Listing Thumbnail

    Cortex Internal Developer Portal

     Info
    Sold by: Cortex 
    AI-powered Internal Developer Portal that helps engineering teams deliver reliable, secure, efficient software, faster.
    4.2

    Overview

    Play video

    Cortex is the AI-powered Internal Developer Portal that helps engineering leaders at companies like Canva, Skyscanner, and Grammarly build organizations that ship reliable, secure, and efficient software, faster. By connecting data across your engineering ecosystem, Cortex uses AI to make sense of complex systems, identify what's holding your teams back, and drive action automatically. From understanding ownership and production readiness to enforcing best practices and measuring AI maturity, Cortex transforms engineering data into meaningful insights and automated workflows. The result: teams that move faster with confidence, stronger reliability at scale, and an organization fully ready for the AI-powered future of software development.

    Magellan: Onboarding with Cortex 
    Production Readiness 
    AI Chief of Staff for Eng Leaders 
    Cortex MCP Use Cases 
    Scorecards, Initiatives, & Reports 
    Workflows 
    Catalogs 
    Incident Management & Response 

    Book a demo: https://www.cortex.io/demo 

    Cortex provides custom packages for every phase towards engineering excellence. Please contact AWS-Marketplace@cortex.io  for a demo of Cortex, Private Offer, or additional pricing options.

    Highlights

    • Cortex Overview: https://youtu.be/0ugYI8r1DwI
    • Explore Cortex: https://www.cortex.io/explore
    • Customer stories: https://www.cortex.io/case-studies

    Details

    Sold by

    Delivery method

    Deployed on AWS
    New

    Introducing multi-product solutions

    You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.

    Multi-product solutions

    Features and programs

    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    Pricing

    Cortex Internal Developer Portal

     Info
    Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor, and additional usage. You pay upfront or in installments according to your contract terms with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. Usage-based pricing is in effect for overages or additional usage not covered in the contract. These charges are applied on top of the contract price. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before the contract end date, access to your entitlements will expire.
    Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator  to estimate your infrastructure costs.

    12-month contract (2)

     Info
    Dimension
    Description
    Cost/12 months
    Cortex IDP Users
    50 Users SaaS Hosted
    $39,000.00
    Depreciated SKU
    Depreciated SKU
    $100,000.00

    Additional usage costs (1)

     Info

    The following dimensions are not included in the contract terms, which will be charged based on your usage.

    Dimension
    Description
    Cost/user/hour
    Fees
    Overage Fees
    $1.00

    Vendor refund policy

    N/A

    How can we make this page better?

    We'd like to hear your feedback and ideas on how to improve this page.
    We'd like to hear your feedback and ideas on how to improve this page.

    Legal

    Vendor terms and conditions

    Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .

    Content disclaimer

    Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.

    Usage information

     Info

    Delivery details

    Software as a Service (SaaS)

    SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.

    Resources

    Vendor resources

    Support

    Vendor support

    Please refer to Cortex Documentation, your company Slack channel with our team, or your Sales & Customer Success points of contacts for additional support. For any additional troubleshooting please contact help@cortex.io .

    AWS infrastructure support

    AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

    Product comparison

     Info
    Updated weekly
    By Jellyfish
    By Spotify for Backstage (Spotify AB)

    Accolades

     Info
    Top
    10
    In Application Stacks
    Top
    10
    In Agile Lifecycle Management

    Customer reviews

     Info
    Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
    Reviews
    Functionality
    Ease of use
    Customer service
    Cost effectiveness
    3 reviews
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    0 reviews
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Positive reviews
    Mixed reviews
    Negative reviews

    Overview

     Info
    AI generated from product descriptions
    AI-Powered Data Integration and Analysis
    Connects data across engineering ecosystem and uses AI to analyze complex systems and identify bottlenecks
    Production Readiness Assessment
    Evaluates and tracks production readiness status of services and systems
    Automated Workflow Execution
    Drives automated actions and workflows based on insights derived from engineering data
    Best Practices Enforcement
    Enforces engineering best practices and standards across teams and services
    AI Maturity Measurement
    Measures and tracks AI maturity levels within the organization
    Engineering Signals Analysis
    Analyzes engineering signals and contextual business data to provide actionable insights into engineering organizations and their operations
    Resource Allocation Optimization
    Optimizes allocation and operations of engineering resources to align with strategic business objectives
    Engineering Investment Measurement
    Measures investment of engineering efforts to improve business and engineering decision-making
    Project Progress Monitoring
    Monitors, communicates, and facilitates progress of engineering projects and deliverables
    Operations and Delivery Process Improvement
    Continuously improves engineering operations and delivery processes to accelerate value delivery
    Software Quality Assurance
    Codified checks and guidance to ensure quality, reliability, and alignment of software development practices
    Access Control Management
    Role-based access control mechanism to manage and control access to actions and data within the portal
    Usage Analytics and Monitoring
    Identification, benchmarking, and analysis of usage trends to understand adoption patterns and developer behavior
    Ownership and Permission Mapping
    Clear association of owners to permissions and roles to establish accountability and access governance

