Ubuntu Pro FIPS 18.04 LTS

What do you like best about the product?

As a professional, I really value the predictability of the 5-year support cycle (extendable to 12 years with Pro), and the 2026 updates finally add some long-awaited polish.

On performance, the new Linux Kernel 7.0 combined with x86-64-v3 optimizations makes the OS feel incredibly snappy on modern hardware. For day-to-day work, that responsiveness is immediately noticeable.

In terms of modern tooling, the jump to GNOME 50 and the new Resources app (replacing the old System Monitor) make it much more visual and intuitive to manage heavy workloads.

On security, I appreciate the shift toward memory-safe core utilities (using Rust) and the seamless TPM-backed encryption. It gives me peace of mind without the “security tax” of constant pop-ups or slowdowns.

And when it comes to the ecosystem, whether it’s Docker, VS Code, or Python environments, Ubuntu still feels like the primary target for developers. If a tool exists for Linux, it’s basically guaranteed to work on Ubuntu first.

What do you dislike about the product?

Snap Preference: Snap performance has improved a lot in 2026, with faster startup and better compression. Even so, Canonical still tends to push Snaps over Flatpaks or native Debs in the App Center, which can feel polarizing if you prefer having more choice.

The "Pro" Nag: Ubuntu Pro may be free for personal use, but the occasional terminal "advertisements" for it during apt upgrades can come across as a bit intrusive, especially in a professional environment.

Legacy Hardware: Moving to a Wayland-only default and dropping support for older drivers (such as legacy NVIDIA or X11-only setups) helps future-proof the OS, but it can also be a real headache when you’re trying to maintain older workstation fleets.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

1. The “Security vs. Friction” trade-off
The problem: Traditional security often feels like a hurdle. Full-disk encryption usually means memorizing yet another long password, and core system tools (like sudo) have historically been prone to memory-safety vulnerabilities.
The benefit: Ubuntu 26.04 finally brings TPM-backed Full Disk Encryption to general availability. Your disk is secured by your hardware chip, so it unlocks automatically on boot without a passphrase, while still staying encrypted if the drive is stolen. On top of that, rewriting core utilities like sudo (now sudo-rs) in Rust has essentially “deleted” entire classes of memory-related security bugs. The result is a safer system without me having to change a single habit.

2. Modern hardware underutilization
The problem: A lot of Linux distros rely on “generic” packages that don’t take full advantage of modern CPUs (Intel 12th Gen+, AMD Zen 3+).
The benefit: Ubuntu now provides x86-64-v3 optimized package variants that squeeze more performance out of a modern processor. Kernel 7.0 and Mesa 26 also bring native support for the newest Intel Nova Lake and AMD Zen 6 chips. If you’re a gamer or a video editor, you’ll notice immediate frame-rate and rendering improvements that just weren’t there in 2024.

3. The “app fatigue” and permission sprawl
The problem: On traditional desktops, once you install an app, it often has the keys to the kingdom. It can access your files, camera, and mic without you really knowing.
The benefit: The new Security Center in 26.04 treats desktop apps more like smartphone apps. If a Snap app tries to access your microphone or a sensitive folder, you get a clear, granular prompt. It tackles the problem of “silent tracking” and gives you back real control over your privacy.

4. Technical debt in productivity
The problem: Older system tools like the veteran System Monitor or the Totem video player were starting to feel like relics from the 2010s—slow, clunky, and visually dated.
The benefit: Replacing those apps with Resources (a sleek, modern system monitor) and Showtime (a minimalist GTK4 video player) cuts down on visual clutter and makes everyday tasks feel more current. And by finally moving to a Wayland-only session and dropping X11 as the default, Ubuntu 26.04 addresses the “tearing” and “jitter” that plagued multi-monitor setups for years. Everything from window resizing to external displays now feels buttery smooth.

What do you like best about the product?

I use Ubuntu for software development and system administration because it provides a stable and secure environment for coding and running servers. I really like the scripting and automation capabilities, as automation is making life easier and reducing redundant work. Learning new techniques through Ubuntu also adds value.

What do you dislike about the product?

Some proprietary software and hardware can be limited. System updates are very wrong impact. Certain drivers like graphics or Wifi don't work well.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use Ubuntu for a stable and secure environment for coding and running servers, and it simplifies our scripting and automation, reducing redundant work.

I use Ubuntu Linux  22.04 LTS for website hosting and for application stacks like Apache and MySQL . I am using Ubuntu Linux  22.04 LTS for hosting my website, and for the database, I use MySQL  to host the application and get the response from the MySQL database.

I use Ubuntu Linux in different fields including cloud and virtualization, containerization, database management, file and network sharing, and development and DevOps. I use Ubuntu Linux for my AWS  application, as Ubuntu Linux Server is used for heavily utilized hosting websites, databases, and cloud applications.

The best feature of Ubuntu Linux is that it serves as a base for private cloud and public cloud VMs for AWS .

