Infrastructure Monitoring and Observability Platform logo

    Infrastructure Monitoring and Observability Platform

    LogicMonitor's automated SaaS performance monitoring platform provides IT Ops teams with end-to-end visibility and actionable metrics to manage today's sophisticated on-premise, hybrid and cloud IT infrastructures. Deploy and manage your monitoring faster and automatically with Auto-Discovery of devices. Act on infrastructure performance data using built-in and customizable dashboards, performance forecasting, and full reporting. Use built-in workflow capabilities including alerting routing and escalation management to improve IT team response.

    Ratings and reviews

    4.5
    657 ratings
    6 AWS reviews
    |
    651 external reviews
    External reviews are from G2  and PeerSpot .

    Filters

    Review type

    AWS Marketplace reviews
    External reviews
    Reviews (657)
    Patel Dhulva

    Automation has reduced manual work and lets our team focus on security and strategic projects

    Reviewed on May 30, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    LogicMonitor automation is outstanding, as it automatically detects new systems on our server and sets them up to protect against security threats. It lets our team spend more time on important projects instead of tedious, repetitive tasks and helps us avoid costly mistakes.

    How has it helped my organization?

    It keeps our system secure and bug-free. It stops outside access to our systems immediately. Automation has reduced the manual work significantly, which lets our team members focus on more strategic projects instead of repetitive tasks.

    What is most valuable?

    It's easy to use even for non-technical users. It gives us live cost tracking. It is scalable and grows with us. It alerts early in case of any issues or threats.

    What needs improvement?

    It has limited access to financial resources.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have used the solution for four years.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We did not use any other alternative other than LogicMonitor.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    LogicMonitor has helped us with a lot of issues, including budgeting and security issues, so I would highly recommend it.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We considered Dynatrace.

    What other advice do I have?

    The alerting automatically creates and routes tickets in our ITSM system, which saves us a ton of manual work.

    Vinay Machave

    Proactive monitoring has reduced incidents but still needs fewer false alerts and better app insights

    Reviewed on May 29, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for LogicMonitor is to monitor our client environments, which includes servers, websites, and similar resources.

    In my daily work, I monitor all kinds of servers and websites through LogicMonitor. It depends on the particular use case or the client requirement, and it involves all kinds of alerts related to the resources that a computer uses: CPU, memory, and networking.

    I don't think anything unique exists about my main use case for LogicMonitor; anyone who uses LogicMonitor uses it in the same way, with only the types of alerts configured being different.

    How has it helped my organization?

    LogicMonitor has positively impacted our organization by reducing our volume of incidents that we work on. Proactive monitoring has definitely improved, but false alerts keep on coming.

    I don't have any numbers to share, but I can say, with my experience, the incident volume has dropped by about 30%, maybe more.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features that LogicMonitor offers include its UI and the report creation feature. I appreciate how it gives you reports in terms of how it has monitored something, such as CPU usage over a week.

    I find the UI of LogicMonitor is pretty good compared to other tools I've used, and we do use the reports for internal reviews and root cause analyses. I find it very clean.

    What needs improvement?

    LogicMonitor tends to continuously ping the servers and the environment, which can create a lot of false alerts. Another thing is that it is not very good for application monitoring.

    LogicMonitor can be improved by reducing the number of false positives it generates and by enhancing the application monitoring part, which does not work well; Dynatrace still dominates the industry for that.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using LogicMonitor throughout my career for three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor's scalability is good, and it is scalable.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support for LogicMonitor depends on the plans that you have.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Previously, we used Zenoss, which was irrelevant, and that's why we switched to LogicMonitor.

    What was our ROI?

    I don't have any numbers to share, but I can say, with my experience, the incident volume has dropped by about 30%, maybe more.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I do not manage the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for LogicMonitor.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to others looking into using LogicMonitor is that it's a good tool to use, and if you don't have any monitoring for applications, you can definitely go for it. I would rate this review a 7.
    technica2771775

    Unified observability has improved troubleshooting speed and optimized our managed services

    Reviewed on May 29, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    LogicMonitor is primarily used for observability.

    What is most valuable?

    The features I have found most valuable in LogicMonitor are correlation, dashboards, and reporting.