    Contract

     Info
    Standard contract
    No
    No

    Customer reviews

    Ratings and reviews

     Info
    4.2
    4 ratings
    5 star
    4 star
    3 star
    2 star
    1 star
    25%
    75%
    0%
    0%
    0%
    3 AWS reviews
    |
    1 external reviews
    External reviews are from PeerSpot .
    reviewer2807607

    Centralized service catalog has improved visibility and now drives faster incident resolution

    Reviewed on Mar 06, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Cortex.io  is that it provides the centralization of data from all the tools like CI/CD, monitoring, or incident management, making it a single source of truth and giving us a centralized command center for managing the health and reliability of the software services and the teams.

    I use Cortex.io  as a centralized command center to manage many microservices and engineering squads in a centralized way, which provides a centralized service catalog that centralizes data from all the microservices, allowing us to know who owns each service, its current health, and any documentation gaps.

    What is most valuable?

    The best feature Cortex.io offers is visibility, which is most relevant to the teams or services struggling with consistency and operational toil. This visibility gives us complete insight across our entire services and organization, which stands out the most for me.

    The visibility feature has helped our teams by resulting in a 75% reduction in mean time to restore, allowing us to get alerts and incident history instead of relying on scattered spreadsheets and unreliable tools, thus saving around 15 to 20 hours per newly created service.

    Cortex.io positively impacts our organization not only with visibility but also through its scorecards that grade each service against engineering standards, helping us check for on-call owners, passing tests, and production readiness.

    The scorecards feature has changed how our teams work by providing me, as a manager, with a bird's eye view of operational maturity across teams and insight into pending incidents and responsible personnel.

    What needs improvement?

    I wish Cortex.io could cater to smaller teams struggling with visibility and operational toil, as a lighter version would be really great.

    I believe AI adoption tracking can be enhanced and made more useful, as it currently lags behind market trends, especially in the area of security tracking for AI adoption. I think the interface and support could improve in that field.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Cortex.io for the last six months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Cortex.io is very stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The scalability of Cortex.io is high.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support is very professional, and I receive complete answers within a fraction of time.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I haven't used any other solution previously.

    How was the initial setup?

    I deploy Cortex.io using both public cloud and on-premise solutions.

    For my public cloud deployment, I use AWS , and for my self-hosted deployment, I utilize Kubernetes  plus Helm.

    What about the implementation team?

    I don't have complete visibility on how Cortex.io was purchased, but I believe it is through AWS Marketplace .

    What was our ROI?

    I have been seeing a 70 to 75% reduction in MTTR after using Cortex.io, which is the only metric I can share.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Regarding pricing, it is fair, and the setup cost for the self-hosted version is really simple. I am on a starter deal with five product tiers that include engineering intelligence and DORA matrices. Although I have faced budget restrictions regarding engineering intelligence for renewal, initial setup costs are justified and licensing fees are broadly acceptable in the industry.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Cortex.io, I evaluated Spotify Backstage, which I believe is open source, and also looked at Port .io, as these are the two options I discussed or analyzed.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to others looking into using Cortex.io is to start with a service catalog first, as scorecards are the real power feature, and it is beneficial to invest in Cortex  Academy early for teams to learn how to use it effectively.

    If Cortex.io gets better AI adoption tracking improvements and they provide solutions for smaller setups, that would also enhance its value.

    I would rate this product an 8 out of 10 overall. I feel completely satisfied, as I do not have any other improvements needed, and have no additional thoughts about Cortex.io.

    Armani Bond

    Centralized metrics have improved risk visibility and now guide daily security decisions

    Reviewed on Feb 24, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    I have experiences in Cortex.io  to centralize overall security and engineering insights and to track the overall health and risk metrics. I use it for monitoring scoreboards, metrics to measure systems' reliability, and the security posture overall. I also track the vulnerabilities and do remediation progress, provide visibility into the team performances and compliance data, and use dashboards to prioritize security and improve overall operations with my team. I drive data-based decisions to reduce risk and improve engineering efficiency.

    I use Cortex.io  daily to track my security and the operational health metrics for services. For example, I use it to monitor service scoreboards that measure things such as vulnerability backlogs, deployment risk, incident trends, and compliance metrics. When I saw a service with a growing vulnerability backlog, I worked with the engineering team to prioritize remediation tasks and track the progress in Cortex.io. I updated dashboards and metrics so that leadership could see improvements over time, which helped teams make data-driven decisions. It helped them reduce risk by ensuring vulnerabilities were addressed in a timely manner, and everything was fixed promptly.

