
Overview

Product video
1NCE offers the world's first IoT Flat Rate plan with an all-inclusive pre-paid pricing model providing cellular connectivity for IoT devices for up to 10 years. The price for the 1NCE IoT Flat Rate is $10 per unit for the 1NCE IoT Flex Connectivity, and $12 per unit for the 1NCE IoT eSIM, which is available only to AWS marketplace customers. The tariff includes 500 MB data allowance, and 250 SMS as well as all the necessary features like APN, VPN, and API, Data Streamer, and Connectivity Suite over the 10 years. Seamless bearer support for 2G, 3G, and 4G. NB-IoT and LTE-M where and if available. See further details on the included features, bearer support and country coverage on the 1NCE website. Please note, Flex Connectivity requires a SIM to operate; SIM can be procured directly from 1NCE.
The offer can exclusively be used by business customers only.
The IoT Flat Rate allows connecting IoT devices in more than 100 countries, including all US, Europe, China, Australia, Japan, and Singapore.
Highlights
- The 1NCE IoT Flat Rate is an all-inclusive price model for managed cellular IoT connectivity
- 1NCE IoT Flat Rate can be used in more than 100 countries, including Europe, China, Japan, Australia, Singapore and USA
- Seamless bearer support for 2G, 3G, and 4G. NB-IoT and LTE-M where and if available.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/unit |
|---|---|---|
IoT SIM Card Business | IoT Lifetime Flat Subscription, including IoT SIM Card Business | $15.00 |
IoT SIM Chip Industrial (100 pcs) | IoT Lifetime Flat Subscription, including IoT SIM Chip Industrial (100 pcs) | $16.50 |
1NCE IoT Volume Top-up, 500 MB and 250 SMS | Top-Up (500 MB and 250 SMS) | $10.00 |
Vendor refund policy
Refunds are not available as this is a prepaid IoT connectivity product for business customers.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Contact Help Center
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.


Standard contract
Customer reviews
Global connectivity has improved remote monitoring and reduces effort for managing dispersed devices
What is our primary use case?
1NCE is used to provide IoT connectivity for remote devices such as sensors, trackers, and smart monitoring systems. We use 1NCE to provide cellular connectivity for remote monitoring sensors to send real-time temperature and humidity data to our cloud platform.
In addition to sensors and smart monitors, 1NCE is also used for asset tracking devices in remote areas where reliable cellular connectivity is required.
What is most valuable?
1NCE's best features are global IoT connectivity, easy SIM management, wide network coverage, and cost-effective connectivity.
The IoT Connect Management feature makes it easy to monitor SIM usage, manage devices, and troubleshoot connectivity issues from a single platform. The wide network coverage helps us keep devices connected across different regions without needing multiple connectivity providers.
The platform is easy to use, provides good visibility into device connectivity, and integrates well with existing IoT platforms.
1NCE has helped improve our organizational efficiency and productivity.
We have seen reduced connectivity expenses compared to traditional mobile plans and saved time through centralized SIM management. For example, device provisioning now requires significantly less administrative effort.
What needs improvement?
1NCE can be improved with more advanced analytics, enhanced reporting capabilities, and additional customization options within the management portal.
Better API documentation and more integration guides would be helpful. Faster response times for complex support cases would also improve the overall experience.
For how long have I used the solution?
1NCE has been used for around six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
1NCE is deployed as a public cloud solution in our organization.
1NCE has been stable in our environment, providing reliable service.
Since we primarily use 1NCE for IoT connectivity, we have limited experience with its AI capabilities. However, from a reliability standpoint, the platform has been stable and has consistently delivered accurate connectivity and device management data.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
1NCE scales well and allows us to add new devices and deployments without significant operational overhead or performance issues.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support from 1NCE has been responsive and helpful, particularly for troubleshooting connectivity issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used traditional mobile carrier IoT SIM solutions. We switched to 1NCE for its simplified pricing model, global coverage, and better device management.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a positive return on investment from this product. We estimate connectivity costs were reduced by around 20 to 30 percent and centralized device management saved several hours of administrative effort each month.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our experience with 1NCE pricing and licensing has been positive. The pricing is straightforward and cost-effective, and the setup costs were relatively low compared to other IoT connectivity solutions.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated solutions from Aeris, KORE Wireless, and Vodafone IoT services before choosing 1NCE.
