Overview

Product video
Red Hat® Ansible® Automation Platform Service is an end-to-end automation platform to configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate advanced workflows. It includes resources to create, manage, and scale across the entire enterprise and your AWS cloud. Ansible provides a differentiated user experience to start automating and managing AWS resources and your broader IT ecosystems of resources and applications.
Red Hat® Ansible® Automation Platform Service on AWS is a fully managed Ansible Automation Platform controller. Red Hat will manage the deployment and operation of the controler and monitor for it issues, perform patching and upgrades, and will handle back ups and restore. Execution nodes for automation will be need to be deployed separately simplifying networking and bringing automation closer to workloads and infrastructure.
Here are the features and benefits:
Runs on your cloud - Deploy and run the Ansible Automation Platform on your AWS cloud, then extend your automation to private clouds, on-premise datacenters, edge locations, and hybrid cloud environments.
Integrates with AWS services - Includes the Ansible collection for AWS, as well as integration with AWS services such as EC2, CloudFormation, VPC, ALB, AMI, Security Groups, key pairs, EFS, EBS, S3, RDS, Lambda, AWS Secret, and more.
Supported by Red Hat - Red Hat supports the offering at the Premium Support level, meaning that customers have unlimited 24x7 access to our global network of experienced technical support engineers. AWS supports your cloud infrastructure.
Counts toward spend agreements with integrated AWS billing - Integrated billing means one bill and full visibility into cost. If you have a spend agreement with AWS, a percentage of the cost of this offering counts toward that amount.
Deployment
This listing is a subscription for the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS. It is meant to be used with one or more Ansible Automation Platform execution nodes self deployed on your infrastructure. Use the following guide for building execution nodes: red.ht/executionnode. This offer includes 10 Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscriptions for deploying Ansible on.Pricing
A subscription for the Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS can be purchased directly through this listing at list price as noted. For better pricing options please work with your Red Hat supplier or contact Red Hat sales directly here to receive a private offer. See more details in the pricing section.Highlights
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform includes integrations with native AWS services in the full collection for AWS (co-developed and security tested by AWS and Red Hat). This capability, along with other pre-integrated content, provides a differentiated user experience with minimal setup required to start automating and managing AWS resources along with your broader IT ecosystems of resources and applications.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Cost/month |
|---|---|
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS (50) | $412.50 |
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS (400) | $3,168.00 |
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS (1000) | $7,672.50 |
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS (2500) | $18,768.75 |
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS (5000) | $36,300.00 |
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Service on AWS (10000) | $70,125.00 |
The following dimensions are not included in the contract terms, which will be charged based on your usage.
Dimension | Description | Cost/unit |
|---|---|---|
Managed Active Nodes per month | Managed Active Nodes (charged per month) | $8.25 |
Control Plane Infrastructure and Service Fee per hour | Control Plane Infrastructure and Service Fee (charged per hour) | $0.10 |
Managed Active Nodes for Tier 400 | Managed Active Nodes for Tier 400 | $7.92 |
Managed Active Nodes for Tier 1000 | Managed Active Nodes for Tier 1000 | $7.67 |
Managed Active Nodes for Tier 2500 | Managed Active Nodes for Tier 2500 | $7.51 |
Managed Active Nodes for Tier 5000 | Managed Active Nodes for Tier 5000 | $7.26 |
Managed Active Nodes for Tier 10000 | Managed Active Nodes for Tier 10000 | $7.01 |
Vendor refund policy
All fees are non-refundable.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Support
Vendor support
Get answers quickly by opening a support case with us at
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is managing servers through automated deployment, automated management, security patching, and everything in between.
For automating deployments or security patching with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform , we use it for Docker Swarm clusters. We install Docker and automate Docker deployment inside the Docker Swarm, checking which are the master nodes and which are the server nodes and connecting them to each other. All of these things are maintained by Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
I have around 100-200 servers that we need to maintain through security patching. We need to perform sudo apt update or install packages inside them and maintain those servers. For that, we use Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. We maintain an inventory file and execute everything from there.
What is most valuable?
The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us.
The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things.
It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use.
There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.
What needs improvement?
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could benefit from improvements in certain areas. Red Hat Tower is available for enhanced functionality, though it operates on a paid model. I found that acceptable.
Otherwise, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very easy to use with Jinja templating capabilities that make it really straightforward. I do not believe there is anything that could be improved with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform that we have not already discussed.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform for the past eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In my experience, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is highly scalable. We are currently using 200 servers and we are adding more servers each day. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is easily maintainable and highly scalable.