    Because we are now a structured managed services organization using one common platform for observability, we have seen significant benefits from using LogicMonitor. Mean time to resolution has reduced with LogicMonitor, and mean time to troubleshoot or average time to troubleshooting has reduced considerably.

    What needs improvement?

    There is substantial room for improvement with LogicMonitor. The industry is moving towards agentic automation, which we have not yet fully explored. We are currently building agentic automation in-house on top of LogicMonitor. Agentic AI is an additional feature I would like to see in the future to make it closer to a perfect score.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    LogicMonitor has been used in my organization for the last one and a half years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I am satisfied with the LogicMonitor solution so far.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I estimate approximately 70 to 80 people are using LogicMonitor in my company.

    How are customer service and support?

    Nobody has complained about anything regarding the technical support, so it should be good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have worked with almost every solution in the observability space before LogicMonitor.

    How was the initial setup?

    LogicMonitor helped us to set up the platform initially.

    What about the implementation team?

    We purchased LogicMonitor directly from LogicMonitor.

    What was our ROI?

    It is difficult to commit to a return on investment figure at this time. That number is with my counterpart and not with me, and they can tell you what the ROI is.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing of LogicMonitor is reasonable compared to others, and I find it to be fine.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    When comparing price to feature ratio, LogicMonitor is a much better product compared to Datadog. Additionally, our team had some existing skills with LogicMonitor to start.

    What other advice do I have?

    LogicMonitor tools are still being used in my organization. Our company is using LogicMonitor, and I am the consulting head. We want to use LogicMonitor's Edwin AI for diagnosing root cause, but that feature is not yet available. We are not yet using the autonomous learning feature of LogicMonitor. We are a partner of LogicMonitor and also a customer, and we have purchased all the licenses for our managed services. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    NishantKumar2

    Centralized monitoring has reduced network oversight time and now streamlines global switch alerts

    Reviewed on May 27, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for LogicMonitor is managing network and switches. We have set up our office in various sites around the world, and LogicMonitor helps us in monitoring the switches, the overall network, the ISP's state, and everything about the network. It's all managed by LogicMonitor.

    If there are any alerts or if any switch goes down, we get an instant email through ServiceNow to our mailbox.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features that LogicMonitor offers include integration with various platforms and the UI. LogicMonitor has positively impacted my organization by reducing network monitoring time and the overall time spent on reviewing the switches and network-related concerns.

    Now we simply rely on the alerts, the emails, the priority of those alerts, the warning, and the severity; everything is managed by LogicMonitor. We don't have to work extensively on it anymore. We rely on the tool and the triggers.

    What needs improvement?

    I think if LogicMonitor offered a desktop app or something that can be installed on the machine, it would be really helpful.

    Additionally, it times out after every couple of minutes, perhaps 20 or 30 minutes. If there were a way that it could continue running, whether as an app or as a site in the background, that would be helpful.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using LogicMonitor for 2.5 years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor's scalability is good; it is something that we can work on, and as I already mentioned, we are still working on it.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was all feasible; it wasn't that expensive.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to others looking into using LogicMonitor is to go for it and use it; it's worth trying.

    Dynamic Service Insights doesn't affect us in any way; it's just that the overall concept of managing the networks is working fine for us. LogicMonitor doesn't help in resolving MTTR; it only manages the network and gives alerts if there is an issue. Once there is an issue, if it's something that can be resolved onsite, we have to send engineers onsite. The ticket resolution is not managed by LogicMonitor. I'm not sure exactly how the cost was saved, but it has helped us in terms of viewing the network from one single tool. We don't have to keep switching from one to another. We have given access to more than 10 or 15 employees already, with two from network and the rest from the other teams.

    My overall rating for LogicMonitor is 9 out of 10.

    Arnab Mondal

    Real-time monitoring has improved alert handling and supports proactive incident response

    Reviewed on May 26, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    I am using LogicMonitor for accessing devices in real time to monitor any critical or major alerts. We use LogicMonitor to map alerts to ServiceNow to generate tickets on a real-time basis. This is one of the excellent applications and portals I have used in my career, and it is a strong product for any enterprise, small, or medium-sized company that needs to handle or monitor large-scale devices, cloud devices, or servers.