What other advice do I have?
1NCE is recommended to organizations looking for cost-effective IoT connectivity with global coverage. Plan your device deployment requirements early and take advantage of the management platform to simplify ongoing operations.
We did purchase 1NCE through the AWS marketplace.
Our use of 1NCE is primarily focused on IoT connectivity rather than AI capabilities. From a security perspective, we find the platform provides appropriate security measures.
This review has an overall rating of 8.
Lifetime connectivity has transformed how I manage global IoT sensors and trackers
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for 1NCE is for IoT devices. I use 1NCE like eSIMs in my IoT devices, which function as sensors, trackers, and manage their connectivity of IoT devices globally. This eliminates the need to worry about monthly billings and similar administrative tasks. 1NCE works in over 100 countries, which is beneficial. Since I use 1NCE for IoT devices, it has significantly changed IoT device management and everything related to it.
What is most valuable?
The best feature that 1NCE offers is the lifetime flat fee. I get it one time and I am set. SIM management is easy, SIM support is straightforward, power consumption is low, and it works great. I find myself relying on the one-time payment feature the most, and SIM compatibility in over 100 countries truly stood out for me.
The management of my devices has changed significantly. The dashboard access is globally accessible, so no matter if my devices move from one location to another, I always have access and can monitor everything.
What needs improvement?
1NCE has a 500 MB lifetime cap, which is tight for some IoT devices that use more data. Additionally, 1NCE is limited to IoT devices only, and sometimes the coverage cost can be surprising.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using 1NCE for about three to four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
1NCE is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
1NCE's scalability handles my growing needs well for my organization.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is good, and I have had positive experiences with it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not used a different solution before 1NCE. I compared multiple options such as Twilio Super SIM and Aeris IoT connectivity, and I chose 1NCE.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is straightforward and easy.
What was our ROI?
I don't have metrics, but I have seen a return on investment from using 1NCE.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is straightforward and easy.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing 1NCE, I evaluated other options such as Aeris IoT connectivity and Twilio Super SIM.
What other advice do I have?
If you need one-time headache relief, get the one-time payment option with 1NCE, and you will be set for the rest of your life. I gave this review a rating of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
IoT projects have become effortless as I manage long‑life sensor connectivity and tracking
What is our primary use case?
I have been using 1NCE on and off over the past five years for IoT applications.
My main use case for 1NCE is that it provides IoT SIM cards. I work on IoT use cases where I bring sensors into the field. Those sensors might have power if you are lucky, but maybe do not even have power and you want to get some sensor values back from those sensors every once in a while. I use the mobile network for doing that.
A specific example of a project where I used 1NCE SIM cards for my sensors is when I worked in the chemical industry. They have their own area for traffic management and there was specific traffic that needed to be tracked. I brought in sensors to track that traffic. This was also an area where not a lot of traffic was present. So that meant we could run off batteries and scan the vehicles from there and have an understanding of who is where at what time for SHE, for safe, healthy, and environment purposes. IoT devices in essence, I was measuring traffic.
What is most valuable?
I think the cool part about 1NCE is that they provide SIM cards for ten years, making them relevant for ten years. It is fairly cheap to get a SIM card from them and if you have a need for particular networks, they support the breadth of networks. With IoT sensors, for example, the 2G and 3G are probably more used. NarrowBand-IoT is also available there. When you want to bring a sensor in the field, it is going to have a certain lifetime and you want to add a SIM card to that, and it is very easy to do that with 1NCE.
