Listing Thumbnail

    Snowplow

     Info
    Sold by: Snowplow 
    Deployed on AWS
    Unlock the full potential of your data with Snowplow's Customer Data Infrastructure (CDI) for AWS - the key to eliminating data silos, optimizing costs, and leveraging AWS's powerful ecosystem for advanced analytics, real-time operations, and AI workloads.
    4.5

    Overview

    Snowplow on AWS allows you to leverage your behavioral data in any lake, real-time stream, or analytical workload. Snowplow Customer Data Infrastructure is a privacy-centric solution deployed in the client's VPC and Amazon sub-account. It offers comprehensive behavioral data collection, enrichment, and governance capabilities, eliminating data silos by gathering information from various first-party data sources (websites, mobile apps, etc).

    Snowplow offers cost-effective data management by storing diverse data sets (structured, unstructured, semi-structured) in S3 object storage and leveraging AWS Glue as a cataloging method. Snowplow CDI also leverages Amazon Kinesis to process and operationalize large streams of data into other AWS services and/or external platforms, focusing on interoperability and scale. The solution democratizes access to data across analytics, data science, and other workstreams.

    In storing and processing your most valuable asset, first-party customer data, businesses can rely on a Snowplow + AWS foundation within their data stack, avoiding downstream vendor lock-in for various workloads, and ultimately future-proof their business for an AI-centric architecture.

    Highlights

    • Thousands of companies like Burberry, Strava, and Auto Trader use Snowplow to generate AI-ready data to uncover deeper customer journey insights, predict customer behaviors, personalize customer experiences, and detect fraud.

    Details

    Sold by

    Delivery method

    Deployed on AWS
    New

    Introducing multi-product solutions

    You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.

    Multi-product solutions

    Features and programs

    Buyer guide

    Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
    Buyer guide

    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
    Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases

    Pricing

    Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor, and additional usage. You pay upfront or in installments according to your contract terms with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. Usage-based pricing is in effect for overages or additional usage not covered in the contract. These charges are applied on top of the contract price. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before the contract end date, access to your entitlements will expire.
    Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator  to estimate your infrastructure costs.

    12-month contract (1)

     Info
    Dimension
    Description
    Cost/12 months
    BDP Enterprise
    Guide price is dependent on event volumes, SLAs & support requirements
    $37,500.00

    Additional usage costs (1)

     Info

    The following dimensions are not included in the contract terms, which will be charged based on your usage.

    Dimension
    Cost/unit
    Additional Overage Fees
    $0.10

    AI Insights

     Info

    Dimensions summary

    This listing uses a contract pricing model with two dimensions. BDP Enterprise is the core commitment. Its guide price depends on your event volumes, service-level agreements, and support requirements, so the amount is scoped to your needs. Additional Overage Fees apply when your usage exceeds what your BDP Enterprise contract covers. These fees bill on top of the base contract to account for extra event volume. Together, the two dimensions form a committed contract plus a usage-based overage charge that scales with the data you send beyond your agreed level.

    Top-of-mind questions for buyers

    An event is a single tracked user or agent interaction, such as a page view, click, or purchase. The pipeline collects, validates, and enriches these events in real time across web, mobile, and server sources. Your event volume drives both the base contract price and any overage charges.
    Additional Overage Fees apply when your usage passes the event volume set in your BDP Enterprise contract. These fees bill on top of the base contract to account for the extra events you send. The base contract price itself stays fixed for your agreed volume.
    Three factors set your guide price: your event volumes, your service-level agreements, and your support requirements. Higher event volumes, stricter uptime and latency commitments, or added support all raise the scoped price. The amount is tailored to your specific needs rather than a fixed rate.
    snowplow.io+1
    Helpful?

    Vendor refund policy

    All fees are non-cancellable and non-refundable except as required by law.

    How can we make this page better?

    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.
    Tell us how we can improve this page, or report an issue with this product.

    Legal

    Vendor terms and conditions

    Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .

    Content disclaimer

    Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.

    Usage information

     Info

    Delivery details

    Software as a Service (SaaS)

    SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.

    Resources

    Vendor resources

    Support

    Vendor support

    Additional support information available at https://docs.snowplow.io/docs/  Support offered 24/7 via support@snowplow.io .

    AWS infrastructure support

    AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

    Product comparison

     Info
    Updated weekly

    Accolades

     Info
    Top
    25
    In eCommerce, Streaming solutions, ML Solutions
    Top
    10
    In Data Preparation, Streaming solutions
    Top
    10
    In Databases & Analytics Platforms, ML Solutions, Data Analytics

    Customer reviews

     Info
    Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
    Reviews
    Functionality
    Ease of use
    Customer service
    Cost effectiveness
    0 reviews
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Insufficient data
    Positive reviews
    Mixed reviews
    Negative reviews