    Regarding the use of Admin AI for diagnosing root causes and orchestrating remediation, I have not yet implemented this. My cloud AI team or ECI AI team may be working on this capability. I need to investigate this further in the future. Currently, I use LogicMonitor for real-time monitoring to check for any critical outages occurring in networks or system servers. I can also fetch reports from LogicMonitor to obtain all the data for a particular client as needed for my company's perspective during data preparation. I refresh reports from LogicMonitor regularly, and I need to check further with my cloud team regarding the AI functionality. As of now, I am not using that option.

    What is most valuable?

    I use LogicMonitor for accessing devices in real time and monitoring any critical or major alerts. We map alerts to ServiceNow to generate tickets on a real-time basis. This is one of the excellent applications and portals I have used in my career. It is a strong product for any enterprise, small, or medium-sized company that needs to handle or monitor large-scale devices, cloud devices, or servers.

    I can also use the old UI, which is still available to me where the setup is almost the same, although the overall interface is a bit older. Apart from that, there are no issues. We can set up the time zone in the application according to standards, such as EST or any other zone we require.

    What needs improvement?

    Based on my experience with LogicMonitor, I dislike a particular design aspect, and I am uncertain whether this design was created by my company or if it is a global configuration. For any particular client, we use network and system or server devices, and these are mapped in the resource or resource mapping group. For those resources of a particular client, we can access all the details, including all thresholds and real-time monitoring. For example, for a client using five network devices and five servers, they may have some ISP circuits or WAN circuits being used by that same client. Whether there is a single circuit or dual circuit depends on the environment or the client setup. We have to search in a different option within the same resource tab to access only those circuit details for all clients. It would be beneficial if there were an option available to add ISP circuit details for a particular client within the same platform, as that would save time accessing it.

    When we open a particular monitoring tab in LogicMonitor, we have to open a duplicate LogicMonitor window in the same browser. Based on my understanding, this may be by design, but if it were possible to add those details within the same client environment or client setup in the same tab, that would reduce the time required to access or troubleshoot during any outage. Additionally, I found that LogicMonitor needs some improvement in threshold monitoring. For example, when we monitor a particular device with a temperature issue or high-temperature problem, sometimes I observe that in real time when I log into the device, the temperature shows something that does not accurately match what is displayed on the LogicMonitor platform. That needs fine-tuning.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working with LogicMonitor for the last eleven months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I have not experienced significant lagging, crashing, or downtime with LogicMonitor during the last eleven months. When I first started using this application, I used it for approximately one to one and a half minutes, and during that time LogicMonitor became unresponsive after refreshing the window. However, it returned to normal operation after that. That is my only experience with such an issue.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I have already mentioned that LogicMonitor is very scalable and useful for large enterprise networks and large enterprise companies. I can confirm that it can be very helpful for all companies.

    How are customer service and support?

    I have not had to contact technical support yet. I completed a certification through my organization as part of the LM Getting Started Batch 2025 LogicMonitor Basic Training. I learned a lot from that training, including basic modules about LogicMonitor, which was helpful for gaining knowledge. I did contact my company's technical support or Enterprise Tools team when I found some issues such as multiple alerts flooding from LogicMonitor or if an alert had already been removed from the system but still appeared in LogicMonitor, and those issues were resolved. I have not yet contacted any LogicMonitor technical team directly.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Regarding alternatives to LogicMonitor, I can say that in my previous organization at Unify CX, I used PRTG as a monitoring tool, the PRTG Network Monitor. I have also used SolarWinds as a real-time monitoring tool. However, I can confirm that LogicMonitor is one of the best platforms for any organization to use for network, cloud, or system monitoring. It is user-friendly and the overall structural setup is very strong.

    How was the initial setup?

    Regarding the initial deployment of LogicMonitor, I found it not very difficult, but the setup was quite new to me because I was using it for the first time. Within one or two days, I understood most of it, and as I continued using it more, I gained knowledge about everything, including the setup, access, how to check alerts, alert tuning in this setup, how to check if any alert is in SDT, checking graphs, and all the configurations we have in this setup. It is truly impressive.

    What about the implementation team?

    LogicMonitor does not require any maintenance on my end. We do not involve ourselves in the maintenance, but there is a team in my organization called the Enterprise Tools Team (ETT). They handle the maintenance portion of the application. We do not have much involvement in it currently.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Regarding pricing, I do not know much about it. I do not have much knowledge about the pricing or how much it costs to a particular organization because I work as a NOC engineer, so my focus is to monitor the network and system components from LogicMonitor on a twenty-four-seven basis. I wish to know more if you want to share that information with me, but I do not have that knowledge currently.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Currently, there is a new UI option that is an advanced UI version for monitoring the application.

