Infrastructure Monitoring and Observability Platform

LogicMonitor  automation is outstanding, as it automatically detects new systems on our server and sets them up to protect against security threats. It lets our team spend more time on important projects instead of tedious, repetitive tasks and helps us avoid costly mistakes.

It keeps our system secure and bug-free. It stops outside access to our systems immediately. Automation has reduced the manual work significantly, which lets our team members focus on more strategic projects instead of repetitive tasks.

It's easy to use even for non-technical users. It gives us live cost tracking. It is scalable and grows with us. It alerts early in case of any issues or threats.

It has limited access to financial resources.

I have used the solution for four years.

We did not use any other alternative other than LogicMonitor .

LogicMonitor has helped us with a lot of issues, including budgeting and security issues, so I would highly recommend it.

We considered Dynatrace .

The alerting automatically creates and routes tickets in our ITSM  system, which saves us a ton of manual work.

In my daily work, I monitor all kinds of servers and websites through LogicMonitor . It depends on the particular use case or the client requirement, and it involves all kinds of alerts related to the resources that a computer uses: CPU, memory, and networking.

I don't think anything unique exists about my main use case for LogicMonitor; anyone who uses LogicMonitor uses it in the same way, with only the types of alerts configured being different.

I don't have any numbers to share, but I can say, with my experience, the incident volume has dropped by about 30%, maybe more.

I find the UI of LogicMonitor is pretty good compared to other tools I've used, and we do use the reports for internal reviews and root cause analyses. I find it very clean.

LogicMonitor can be improved by reducing the number of false positives it generates and by enhancing the application monitoring part, which does not work well; Dynatrace  still dominates the industry for that.

My main use case for LogicMonitor  is managing network and switches. We have set up our office in various sites around the world, and LogicMonitor  helps us in monitoring the switches, the overall network, the ISP's state, and everything about the network. It's all managed by LogicMonitor.

If there are any alerts or if any switch goes down, we get an instant email through ServiceNow  to our mailbox.

The best features that LogicMonitor offers include integration with various platforms and the UI. LogicMonitor has positively impacted my organization by reducing network monitoring time and the overall time spent on reviewing the switches and network-related concerns.

Now we simply rely on the alerts, the emails, the priority of those alerts, the warning, and the severity; everything is managed by LogicMonitor. We don't have to work extensively on it anymore. We rely on the tool and the triggers.

I think if LogicMonitor offered a desktop app or something that can be installed on the machine, it would be really helpful.

Additionally, it times out after every couple of minutes, perhaps 20 or 30 minutes. If there were a way that it could continue running, whether as an app or as a site in the background, that would be helpful.

I have been using LogicMonitor for 2.5 years.

LogicMonitor is stable.

LogicMonitor's scalability is good; it is something that we can work on, and as I already mentioned, we are still working on it.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was all feasible; it wasn't that expensive.

My advice to others looking into using LogicMonitor is to go for it and use it; it's worth trying.

Dynamic Service Insights doesn't affect us in any way; it's just that the overall concept of managing the networks is working fine for us. LogicMonitor doesn't help in resolving MTTR; it only manages the network and gives alerts if there is an issue. Once there is an issue, if it's something that can be resolved onsite, we have to send engineers onsite. The ticket resolution is not managed by LogicMonitor. I'm not sure exactly how the cost was saved, but it has helped us in terms of viewing the network from one single tool. We don't have to keep switching from one to another. We have given access to more than 10 or 15 employees already, with two from network and the rest from the other teams.

My overall rating for LogicMonitor is 9 out of 10.

I am using LogicMonitor  for accessing devices in real time to monitor any critical or major alerts. We use LogicMonitor  to map alerts to ServiceNow  to generate tickets on a real-time basis. This is one of the excellent applications and portals I have used in my career, and it is a strong product for any enterprise, small, or medium-sized company that needs to handle or monitor large-scale devices, cloud devices, or servers.

Regarding the use of Admin AI for diagnosing root causes and orchestrating remediation, I have not yet implemented this. My cloud AI team or ECI AI team may be working on this capability. I need to investigate this further in the future. Currently, I use LogicMonitor for real-time monitoring to check for any critical outages occurring in networks or system servers. I can also fetch reports from LogicMonitor to obtain all the data for a particular client as needed for my company's perspective during data preparation. I refresh reports from LogicMonitor regularly, and I need to check further with my cloud team regarding the AI functionality. As of now, I am not using that option.

