenty percent to just two to three percent after implementation. This significant reduction in errors means that fraud detection is not negatively impacted. It has also helped reduce the time agents spend on document validation, thereby increasing efficiency and accuracy. These are the main two metrics that have contributed to our success.

In terms of time saved, the accuracy has dramatically increased, with error rates decreasing from fifteen to twenty percent down to two to three percent. We have saved almost two hours of daily work per agent. With more than twenty agents working on this document validation task, we are saving a total of around forty hours per day.

What needs improvement?

To improve Kore.ai, I suggest focusing on more agentic automation, such as offering MCP kind of features with an orchestration layer for use cases. This would allow us to implement business logic in the orchestration layer. With the ability to build our own MCP servers and plug-and-play with the MCP client, we could have more scalable options for deploying multiple agents on one platform, enabling them to work simultaneously across different use cases.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kore.ai for around eight or more months in my previous company, where I worked on a proof of concept for that particular engagement.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kore.ai is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Kore.ai's scalability is good, and it is indeed scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for Kore.ai is really good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Kore.ai, we used InteliX, which was one of the vendor products we explored but switched to Kore.ai due to its superior connectors and more affordable licensing compared to InteliX. Additionally, the user experience in Kore.ai is much more user-friendly, unlike the complex user interface of InteliX.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been good. Although I was not directly involved in the pricing discussions, the setup costs and licensing were straightforward, and we received excellent support from the Kore.ai product team. Their training sessions were effective, and we also achieved certifications through mini-projects alongside the training, making the transition and onboarding process quite smooth.

What was our ROI?

We have seen a return on investment, particularly in full-time equivalent count saved.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate any other options besides InteliX, but we also tried Copilot. Unfortunately, Copilot did not deliver good accuracy during the proof of concept, and its licensing costs were higher than those of Kore.ai, which is why we ultimately chose Kore.ai.

What other advice do I have?

Kore.ai has impressive features, such as effective connectors and a very good user interface. It is a no-code platform where drag-and-drop functionality is sufficient to build logic without needing to write code. It is easy to deploy agents and much more scalable than other tools I have explored so far.

My advice for others considering Kore.ai is that it is really easy to use for beginners. People will quickly learn how to use it and deploy their own use cases. Kore.ai is a good product, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.


    reviewer2834352

Chatbot projects have saved implementation time but now need better stability and updated docs

  • April 29, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I have been using Kore.ai for several months for certification purposes.

My main use case for Kore.ai is a chatbot that I use for customers in the informatics area.

I do not use any other tasks or features in my chatbot beyond this primary use case.

What is most valuable?

The best features Kore.ai offers are that everything is centralized in an online platform and it is easy to use to build a production-ready chatbot.

The platform is easy to use because everything is very direct for implementation and all is on one page, which means it does not require extensive technical knowledge.

Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization. Although we did not use it for many use cases, we used it for one use case where I noticed significant improvements. It saved a lot of time in implementation. The proof of concept was very fast to implement and easy to develop.

What needs improvement?

I do not see any need for improvement in Kore.ai, as I found no challenges or missing features.

However, there could be more documentation in the latest versioning of the platform. I found that the previous documentation was outdated.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working in my current field for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, Kore.ai is not stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I do not know about Kore.ai's scalability and whether it has met my needs as my project grows or changes.

How are customer service and support?

I did not communicate with Kore.ai customer support, so I have no experience to share.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Kore.ai, I used Microsoft, and I did not switch to Kore.ai. However, we also tested Kore.ai because it offered many tools ready to test.

How was the initial setup?

I encountered some minor problems in the setup for the proof of concept, but nothing significant.

What about the implementation team?

My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment from using Kore.ai, as it saved time for the implementation project.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I did not get access to pricing, setup cost, and licensing information because my organization handled that for me in my previous work.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Kore.ai, we also tested Amazon AWS, but it was not very effective.

What other advice do I have?

I do not want to add anything else about the features, including integrations or analytics, as there is nothing else that stands out.

My advice to others looking into using Kore.ai is that they can try it because it can be the solution. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.


    reviewer2834304

Chatbots have reduced tax support calls and now need better documentation and agentic AI

  • April 29, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

Our main use case for Kore.ai is developing four chatbots which are used to serve customers relating to various tax products. We had different tax products in our organization, and our purpose was to provide customers with FAQ answers, obtain their bank details, retrieve their other product details, assist if they would like to order something, connect them to an agent, and answer any kind of query that they have regarding their products or anything tax-related.

One of the main chatbots I built for a co-system tax product allows users to come in and filter based on which product they are using. They can get information about their locators. If they have filed a tax and received some kind of rejection, they can get their information on that. We also had different kinds of forms which the user could fill and submit their information to the back-end team to act on it. Apart from that, they could also connect to a live agent to get any queries sorted which were not handled through the chat agent. We also had a case creation feature that creates a case at the back-end for someone in our team to look into.

How has it helped my organization?

Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by being a big money saver because before having our chatbot, the use case was that every time some of our customers needed help, they used to call a number. During tax season, the wait time on that number would go up to one or two hours, which cost our company a lot of money. Integrating these chatbots helped reduce that wait time significantly. Mostly, people can chat instead of calling, or they don't even need a person to solve their basic queries, which the chatbot can handle. It reduced the calls made to our agents by 50 to 60 percent. That was evident as our team, which started with three or four people for one bot, expanded to around five to six bots, and a lot of new people joined. We received a lot of extra funding to create agents for all the other products and teams we support.

What is most valuable?

