What do you like best about the product?

There are so many things but for starters, it's just how fast we are able to serve up query results to applications and end users regardless of the data set size. Hugely complicated queries run like lightning fast, so much so that we've pivoted from using Firebolt just for reporting and analytics to also including it in our internal tooling for our business. Things we simply couldn't pull off otherwise without a massive scaling of our infrastructure.

The cost is simply unmatched for the levels of feature and performance. We're a small company with big ambitions but cost is still a paramount consideration. We have flexibility in controlling our costs and scaling as we see fit, which is great.

I've found that my team has generally found the syntax to be pretty easy to pick up, it shares a lot of commonality with other SQL flavors we're familiar with. And even when it stumps us, the documentation is pretty robust (unlike many software vendors we use) and their support staff has been top-notch. They even share a channel in our Slack where we get quick answers to many of our questions. Firebolt goes so far as to proactively watch our query performance patterns and shares that with me and will help us fix them.

Simply put, I work WITH Firebolt to solve our problems and limitations instead of working AROUND them like we have to with some other vendors.

What do you dislike about the product?

The segregation of ingestion (or "general purpose") engines from read-only "analytics" engines is great from a granular control mechanism, especially as it pertains to cost. However that often requires bouncing of the read-only engine that services our applications to reflect changes made by the ingestion engine, causing a several minute outage. There are ways around it but this is often the case for us at this time.

Additionally, it would be great if there was a way to have stored queries accessible via the API access. Currently the query has to be passed to the API meaning that even where the same query could be used in our code, that is being duplicated and would necessitate an application deployment to make alterations. Compare that to a stored function/procedure model in our sql transaction engine and this is not ideal for a small shop that moves this quickly.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Firebolt serves us as our data warehouse, our primary ETL processing engine, reporting and analytics platform as well as our high performance query engine for internal tools built for the rest of our organization.

What do you like best about the product?

It has great speed and performance. It allows me to handle large datasets and complex queries in a fraction of the time. It also offers a flexible pricing model, which allows me to pay only for the compute resources I actually use. This is very cost-effective for me as I have variable workloads and don't want to pay for unused capacity.

What do you dislike about the product?

I have been using firebolt for quite some time and till now I have enjoyed using it and its interface. As of now I dont think that there is something in Firebolt that I dont like about.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Traditional data warehouses are often slow and inefficient when it comes to querying and analyzing large amounts of data. But Firebolt solves this problem of mine by using a unique indexing technology and a cloud-native architecture that enables it to deliver fast query performance even on very large datasets.Traditional data warehouses are very expensive to set up and maintain, especially as data volumes grow. Firebolt's cloud-native approach and pay-as-you-go pricing model make it more cost-effective than traditional data warehouses, allowing me to save money while still getting the analytical insights I need.

What do you like best about the product?

I like how fast it is to run queries and retrieve data using Firebolt. It is really good and our performance increase exponentially when we moved our data from on premise to Firebolt.

What do you dislike about the product?

Right now the integration works very well. But I think it would be really good if we are able to seemlessly integrate with many services out of the box with minimal adjustment.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

We use Firebolt to host our data. All of our data was moved from on premise database server to Firebolt could database server. And every day we ran thousands of queries to retrieve data from Firebolt.

What do you like best about the product?

The exceptional indexing technology, designed with a focus on security and equipped with data encryption capabilities, delivers outstanding performance. Furthermore, it provides a cost-effective solution that caters to businesses of all scales.

What do you dislike about the product?

The distinct architecture and querying language of Firebolt may necessitate users to acquire new skills and modify their workflows, which could impede the adoption process and act as an obstacle to some organizations.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Due to its distinctive architecture and optimization techniques, Firebolt can process enormous data volumes and run complex queries at exceptionally fast speeds.

What do you like best about the product?

It boasts exceptional speed and performance, delivering high-quality results at an affordable cost. Its user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate and operate, even for those with limited technical experience.

What do you dislike about the product?

The steep learning curve is one major dislike about firebolt. Although its indexing technology enables fast querying of data, the platform may face challenges with complex queries.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Setting up and managing traditional data warehousing solutions can be complicated and require specialized skills and knowledge. In contrast, Firebolt offers a user-friendly interface.