It is very useful to use Ubuntu Linux with its GUI-based and CLI modes; the commands are very lightweight, and it is much more feasible for me with its long-term support.

Ubuntu Linux provides business advisory consultancy for business purposes and enables the smooth running of my website hosting to meet all business purposes.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good because I am using the freeware version.

The user experience on Ubuntu Linux is very good, so I believe there is no need for improvement.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for the last five years.

Ubuntu Linux is definitely stable.

Ubuntu Linux is widely used for business purposes including app storage, development, and staging environments. From my perspective as a user, I would rate Linux at eight points for its high scalability and greater relevance and advantage in terms of adherence, cost-saving, desktop compatibility, cloud server dominance, and wide industry adoption. I believe it is good for new users as well as for experienced people.

Customer support for Ubuntu Linux was very good.

Before Ubuntu Linux, I was using Windows applications for application purposes. However, because of its lightweight and user-friendly environment, I am now using Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS for all relevant business purposes.

Ubuntu Linux Pro version provides 20 years of security maintenance, including kernel patching and compliance with standards such as FIPS and CIS, making it cost-effective. It is open-source and free, which is already beneficial for business purposes and for running any environment.

I have reduced staff because I am using a centralized server to manage it with Ubuntu Linux.

By using Ubuntu Linux on the cloud, I am reducing costs by at least 22 percent by providing a feasible and secure environment.

I was not using another solution. I am new to this environment, so this is very relevant based on my experience.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux an eight.

I provide the rating of eight because Ubuntu Linux is heavily used for business purposes with different benefits. For example, private users and small businesses can register, and the Hardy Heron release in April has led to wide industry adoption, server dominance, cloud, desktop compatibility, cost savings, and management tools.

I deploy Ubuntu Linux on an on-premises cloud as well as AWS public cloud. I use Amazon Web Services, the AWS cloud, for my public cloud deployment.

My overall review rating for Ubuntu Linux is eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

What do you like best about the product?

I use Ubuntu as a technology platform and for container testing purposes because it is easy to use and requires minimal CLI commands on the Desktop version. It is highly customizable and lightweight, making it very flexible for testing my projects. Most importantly, I find it secure, and the support coverage for security updates, which I find to be pretty long, makes it a good technical investment to learn. I can easily install and configure container environments, host many applications, and use it for about five years without needing to reinstall the distro because it's stable. Even though learning it can be steep for new users, it's totally worth it. Installing many third-party tools, agents, or even Docker containers is straightforward, and Ubuntu allows for a variety of things to be done. Although initially, partition configuration was difficult, it's now very easy, and anyone can follow the basic steps to make it usable from the beginning.

What do you dislike about the product?

I don't have anything that I dislike about Ubuntu, it's good distro.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use Ubuntu for a flexible and secure platform for testing projects. It's easy to use, requires minimal CLI commands, and offers a long support period. The stability eliminates crash worries, and its lightness and customizability enhance the experience.

What do you like best about the product?

What I like most about Ubuntu is its stability and flexibility for both daily use and technical work. It provides a clean and intuitive interface while still allowing deep customization when needed. The package management system (APT) makes it easy to install, update, and maintain software, which saves a lot of time compared to other operating systems.

Another major advantage is performance, especially on older or resource-limited hardware, where Ubuntu runs smoothly. I also value the strong community support—whenever an issue comes up, there is almost always documentation or forums with clear solutions.

From a workflow perspective, Ubuntu integrates well with development tools, scripting, and server environments, making it ideal for IT and automation tasks. Overall, it offers a great balance between usability, control, and reliability without licensing costs.

What do you dislike about the product?

One of the main drawbacks of Ubuntu is that compatibility with certain proprietary software and hardware can still be inconsistent. Some drivers—especially for newer or specialized devices—require manual installation or additional configuration, which can be time-consuming.

Another issue is that occasional system updates may introduce unexpected bugs or break existing configurations, particularly in more customized environments. This can require troubleshooting that less technical users may find challenging.

Additionally, while the interface is generally user-friendly, it can feel less polished or consistent compared to other operating systems, and some workflows are not as intuitive out of the box.

Finally, certain widely used commercial applications are either unavailable or have limited support on Ubuntu, which can make it less suitable in environments that depend heavily on specific proprietary tools.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Ubuntu solves the problem of having a reliable, cost-effective, and flexible operating system for both everyday use and technical work. It eliminates licensing costs while still providing enterprise-level stability, which is especially beneficial for organizations and personal projects.

It also simplifies software management through its package system, allowing me to quickly install, update, and maintain tools without spending time searching for installers or dealing with compatibility issues. This directly improves my productivity.

Another key problem it solves is providing a consistent environment for development and server-related tasks. Since many production environments run Linux, using Ubuntu locally reduces friction when deploying applications or automating processes.

Additionally, Ubuntu performs well on a wide range of hardware, including older machines, which helps extend the lifecycle of equipment and reduces costs.

Overall, it benefits me by improving efficiency, reducing expenses, and giving me more control over my system and workflows.