The best features 1NCE offers in my experience are that you get the SIM cards, you have a platform in which you can manage your SIM cards and you have a backend where you can also communicate. What I think is really powerful about 1NCE is that you can just order it online. It is very simple to do, you have it really quickly and it just works out of the box. If you would compare that to other mobile phone or mobile network providers, then this would be a lot of work with contracts and other administrative tasks. Here you do not have that. Another nice feature is that their platform allows for geofencing or geolocation, so you can identify where what towers are being used and where your sensor approximately is. This also helps with tracking. They have the capability to manage network access, whether devices can go directly to the internet or have a different approach of accessing those devices. This covers the breadth of needs for bringing IoT and mobile network together.
1NCE has impacted my organization positively because I am a freelancer and I deliver this to customers. Customers very often struggle with getting started with IoT. They have to think about contracts for mobile phone providers or mobile network providers. Because 1NCE has a very simple business model, it is very easy to understand, very easy to budget, and that lowers the threshold for companies that want to start with this.
What needs improvement?
I do not have any complaints about 1NCE at the moment. I do not have much to add about needed improvements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for about ten plus years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Regarding the stability of 1NCE, I appreciate that there is a little bit of maintenance, but they always call it out. I have never had unexpected downtime. Sometimes there was expected downtime, and I think that is good enough.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I find the scalability of 1NCE extremely easy; that is one of the core features.
The scalability of 1NCE means, first of all, can the platform handle the traffic? The answer is that there is no issue in that. But I think scaling also means onboarding new devices, and that is very simple to do. Getting the SIM cards is also a matter of within one or two days, you have a new SIM card. The scalability is also fast in that sense. It is not just easy, but it is also fast. And I think that makes it extremely good.
How are customer service and support?
I have reached out to customer support very rarely, and it was always excellent. I rate the customer support a ten. They are extremely knowledgeable and effective. I also was not moved along; they could help me directly. That was great.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I had some experience with Vodafone and KPN, and that did not work very well.
How was the initial setup?
The requisitioning process with 1NCE is extremely simple. It is very easy to get on board and start doing this. I think it means that your IT organization has a problem less to deal with. How big that problem is to begin with depends, of course, on your usage. I cannot provide concrete numbers, but I think it is the easiest way to bring IoT online through the mobile network.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is cheap, simple, and easy.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated Vodafone and KPN before choosing 1NCE.
What other advice do I have?
The core feature is not time saved in that sense. The core feature is that people actually start doing it, where they otherwise would not because it is just too laborious.
I rate 1NCE a ten out of ten.
I give it a ten because it is a seemingly simple problem, but as you start looking closer to it, it is actually a difficult problem that they are fixing. What I really appreciate about 1NCE, and I think they are the only player that really does it like this, is that they provide the SIM card and it just works. There is very little clutter in getting this operationalized. If you are with a bunch of IoT engineers working on a project and you actually need a SIM card, you can get that done in a matter of hours. The enablement is what I think is unique to 1NCE and what I really appreciate.
Regarding 1NCE's AI capabilities, I think it has a very good suite of tools. They also provide APN and OpenVPN solutions to get site-to-site connectivity, for example. You can make your own little infrastructure, your own little network for your own data, or you can just go through the internet, and that makes it so you can have many security postures fitting the need of your organization. They have a little bit of AI, and it works effectively. It works on the data you have inside of your platform, so the usage of your sensors and your IoT devices.
1NCE is a standalone platform hosted by Deutsche Telekom, and it is not hosted anywhere else. You can use OpenVPN , for example, to make site-to-site VPNs to connect it to any cloud provider that you like. Currently, it just goes over the internet and reaches different cloud providers depending on my customers.
My advice to anyone looking into using 1NCE is to just use it. It seems daunting at first; you just put in your credit card and then it works, and with anyone else, it is such a big problem. But it really is that simple. My overall rating for 1NCE is ten out of ten.
Reliable connectivity has reduced IoT costs and simplifies managing global sensor fleets
What is our primary use case?
We use 1NCE with our sensors and monitoring devices to connect remote environmental monitoring sensors that transmit temperature, humidity, and equipment status data back to our central platform in real-time.
