MoEngage (IN)
Targeted campaigns have increased active users and revenue but AI speed and cost still need work
What is our primary use case?
In my current organization, we are using MoEngage to engage with our customers, improve our funnel metrics, and onboard new users from our unpaid to paid category of business.
MoEngage is currently live on our MathUp app, which is a math gaming app for kids. There are users who come into our funnel from different sources, and we use MoEngage to increase the DAU and MAU and ultimately reach out to them through in-app popups and push notifications to pitch them our math and English program, which is a paid program. This is how we use MoEngage; it is one of the revenue-generating channels for us.
There are a couple more ways that we use MoEngage. For example, we recently came across a lower rating on our application, and we are using MoEngage to run a campaign on the active user base who are on the application to take them to the Play Store and App Store to get their reviews. Since we do not have the bandwidth of our current product managers to enable a feature on the app, we are using MoEngage push notifications as well as in-app popups as a way to redirect the user to the Play Store and App Store for the ratings.
What is most valuable?
I think the best features MoEngage offers, in my experience, are send time optimization and the recent AI insights that are very helpful.
Send time optimization is beneficial since Bhanzu is serviceable across the globe, and there are different behavior patterns from users in different geographies. By using send time optimization, it helps us capture more eyes and increase our user interaction across different geographies. Additionally, AI insights help us optimize the campaign; we also get suggestions in terms of the creatives and the content. MoEngage has been a good platform so far, and I think it is very useful for keeping our users engaged on the application, which ultimately turns into a revenue channel. The more users engage with my platform, the more they will end up buying my product, which is the actual math course. MoEngage helps me reach out to these users very actively based on their activity, and hyper-personalization combined with reaching the audience at the right time helps me improve the end-to-end funnel and create more revenue opportunities.
Our MAU has increased from 10,000 users to 35,000 users in India, and we were also able to run a championship through our MathUp application, wherein we generated almost one crore of revenue across different verticals in the last year through various campaigns and championships that we run on the MathUp application.
What needs improvement?
I think MoEngage's AI capabilities comply with all the security norms.
Regarding the accuracy and reliability of MoEngage's AI capabilities, I think it takes a lot of time to learn and can be optimized. There is definitely scope for improvement, and the better data you feed into it, the better it gets. However, it can learn more, and the speed can be improved.
I think there are more tools available in the market that are very competitive and similar to MoEngage. MoEngage is a bit on the expensive side considering the features available, especially since similar features are available in the market. If there is something that can be worked around to bring down the cost, it will definitely increase the ROI for the users of MoEngage.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for 11 years.
What other advice do I have?
I would suggest considering the different use cases for MoEngage. It definitely enables use cases that are not practically possible in-house, in terms of hyper-personalization, real-time notification, event-based cards, and other capabilities. MoEngage also has a feature called LPs, landing pages, where you can create your own landing pages, customize them, and make modifications to go live. You can explore multiple use cases with MoEngage and should discuss your business objectives with the MoEngage SPOC for different alternatives and available use cases that you might not have thought of. I give this review an overall rating of 7.
Targeted cohorts have improved campaign performance and provide clear engagement insights
What is our primary use case?
.
What is most valuable?
.
What needs improvement?
.
For how long have I used the solution?
.
What other advice do I have?
The marketing team with help of an chatbot is offering dollars worth of reward for the reviews and once the reviews are posted, the bot just wont respond..
MoEngage found a fraud way to get reviews..
Funnel and prediction reports have improved CRM media performance analysis and decision making
What is our primary use case?
A specific example of how I used the reports for media performance in CRM is by observing the results of the campaigns through the trackings and using the funnel report dashboards, retention report, and prediction reports with MoEngage.
What is most valuable?
Regarding the funnel report, I would highlight that it is a report that has several possible perspectives regarding CRM attributions and it helps significantly in decision-making for upcoming communications and day-to-day strategies.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
What about the implementation team?
What was our ROI?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
Behavior insights have improved real-time engagement but integration ownership still needs work
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for MoEngage is user behavioral analysis and the trigger of campaigns based on the user's behavior that MoEngage provides.