How are customer service and support?
We are not using Ansible Tower for customer support, so we do not receive official support. However, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a large community with many written blogs and resources available, making it easy to maintain.
How would you rate customer service and support?
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is always free to use. If you do not use Ansible Tower, then it is definitely free and easy to maintain. Writing playbooks is just like writing a simple Bash script or writing code with clauses and everything.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. We need fewer employees and have saved significant time. The work that previously took two months now takes 10 to 15 minutes. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is automated, so we do not need as many employees to perform manual work. We have fewer employees, which also results in cost savings.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is always free to use. If you do not use Ansible Tower, then it is definitely free.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, I evaluated other options such as Chef and Puppet , but I did not use them.
What other advice do I have?
The advice I would give to others looking into using Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is that it is one of the best Ansible management tools available for servers. You should start using it. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers Jinja templating where you can write your own templates and NGINX configurations. It is very simple to use and you do not need any extra server or additional infrastructure. I give this product a rating of 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Consistent, Scalable Automation That Boosts Stability and Efficiency
Cloud services, on‑prem servers, or network devices, Ansible connects to everything without needing any agents. This flexibility has made it much easier to scale automation across the organization stacks.
Also, its write once-reuse anywhere motoo help us reuse across multiple projects or environments. This not only speeds up deployments but also ensures the same process runs the same way every time, which has noticeably improved our operational stability.
May be few cases where they struggeled are role structuring, output capturing and reusing andYAML Sensitivity are more prone to error.
UI is helpful, but it introduces extra complexity compared to using Ansible alone. Managing inventories, credentials, and job templates through the controller sometimes feels more complicated than necessary.
These are just my experiences, others may feel it easy though if the have already used CFT or TF.
Agentless Architecture and Scalable Orchestration Made Simple
IT Observability Advisor
Have managed thousands of servers with streamlined configuration processes
What is our primary use case?
I have created resources for the monitoring tech stack with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform , especially for setting up one master data center and another data center for different applications routed to the monitoring setup, where I have created Splunk servers and installed all Splunk agents and prerequisites with the help of Ansible , including an Ansible playbook.
I have used the agentless architecture in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, as SSH is agentless.
I use a centralized automation controller in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, called the master setup, where we execute our commands with installed prerequisites, inventory information, and the Ansible playbook, managing other node servers with a passwordless setup.
When creating any server with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, it is a significant advantage because if we set up a Splunk agent in one case, it is necessary for each server. By writing the playbook, the agent is installed immediately during server provisioning, providing us with an edge.
What is most valuable?
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very helpful due to passwordless integration and the ability to interact with multiple servers at once, which is especially advantageous when dealing with thousands of servers.
The integration aspect of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has optimized my IT ecosystem significantly by consolidating multiple tools, such as a CI/CD pipeline with Jenkins , where we validate everything, including testing and SonarQube code quality.
The agentless architecture of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, using the SSH key, makes it passwordless and allows us to push configurations with one click, creating a major advantage.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's main benefit is that it allows us to push configurations to multiple servers without manually visiting each one, maintaining efficiency.
What needs improvement?
I have observed that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could improve by creating modules for upcoming AI and ML tech stacks, as currently, specific modules for these are not available.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have worked on Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, especially Ansible Playbooks, for around three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have not encountered any performance issues, crashes, downtimes, or limitations with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
How are customer service and support?
Ansible is a Red Hat product, so they provide all necessary support.
I have not escalated any questions to the Red Hat support team regarding Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, as their modules are professional and complete.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Both Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Chef have similar capabilities but differ in architecture; one is agentless while the other is agent-full.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform on the AWS cloud is very straightforward; I take one server, install Ansible, set up the inventory, and use it.
What was our ROI?
By using the enterprise version of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, we receive support that aids in overcoming challenges, a measurable benefit in terms of ROI.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For enterprise users of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, there are fees, but it is free and open-source for testing or small labs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have worked with Chef as a configuration management tool for one project, and I have used Chef and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform together in the same project.
What other advice do I have?
I have worked on the AWS cloud with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was hosted on AWS.
I prefer Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because it is easy to implement, and the extensive supporting documentation is very helpful.
I suggest everyone consider Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because it is agentless, easy to implement, and has sufficient supporting documentation available.
On a scale of one to ten, I rate Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform a ten out of ten.