I use LogicMonitor for accessing devices in real time and monitoring any critical or major alerts. We map alerts to ServiceNow  to generate tickets on a real-time basis. This is one of the excellent applications and portals I have used in my career. It is a strong product for any enterprise, small, or medium-sized company that needs to handle or monitor large-scale devices, cloud devices, or servers.

I can also use the old UI, which is still available to me where the setup is almost the same, although the overall interface is a bit older. Apart from that, there are no issues. We can set up the time zone in the application according to standards, such as EST or any other zone we require.

Based on my experience with LogicMonitor, I dislike a particular design aspect, and I am uncertain whether this design was created by my company or if it is a global configuration. For any particular client, we use network and system or server devices, and these are mapped in the resource or resource mapping group. For those resources of a particular client, we can access all the details, including all thresholds and real-time monitoring. For example, for a client using five network devices and five servers, they may have some ISP circuits or WAN circuits being used by that same client. Whether there is a single circuit or dual circuit depends on the environment or the client setup. We have to search in a different option within the same resource tab to access only those circuit details for all clients. It would be beneficial if there were an option available to add ISP circuit details for a particular client within the same platform, as that would save time accessing it.

When we open a particular monitoring tab in LogicMonitor, we have to open a duplicate LogicMonitor window in the same browser. Based on my understanding, this may be by design, but if it were possible to add those details within the same client environment or client setup in the same tab, that would reduce the time required to access or troubleshoot during any outage. Additionally, I found that LogicMonitor needs some improvement in threshold monitoring. For example, when we monitor a particular device with a temperature issue or high-temperature problem, sometimes I observe that in real time when I log into the device, the temperature shows something that does not accurately match what is displayed on the LogicMonitor platform. That needs fine-tuning.

I have been working with LogicMonitor for the last eleven months.

I have not experienced significant lagging, crashing, or downtime with LogicMonitor during the last eleven months. When I first started using this application, I used it for approximately one to one and a half minutes, and during that time LogicMonitor became unresponsive after refreshing the window. However, it returned to normal operation after that. That is my only experience with such an issue.

I have already mentioned that LogicMonitor is very scalable and useful for large enterprise networks and large enterprise companies. I can confirm that it can be very helpful for all companies.

I have not had to contact technical support yet. I completed a certification through my organization as part of the LM Getting Started Batch 2025 LogicMonitor Basic Training. I learned a lot from that training, including basic modules about LogicMonitor, which was helpful for gaining knowledge. I did contact my company's technical support or Enterprise Tools team when I found some issues such as multiple alerts flooding from LogicMonitor or if an alert had already been removed from the system but still appeared in LogicMonitor, and those issues were resolved. I have not yet contacted any LogicMonitor technical team directly.

Regarding alternatives to LogicMonitor, I can say that in my previous organization at Unify  CX, I used PRTG as a monitoring tool, the PRTG Network Monitor . I have also used SolarWinds as a real-time monitoring tool. However, I can confirm that LogicMonitor is one of the best platforms for any organization to use for network, cloud, or system monitoring. It is user-friendly and the overall structural setup is very strong.

Regarding the initial deployment of LogicMonitor, I found it not very difficult, but the setup was quite new to me because I was using it for the first time. Within one or two days, I understood most of it, and as I continued using it more, I gained knowledge about everything, including the setup, access, how to check alerts, alert tuning in this setup, how to check if any alert is in SDT, checking graphs, and all the configurations we have in this setup. It is truly impressive.

LogicMonitor does not require any maintenance on my end. We do not involve ourselves in the maintenance, but there is a team in my organization called the Enterprise Tools Team (ETT). They handle the maintenance portion of the application. We do not have much involvement in it currently.

Regarding pricing, I do not know much about it. I do not have much knowledge about the pricing or how much it costs to a particular organization because I work as a NOC engineer, so my focus is to monitor the network and system components from LogicMonitor on a twenty-four-seven basis. I wish to know more if you want to share that information with me, but I do not have that knowledge currently.

Currently, there is a new UI option that is an advanced UI version for monitoring the application.

Regarding dynamic service insights for real-time visibility, I apologize, but I do not understand what you mean by dynamic service. Could you please elaborate a bit further? As of now, I am not using that service, so I cannot tell you elaborately about this topic. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate LogicMonitor as a nine overall because I cannot provide a ten, as there is always a chance to improve. My overall review rating for LogicMonitor is nine out of ten.