Laravel 11 deploy solution by aMiSTACX w/ A51 Monitoring

My main use case for Laravel PHP Framework  is working on a project, a freelance platform built on Laravel and Vue.js on the front end side. I have been part of the external company team as one of the senior engineers there. I have been building their site using Laravel as the primary stack and on the front end, it is Vue.js and Tailwind CSS framework. It is a freelance platform of all kinds, and it is a very powerful platform with a lot of features, filtering options to find new jobs or leads from the companies.

I have been working on providing the APIs, Laravel-based APIs for rendering the data on front end side and have been working also with external integrations with other systems, where mostly we are using third-party extensions for supplying these integrations because Laravel is a rich pool of third-party modules tailored specifically to solve different integrations in a quick and predictable way.

I am using Laravel APIs, then database connection using Eloquent ORM. That is a Laravel specialized ORM for communication to the database layer, and it is built on optimized querying language where you can with minimal syntax produce great pool of queries, even complex ones for what would normally take much more time to build if you were building it out of Laravel PHP Framework  but directly in PHP, for example. It is so powerful. Inside of that ORM has its own caching model for the queries which optimizes the performance. I had a chance to work on one occasion in the past with Lumen, a Laravel-based framework. Lumen is a kind of API specialized niche of Laravel, which is just for the blazing fast and quick APIs. It uses the same Illuminate  vendor Laravel models, but the advantage compared to Laravel is that this one is strictly specialized in API and it gives you a tiny overhead resulting in a blazing fast API.

The best features Laravel PHP Framework offers include its great community and a pool of a lot of modules already built on and different integrations which really cuts development time. Then, all of these Illuminate  vendor modules are optimized and have the wrapper around most of the PHP communication. It is a bridge to the PHP development that speeds up development, optimizing it. Laravel PHP Framework is good because it has set up a fixed folder or code organization structure where you know where everything is so predictable. It allows you and introduces a lot of CLI commands which basically generates content for you. For example, if you are creating database migration, you have command for that. You can also easily scaffold or create specific modules so that will be organized in model database seeders. There are also nice libraries which populate the content, seeding the data easily. There is a good Mockery library that speeds up writing unit tests in Laravel PHP Framework. It contributes to the speed development of the entire team. It also has a really good integration with Vue.js framework and Tailwind CSS. It provides you with some templates and it is really good.

In Laravel PHP Framework, there is Blade, a Blade template, templating language, which speeds up the building of the pages in such a way that it extremely cuts the code writing with a lot of shortcut commands, safe PHP function wrappers, optimized ones, even cached ones. I think it is really great, marvelous thing.

Out of all those features, I would say CLI commands definitely provide me the most because on different layers and levels, it speeds up the development. It is organized and it is a predictable way of working. If you work on one Laravel PHP Framework project you can easily onboard even if you are new, then you switch to another one, you will know how another one would work because its code-based structure is very predictable and it also provides you always these CLIs which speed up development, for example, creating entire new entities. When I said entities, I mean factories, models, class proxies, controllers, everything can be boilerplate. Even if you want to speed up these things more, there are free third-party extensions which additionally contribute. It all depends on your project requirements and how often and useful it is to introduce even more support in that direction from the third-party Laravel PHP Framework modules. CLIs stand out as a really good feature. Then after that, I would put Eloquent ORM, which really speeds up the communication and queries on a database level, provides a caching of the queries using intuitive, self-descriptive commands that are really more readable than plain SQL queries writing. It speeds up my work a lot. Then after that, maybe third on the list will be Blade templating.

Laravel PHP Framework is constantly improving and it can be improved by following the current release structure, staying up to date with the most recent PHP releases. I think Laravel PHP Framework has a really good collaboration with other vendors like front end frameworks, Vue.js, Tailwind CSS optimization. When I say collaboration, I mean that you have it injected in the Laravel PHP Framework default project setup. It is saying to you, you can use whatever you want. You do not have to use Vue.js, you can use React JS, but then you will need to integrate these things. If you decide to use Vue.js, it is a breeze, because Vue.js and Laravel PHP Framework are optimized and injected by default together. That is how I have seen it could be even improved. For example, if they would put more collaboration with modern frameworks and introduced something better for the front end or other queuing systems. Laravel PHP Framework is really good with AWS  SQS, but for example, on RabbitMQ queuing system, the collaboration is not so strong. On the other hand, by default, it is not so strong, but where Laravel PHP Framework rises as time passes is from the community which is evolving; the modules that have been added are huge and are constantly growing. It is written in a way that these modules do not need much code changes to always be supported by new Laravel PHP Framework versions, which is also a really good thing for Laravel PHP Framework.

There could be even more modules, which I believe will be the case in future, as it is constantly evolving. Strengthening the community, and promoting this framework more in the web world could make it conquer other frameworks or programming languages for web development. That would be really good. Laravel PHP Framework has borrowed the best things from some other web frameworks such as Ruby on Rails and one of the Python web frameworks.

I have been using Laravel PHP Framework on several occasions throughout my career, with some periods where I have been more exposed to Magento  2 than Laravel PHP Framework. I am actively using it the last four years for some of my minor projects in my current company and I really enjoy it.

Laravel PHP Framework is really stable in my experience. There are no downtimes or major issues. It is surprising how well it supports large websites, traffic, and customers.

Regarding the scalability of Laravel PHP Framework, it handles growth well and is easy to extend and scale. It is really performant and it has an integration with Redis  cache system out of the box but also some other cache frameworks. It is really good.