    Another example of how I used Cortex.io is that I used it to monitor security and compliance health across our services. I review service scoreboards and metrics that track open security findings, configuration compliance, incident response performance, and deployment risk indicators. When a service showed non-compliant configurations or any open findings, I notified the engineering teams, helped prioritize remediation, and tracked progress in Cortex.io dashboards. I provided updates so leadership could measure improvements. Overall, this ensured security issues were addressed proactively and in a timely manner, giving teams clear visibility into the risk. I check dashboards and metrics regularly as part of my daily workflow and use the data to guide security and operational improvements.

    What is most valuable?

    In my opinion, one of the best features of Cortex.io is the unified service catalog because Cortex.io automatically builds a centralized catalog for all your services and teams, detailing the ownerships, so you always know what exists and who owns that feature. I also love the scorecards and readiness checks; Cortex.io provides custom scoreboards that measure things such as security controls and best compliance practices, allowing teams to track health and improvements over time. I also love the progress tracking and how you can initiate and tie the scorecard goals so that work isn't just visible but actionable, allowing you to complete owners, deadlines, and also track progress that way. I appreciate the visibility and overall better reliability, as Cortex.io helps speed up onboarding, improves reliability, and frees engineers to focus on high-impact work throughout the team.

    The scorecards control the readiness, security controls, and best practices, and they have helped my team make better tracking of health improvements and save a lot of time.

    Cortex.io has positively impacted team collaboration because it provides clear visibility into service health, security posture, and operational metrics. Before Cortex.io, insights were scattered across tools and spreadsheets, making it harder to prioritize work and measure progress. With Cortex.io, my teams could see scoreboards and metrics all in one place, which allowed us to identify vulnerabilities and risks faster. We track remediation progress over time, make data-driven decisions more quickly, and improve collaboration through shared visibility. This enhances my team's efficiency, accountability, and helps reduce risk by addressing issues proactively and in a timely manner.

    I experienced timely remediation because Cortex.io improved my team's efficiency and security visibility by centralizing service measures and risk data. Before using it, we tracked vulnerabilities and operational metrics in separate tools and spreadsheets, which made prioritization difficult. We reduced time spent searching for risk data because everything was on one dashboard, and my teams could quickly see scoreboards. We did remediation efforts to track it better and prioritize high-risk issues faster, and overall, it improved collaboration and decision-making within my security team. The operational health measures also made it more transparent.

    What needs improvement?

    One feature I would love to see in Cortex.io is more advanced real-time threat detection and automated alerting. I feel that this is very important, especially tailored for vulnerability severity and risk prioritization. Currently, Cortex.io provides excellent scoreboards and insights, but having real-time security alerts tied directly to risk levels, with automatic escalation and suggested remediation actions, will make the platform even more powerful in my opinion. This matters because it bridges the gap between observability and active security response, helping prioritize high-severity risks automatically, which can cut down the time spent manually correlating metrics and alerts.

    One area for Cortex.io's improvement could be deeper automation and actionable recommendations. For example, the automation prioritization for vulnerabilities by risk could have more remediation actions based on historical issues, and also more security tools for real-time alerts.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Cortex.io for about five years.

    What other advice do I have?

    Something I wish I knew before starting that could serve as good advice for others looking into using Cortex.io is to integrate it into your daily workflow. If possible, use it more than just part of your daily routine. I feel that it should be used actively as a decision-making tool and not just for visibility. The scorecards and metrics are powerful, and they are most valuable when teams actively use the insights to prioritize security and operational improvements. I advise others to regularly review scorecards and health metrics and to treat the dashboards as decision-making tools. Collaborate on remediation based on insights, track progress over time, focus on metric improvements, and maintain clear ownership and accountability, as Cortex.io works best when integrated into team processes, leading to better overall improvement. I would rate my overall experience with Cortex.io as an 8 out of 10.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Ronald Paz

    Behavior analytics has transformed threat detection and reduces investigation time in our SOC

    Reviewed on Feb 20, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    Cortex.io  is most valuable when used as a correlation and behavior analytics engine rather than just as endpoint protection. In a financial sector project, I deployed Cortex XDR  to consolidate endpoint, network, and identity telemetry into a unified detection model. A specific use case involved detecting lateral movement attempts via anomalous Kerberos ticket behavior combined with unusual PowerShell execution.

    Cortex XDR  correlates endpoint behavior telemetry, Active Directory authentication logs, and network connection patterns. This capability allowed me to detect a stealthy privilege escalation attempt that traditional antivirus and isolated SIEM  rules would not have identified independently.

    What is most valuable?