Regarding our use case with those remote sensors and monitoring devices, its global connectivity and predictable pricing have made it easier to manage large numbers of devices across different locations.
What is most valuable?
The centralized device management helps my team by making it easy to monitor connectivity and manage large fleets of devices from a single platform, while the simple pricing helps us forecast costs more accurately.
1NCE has positively impacted our organization by reducing connectivity costs and simplifying the management of our IoT deployment, making it easier to scale effectively.
Regarding specific outcomes or metrics, our IoT connectivity costs fell by around 30% compared to our previous provider, and we spend significantly less time managing SIM subscriptions and billing.
What needs improvement?
More fine-tuned alerting options and deeper integration with third-party IoT platforms would be valuable additions.
For how long have I used the solution?
What other advice do I have?
Regarding 1NCE's governance and security, they are solid with strong SIM management controls, secure connectivity, and good visibility into device access and usage.
Regarding 1NCE's AI capabilities, 1NCE does not really have AI output in the traditional sense, but its connectivity data and device status reporting are very reliable and accurate for monitoring our IoT deployments.
My advice for others looking into using 1NCE is to plan your device rollout and connectivity requirements upfront and take advantage of the flat-rate model to simplify long-term cost management.
We do not have any partnership or reseller agreements; it is just a standard customer relationship with 1NCE.
Centralized device connectivity has improved operations but monitoring integrations still need work
What is our primary use case?
I have been using 1NCE for over a year and a half. Primarily, it is a solution for IoT connectivity and device communication use cases across distributed environments.
My primary use case for 1NCE is supporting IoT devices and connectivity with centralized SIM management of distributed deployments. One of the key use cases involves reliable connectivity for remotely deployed devices that need consistent data communication across different locations.
When I talk about reliable connectivity for remotely deployed devices, I would start with one specific scenario involving remotely deployed monitoring telemetric devices, which required scalable understanding of telemetric data, and that is critical for continuous data transmission and operation visibility. Earlier, I was managing connectivity across different regions, which created central operational overhead and inconsistent performance in some locations. With 1NCE, I was able to standardize connectivity management through a more centralized approach with simplified provisioning and reduced manual coordination for the teams.
What is most valuable?
The best features of 1NCE that I can recollect would be the connectivity management model of an operational architecture from an operational architecture standpoint. Because I have been working as a solution architect for over five to six years, having a centralized management visibility for IoT connected devices across distributed deployments is very useful.
Regarding centralized management, the capability helped in giving the operations and engineering teams the ability to monitor and check the connectivity status, outages, device activity, and all that. That is one better use case. Instead of coordinating with different providers, the visibility and monitoring is key for any infrastructure. Provisioning through one platform is one of the best use cases.
From an architecture perspective, having consolidated visibility also made it easier to track the behavior and maintain consistency of the distribution deployments.
I would repeat that what is primarily important is about the deployments, visibility, and the engineering teams in one place. That is something good with the best use case of the application.
Instead of coordinating with different providers or handling fragmented visibility, the team could manage provisioning, troubleshooting, and monitoring more efficiently through one platform.
What needs improvement?
The areas for improvement could be around analytics and reporting flexibility. While the platform provides good operational visibility, having more customizable dashboards and deeper reporting capabilities would be beneficial. I would also say that 1NCE can expand the integration options with automation capabilities in organizations, with tighter integration within the internal monitoring or ITSM platforms.
Depending on the organization, the organization could have the ability to provide monitoring or ITSM platforms. That is one thing that I can say.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using 1NCE for over a year and a half.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
1NCE is very much stable in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
1NCE does handle growth in device numbers or data volume well.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not used any different solution before 1NCE.
How was the initial setup?
I was not focused on pricing and setup cost. I was only focused on deployment and use case scenarios.
What was our ROI?
I would say there is a return on investment, and the primary use case is monitoring and centralized capabilities.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I was not focused on pricing and setup cost. I was only focused on deployment and use case scenarios.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have not evaluated other options before choosing 1NCE.
What other advice do I have?
1NCE is a good product and I would recommend this. I would rate this review a 7.
