Listing Thumbnail

    Laravel 11 deploy solution by aMiSTACX w/ A51 Monitoring

     Info
    Sold by: aMiSTACX 
    Deployed on AWS
    AWS Free Tier
    This product has charges associated with it for deployment support, and the aMiSTACX A51 Monitoring and Control dashboard. Laravel 11.x packaging and deployment via aMiSTACX G6 Flexibility! This stack brings you simplistic configuration while increasing performance. Performance features such as Apache or NGINX, PHP 8.3, MySQL 8, Redis, HTTP2, phpMyAdmin, and more.
    4.3

    Overview

    Play video

    This is a repackaged open source software product wherein additional charges apply for supported deployment, and the aMiSTACX A51 Monitoring & Control Dashboard.

    Laravel 11.x packaging and deployment via aMiSTACX G6 Flexibility! This stack brings you simplistic deployment and configuration while increasing performance. Performance features such as Apache or NGINX, PHP 8.3 or PHP 8.2, MySQL 8, Redis, HTTP2, phpMyAdmin, and more. Deployment time in about 5 minutes, and ready to go.

    G6F stack: Laravel 11.x, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Apache 2.4.68, NGINX 1.26.1, MySQL 8, PHP 8.3.x, Redis 7.2.x, phpMyAdmin 5.1.3, Composer 2.5.7, FPM, Opcache enabled, Postfix installed, and Cloudflare aware.

    Note: Laravel installed with composer.

    Extras: Redis, aMiSTACX A51 Dashboards, CloudWatch Advanced Metrics via A51

    Did you review the video? Ask questions BEFORE you deploy.

    Highlights

    • Laravel 11
    • A51 Monitoring and Control Dashboard for AWS
    • aMiSTACX G6F Performance & Flexibility

    Details

    Sold by

    Delivery method

    Delivery option
    64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

    Latest version

    Operating system
    Ubuntu 22.04 LTS

    Deployed on AWS
    New

    Introducing multi-product solutions

    You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.

    Multi-product solutions

    Features and programs

    Buyer guide

    Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
    Buyer guide

    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    Pricing

    Laravel 11 deploy solution by aMiSTACX w/ A51 Monitoring

     Info
    Pricing is based on actual usage, with charges varying according to how much you consume. Subscriptions have no end date and may be canceled any time.
    Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator  to estimate your infrastructure costs.
    If you are an AWS Free Tier customer with a free plan, you are eligible to subscribe to this offer. You can use free credits to cover the cost of eligible AWS infrastructure. See AWS Free Tier  for more details. If you created an AWS account before July 15th, 2025, and qualify for the Legacy AWS Free Tier, Amazon EC2 charges for Micro instances are free for up to 750 hours per month. See Legacy AWS Free Tier  for more details.

    Usage costs (27)

     Info
    Dimension
    Cost/hour
    t3.small
    Recommended
    $0.038
    t3.micro
    $0.038
    c5.large
    $0.049
    c5.xlarge
    $0.049
    c5.2xlarge
    $0.057
    t3a.small
    $0.038
    c5.4xlarge
    $0.057
    m5.large
    $0.049
    m5.8xlarge
    $0.066
    m5.4xlarge
    $0.057

    Vendor refund policy

    No refunds. Please contact support BEFORE deployment for any issues, questions, or feedback! Stop subscription at any time.

    How can we make this page better?

    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.
    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.

    Legal

    Vendor terms and conditions

    Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .

    Content disclaimer

    Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.

    Usage information

     Info

    Delivery details

    64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

    Amazon Machine Image (AMI)

    An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.

    Additional details

    Usage instructions

    Important - Please review the aMiSTACX full admin HTML/PDF guide for your stack.

    It can be found here:

    https://your_IP_address:8080/laravel_11_amistacx_g6f_guide_v2.2/help.pdf

    Database Access:

    https://Your_AWS_IP_Address:8080/phpmyadmin/

    SSH User: ubuntu

    Support

    Vendor support

    Laravel 10 deployment supported via email, chat, and bot.

