Webex Suite Named User

My main use case for Webex is for conference calls, workshops, and team meetings.

I use Webex for communication and collaboration at work, valuing the ability to discuss technical topics directly with the people involved, especially when an email exchange would take too long or leave room for misunderstanding, making it fast and efficient.

Webex helps me resolve questions with colleagues more efficiently, particularly when a technical issue is difficult to explain by email, as I can share the relevant application, walk through the settings, and discuss the next steps while everyone follows the same view, reducing misunderstandings and repeated explanations. It also makes remote collaboration more practical because I can work through an issue with someone without needing to be in the same location.

The clearest practical benefit I have noticed since using Webex is less back and forth during technical discussions, with screen sharing allowing me to show the issue and clarify questions in the same session rather than exchanging several emails or arranging another meeting.

The best features Webex offers for me are screen sharing, meeting chat, and the audio and video controls, with screen sharing being particularly useful for technical discussions as I can show the exact issue or walk through a configuration instead of trying to explain everything verbally, complemented by meeting chat that provides a place to share links and clarify technical terms without interrupting the speaker. I appreciate the ability to select and check my microphone, speakers, and camera before joining, as well as giving control to someone who wants to explain something or provide support.

The feature I find myself using the most is screen sharing and control giving, especially during technical discussions, as it allows me to show the relevant application, walk through settings, and let everyone follow the same steps, making it easier to pinpoint an issue and clarify what needs to change with less back and forth than explaining everything verbally. Other solutions have screens that obstruct explanation, but Webex does not have that problem.

I appreciate being able to share a specific application rather than my entire desktop, as it helps me keep the discussion focused and avoid exposing unrelated or sensitive information. Combined with meeting chat for links and technical details, this makes screen sharing particularly useful for troubleshooting and demonstrations.

I would appreciate clearer controls for switching between shared applications during a presentation, with a more prominent indication of exactly what participants can see. I would also appreciate having microphone, speaker, and connection diagnostics in one easily accessible place, as those improvements would make it easier to manage technical discussions and troubleshoot meeting issues without interrupting the conversation.

For mobile use, I would prioritize an easy way to follow shared technical content on a smaller screen, particularly text and configuration details. For integrations, calendar scheduling and joining meetings with minimal steps matter most to me.

I have been using Webex for six months.

I rate Webex a 10 out of 10.

I chose this rating because Webex meets my needs for everyday collaboration, discussing technical issues, sharing the relevant application, and clarifying details in the same meeting, with screen sharing being the biggest reason for my rating as it helps me explain issues clearly and agree on next steps. This rating reflects its value for my needs, even though there are usability improvements I would welcome.

Regarding Webex's AI capabilities, I believe governance and security priorities should include controlling who can enable AI features, what meeting content they process, and who can access the resulting summaries or transcripts, along with wanting clear information about retention and whether content is used for model training.

For Webex's AI capabilities, I check the accuracy and reliability of meeting summaries to ensure they capture decisions, action owners, and deadlines correctly, especially when the discussion includes technical terminology. I would review those details before sharing a summary or relying on its record of agreed actions.

I would advise others looking into using Webex to test it with the types of meetings they actually run, particularly for technical collaboration, checking how clearly participants can read shared applications. Testing guest access, audio devices, and calendar integration early is important to evaluate.

My main use case for Webex is online meeting and collaboration. I use Webex for daily technical meetings with colleagues to discuss ongoing projects, troubleshoot issues, and share updates. For example, when troubleshooting an OpenShift issue, I share my screen to review logs and command outputs, collaborate with the team to identify the root cause, and agree on the next steps.

I also use Webex to share technical knowledge, discuss best practices, and coordinate troubleshooting activities and follow up on action items.

Webex has helped our team collaborate more effectively by making it easier to discuss technical issues, share information in real time, and resolve problems faster. Screen sharing is especially useful, as everyone can review logs and configuration together without lengthy back and forth communication. It also saves time by reducing unnecessary meetings and delays, improves coordination between team members, and helps us make decisions faster, leading to smoother project execution and better outcomes.

Webex has improved teamwork by making communication and collaboration quicker and more efficient. We use it to discuss technical challenges, share screens during troubleshooting, and exchange knowledge in real time. This reduces delays, minimizes unnecessary email exchange, and helps us resolve issues faster.

The best features of Webex are high-quality video and audio, screen sharing, chat, and easy collaboration during meetings. Out of those features, I find myself relying on screen sharing the most because it allows me to walk colleagues through a technical issue in real-time, review logs and configuration together, and collaborate on troubleshooting OpenShift clusters problems more efficiently. It makes complex technical discussions easier to understand and helps the team identify a solution faster.