A specific example of how I use MoEngage for user behavioral analysis or campaign targeting is that we have integrated MoEngage's SDK with our mobile application. When a user launches the mobile application, whatever journey or path the user takes, we have configured the respective events and custom events within MoEngage, which gives us the ability to do funnel analysis and provides us with clickstream data. Based on the key actions on the mobile application, we trigger various cross-channel campaigns such as push notification campaigns, WhatsApp campaigns, email campaigns, or SMS campaigns.
What is most valuable?
MoEngage's best features are its structured approach to everything, from creating user profiles to deciding the system attributes and custom attributes. How the events are defined, both system events and custom events, is another excellent aspect, making it a new-age platform which allows users to configure everything through profile APIs and event APIs.
MoEngage has positively impacted my organization because before MoEngage's onboarding, we were not having behavioral data or the behavioral analysis of our users in a single platform. Google Analytics was available, but it is somewhat user-agnostic. When we onboarded MoEngage, we could gather a lot of clickstreams and event data of whatever user profiles were created, and that has given us insights about the behaviors of the users which have positively impacted the business decisions that the marketing team or the business team makes.
What needs improvement?
MoEngage can be improved in the sense that while it is aligned to a mobile-first business strategy, bigger organizations with multiple business entities have complex requirements. Although MoEngage is great for having user behavioral data as the core of the platform, it should try to build the channels in-house. For example, the email channel relies on integrations with third-party service providers, which can create issues when there are integration glitches as MoEngage does not take ownership of those channels.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using MoEngage for close to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
MoEngage is stable. It does not own any channels, so it remains stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Regarding MoEngage's scalability, it is quite scalable, but the only issue is that when user profiles created in MoEngage increase, the cost also rises, sometimes creating a mismatch between scalability and engagement.
How are customer service and support?
MoEngage's customer support is good, and they have a dedicated customer success manager and integration expert. However, since they do not own actual channels, many queries are redirected to third-party service providers such as Netcore or SendGrid, which can lead to challenges as MoEngage does not take ownership of those services.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have not used a different solution before using MoEngage.
What about the implementation team?
We did not purchase MoEngage through AWS Marketplace. Instead, we connected with MoEngage's sales team, and they guided us through the agreement and onboarding process, with integration experts helping us get started.
What was our ROI?
Specific outcomes that show how MoEngage has impacted my organization include real-time triggers that it offers, enabling real-time campaigns that have increased the engagement rate. For example, when we started, our active user base was around 2 to 2.5 lakh users, which in 2.5 years has crossed a million now. The engagement rate, or what I would say, active monthly users has grown from 2 to 2.5 lakhs to over a million in around 30 months.
We have managed to increase campaign execution efficiency by 30%, as earlier, a campaign used to take around three days to rollout to actual users, but now it can be done in a day or maximum 10 to 12 hours.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with MoEngage's pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is reasonable. It is not too costly or too cheap, but when considering the overall cost, as it is a new-age platform, the tech team must be available to push data events and attributes into the platform consistently, making the total overall cost comparable to that of Salesforce Marketing Cloud for their enterprise edition.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing MoEngage, we evaluated a couple of options, including Gupshup and WebEngage, alongside MoEngage.
What other advice do I have?
Regarding MoEngage's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are quite good and standard as offered across other platforms. Their capabilities are good and easy to use and help marketers improve their campaign execution efficiency with those features.
Regarding the accuracy and reliability of MoEngage's AI output, I note that since it is an AI feature, it comes with a learning curve. Although MoEngage claims that it provides a well-trained AI model, we have reservations as sometimes the data it collects may not be accurate due to the specific format required for user attributes and events, which creates challenges for providing input data conveniently.
My advice to others looking into using MoEngage is that if your business model operates on a mobile-first strategy, then MoEngage is a good platform for getting user behavior and user engagement. However, it can be challenging to integrate with your in-house CRM if your sales teams are using CRMs such as Salesforce CRM or Microsoft Dynamics, as that integration requires significant tech resources. I would rate my overall experience with MoEngage as a 7 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Targeted campaigns have increased registrations and improved data driven user engagement
What is our primary use case?