    What other advice do I have?

    Regarding dynamic service insights for real-time visibility, I apologize, but I do not understand what you mean by dynamic service. Could you please elaborate a bit further? As of now, I am not using that service, so I cannot tell you elaborately about this topic. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate LogicMonitor as a nine overall because I cannot provide a ten, as there is always a chance to improve. My overall review rating for LogicMonitor is nine out of ten.

    Robert B.

    Proactive Server Monitoring That Helps Us Prevent Issues

    Reviewed on May 21, 2026
    Review provided by G2
    What do you like best about the product?
    Logic Monitor allows us to monitor all of our servers and anticipate potential problems before they happen, such as heavy disk space utilisation and similar issues.
    What do you dislike about the product?
    Logicmonitor costs more than some of its competitors, and when we were setting it up, we found that some of the rules required for remote communication were quite complex.
    What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
    Logicmonitor allows us to monitor servers in our VMware environment for key measurables such as disk space, RAM, and CPU usage. It also helps us identify bottlenecks that could cause slowdowns or potential failures before they’re reported by end users. This lets us act sooner and keep everything moving.
    reviewer2841768

    Centralized monitoring has improved real-time visibility, alerting, and faster issue resolution

    Reviewed on May 14, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for LogicMonitor is real-time monitoring, alerting, performance tracking, and infrastructure visibility.

    In LogicMonitor, I can create a dashboard to monitor proactively, manage alerting, capacity planning, and operational visibility. Our network team monitors bandwidth utilization, device health, and server availability to prevent outages, making this one of the best use cases with LogicMonitor.

    LogicMonitor is good for dashboards and reporting, allowing us to easily track the real-time performance of servers and network devices, as well as create custom reports for operational visibility, representing the main cases we are working with.

    Day-to-day, I rely on real-time monitoring, which includes monitoring network devices such as routers and servers for CPU utilization and server memory use. Alerts are triggered when server disk usage reaches 90%, which is beneficial for monitoring alert management.

    In addition to the aforementioned features, LogicMonitor provides log and event correlation, helping to correlate logs, alerts, and metrics for troubleshooting. It aids in investigating application slowdowns by checking logs and CPU spikes together, supporting day-to-day operations through real-time monitoring, alerting, dashboard, reporting, auto-discovery, topology mapping, and proactive infrastructure management.

    In our organization, LogicMonitor is deployed to provide centralized monitoring of infrastructure, network devices, server applications, and cloud resources, allowing us to monitor routers, switches, and servers from a single platform while enabling proactive alerting and operational visibility across hybrid IT environments.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features of LogicMonitor include alerting and escalation, triggered when CPU utilization exceeds 90%. Additionally, topology mapping provides visual dependency mapping of infrastructure, mapping relationships between servers, network devices, and applications, leading to faster issue detection and troubleshooting, along with centralized operational monitoring.

    LogicMonitor has positively impacted our organization by allowing early detection of memory spikes on production servers, enabling the team to resolve issues before they affect service, and making day-to-day work much less stressful for us.

    LogicMonitor helps improve outcomes, including improved infrastructure uptime, faster issue resolution, and better visibility across servers, network devices, and cloud resources. In terms of metrics, I can point to uptime percentage, availability of servers and network devices, and faster incident resolution times, as well as a reduction in the number of monitoring-related incidents.

    What needs improvement?

    In terms of improvement, I suggest that the pricing could be on the higher side for smaller organizations, advanced customization has a learning curve, and alert tuning may require initial optimization to avoid too many alerts.

    Areas for improvement include optimizing alert noise, enhancing dashboard customization, increasing pricing flexibility, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using LogicMonitor for 24 months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor is a stable and reliable monitoring platform that supports continuous monitoring of infrastructure, networks, and clouds with strong uptime and consistent performance. Specifically, my team uses LogicMonitor daily to monitor servers, routers, network devices, applications, and cloud resources with minimal operational disruptions.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support is very good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Previously, we used SolarWinds, and the reason for switching was that we could not access real-time dashboards or monitor servers, routers, switches, and CPU utilization effectively, which is why LogicMonitor has proven to be a much better platform for our needs.