Webex could be improved by making the application faster and more reliable, especially during screen sharing and large meetings. Better audio and video quality on unstable internet connection, improved noise cancellation, and easier navigation would enhance the user experience.

It would also be helpful to improve search functionality for past meeting recordings, chat messages, and shared files, so that important technical information could be found quickly. Better integration with project management and incident tracking tools would help us follow up on troubleshooting tasks more efficiently.

Webex's AI capabilities are useful for generating meeting summaries, transcribing discussions, and identifying action items, but accuracy and reliability are essential. AI-generated notes can save time, although they may occasionally miss technical details, misunderstand terminology, or summarize discussions incorrectly. I would like to see improved accuracy in technical conversations, better recognition of specialized terminology, and clear ways to review and correct AI-generated content. Human verification is still important before relying on AI outputs for critical decisions.

I have been using Webex for four years.

I give Webex a rating of eight out of ten because it offers reliable video meetings, convenient screen sharing, and effective collaboration tools that help our team communicate and troubleshoot technical issues efficiently. It saves time and improves teamwork. However, there is still room for improvement in application performance, search functionality, integration with other tools, and AI-powered meeting summaries and action item tracking.

Governance and security are very important when it comes to Webex's AI capabilities. Organizations need to ensure that meetings, recordings, transcripts, and shared information are protected with clear data policies, privacy, access control, and transparency about how AI uses data.

We currently use Webex as a public cloud software-as-a-service solution. We use Cisco Webex on cloud infrastructure managed by Cisco rather than deploying Webex directly on AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. I recommend Webex to organizations looking for a reliable platform for online meetings, screen sharing, and team collaboration.

My main use case for Webex is enterprise collaboration and communication across distributed teams, where I use it for instant messaging, voice and video meetings, screen sharing, and coordination between technical and business teams. The scenario where I find it most valuable is during cross-functional projects involving participants from different locations. Being able to quickly move from a chat conversation to a voice or video meeting helps accelerate decision-making and resolve issues faster. Screen sharing and file collaboration are particularly useful during technical workshops, troubleshooting sessions, and project planning meetings.

One aspect that is particularly important in our workflow regarding my main use case for Webex is supporting collaboration between technical teams, project stakeholders, and external partners who may be working from different locations. Webex provides a single platform for messaging, meetings, and content sharing which helps keep discussions organized and accessible.

Webex has had a positive impact on our organization by improving communication, collaboration, and responsiveness across teams. Since messaging, meetings, calling, and file sharing are integrated in a single platform, employees can connect and work together more efficiently without relying on multiple disconnected tools. One noticeable outcome has been faster decision-making. A team can quickly move from a chat discussion to a live meeting, share screens, review information, and reach conclusions in real time. This has helped reduce delay and improve overall productivity.

While we do not formally track collaboration metrics tied specifically to Webex, we have observed noticeable improvements in responsiveness and decision-making. For example, issues that previously required several email exchanges can often be resolved through a quick chat followed by an ad hoc Webex meeting with the relevant stakeholders.

In my opinion, the best feature for Webex is the ability to bring messaging, calling, meeting, and file sharing together in a single platform, creating a seamless collaboration experience and reducing the need to switch between multiple applications throughout the day.

Having messaging, meetings, calling, and file sharing in a single platform has significantly improved efficiency for both me and my team. Instead of switching between multiple applications, we can manage most of our communication and collaboration from one place, which saves time and reduces context switching. For example, a technical discussion often starts in a team chat, then quickly moves to a voice or video call if deeper collaboration is needed.

One thing that stands out compared to other collaboration tools I have used is how naturally Webex combines communication and collaboration workflows. Rather than treating chat, meeting, calling, and content sharing as separate experiences, everything feels integrated and consistent.

From my perspective, Webex takes a strong approach to AI governance and security, which is particularly important in enterprise environments where sensitive and business information is discussed and shared.

Based on my experience, Webex AI capabilities have generally been accurate and reliable, particularly for meeting summaries, transcription, and capturing key discussion points. The AI does a good job of identifying the main topics, decisions, and action items from meetings, which helps reduce manual note-taking and improves follow-up efficiency.

Overall, my experience with Webex has been very positive, but there are always opportunities for improvement. One area that could be enhanced is the user experience for new users. While Webex offers many powerful collaboration features, some settings and capabilities can take time to discover and fully utilize. Making advanced features easier to find and configure would help accelerate adoption. I would also appreciate seeing continued improvement to search and information discovery across messages, files, and meeting content, especially for large teams that generate a significant amount of collaboration data.