    The feature that made the biggest operational difference in Cortex.io  is behavioral analytics plus cross-domain correlation in the XDR  engine.

    The most valuable aspect of the behavioral analytics and cross-domain incorporation in Cortex.io, more than advanced policy or XDR  integration alone, is that the key differential is automatic incident grouping, attack storyline visualization, and cross-source correlation without manual rule building. This significantly reduces MTTD and MTTR analyst fatigue.

    Integration with XSOAR further enhances this through automation playbooks in Cortex.io.

    Positive impact areas from Cortex.io include a 40 to 60% reduction in false positives compared to legacy SIEM  and antivirus setup, faster containment via automated response actions, improved SOC efficiency, and improved compliance posture. Cortex.io improves compliance posture, evidence collection, and reporting. It also improves executive visibility through dashboards aligned to risk exposure, MITRE ATT&CK coverage, and incident response KPIs.

    What needs improvement?

    Areas for improvement in Cortex.io include the licensing model complexity, which can become modular and fragmented. The initial tuning effort requires experienced analysts. Different tools are managed separately. Advanced analytics sometimes require deeper partner ecosystem integration. Data ingestion cost optimization could be more transparent.

    While technically strong, Cortex.io could improve cost predictability and cross-vendor integration flexibility.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Cortex.io for three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Cortex.io is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Cortex.io has the performance and scalability for my network.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support for Cortex.io is not the best; I had a few problems.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I previously used Harmony Check Point, and it was changed because Check Point does not have a native integration with other tools from other vendors.

    How was the initial setup?

    Pricing for Cortex.io is expensive. The setup cost depends on the scope, endpoint count, and data source. Licensing is modular for endpoint, data lake, and analytics, so it depends on what I want. For my mid-sized organization, cost planning is critical to avoid unexpected expansion charges.

    What was our ROI?

    I see a return on investment with Cortex.io, and the most important metric is a 35% reduction in SOC operation and 50% faster investigation time.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Pricing for Cortex.io is expensive. The setup cost depends on the scope, endpoint count, and data source. Licensing is modular for endpoint, data lake, and analytics, so it depends on what I want. For my mid-sized organization, cost planning is critical to avoid unexpected expansion charges.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Cortex.io, I evaluated other options, including Trellix and Trellix Helix.

    What other advice do I have?

    Cortex.io has strong detection capability, a mature ecosystem, and excellent visualization and threat analytics. However, the cost model can escalate quickly and requires skilled resources to fully exploit its capabilities.

    I would advise others evaluating Cortex.io to ensure their SOC maturity level aligns with the tool's capability. Define a clear use case before deployment. Invest in proper tuning and playbook automation. I would rate Cortex.io an eight on a scale of one to ten.

    reviewer2801571

    Cloud security has improved as detailed dashboards prioritize vulnerabilities and risks

    Reviewed on Feb 07, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    I use Cortex.io  for cloud security to check vulnerabilities and for application security to check misalignments, misconfigurations, and open scanning of vulnerabilities in the environment, in the cloud environment. My main use case for Cortex.io  is cloud security.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Cortex.io offers are the dashboard, which is very detailed, and the fact that you can run different kinds of testing such as application security testing, vulnerability management testing, and cloud security testing, allowing you to see the levels and rankings of how vulnerable those situations are, including the risk factors.

    Out of those features, the dashboard stands out as the most valuable to me because it contains all of the information and analytics that is required.

    Cortex.io has positively impacted my organization by helping as an accelerator in fixing a bunch of different code reviews and cloud-based systems, and we also use it for client work just to ensure that everything is properly shipped.

    The specific outcomes from using Cortex.io include quicker insights represented by numbers and graphs, allowing us to see the severity level, the number of open vulnerabilities, and the number of open tickets, which helps us check which one to resolve first.

    What needs improvement?

    For now, I cannot think of how Cortex.io can be improved. I do not have more about the needed improvements, even small things that could make my experience better.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Cortex.io for about a year.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I would assume Cortex.io is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I think Cortex.io is quite scalable for multiple users depending on the task and demand.

    How are customer service and support?

    I haven't had to reach out to customer support, so I wouldn't know how it is.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Negative

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I did not previously use a different solution.

    How was the initial setup?

    I am not sure if we purchased Cortex.io through the AWS Marketplace , but it is provided by Palo Alto.

    What about the implementation team?

    I cannot really tell if we purchased Cortex.io through the AWS Marketplace , but it is provided by Palo Alto.

    What was our ROI?

    I have not seen a return on investment, so I cannot share relevant metrics.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I am not sure about my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Cortex.io, I did not evaluate other options because I did not make the decisions; it was a business decision.

    What other advice do I have?

    I think Cortex.io is a good space to start. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Private Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    View all reviews