    What was our ROI?

    The use of LogicMonitor significantly helps save time and reduce downtime in our organization.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Our pricing and setup costs are organization-specific and based on company deployment across network areas. The pricing model is subscription-based.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing LogicMonitor, we evaluated SolarWinds.

    What other advice do I have?

    I advise others looking into LogicMonitor that it is a very good platform.

    LogicMonitor is a strong choice for any organization seeking proactive monitoring, centralized observability, and improved operational visibility across the IT environment.

    I would rate this review 9 out of 10.

    Syed

    Monitoring has improved visibility and response times but requires simpler setup and customization

    Reviewed on May 08, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    I primarily use LogicMonitor as a centralized infrastructure monitoring platform, which helps me to identify performance issues, outages, and capacity bottlenecks before they impact the users. It is basically used for monitoring servers, network devices, cloud infrastructure, storage systems, and similar infrastructure components.

    What is most valuable?

    LogicMonitor offers standout features such as agent-plus monitoring, easy scalability, multi-vendor support, and cloud monitoring integrations, which are valuable features. LogicMonitor has positively impacted my organization by improving scalability, allowing me to expand monitoring from a small environment to a large, cloud-based infrastructure without any changes in the architecture. It also supports enterprise operations effectively.

    Since using LogicMonitor, I have improved infrastructure visibility, which has resulted in faster incident response, reduced downtime, better capacity planning, and a significant reduction in manual monitoring efforts, providing me with substantial benefits.

    What needs improvement?

    LogicMonitor has a few areas that need improvement, such as more simplified customization for advanced monitoring, better pricing flexibility for smaller organizations, improved reporting templates, and an easier onboarding process for beginners.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using LogicMonitor for the past four years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor is reliable and stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor is scalable and very good at monitoring and capturing the alert systems, with alerts configured based on threshold anomalies and device groups, making it one of the strongest features.

    How are customer service and support?

    The support team is good, but the response time is low; they need to focus on improving the response time.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have not used any other solutions previously. LogicMonitor is the only tool I have used.

    How was the initial setup?

    The challenges I faced during the deployment of LogicMonitor include fine-tuning alert thresholds, reducing alert noise, and customizing monitoring for some legacy applications.

    What about the implementation team?

    The challenges I faced in gaining complete visibility across my hybrid infrastructure include fine-tuning alert thresholds, reducing alert noise, learning the platform's advanced configuration options, and customizing monitoring for some legacy applications.

    What was our ROI?

    There is a good return on investment, as I have saved a lot of time and can monitor all alerts with fewer employees thanks to LogicMonitor, which has definitely saved money.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing part is taken care of by my accounts team, so I do not have the details.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I did not evaluate any other options.

    What other advice do I have?

    I have utilized the Dynamic Service Insights feature in LogicMonitor, which has improved root cause analysis by quickly identifying the affected dependency chain, resulting in faster incident response, reduced mean time to resolution, and better visibility for management and operation teams to understand service health, leading to better risk assessment during outages or performance issues.

    The faster response time and reduced MTTR have been noticeable, although I do not have the exact numbers.

    I have not used LogicMonitor's Edwin AI for diagnosing root causes or orchestrating remediation.

    I have not used the autonomous learning feature of Edwin AI.

    I would rate LogicMonitor a seven out of ten. My advice for others looking into using LogicMonitor is that they can proceed with this particular tool as it is a good tool for monitoring systems and a stronger option than other monitoring tools available.

    Shah Nawaz K.

    In-Depth Analysis in One Place with Smooth ITSM Integration

    Reviewed on May 06, 2026
    Review provided by G2
    What do you like best about the product?
    The in-depth analysis it provides while I’m using it has made me a fan, since everything is available in a single place. It doesn’t throw random errors or false alerts, which I really appreciate. Integration is easy with ITSM tools, and the UI also works well.
    What do you dislike about the product?
    Sometime the information needed is deep inside and you need to go inside to fetch that which makes things a lil bit clumpsy and less usable
    What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
    I work in network operations and IT operations. We monitor network health for our clients, as well as cloud health, and LM works best for us.
    Sanchit Makkar

    Monitoring has improved network visibility and keeps global infrastructure proactively managed

    Reviewed on May 05, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    LogicMonitor is used to monitor servers, network devices, firewalls, routers, switches, and anything with support for SNMP, WMI, and API support.

