Transaction Monitoring

What do you like best about the product?

The interface is user-friendly, and it’s easy to navigate.

What do you dislike about the product?

I had some trouble creating new accounts for my colleagues.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Comply Advantage helps us with daily fiat transaction monitoring.

What do you like best about the product?

We've had a very positive experience using ComplyAdvantage for sanctions and adverse media screening. The platform provides extensive risk intelligence, and the quality of its screening data helps us to identify potential risks quickly and confidently. Response times are fast, and ongoing monitoring has significantly reduced the amount of manual work required in our onboarding and review processes.

What do you dislike about the product?

The main area for improvement is the initial implementation and configuration process, which could be smoother and more straightforward. I’d also welcome more flexibility in reporting and in how dashboards can be customized. Finally, having greater confidence that false positives aren’t occurring would improve my overall perception of the product.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

ComplyAdvantage helps us address several key compliance and financial crime risks, including sanctions screening and adverse media checks. In the past, these activities required significant manual effort, which often led to inconsistent reviews and slower supplier onboarding. With ComplyAdvantage, these processes are centralised and supported by real-time risk intelligence, allowing us to identify potential compliance concerns far more efficiently and with greater consistency.

What do you like best about the product?

What I like most about ComplyAdvantage is how it streamlines sanctions, PEP, and adverse media screening through an intuitive, cloud-based platform. It enables a more efficient and consistent approach to supplier due diligence, helping us meet compliance requirements without adding unnecessary administrative burden.

The platform is straightforward to navigate, screening results come back quickly, and the risk-based approach helps us focus on suppliers that genuinely require closer review. I also find the ability to maintain an auditable record of screening activities especially valuable for demonstrating compliance with institutional policies and governance requirements. Overall, it supports more informed procurement decisions while improving the efficiency and transparency of our supplier onboarding process.

What do you dislike about the product?

While ComplyAdvantage is generally easy to use, some screening results require manual review to distinguish genuine risks from false positives. It would also be helpful to have more flexible reporting and dashboard customisation to better support procurement monitoring and internal stakeholder reporting. Aside from these minor improvements, the platform meets our supplier due diligence requirements well.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

ComplyAdvantage helps us manage supplier due diligence more efficiently by automating sanctions, PEP, and adverse media screening. This reduces the time spent on manual checks, supports compliance with university procurement and governance requirements, and provides a clear audit trail for decision-making. As a result, supplier onboarding is faster, compliance risks are better managed, and procurement staff can focus on higher-value activities.

What do you like best about the product?

I like that ComplyAdvantage posts a lot of data from the Internet and its sources, and it pulls in a lot of information in adverse media. That's really useful. The adverse media feature is particularly valuable for understanding reputational risks and the reputation or legal concerns of transacting with an individual or company.

What do you dislike about the product?

One thing I find lacking in ComplyAdvantage is the very limited ownership information. There's very little information about the beneficial ownership of a sanctioned entity. I believe when a sanctioned company is identified, there should also be a trail to highlight why the company is deemed sanctioned, whether that's because of a sanctioned owner or because of a specific designation by authority. They should also provide links to any related entities tied to the sanctioned entity itself.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

I use ComplyAdvantage to verify sanctioned status and assess reputational and legal risks of transacting with individuals and companies using adverse media data.

What do you like best about the product?

The visibility of data on the executive summary section is really helpful, I can quickly get insights at a glance and fill my MI reports quickly and accurately.

What do you dislike about the product?

I don't like the fact that there is no geolocation feature when reviewing transactions. I would like to be able to see the location of transactions being carried out.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

We struggled to find a platform that could help us monitor transactions properly. We worked with vendors who either couldn’t keep up with the rules we needed or didn’t fully understand our requests, and they weren’t willing to collaborate with us to get things right. ComplyAdvantage has gone beyond our expectations, especially thanks to our account manager , Chemilla Lambert. She has been amazing.