I have not needed to reach out for customer support for Laravel PHP Framework, and you do not need that. If you are not a developer or an engineer, you might. However, I do not think in my daily workflow I need to reach customer support. Developers can fix any kind of issue normally in Laravel PHP Framework, but of course, you can contact their support and ask for new features or ideas; it is a free option which you really do not have to pick since there are not many issues.

I previously used Symphony, CodeIgniter  frameworks, CakePHP , and others. I also developed in vanilla PHP, but that takes time and is not the cleverest way of writing code in today's world.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Laravel PHP Framework is straightforward with no challenges at all. It is really quick and straightforward. You have just one environment file where you have to fill all your variables, such as database connection, connection to mail providers, and connection to AWS  S3  bucket concretely for our project. It is really straightforward; you just clone the repository, Laravel PHP Framework default framework repository, and then also have some system administration to point it on an NGINX  server. It is a predictable way, and Laravel PHP Framework documentation is great. You just have to follow it, and you can easily spin it up on any server with minimal effort.

We are deploying Laravel PHP Framework in my organization using AWS; everything is on AWS EC2  instances, and the database is on RDS . We are also using AWS injected code pipelines, but I had a chance to work on some other deployment tools such as Deployer and CircleCI .

I have seen a return on investment with Laravel PHP Framework. I do not have numbers to say how much money, but I can say that for example, it can reduce the time of shipping software to production. That is first. Then also, it can cut your need for new developers. Let us say theoretically, if you were working on normal PHP and you have a team of five people, in Laravel PHP Framework you might only need three people to manage the same effort and achieve the same speed.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Laravel PHP Framework is straightforward with no challenges at all. It is really quick and straightforward.

Before choosing Laravel PHP Framework, I did not evaluate other options myself. But if I had to choose for my personal project, Laravel PHP Framework is better than the others. It is simple, quick to spin up, very performant, easy to learn, security-wise it is good, there are lots of boilerplates, scaffolding, speed up development, and it has good integration with particular front-end frameworks. It is free to use with no licensing costs, so I think that is enough.

I would advise others looking into using Laravel PHP Framework to choose it if you want fast development, cut your costs, or do web-specialized development. If your site is not huge or an enterprise system, then always choose Laravel PHP Framework. And of course, if you choose to work with PHP programming language, then always use Laravel PHP Framework. I think Laravel PHP Framework is optimal and it shines in these kinds of setups.

I think Laravel PHP Framework rocks and will continue to rock the web development world in the coming years. I would rate my overall experience with Laravel PHP Framework as an 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My main use case for Laravel PHP Framework  is backend development and web applications as a whole.

A quick specific example of a web application I've built using Laravel PHP Framework  is a collaboration platform for professionals and scientists, which allows professionals to collaborate on projects and share their achievements and knowledge.

The best features Laravel PHP Framework offers include a well-known structure and architecture that lets you move fast but not compromise on code quality and even performance.

That structure or architecture has helped me in my daily work by making the standards become a routine in the daily development and in the team's mindset.

Laravel PHP Framework has a lot of well-maintained and very popular first-party packages that are really useful.

Laravel PHP Framework has positively impacted my organization by making it easier for us. It made things easier by helping us deliver features more quickly and standardizing some patterns and principles in the architecture.

In terms of improvements, I think Laravel PHP Framework is very mature and performant enough, but I believe they could work a bit on the adoption part since it is used for medium projects like CRMs and ERPs. I really think it could be adopted more on the enterprise side as well because it's a modern technology that has improved a lot and could replace older technologies that enterprises have stuck with.

Regarding enhancements, they can improve performance by refactoring the service container in a more performant way, similar to how the service container for Symfony  framework is written, as the binding of dependencies is much faster in Symfony  compared to Laravel.

I have been using Laravel PHP Framework for about four years.

Laravel PHP Framework is stable.

The scalability of Laravel PHP Framework is impressive, as it can really scale with your software product and has the potential to support millions of users. However, you have to know what you're doing on the infrastructure side and on the configuration side of servers and PHP processes, workers, and so on.

I have never used customer support, but I find the documentation clear enough, and there is a lot of community support that is more than willing to help with problems.

Previously, I used TypeScript with a framework on the back end, but I switched because the tooling for the JavaScript ecosystem is too unorganized and cluttered, and JavaScript is not really made for the back end.

I did not purchase Laravel PHP Framework through the AWS Marketplace .

I have seen a return on investment with Laravel PHP Framework, as I think it saved us quite a bit of money on the licensing part and, of course, on the development side. We move with the features development much faster.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost is basically zero since Laravel PHP Framework is open source and free to use. Although some first-party packages like Laravel Cloud and some packages require a license with a monthly or yearly plan, most of it is free to use.

Before choosing Laravel PHP Framework, I evaluated other options like TypeScript with NestJS, C#, .NET, and even Symfony, but I ultimately chose Laravel PHP Framework.

My advice for others looking into using Laravel PHP Framework is to be open-minded and embrace its patterns since it is an opinionated framework, and to have fun using it because it provides a great developer experience.

Regarding Laravel PHP Framework's AI capabilities, I find its governance and security pretty strong since many JavaScript libraries have been hacked, but I've never heard of Laravel PHP Framework first-party packages or even Laravel PHP Framework itself having any problems.

In terms of the accuracy and reliability of output regarding Laravel PHP Framework's AI capabilities, it has the Laravel AI SDK, which is a first-party package with a lot of features and integrates with providers, so I find it pretty decent. Personally, I use PHP Prism because it's more flexible and I just have a personal preference for it.

I would rate this Laravel PHP Framework experience a nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services  (AWS )