    LogicMonitor manages network assets that are deployed globally across all data centers. Proactive monitoring for any SNMP alert helps to check the device status and its availability.

    An agentless architecture is implemented with collectors that are very easy to deploy and manage, which helps reduce the overhead of installing agents on every monitored endpoint.

    LogicMonitor has a device discovery console that helps monitor devices and significantly reduces onboarding time. The platform is MSP friendly with strong, mature multitenant capabilities.

    Several customers leverage the same tenant of LogicMonitor, making it easy to navigate and switch between different tenants to manage customers.

    LogicMonitor supports monitoring for a vast array of devices including VMware, Cisco, NetApps, and Linux and Windows servers. The platform also supports API-based monitoring, which is very useful for SaaS-based applications.

    What is most valuable?

    LogicMonitor is a very easy and agentless monitoring platform offering over 3,000 automated integrations. This is one of the very nice and good tools to be acknowledged in the case of enterprise-level monitoring.

    LogicMonitor delivers a lot of positive outcomes through proactive SNMP alert monitoring. When a device goes down, it triggers an alert to the operations team, and the operations team quickly checks why and what problems may have arisen for the device to go down. This allows the operations team to open a relevant ticket to the support team to check the device physically.

    LogicMonitor has delivered a lot of good use cases in terms of knowing the availability of the network and how the network devices are performing. In a large enterprise environment, knowing this is always valuable. Downtime on each network asset has been reduced, and now there is better visibility for the operations team to manage 24/7 support.

    A change in handling incidents has been noticed. The visibility on overall network infrastructure and availability has been maintained above 98% overall in terms of managing network services.

    What needs improvement?

    Reporting limitations exist with the product. When trying to create a dashboard that is useful for day-to-day monitoring, the native reporting is not that intuitive.

    For the first-time user, learning the product presents a very steep learning curve. It is a bit complicated yet effective tool. It may take some time for an individual who is new to the platform to learn and become familiar with the navigation because the GUI is full of tabs.

    LogicMonitor is a very effective and helpful tool to monitor all SNMP-based network devices. However, the response time and application loading can be slow, and despite being a SaaS-based application, the GUI could be better designed to show less and do more.

    Customization support is not that easy. Professional support or the support team must be involved to look after customized monitoring, which is sometimes not that straightforward and requires a lot of collaboration with other teams to support that requirement.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    LogicMonitor has been used for more than two years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    LogicMonitor scales well across the geography of customer presence. By placing the number of pollers, N number of devices can be polled, and managing those pollers is easy as it is a SaaS-based application that can be managed without any dependency on VPN or being on-premises.

    How are customer service and support?

    There have been no issues so far to report to customer support. However, based on what has been heard, the support team is very good and very responsive in terms of acknowledging and attending to any problems and challenges from end customers.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    A different solution called SolarWinds was used previously. That product was implemented in a different business environment. After splitting the network infrastructure from a legacy business environment to new, there was an opportunity to onboard and review a new product, and LogicMonitor was onboarded.

    How was the initial setup?

    Though LogicMonitor is a SaaS-based platform, the pricing and overall deployment was quite easy. The licensing part was not involved in the process. The decision was made by the customers, and the purchase order was made directly by them.

    What about the implementation team?

    LogicMonitor underwent a POC, and it was then finalized.

    What was our ROI?

    LogicMonitor is a very effective and helpful tool to monitor all SNMP-based network devices. Downtime on each network asset has been reduced, and there is now better visibility for the operations team to manage 24/7 support.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing and overall deployment was quite easy. The licensing part was not involved. The decision was made by the customers, and the purchase order was made directly by them.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    For someone looking for an all-in-one solution that covers network, infrastructure, and cloud, LogicMonitor is a pretty solid choice. However, if the needs are simpler, more cost-effective, or less complicated, open-source tools might be better options.

    What other advice do I have?

    LogicMonitor is overall a great tool, and it is moving in the right direction. The latest enhancement in the GUI console is really intuitive and has brought a lot of good insight about monitoring network infrastructure. The review rating for LogicMonitor is 9 out of 10.