    AWS infrastructure support

    AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

    Product comparison

     Info
    Updated weekly

    Accolades

     Info
    Top
    25
    In Databases

    Customer reviews

     Info
    Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
    Reviews
    Functionality
    Ease of use
    Customer service
    Cost effectiveness
    0 reviews
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Positive reviews
    Mixed reviews
    Negative reviews

    Overview

     Info
    AI generated from product descriptions
    Web Server Configuration
    Apache 2.4.68 or NGINX 1.26.1 with HTTP2 support
    Runtime Environment
    PHP 8.3.x or PHP 8.2 with Opcache enabled and FPM
    Database and Caching
    MySQL 8 and Redis 7.2.x for data persistence and in-memory caching
    Monitoring and Observability
    A51 Monitoring and Control Dashboard with CloudWatch Advanced Metrics integration
    Pre-configured Stack Components
    Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Composer 2.5.7, phpMyAdmin 5.1.3, Postfix, and Cloudflare compatibility
    Pre-configured Web Stack Components
    Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP pre-configured and integrated for immediate deployment
    Operating System Version
    Ubuntu 20.04 LTS with long-term support and regular security updates
    Performance Optimization
    Tailored configurations designed to enhance speed and efficiency for web applications
    Scalability Architecture
    Support for flexible scaling across AWS EC2 instance types to handle varying workloads from small projects to enterprise applications
    Security Update Mechanism
    Regular automatic security updates and security features included for web application protection
    Web Server Technology
    Apache Webserver included as the HTTP server component
    Server-Side Programming Language
    PHP for server-side scripting and web application development
    Security Patching
    Automated security patch application through patchawscloud service
    Production Optimization
    Hardened configuration and performance tuning for production-grade deployment

    Contract

     Info
    Standard contract
    No
    No

    Customer reviews

    Ratings and reviews

     Info
    4.3
    20 ratings
    5 star
    4 star
    3 star
    2 star
    1 star
    35%
    65%
    0%
    0%
    0%
    10 AWS reviews
    |
    10 external reviews
    External reviews are from PeerSpot .
    Navid Bakhtiary

    Structured workflows have boosted API development and have supported creative microservices

    Reviewed on Jun 23, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Laravel PHP Framework  is to manage backend systems and prepare APIs.

    I typically use Laravel PHP Framework  to manage backend systems and prepare APIs by providing microservices and also using it for machine learning purposes.

    I have additional uses for Laravel PHP Framework, including integration with AI agents and connecting with FastAPI to have Python capabilities for machine learning.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Laravel PHP Framework has positively impacted my organization by being really helpful for productivity and creativity. It helps to manage different kinds of APIs and services, and it has a simple workflow and structure that is understandable, which helps to develop projects quicker and more understandably.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Laravel PHP Framework offers are simplicity and providing different kinds of packages that can help me to develop my project.

    When I mention simplicity and the variety of packages, those features help me day-to-day by making my work more accurate, and for some projects, I don't have to repeat myself by using packages or developing packages for my own projects.

    I would like to add that the documentation and community support for Laravel PHP Framework is really good and helpful, and the number of features added in each release is also really good and a great help for future projects.

    What needs improvement?

    All programming languages and frameworks have challenges, and the main challenge in Laravel PHP Framework nowadays is some of the packages that are needed, especially about AI agents. I think it has good packages, but it is not enough, and sometimes I have to develop my own solutions.

    Regarding needed improvements, I find integration is good, documentation is good, and performance is improving, but I still depend on other languages or frameworks like Python for machine learning and high-performance computations. However, for a tool that connects you with other services, Laravel PHP Framework is really good.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Laravel PHP Framework for almost five years.

    What other advice do I have?

    One of the main outcomes I notice is the testing feature. I can develop tests for my projects, and it is really scalable, which makes the features more clear. I rate Laravel PHP Framework an eight out of ten because there is no perfect ten.

    Serhii Dychko

    Unified framework has accelerated API delivery and simplified full‑stack team collaboration

    Reviewed on Jun 23, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    I use Laravel PHP Framework  most often for API development, and we build APIs for mobile applications. I also have experience with building full-stack applications powered by Laravel PHP Framework  combined with front-end frameworks such as Vue.js or React.js with Inertia as middleware for connecting the client and server.