From a mobile perspective, the experience is generally good, but there are times when accessing advanced meeting controls and messaging collaboration space can feel easier on the desktop application. Continued enhancement to the mobile experience would be valuable for users who frequently work while traveling or away from their desk.

I did not give a rating of ten because there is still room for improvement in areas such as advanced search, integration with other business tools, mobile usability, and AI-powered productivity features.

Our organization uses Webex for daily messaging, team collaboration, voice calls, video meetings, and file sharing since 2017.

In my experience, Webex has been a stable and reliable platform for day-to-day business communication and collaboration.

In my experience, Webex scales very well and is well-suited for organizations of different sizes, from small teams to large enterprises with thousands of users.

Customer support has generally been a positive experience.

We have not conducted a formal ROI study specifically for Webex, so I cannot provide exact figures.

My experience with Webex pricing, setup, and licensing has generally been positive. Since Webex is offered as a cloud-based service, deployment and onboarding were relatively straightforward compared to solutions that require significant on-premises infrastructure.

Before standardizing on Webex, we considered other enterprise collaboration platforms, particularly Microsoft Teams and Zoom, as they are widely used for messaging, meetings, and remote collaboration.

I would rate Webex a nine out of ten overall, as it provides a reliable, secure, and feature-rich collaboration platform that successfully brings messaging, meeting, calling, and content sharing into a single experience.

Webex is deployed in our organization as a public cloud solution, allowing users to access messaging, meeting, calling, and collaboration services through the Cisco cloud platform without the need to manage the underlying infrastructure ourselves.

We use Webex public cloud service.

My advice to organizations considering Webex is to look beyond meetings and evaluate the entire collaboration ecosystem. The real value of Webex comes from combining messaging, calling, meetings, file sharing, and collaboration spaces into a single platform rather than using separate tools for each function.

Webex is primarily used for customer meetings, collaboration with team members, presenting to customers, and virtual calls with customers. In my daily work, I get on the meeting and take the discussion forward using Webex.

Webex offers exceptional sound and video qualities, which I find to be the best. The second standout feature is background noise cancellation, which effectively filters out background noise when someone is speaking. The third feature is the AI-powered intelligence that notes down minutes of the meeting, allowing us to concentrate on the content rather than jotting down points.

I find the seamless way of connecting with people in Webex useful; it allows for an effortless meeting experience. Additionally, real-time translation is another important feature of Webex that helps break language barriers.

Webex has definitely improved productivity and communication within my organization. Communication has increased because we are just one Webex call away for any doubts related to creating a PowerPoint presentation or an architectural diagram, and we can focus on the meeting without worrying about jotting down points since someone is taking notes on our behalf. My team regularly uses this feature, and I would say it saves us about half an hour per meeting, with the AI-powered intelligence saving that 30 minutes easily.

Webex is top-notch at this point in time. The only improvement I see is related to RAM and CPU usage, as older systems with 4GB RAM or i3 processors might slow down the application. I do not have any challenges in terms of performance, but making the application a little lightweight would help.

I have been working in my current field for nine years.

Webex is very stable in my experience; I have not faced any downtime issues.

Webex can handle any organization's growth and increased users. It is not per device but per user, making it easy to add users.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is great; the pricing model is very transparent with a per user, per year license.

Time is the biggest asset, and I have saved a huge amount of time instead of waiting, which significantly contributes to my overall time savings.

My advice for others looking into using Webex is to go for it; there are absolutely no two ways about it. Webex is one of the best collaboration solutions available in the market. I give this product a rating of 9.

We typically use Webex for meetings to train in web development, business analytics, and cybersecurity, as the training platform was hosted on Webex and we used it for video calls as well.

Our first call on Webex ensured all of us met together and knew the people who succeeded in joining the cohort. The next one was a gathering, so we used Webex to call and connected individually with the trainers, who trained each of us using Webex.

Since it was an IBM meeting, I believe IBM uses Webex as their go-to for such meetings, and it helps our meetings run seamlessly.

Webex is more similar to Zoom, but I feel it has some extra features, offering a good user experience for those who use Slack.

Overall, it was good, especially for calls, with connection quality being very acceptable, and it has features that enabled us to communicate effectively, giving it a Microsoft Teams vibe. I can always recommend Webex to companies looking for a better alternative to Google Teams, especially since it probably does not consume as much data as Microsoft Teams.

Webex works well with Cisco, and Cisco devices work seamlessly with Webex.

Webex can be simplified in terms of user interface, where many features should be displayed in a compact view, with similar features grouped together and a minimalistic design helping users understand what each button does.

If specific features are not needed, they should not distract you, and some features should appear as sliding elements for ease of access.