MoEngage is primarily used for campaigning through push notifications and in-app notifications. Additionally, I heavily utilize the flows project that MoEngage launched in 2024 as part of orchestrated campaigning.
A specific example of how MoEngage is used for campaigning involves seller onboarding in IndiaMART. When a seller registers in the IndiaMART app, they complete an onboarding journey consisting of three different steps. If a seller completes only two steps and does not complete the third step, which is the most important step to complete their registration, MoEngage is used to inform the user after a certain time that they have completed two steps and only one step remains to complete the registration. A push notification is sent to the user informing them about the drop-off and encouraging them to complete the registration process as soon as possible in order to use IndiaMART and its features to grow their business.
In addition to push notifications, in-app notifications are used heavily in MoEngage by the marketing team. For instance, if there is a New Year offer on buy leads, which is very important for the subscription model purchased by paid sellers, multiple offers and promotions are shared while the user is using the app. This is an excellent use case for in-app notifications, and good conversions are achieved using MoEngage.
What is most valuable?
MoEngage's best feature is that it itself functions as an analytics engine. It is not just a notification service provider; it provides features to push notifications, show in-apps, and create flows. Having access to analytics helps in conducting valuable case studies. For example, I can analyze all users who came to the app, viewed the buy lead screen, but did not purchase the buy lead. Having this data allows for analysis of the problems that may have prevented the user from making a purchase. MoEngage's analytics engine is an important feature, along with the flows that allow creation of a complete web based on user journeys.
MoEngage has positively impacted the organization in three ways. First, there has been an increase in notification delivery rate by five to eight percent on Chinese OEMs, which typically have battery-aggressive operating systems. MoEngage has partnerships with these Chinese OEMs, enhancing the delivery of push notifications, leading to better user engagement.
What needs improvement?
One area where MoEngage could improve is by providing a feature that allows the app to maintain a persistent connection with internal organization servers. MoEngage claims partnerships with OEMs to ensure their processes are not killed when the app is in the background. If this feature were implemented, it could help run background services, engage users who have not been active on the app for days, and collect valuable information.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using MoEngage for about five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
MoEngage is quite stable overall. Some issues were encountered during the last quarter of 2023 due to GDPR changes implemented by Google, which required MoEngage to alter its architecture. This resulted in a slight dip in delivery rates, but it did not affect any key performance indicators significantly. Overall, MoEngage's performance remains smooth, and their status is consistently 200 OK.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
MoEngage's scalability is impressive, as it can easily handle growing workloads and user numbers. With 2.2 million users per month served, this figure is not even close to the peak capacity MoEngage can manage. It can handle millions of users and hundreds of millions of events per month, making it a robust product utilized by many top companies in the market.
How are customer service and support?
I have had positive experiences with MoEngage's customer support. There is a direct way to reach them, and about a year and a half ago, they established a ticketing system for help and support, which I find to be a significant improvement. Tickets can now be raised in MoEngage's help and support section, and communications are reflected in email automatically, making the entire support experience much more streamlined.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using MoEngage is to consider whether you are using it on the app side or API side. If using it on the app side, ensure that the unique MoEngage profile is created using the user account rather than the Google Advertiser ID. Using the user account helps in identifying users and reduces the number of profiles created, leading to lower costs. This is a crucial metric that can greatly benefit organizations in their monthly invoices and allow them to achieve more events and reach more users.
Having used MoEngage for five years, I have many thoughts about it. I have observed its ups and downs and the innovations it has undertaken over time. MoEngage's scope as an analytics engine is significant. I am confident that it will provide insights to product managers to improve their products, and I encourage everyone to try it.
Regarding MoEngage's governance and security related to its AI capabilities, I find that MoEngage takes care of every compliance and privacy law, including GDPR compliance.
MoEngage's accuracy and reliability of AI output have met my expectations. For example, when creating campaigns through push notifications or in-app notifications, content is crucial. MoEngage utilizes its Merlin AI to generate campaigns that yield maximum conversions. If data fed into the system contains PII, MoEngage flags it and ensures data privacy. High-performing campaigns have been successfully created using their AI, and there has been a conversion increase of ten to twelve percent compared to previous click rates.
