ACCELQ

What do you like best about the product?

I like ACCELQ for its user-friendly and codeless automation approach, which makes testing easier and faster. It streamlines test creation and execution without needing advanced programming skills and supports strong collaboration among team members. Its ability to provide accurate and reliable testing results is helpful. Plus, the platform helps automate software testing and improve test coverage, creating, managing, and executing test cases with ease. It speeds up the testing process and helps identify bugs early, improving software quality. I also appreciate how ACCELQ integrates with tools like Jira, Azure DevOps, ClickUp, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Bamboo, BrowserStack, and Sauce Labs to enhance testing and development workflows.

What do you dislike about the product?

One area that could be improved in ACCELQ is its learning curve for new users, as some advanced features can be slightly complex to understand. The platform interface can sometimes feel slow when handling large test suites. More detailed documentation or tutorials would help users get started faster. Additionally, expanding integration options with other tools could make it even more flexible.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use ACCELQ to automate software testing, reducing manual efforts and saving time. It helps manage complex test cases, ensures accuracy, improves team collaboration with a centralized environment, and identifies bugs early, enhancing software quality.

What do you like best about the product?

I use ACCELQ for automating web, mobile, and API testing, which helps my team create and manage test cases. I really like its codeless automation approach because it makes test creation fast and easy for both technical and non-technical team members. The self-healing feature and reusable test components make the automation process much more efficient and reliable. ACCELQ's seamless CI/CD integration is something I appreciate as it enhances the workflow. The initial setup of ACCELQ was fairly straightforward, and the onboarding process was smooth, thanks to the platform's intuitive design.

What do you dislike about the product?

While ACCELQ is very helpful overall, there are a few areas that could be improved. Sometimes the platform feels slightly slow when working with large test suites during test execution and report generation, which impacts overall productivity.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

ACCELQ solves our complex automation scripting issues, reduces maintenance effort, and speeds up test creation. Its codeless platform allows both technical and non-technical members to quickly create tests, making the process efficient and reliable. The self-healing and reusable components enhance productivity.

What do you like best about the product?

what stood out for us is ACCELQ's broad test support combines with how well it enhances Agile and DevOPs workflows. The platform support UI, API, mobile , and backend testing in one place, which makes it easier to manage quality without juggling multiple tools.

The codeless approach is genuinely helpful both QA and non technical team members can contribute to test creation, which speeds things up during sprints. We also like how test cases align well with CI?CD pipelines, making continuous testing feel natural instead of forced. Overall, it fits nicely into a fast moving Agile environment

What do you dislike about the product?

There is a bit of a learning curve at the beginning, especially around understanding how ACCELQ structures test logic and flows. Some advanced configurations could also benefit from clearer documentation or more in app guidance once you are past onboarding, it is smooth, but initial setup can feel slightly overwhelming for first time users.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

ACCELQ helps us reduce dependency on heavy scripting and fragmented testing tools. Before using it, our testing process was slower and more siloed between QA and development.

With ACCELQ, We've improved collaboration accross teams, shortened regresion cycles, and increased test coverage without increasing headcount. The DevOPs integration ensures tests run consistently as part of our delivery pipeline, which has helped us catch issues earlier and release with more confidence.

What do you like best about the product?

I use ACCELQ for automated testing of web and mobile applications. I really like its no-code automation approach because it makes test creation fast and easy, even without heavy scripting. Its smart self-healing capabilities and reusable test logic work especially well. I also appreciate how ACCELQ integrates with CI/CD tools like Jenkins for continuous testing and with Jira for test management. The combination of these features led our team to highly rate ACCELQ a 10 out of 10.

What do you dislike about the product?

ACCELQ is powerful, but the initial setup and learning curve can be a bit challenging for new users. It could be improved by offering more guided onboarding, such as step-by-step setup.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

ACCELQ solves complex, time-consuming test automation and reduces heavy scripting needs. Its no-code automation makes test creation fast and easy. The smart self-healing capabilities and reusable test logic work well, streamlining automated testing for web and mobile applications.

What do you like best about the product?

I like ACCELQ's codeless automation approach and user-friendly interface, which makes test creation quick and simple for everyone. It helps both technical and non-technical team members to create and manage tests without needing programming skills. This allows us to build test cases faster, reduce dependency on developers, and quickly update tests whenever requirements change. The integrations with tools like Jenkins, Jira, and Git streamline our workflow. Connecting with Jenkins allows us to automatically trigger test executions as part of our CI/CD pipeline, which saves time and ensures continuous testing with every build or deployment. Integration with Jira helps us easily track defects and link test cases. Since ACCELQ is a cloud-based and codeless platform, there was no need for complex installations or heavy technical configuration, which saved us a lot of time. We were able to onboard the team quickly, connect our applications, and start creating test cases almost immediately. I rated ACCELQ a 10 out of 10 for recommendation because it has made our testing process faster, easier, and more efficient.

What do you dislike about the product?

I think there could be more advanced customization options and deeper reporting or analytics features. It would be helpful to have more flexibility in configuring workflows, reusable components, and test logic to better match our specific project requirements. Options like custom templates, advanced parameterization, and more control over execution settings would allow us to design tests that fit complex scenarios more easily. For reporting, I would like more detailed dashboards that show pass/fail rates over time, flaky test detection, execution history, and defect trends to help us quickly identify problem areas and improve stability.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use ACCELQ for testing processes like web, API, and regression. It reduces manual effort, speeds up test creation, and minimizes script maintenance with its codeless platform, allowing all team members to easily manage tests and quickly update as requirements change.