    I use Laravel PHP Framework as a modern full-stack solution because it provides freedom in choosing how to solve different cases. Laravel PHP Framework offers solutions for schedulers and asynchronous job processing. It provides the ability to build modern APIs, whether REST API or GraphQL, and it has built-in solutions for various purposes, including building different MCP tools and AI agents.

    What is most valuable?

    I appreciate Laravel PHP Framework for its all-in-one solution because you do not need any additional technology. You can build everything using only Laravel PHP Framework, and this is truly useful because all team members can understand the full project in just one repository. If there are multiple repositories, it remains easy to support because Laravel PHP Framework describes the rules for how your application should be built, providing a structure that helps developers understand how different applications work, allowing Laravel developers to grasp almost all PHP projects quickly.

    Having everything in one place with a defined structure definitely helps my team in practice. When all team members are PHP developers, they can easily collaborate using Laravel PHP Framework due to its clean structure and smooth onboarding.

    The features of Laravel PHP Framework that were mentioned are truly helpful and are open by default. Eloquent is the best solution I have for interacting with databases, and one feature I appreciate is that Laravel PHP Framework has built-in solutions, so you do not need to search elsewhere, as it provides its own ORM, which is Eloquent.

    I truly appreciate Laravel PHP Framework's event-driven architecture because it provides the ability to build applications in an event-driven way, allowing you to dispatch events in your application while different parts can subscribe to these events and handle them synchronously or asynchronously, resulting in a predictable code structure. Before Laravel PHP Framework, we used some custom PHP solutions, but when we switched to Laravel, our development speed increased because Laravel provides one single structure that all team members must follow, so you do not waste time understanding code written by another developer as everything is in one system.

    I have noticed easier onboarding for new team members since we started using Laravel PHP Framework, and we see that we deliver features faster during our two-week sprints with fewer bugs.

    I appreciate the Laravel PHP Framework core team and its ecosystem because they consistently provide useful features that the community needs. I think it would be great to have a built-in static analyzer tool similar to Psalm or PHPStan to predict type mistakes specifically for Laravel PHP Framework.

    I truly appreciate Laravel PHP Framework's documentation because it is clear and easy to understand for onboarding new developers, so I cannot suggest additional improvements.

    What needs improvement?

    Laravel PHP Framework has different Composer dependencies, and there are many tools to analyze these dependencies for security problems. As far as I know, the latest Laravel does not have security issues. I do not encounter problems with its AI capabilities since security is ultimately the developer's responsibility when using an AI agent.

    I cannot discuss these goals in detail because Laravel PHP Framework is essentially a wrapper using different AI agents, and it can validate some output, but most capabilities rely on the AI agent tool side.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    Laravel PHP Framework is my main technology, and I use it all the time I work as a software engineer, which spans approximately five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Laravel PHP Framework is stable and has different solutions for logging and monitoring, providing excellent analytics to understand application performance and stability. Any issues that arise are generally due to developer bugs rather than framework instability.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We have some projects deployed with Laravel Cloud, which is part of the Laravel ecosystem, but most of our projects are deployed via public cloud, some using private cloud, and we utilize Kubernetes  for deployment, although I may not know all the specifics.

    Regarding Laravel Cloud, it provides all you need for deploying Laravel applications, including an easy setup of queues and schedulers, and connections for databases and Redis , which are all set up by default. The deployment process can be done with just a push to GitHub  or GitLab , and it can autoscale parts of your application when needed, saving money by putting your application to sleep when not in use.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before choosing Laravel PHP Framework, I used Node.js with NestJS and also have experience with Go, but when I switched jobs and my current company uses Laravel, I switched because I did not need to continue using my previous technologies.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Regarding pricing for Laravel PHP Framework, I can only share my experience with my personal projects, where I spent around ten dollars for the Laravel Cloud setup.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I evaluated Node.js before choosing Laravel PHP Framework.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice for others looking into using Laravel PHP Framework is to start by learning its documentation and the features it offers by default, as many people try to reinvent what is already included in the framework. Also, asking AI agents about relevant features and checking out open-source projects powered by Laravel can provide insights on how large enterprise projects are implemented. I would rate my overall experience with Laravel PHP Framework as a nine out of ten.