I provide this review a rating of nine out of ten.
Targeted journeys have boosted segmentation accuracy and now drive high campaign engagement
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for MoEngage is building journeys in the Automation Studio and conducting segmentation work for different types of audiences.
I have used MoEngage for different types of audiences, especially for B2B and B2C, where I segmented audiences based on different sectors such as retail, healthcare, and educational sectors. I had a particular campaign that was supposed to be deployed to all sectors available in the market, using different types of creative content for the same campaign, and I used MoEngage for segmenting the audiences.
What is most valuable?
MoEngage is an excellent tool for A/B testing of the subject line and A/B testing of campaigns, and I especially use it for audience segmentation. It is a great tool for segmentation and testing, including A/B testing of content, pre-header, subject line, and everything related to campaigns.
In my opinion, the best features MoEngage offers are segmentation and the user-friendly terminologies used for the user experience, which are really great and not confusing like other tools used for campaigns. The terminologies used for the user side are simple to understand, and it is a self-explanatory tool to deploy campaigns, segment campaigns, and handle everything else.
Regarding the segmentation feature, I appreciate that MoEngage is very effective in segmenting a large number of audiences, and it has an automatic filter that recognizes the retail sector. When I use it for campaigns, I use the email IDs of particular individuals, and the individual email IDs are associated with the particular organization or association they work for. MoEngage automatically drags the particular sector email IDs, so if you specify a healthcare sector email ID, it will completely drag the email ID to the healthcare sector, and in a similar way for the educational sector. Millions of emails are segregated automatically based on the sector and are attached to the campaign, which is deployed in seconds.
MoEngage has positively impacted my organization because the delivery rate from MoEngage is really high, and I receive a very low amount of bounce-back rates and undeliverable email IDs because it has an automatic feature of segregating nullable and invalid email IDs. I notice a very minimal bounce-back rate and high deliverability, resulting in a high open rate, as it completely targets the open rate in the inbox.
I recall a specific campaign that was only selected for the healthcare sector, where I achieved a 92% open rate, a 50 to 60% click rate on average, and a bounce rate of just one percent, with undeliverable rates at 0.09%. That was a very significant achievement in my entire career using MoEngage.
What needs improvement?
MoEngage can be improved because although the platform is really user-friendly, it sometimes becomes slow when I click and enter. In a single dashboard, you can find all the features, and while it is user-friendly, segregating the interface would be really helpful. For example, if I need to go to a journey, I could click on the journey and then place it in the Automation Center or segmentation center. Having this segregation would make the experience better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using MoEngage for more than two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
MoEngage is a stable platform for me as it runs smoothly, and I appreciate the customer contact because whenever any bugs are escalated, we receive immediate support.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
MoEngage can handle growing amounts of data and users easily, and its scalability is impressive.
How are customer service and support?
I rate the customer support 9 out of 10 because they provide great email support, and if the bug is critical and needs priority attention, we have contact numbers to get in touch with the team.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used different types of ESPs such as Mailmodo and Mailchimp before switching to MoEngage.
What was our ROI?
I do not have a specific example of return on investment, but as a Senior Campaign Analyst, I see that whenever reports are circulated across the team after campaigns are deployed, the analysis shows a 30% reduction in OPEX costs. My role is limited to campaign analytics, while the return on investment is handled by a different team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is limited because this is handled by a different department in my organization, specifically the accounts section and sales. They handle different pricing aspects and deals, while I focus on the user experience.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Our sales team is responsible for evaluating options before onboarding an ESP, and I only provide my user experience reporting and pricing details. Factors such as pricing comparison and ROI are handled by a different team, which decides on onboarding the ESP for the organization.
What other advice do I have?
MoEngage is deployed in my organization on a private cloud, and we use Oracle as our cloud provider.
Regarding MoEngage's AI capabilities, I think it is pretty good for creating content for campaign subject lines, and the security is safe. I do not see any drawbacks using AI integrated with MoEngage.