Additionally, connecting to Webex can be technical, and it would be beneficial to have a way to connect anonymously using a simple code instead of going through microphone issues.

I have been studying web services since 2019.

I hope Webex can handle scalability well, but during our call, we were not yet up to 20 people, and I cannot say for certain. However, I believe Webex should be performing fine scalability-wise since when we called, we should have been more than 20 in the call together.

My advice to others looking into using Webex is to go ahead, as it fits organizations that work with a set of teams. I gave this review a rating of 7 out of 10.

Webex is primarily used for conducting video meetings. We use Webex for conducting all kinds of meetings, including stand-up meetings, project discussions, and incident ticket discussions. For these activities, we schedule meetings through Webex and group together to discuss matters.

Since we are a production support team, we meet frequently in our hybrid work environment. Whenever we have incidents or production issues, we use Webex to set up ad hoc meetings.

The best features are the ability to schedule meetings and launch ad hoc meetings. Additionally, we can create breakout rooms within the meeting itself, which is another excellent feature.

Whenever we have production issues, many teams join a single Webex call. Sometimes we need to group together as separate smaller groups and work in parallel to identify the production issues. In those cases, we create Webex breakout rooms and each member joins the corresponding breakout session to progress on their task.

Webex helps significantly in the hybrid environment. When we are working from home, it is very easy for us to meet with other team members and the management to get in touch and progress.

Webex improves communication because even if we are working from home, we can connect with people and talk to them on a video call. It has improved the incident resolution time by getting into a call in Webex rooms and remediating the issues together as soon as possible.

Audio and video quality is excellent for Webex.

It has saved considerable time in terms of incident remediation. Whenever we have issues, we jump on a call and work together in parallel. This approach saves time and improves efficiency.

Webex can be improved in terms of better user experience. Sometimes I experience glitches that can be fixed.

One of the pain points with the interface is that sometimes it gets stuck when launching or starting a room. Even if I click to start a room, it will get stuck for a while.

Webex is generally stable, but there are still areas of improvement in terms of starting or launching Webex rooms. Occasionally, glitches have been experienced.

I have been using Webex for the last three years.

I never talk to the customer directly. Regarding customer support, we have an internal team and sometimes they escalate the issues to Webex customer care.

We previously used Microsoft Teams and switched to Webex because it is the enterprise standard in this organization.

We checked with Microsoft Teams as well, but we decided to go with Webex because this is the enterprise standard in our organization.

Webex is one of the great tools in the industry for video calling capabilities. However, there are still areas of improvement. Webex is one of the best tools in the market for video calling capabilities, plus it also supports chat support. I would rate this product a seven out of ten.

I am working with about three of these products at the moment.

I am primarily a user of Webex.

Webex is a fine, perfectly adequate product, and I don't see any room for improvement.

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which makes it very restrictive.

I would rate Webex as a tool seven out of ten due to their licensing model and pricing; it's the licensing model that lets it down, but it's a great product.

Webex is a fine, perfectly adequate product, and I don't see any room for improvement.

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which makes it very restrictive.

They should probably reconsider the licensing model to be less restrictive and more adaptable for organizational use.

I have been using the solution for 10 years.

I don't face any issues with Webex; it's a fine, perfectly adequate product.

We worked with a third-party integrator who was responsible for the technical support. The support was fine, but it was not a product of Webex per se; it was a product of the third-party we were working with.

We worked with a third-party integrator who was responsible for the technical support.

It has been purchased through a third-party integrator.

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which makes it very restrictive.

I have not utilized its AI features.

I haven't really integrated Webex with anything in terms of third-party applications.

Based on my experience, I would recommend Webex to others; it's a good solution.

I am generally satisfied.

I rate Webex seven out of ten.

For personal purposes, we use Webex for communication and collaboration at the bank side, which is the main tool. With the merge with Credit Agricole, we also use Microsoft Teams, depending on which entity of Credit Agricole we are meeting with.

For Webex, we use it for phone calls, meetings, and chat between everybody.

Webex is integrated with our calendar, specifically with Microsoft Outlook, without any problems. In Outlook, I can schedule a Webex meeting, and in Webex, I can also schedule a meeting in my agenda.

Over the years, the all-in-one capability has been the most valuable feature of Webex. We have calling tools, chat tools, and meeting tools all in one tool now. Before, we used Jabber for chat, and another tool for communication, so we always needed to switch between both. Now everything is in the same tool making it very easy to use for all communication purposes.

The most beneficial feature of Webex for my virtual meetings is the screen sharing feature. We use it a lot for sharing screens between the teams during meetings and also with the meeting rooms where Webex is incorporated in the system, making it very useful to share screens.