    Carlosdico Carlosdico

    Rapid development has boosted team productivity and simplified building secure business APIs

    Reviewed on Jun 23, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Laravel PHP Framework  is to build applications for my company. I use other frameworks from Python, for example, but Laravel PHP Framework  is the main framework.

    I cannot speak about my applications I have built with Laravel PHP Framework for my company because they are confidential. However, I use it in personal projects to currently work on an API for the POS system, and it works really well.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Laravel PHP Framework offers, in my opinion, are that it is very simple and you can make an app in a few minutes.

    The features in Laravel PHP Framework that help me build apps so quickly include Eloquent for accounts and security. We do not use Blade because we have a frontend in Vue and I use Laravel PHP Framework for the backend.

    There are a lot of packages that you can use on the website, which I find valuable in Laravel PHP Framework.

    Laravel PHP Framework has positively impacted my organization as our team that uses this framework is considered really fast. We can change a lot of things in a few minutes, while other teams need days or maybe weeks to do these things.

    Not only has Laravel PHP Framework improved our productivity but also the productivity of the company because we can find bugs and a lot of other issues in other teams with our software, thanks to the software we have for calculating metrics about the other software that is used in the company.

    What needs improvement?

    I use Laravel PHP Framework a lot, but I think it is not the quickest framework to do APIs. I use another one that is more simple that is Laravel-based.

    Laravel PHP Framework can be improved in terms of speed. It is not really fast when you need to use it for a long batch process; it takes a lot of time.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Laravel PHP Framework since the beginning, since version four, I think. I have been using it for more or less 15 years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    In my experience, Laravel PHP Framework is stable, as we use version nine, and it is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I think Laravel PHP Framework's scalability is a little bit difficult; I think it is not easy.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support for Laravel PHP Framework involves using the open libraries, sites like Stack Overflow, and the documentation on the framework's page.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before using Laravel PHP Framework, we used CakePHP , but we could not find a lot of people in the market that use this framework, so we decided to switch to Laravel PHP Framework because it is really easy to find people that know it.

    How was the initial setup?

    I think Laravel PHP Framework is a very good framework.

    What about the implementation team?

    I evaluated other options before choosing Laravel PHP Framework, but I cannot remember the details.

    Before choosing Laravel PHP Framework, we considered Symfony , but it was a little bit difficult for our people.

    What was our ROI?

    We have seen a return on investment with Laravel PHP Framework because we save a lot of time, and time is money nowadays. We do not really need fewer employees, but when we need to rotate someone, the new one can start working with us in a few days, which is really good.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    We did not use Laravel PHP Framework in terms of pricing, setup cost, and licensing.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    My advice for others looking into using Laravel PHP Framework is to try other frameworks first, maybe Symfony  or CakePHP , and then try Laravel PHP Framework to see how easy it is to do things. However, to be honest, I recommend a lot of other frameworks, like Node.js and Django for Python.

    What other advice do I have?

    I think Laravel PHP Framework is okay; it is good and easy for people. When we have to hire someone, they can start working with us in a few days, which is really good. I would rate this product an 8 overall.

    Elvis Muchasaj

    Framework has streamlined building SaaS, ERP, and CRM solutions and is boosting delivery speed

    Reviewed on Jun 20, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Laravel PHP Framework  is that I have developed many types of software. A specific example of a project I built using Laravel PHP Framework  is a SaaS framework focused on a type of football management for big football clubs. I have also built an ERP , CRM , and different types of software with it.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Laravel PHP Framework has positively impacted my organization because our main framework of choice is Laravel. We build every project with Laravel for the back-end. If we have a front-end project, we always use Laravel API for development, which is very easy. I also want to mention the Laravel API system, the routing, and the middleware.

    This has impacted my team's productivity because, for example, if we have a small project, we use Laravel Nova, which is a first-party package to develop an MVP dashboard. It is also very easy for us because most of the team is focused only on Laravel PHP Framework.

    What is most valuable?

    I appreciate everything about Laravel PHP Framework, including how easy it is, how well structured it is, and how it bootstraps everything together. You have everything in one place. Additionally, it is OOP, which helps a lot, and it has first-party package support for many different types of packages. It also has very large community support.