Regarding MoEngage's AI capabilities, I sometimes feel that the answers I get from the AI are completely automated, as I have to provide keywords and frame questions to receive accurate answers. More analysis for specific questions would be really helpful for getting the exact answers I need.
I can definitely say that if you are considering using MoEngage for segmentation and A/B testing of the subject line, pre-header, and campaign body, it is a very nice tool. You do not need to do anything manually. You just have to set up a journey by providing the subject line and pre-header, and then the campaign gets automatically segregated. You just have to set up the journey and click to deploy, and it will be completed.
I think MoEngage is a very smooth platform that really matches the quality of the campaign market nowadays and fits well in the media and market environment. I give this review an overall rating of 8 out of 10.
Funnels have revealed onboarding drop-offs and now need a global view for event tracking
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for MoEngage is for tracking user events. I use MoEngage for tracking user events by monitoring how the user has navigated on the onboarding flow, which actions were taken, and how the user flowed through our onboarding.
What is most valuable?
The best features MoEngage offers include the ability to create a funnel for the user flow, track how the flow is dropping, and identify where the flow drops, and we are experiencing good uplifting.
It is very easy to set up and analyze these funnels in MoEngage, and I find the process intuitive.
MoEngage has positively impacted our organization by providing us various insights through which we have tracked how the user dropped.
The insights I have gained have helped us improve our onboarding flow. Specifically, we analyzed what was impacting the process. We found that the major drop-off was at the point of Digilocker flow, and so we tried to analyze that.
We are still working on improvements to the onboarding process, and once that is live, we will see if there is an improvement.
What needs improvement?
I would like to add a feature on which we can track the events globally as we have in Mixpanel.
MoEngage can be improved by having a global screen on which we can track the events globally for all the users instead of going for a particular user or going for a particular event. We should have a single global view.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using MoEngage for three years.
What other advice do I have?
Regarding MoEngage's AI capabilities, I find its accuracy and reliability of output quite accurate, as I can see in conversation, the replies are as if I am having a conversation.
My advice for others looking into using MoEngage is that it is quite good for creating the funnels and tracking the user flows. I would rate this review seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Unified messaging has streamlined monthly promotions and improved campaign tracking
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
MoEngage is helpful because our data can be connected from our API, and we can connect WhatsApp platforms to send our communications via MoEngage.
MoEngage offers a proper monitoring system, which I find most valuable in my daily work, as we can directly see the communication marketing funnel, know the CTA, how many users received our communications, and how many users have read our communications.
We can know if the campaign performed well because in MoEngage, we can set up our goal, and in our cases, we can know how many users are making transactions by clicking our communications based on our campaign that was sent to users.
We can reduce our manual process when we select the target user because MoEngage is already connected to our system using API, which is very helpful for us to select the user data; for example, filtering only active users can be achieved with that feature.
What needs improvement?
The one thing that needs to be improved is the customer service itself. We experienced trouble when we wanted to send the campaign via WhatsApp; MoEngage is connected with our another platform for WhatsApp communications, but suddenly our template that was created on our another platform could not be synced with MoEngage, which is a case not solved until now as I have complained to their customer service since three months ago.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for almost two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
MoEngage is stable as I have experienced no downtime or issues with reliability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
MoEngage can handle the increasing number of our users easily because our campaign adoption is aligned with our communications.
How are customer service and support?
I have one case that we cannot solve with customer service.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I never used a different solution before. I have used SendGrid, but that was only for email communications before choosing MoEngage.
What was our ROI?
The saving is on money, as we can save a number of people who maintain target user, and with MoEngage, we can simplify by clicking the attribute user or the segment or behavior user, which I believe can save our money.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using MoEngage is that it allows people to have one platform with multiple channel communications, which will be helpful.
User behavior insights have driven focused improvements in loan journey engagement
What is our primary use case?
I was a developer in a company, and our company wanted MoEngage for user analytics, so the developer team integrated MoEngage user analytics system on our website.
Our developer team wanted user analytics from MoEngage to track how users interact with our website for page views, button clicks, signups, purchases, and how much time the user spent, where they clicked, and what intrigued the customer.