I would appreciate improvements in communication stability and performance. Sometimes we experience a poor communication stream, but I am uncertain whether it is due to the internet link or something else. The video and voice quality can be poor, though this does not happen constantly; it depends on certain individuals.

I have been working with Webex for seven or eight years.

I did not participate in the initial setup of Webex at all.

Webex is very scalable now with the cloud version. Setting it up with other companies, branches, or countries is just a small setup, as I have heard from the administrator. We request it, and some days later, it is in place, so chatting between companies seems to be easy.

Webex supports our daily communication and collaboration needs, but not extensively, as all support is via our service center. I believe we have a support contract with Proximus, but it is directly our service center and service desk that are in contact with the official support team.

I cannot rate the support team because I never use it. For the Webex part, I have never had an incident or issue, so it is not relevant to score this since I have never contacted the support for Webex.

Before Webex, we used Jabber, which was the old solution. Prior to that, we did not have a tool similar to this; we just used a standard phone without chat functionality.

We switched from Jabber to Webex to have an integrated tool that encompasses calling, messaging, meetings, and screen sharing.

I did not participate in the initial setup of Webex at all.

Webex was not my only option; at the beginning, both options were available. However, our meeting rooms were already installed with the Cisco solution, so the main tool provided by Cisco was Webex. Initially, they checked the compatibility with our Cisco system and Microsoft Teams, and it was not 100% compatible, which is why they chose Webex instead of Microsoft Teams.

I don't have any experience with other remote solutions at this moment because we still use Citrix as our remote solution. When I look for other solutions, it is to challenge Citrix. We merged with the Industrial of Credit Agricole groups a few months ago, and the goal is to remain with Citrix until a decision post-merge is made with Credit Agricole.

I work with Citrix Provisioning Server, Citrix XenApp, and Citrix XenDesktop, which are the principal parts of Citrix. We don't use Citrix XenServer because our Citrix infrastructure is based on VMware.

I work with VMware, specifically the standard web application for the web admin interface. Our data center is outsourced by Proximus, who manages the whole VMware infrastructure for us.

I have no knowledge about Webex security features and how they meet our company's compliance requirements because this is not part of my job. I am uncertain whether artificial intelligence is integrated into Webex. There was a project related to this, but I don't know the technology involved.

I haven't seen any evident positive impacts or benefits from using Webex. For us, it's mainly a tool for direct chat, which allows us to save time when chatting between colleagues. Before, we used to send emails and wait, but now the chat function enables us to directly schedule meetings or calls, making it easier to exchange information.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Webex a 7 out of 10.

I am in a hospital setting where Webex is used for telemedicine.

The number one reason we chose Webex was the security features. It was the main reason why we chose Webex over other solutions. We do have other solutions as well, but for telemedicine, we decided that the best solution was Webex.

Usability needs improvement. Webex is more complex compared to Zoom. Zoom has a big advantage in simplicity, especially for the other side to connect to a session.

I have more than three years of experience with Webex.

We did not experience any significant deployment issues. Setting up a simple deployment was very simple and easy, but performing advanced features like setting up lines and connecting our IP telephony was complex.

Webex is very stable. I would rate its stability as ten. We haven’t had any issues with it at all.

Webex is very scalable, and I do not think that our organization has ever reached its limit.

We had a very small use case for technical support, and it was okay. I would rate their technical support as seven.

We use Zoom as well. The major advantage that Zoom has over Webex is its simplicity.

The initial setup depends on the feature. For a simple deployment, it was very simple and easy. However, performing advanced setups was complex.

We used an integrator for the implementation.

There is nothing we can specifically label as ROI, but we chose Webex for its security. We also purchased Webex communication devices like a television with everything inside, which users love.

Webex is expensive. If it weren't that expensive, we would probably use it for all our telecommunication needs, not just for telemedicine.

I would definitely recommend Webex to others in our industry. Overall, I would rate it around seven to eight.

The vendor who supports me uses Webex for technical support. They set up Webex, and we are able to connect with each other. Some people use Webex to do sales pitch presentations for various solutions. They send me a Webex link, and I can join and have our conversation.

Webex is a collaboration tool that helps you with remote support and collaboration.

The solution's initial setup process is lengthy. The tool takes a bit of time to download. When you are at the tail end of starting up a meeting, installing Webex will delay you.

The solution's stability is great during meetings unless there are network fluctuations, in which case you start having the usual problems.

The solution needs to make the installer packages lighter. This would reduce the turnaround time to download, which would speed up the installation.

The solution's video conferencing quality is great, and I rate it a seven out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.