    The best features Laravel PHP Framework offers include the queue, scheduler, mailing systems, notifications, and WebSockets, which are very easy to integrate with the help of Reverb. Integration with third-party libraries is also seamless, especially with Stripe for Cashier.

    Out of those features, I find myself relying most often on the queues, which help a lot. The cache, which I should have mentioned earlier, speeds up the system. Another important feature is the ORM, which helps a lot with the queries. It is very well structured.

    Another handy feature in Laravel PHP Framework is form validations, which are very easy to integrate. We have many first-party integrations for validations and input fields. It is also very easy to add new rules and create custom rules. This is a small feature which actually helps a lot.

    What needs improvement?

    I have not thought much about how Laravel PHP Framework can be improved, because everything I needed, I found within Laravel PHP Framework. I am not certain if I would add something, maybe a type of validation for JSON structural data types, especially if we have a structural JSON object. There is nothing that comes to mind at this point regarding needed improvements.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Laravel PHP Framework for most of my time. My main focus has been only Laravel. I have been using it for six or seven plus years, and it is an amazing framework.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Laravel PHP Framework is very stable in my experience. The upgrade process is very easy and straightforward, and there are not many breaking changes between minor Laravel PHP Framework upgrades.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Laravel PHP Framework is easy to scale. It is very easy to upgrade from one major version to another. The documentation is also easy to navigate and find what you need.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support for Laravel PHP Framework is excellent. It has a large forum and a lot of support.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before Laravel PHP Framework, we only used PHP without any framework. We switched to Laravel PHP Framework because of the easy learning curve. The learning curve was manageable, and it was well-structured to have a framework for all the projects.

    What about the implementation team?

    My advice to others looking into using Laravel PHP Framework is to learn the documentation first to understand better how it functions, what features it has, and what you need to use. Following community standards and guidelines can lead to a better approach.

    What was our ROI?

    I have seen a return on investment with Laravel PHP Framework because, with the development of AI, we can deliver an MVP within a month or maybe two weeks. We lower the cost by at least one-third and the time by at least one-third as well.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I did not evaluate other options before choosing Laravel PHP Framework because, coming from the PHP world, it was easier for us to switch to Laravel PHP Framework.

    What other advice do I have?

    Regarding Laravel PHP Framework's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are excellent. It is very secure, with different layers of validation. You have route middleware, which you can add to the route or controllers, and authorizations. So it is very secure.

    I have used much of Laravel PHP Framework's AI capability, so I am not certain I can give you a straight answer on the accuracy and reliability of output. I would rate my overall experience with Laravel PHP Framework a nine out of ten.

    Tharindu Gimhana

    Framework has enabled faster CMS development for banking content but has left AI features unexplored

    Reviewed on Jun 18, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    I have used Laravel PHP Framework  for one project, and it is an old project. I used Laravel PHP Framework  to build a CMS. The CMS I built with Laravel PHP Framework is managing a banking website, specifically an admin portal, which is used for adding promotions, card offers, and managing members. I used .NET Framework with my first company before switching to Laravel PHP Framework in my second job during the first year.

    What is most valuable?

    I am familiar with and have used Laravel PHP Framework's routing and authentication features. It is very easy to work with Laravel PHP Framework's routing.

    Laravel PHP Framework has positively impacted our organization by helping us develop a feature faster. Laravel PHP Framework helped us with development in less time because it offers modules, components, pre-built components, and pre-built functions, so it made it easier and we built in less time.

    Laravel PHP Framework helped save time because it has pre-built components and pre-built functions, which can reduce the number of employees needed.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have used Laravel PHP Framework for one project, and it is an old project.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Laravel PHP Framework is stable in my experience.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Laravel PHP Framework has great scalability because it has a modular architecture and great folder architecture. If you are building a product and you need to increase scalability, and if you have more modules and more sections, I recommend using Laravel PHP Framework.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support for Laravel PHP Framework is good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I used .NET Framework with my first company before switching to Laravel PHP Framework in my second job during the first year.

    What other advice do I have?

    I did not use any AI features in Laravel PHP Framework because I used it two years ago. I used Stack Overflow to search for functions, and when I fixed issues, I used Stack Overflow. My overall review rating for Laravel PHP Framework is 7.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    View all reviews