I tracked key performance metrics with MoEngage such as user clicks and how much time the user spent on particular sections.
I think we were using MoEngage's user segmentation to create the audience and understand how the audience behaves, separate the audiences, and what they like and what they do not like.
We segmented users with MoEngage who were more interested in our loan section, as our website was more of a lending website, and we analyzed how long users spent on the website and how much time it took for them to sign up for the loan process.
What is most valuable?
I think we used the user analytics area of MoEngage, which was very good, and there were also some other features such as push notifications, email, SMS, and WhatsApp services, but we did not use those. I think those services were also great in my opinion.
I would appreciate if the analytics of MoEngage could be improved in the next releases.
We were able to assess with MoEngage what areas we were lacking and that could be improved, and we knew which sections users liked the most and where they had their focus.
What needs improvement?
I think the analytics part of MoEngage is pretty good in my opinion, as it provides pretty accurate details, and I think there could be some more features that could be added to make it more efficient.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used MoEngage for around two to three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
MoEngage was stable and reliable in my opinion.
I measured the reliability of MoEngage by testing our tracker events during our development process, and we could see how it was performing, and I think it was performing very well.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think our requirements were pretty straightforward with MoEngage, and we wanted to understand how users react and interact with our website, so I do not think I will be able to answer how scalable it is. I would say that I do not think we had that much scope.
How are customer service and support?
I communicated with the technical support of MoEngage, though I think our seniors had more communication with them, mostly for pricing and getting the keys and login. Apart from that, I do not think we had that much communication with them.
I would rate the technical support from MoEngage around nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not use something else for the same use cases before MoEngage. I think MoEngage was our first choice for user analytics.
How was the initial setup?
I participated in the initial setup and deployment of MoEngage.
For the initial setup of MoEngage, you can install it by using the SDK or you can use npm, and you have to go through the documentation for the first time, but I think it is still pretty easy and straightforward to integrate.
What about the implementation team?
The developer team integrated MoEngage user analytics system on our website.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our senior purchased the MoEngage pricing, so I actually do not know the pricing, but I think it was pretty affordable in my opinion.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
It was only MoEngage that we evaluated, as our team wanted, and actually, our seniors wanted that we use MoEngage.
What other advice do I have?
I used it around six or seven months ago.
I think we did not use MoEngage's A/B testing feature.
I do not think there was an AI integration with MoEngage, so we integrated everything by ourselves, and I think we had a pretty decent experience and pretty much okay customer engagement with that.
Overall, I would rate MoEngage around eight based on the aspects I worked with, though I think it could be improved a little bit more.
Targeted notifications have boosted repeat orders and currently improve customer retention
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for MoEngage is to track front-end events and the business team prepares data.
A specific example of how my team uses MoEngage to track front-end events is that they run campaigns on our DeHaat Farmer app and track those events. Based on that data, they track and conduct business.
How has it helped my organization?
MoEngage has positively impacted my organization by helping me send notifications to active users so they return to the app and place orders again, which has increased my orders.
Specifically, we have seen an increased retention rate for our customers, and order volume has increased by 20%.
What is most valuable?
The best features MoEngage offers are that it is very easy to access and has a very user-friendly interface so anybody can use it.
The interface is user-friendly because of how it is designed so that any type of user can use it very easily.
MoEngage has positively impacted my organization by helping me send notifications to active users so they return to the app and place orders again, which has increased my orders. Specifically, we have seen an increased retention rate for our customers, and order volume has increased by 20%.
What needs improvement?
MoEngage can be improved by adding more user-specific flows and decreasing the price.
Regarding improvements, I think the support team is very irresponsible and needs to be more active.
Regarding the notification system, MoEngage is very accurate, but it can be improved to be more user-specific with more custom notification triggers.
We need to get user-specific views inside MoEngage as an improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using MoEngage for two years.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using MoEngage is that a company should use MoEngage for tracking their user orders or user activity, as it can be very helpful for any company.
I have given sufficient feedback about MoEngage for the company to work on. I found this interview to be good overall. My review rating for MoEngage is 8 out of 10.