Some of the best features in Kore.ai include that it is a low-code, no-code tool. I have seen a lot of low-code tools that don't give anyone any room to work with if they have a custom use case or something they don't support. Kore.ai is different in that way; even though it is a low-code platform, we can still write our code if we want and override whatever they are trying to do, in case it is ever needed. Apart from that, their Web SDK and BotKit support is very good, as they have all the functionalities, packages, and everything up to date and available for us to use. Also, they have a lot of in-built integrations for live agent connections. So if you want to connect with Salesforce, Genesys, Live Help Now, Telephony, or any of these kinds of back-end services, including ServiceNow, they just have an integration built-in, so you do not need to write it from scratch. But apart from that, they also give the ability to write it from scratch through a custom BotKit if you don't want to go with their features or if something is missing.

What needs improvement?

Regarding how Kore.ai can be improved, I think agentic AI is booming. Instead of us designing the whole conversation, which feels kind of boring and repetitive, they could move into a different kind of approach where we could write a prompt, and it should create a conversation based on that, in the way that Microsoft Copilot Studio does. So they should move a little more towards the agentic AI approach and start working on and integrating different prompts so we do not need to design conversations. Nowadays, people are used to talking with ChatGPT, which facilitates a human way of conversation, just back and forth. People are not used to seeing a lot of menu buttons, icons, or lists to select things from. Kore.ai does a little bit of that using the agentic nodes and other features they have added, but they should move further in that direction.

The documentation for Kore.ai often poses a challenge because many times when we had issues, we couldn't find anything in the documentation. We either needed to figure it out ourselves through trial and error, or we raised a support ticket. Some of the engineers came and told us that we could do something to solve our problem. It took them two minutes to tell us, but when we asked if there was documentation for this, they mentioned there wasn't. They just knew it because it is some kind of internal knowledge. So if they improve their documentation, it will be beneficial for everyone, as we will not have to raise tickets for any issues.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kore.ai for the last four and a half years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Kore.ai is pretty scalable because when we started, we just had one bot. However, as we expanded to multiple bots with different kinds of BotKits and Web SDKs, we didn't face any issues with scalability. We also have many lower-end bots, so scalability has never been a problem.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support is okay, I guess. We get what we want from them whenever there is an issue or something. But sometimes when we had issues, it was delayed a lot. We had to reach out to their support team, and while they tried to suggest solutions, they didn't always work. Eventually, after a few calls, they involved some engineers who could actually fix our issues. Sometimes it was bad, but I can say around 60 to 70 percent of the time, it was good. We got the support we needed.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I didn't have a previous solution because we have been on Kore.ai from the start.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment with Kore.ai, as it definitely has saved time. We previously only had a helpline where one agent could only attend to one customer at a time. But now, because it is chat, one agent can handle up to three or four chat sessions at the same time for different employees. That is certainly an improvement. Additionally, our chatbot solves a lot of users' problems on its own, meaning it doesn't even necessitate a live agent or person sometimes. This represents a direct time saving for agents to focus on more complex issues.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Kore.ai, I know they evaluated other options, but that happened before I joined the team, so I was not part of those conversations. I know they considered Google's solution, which I forgot the name of, and also Yellow.ai and Google Dialogflow, but ultimately they went with Kore.ai.

What other advice do I have?

One of the unique or unexpected things regarding our main use case for Kore.ai is that I have seen a lot of our teams just use the basic default template that they have. But because our company had a design system, we had to rewrite the whole Web SDK code and design it according to ourselves.

Apart from that, we also had to make a lot of changes in the back end to support a live agent because our live agent handles up to 20,000 to 30,000 users on a daily basis. We had to increase capacity and ensure everything was worthwhile so it did not fail while users are currently there, especially during the tax season.

My basic advice for others considering Kore.ai is that they are adding a lot of new features. They have integrated agentic nodes, switched to the XO 11 platform, and introduced GenAI features. It is beneficial to look into these developments and keep up with whatever is happening. Don't get stuck in old ways of making bots. They are introducing a lot of new features; some are good, some are not, but eventually, everyone should try those features and move towards the new agentic platform. I would rate this solution a 7 out of 10.


    Computer Software

Easy to Learn and Set Up, Modular Platform for Automation and Support

  • April 28, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Easy to learn, setup, and manageable modular structured platform for automation and support
What do you dislike about the product?
Minor issues and inconsistencies across docs and platoform
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
All in one AI Powered automation, Live Knowledge base and contact center platform.


    Yashwanth K.

A Great First Platform for Learning and Building Chatbots

  • April 28, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
This is the first platform I’ve ever used to learn, try things out, and build chatbots. Because of that, I genuinely liked everything about it.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I don’t like about Kore.AI is the agent node performance during chat conversations. At times, the agent node stops working, and we have to log out and log back in, and also refresh the page, to get it working again.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
So far, I’ve learned about automation AI, contact center AI, and a little bit about search AI. I find all of these areas quite useful for many real-time applications that people use in day-to-day life.


    Vincent Miraflor

Automation has simplified handling incoming emails and is saving significant time daily

  • April 28, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

I have been using Kore.ai for two years. My main use case for Kore.ai is to automate incoming emails.

What is most valuable?

The best features Kore.ai offers include an easy interface, which was facilitated by the effective training that I received. Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by simplifying the process of responding to emails and streamlining the workflow, saving me considerable time.

What needs improvement?

Kore.ai works fine and does not need any improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working in my current field for six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kore.ai is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Kore.ai is good.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for Kore.ai is good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before choosing Kore.ai, I evaluated other options.

What was our ROI?

I have definitely seen a return on investment because I saved time.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that everything was easy and straightforward.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using Kore.ai is that it is a good system. I would rate this review 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?