    Overview

     Info
    AI generated from product descriptions
    Behavioral Data Collection
    Comprehensive collection of behavioral data from first-party data sources including websites, mobile apps, and other sources
    Data Enrichment and Governance
    Built-in data enrichment and governance capabilities for processing and managing collected behavioral data
    Real-time Stream Processing
    Integration with Amazon Kinesis to process and operationalize large streams of data into AWS services and external platforms
    Multi-format Data Storage
    Support for storing structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data sets in Amazon S3 object storage with AWS Glue cataloging
    Privacy-centric VPC Deployment
    Deployment within client's VPC and Amazon sub-account for privacy-centric data infrastructure management
    Cloud Native Deployment Architecture
    Built for cloud native deployment on Kubernetes with private or public cloud flexibility
    Data Integration and Connectivity
    Native connectors to data sources, API connectors, pre-built workflows, and developer toolkit for integration
    Data Processing Pipeline
    Decoding, normalization, data quality verification, aggregation, correlation, usage binding, business logic, and metering capabilities
    Workflow Management and Customization
    Flexible workflow management with user-friendly interface for assembling technical building blocks into customized end-to-end workflows with data flow lifecycle visualization
    Vendor-Agnostic Data Management
    Vendor-agnostic usage data management software that processes and enriches data for multiple downstream systems including billing, analytics, and data warehousing
    Lakehouse Architecture
    Unified data foundation built on lakehouse architecture providing open, unified foundation for data and governance with support for open standards and formats
    Data Intelligence Engine
    Powered by Data Intelligence Engine that enables organization-wide access to data and insights across all users and roles
    Multi-Workload Unification
    Consolidates data engineering, analytics, business intelligence, data science and machine learning workloads on a single common platform
    Open Source Foundation
    Built on open source data projects and open standards to maximize flexibility and interoperability across data ecosystem
    Collaborative Capabilities
    Native collaboration features enabling unified data teams to collaborate across entire data and AI workflow

    Contract

     Info
    Standard contract
    No
    No

    Customer reviews

    Ratings and reviews

     Info
    4.5
    37 ratings
    5 star
    4 star
    3 star
    2 star
    1 star
    67%
    30%
    3%
    0%
    0%
    4 AWS reviews
    |
    33 external reviews
    External reviews are from G2  and PeerSpot .
    Neha Lall

    Granular behavioral tracking has transformed how we understand user journeys and optimize funnels

    Reviewed on Aug 21, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    I have been using Snowplow for the past four or five years. We migrated from Google Analytics to Snowplow, and our main use case for Snowplow is for tracking events for instrumentation. We also use it to understand user journeys and funnels, measure conversion, retention, and engagement, and it helps us to send clean, structured behavioral data into a data warehouse, such as BigQuery or Snowflake. The main purpose, to summarize, is for event-level behavior tracking where we capture how users interact with the product, and then we use that data to analyze funnels, engagement, and feature performance.

    I can walk you through something we do on a day-to-day basis using Snowplow to track how many users are exposed to the feature, how many interact with it, where they drop off, whether they complete the intended action, and how downstream metrics such as conversion or engagement change.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Since we have visibility and control over our event tracking and the raw data we store, it helps us to quickly understand if there is a data quality issue rather than just thinking it could be due to seasonality or a promotional period. It simplifies our work when KPIs are trending down or up exponentially, making faster root cause analysis possible. We can quickly isolate the affected step, market, or platform rather than investigating the entire journey, resulting in measurable improvements in conversion, sometimes in the range of ten to twenty percent at specific funnel steps.

    What is most valuable?

    What makes Snowplow so unique and different is its flexibility. There are multiple use cases, and you can basically come up with your own customized events and properties, and track everything that you could think of. The challenge we had with Google Analytics and other tools where there were certain limitations does not apply, but Snowplow is quite an open-source tool for me where we can have our own structure, and we can make sure it works as per our taxonomy. We usually use it for event instrumentation and storing that data in our backend, where we have data models to transform that data. We have a silver and bronze layer where all the raw data sits, and we use DBT models on top of it to transform it, and we get our silver layers, with the silver layer being event-based row tracking. On top of that, we have built a gold layer where we get all our KPIs which powers our dashboards directly.

    Snowplow offers very interesting best features because we see a huge difference in how we track data now and how much we trust it to make decisions. The strongest features would be that we get very granular data on what users actually do, define events and properties specific to our use cases, reconstruct sequences, and clearly identify drop-offs. Raw behavioral data goes into our warehouse rather than being locked in some other analytics platform, and it is also real-time, which we appreciate for monitoring our new launches and product changes. You can scale up or down your models quickly, as we used to have spikes in traffic for events such as the Met Gala or Amazon Prime Day, and Snowplow is very flexible for such use cases. It is very easy to validate the data; the schemas help ensure that events are consistently structured, so the biggest value for me is the granularity and flexibility of the event data.

    I would pick granular event-level data because as a product analyst, we are often trying to understand exactly where users drop off or how they are interacting with a new feature. Having detailed events lets me reconstruct the user journey, build funnels, segment by device or market, and drill down when a KPI changes, making my analysis much faster. I can go beyond knowing that conversion dropped and actually understand where and why it happened.

    I would also highlight schema validation, as having consistently structured and validated events gives me more confidence in the data and reduces the time I spend checking data quality before starting an analysis.

    On a broader level, Snowplow has brought a lot of credibility to the analysis and dashboards that I have created, with the biggest positive impact being that it gives us reliable, centralized behavioral data that teams can use consistently. It has made it much easier and faster for us to understand user journeys and make product decisions based on actual user behavior rather than assumptions.

    What needs improvement?

    Snowplow could be improved in a couple of areas. The Snowplow team is readily available and proactive, always jumping on calls to make changes, especially how we track consent and non-consent data for the EU market. One area of improvement could be its vast canvas, which might feel overwhelming and confusing to people who are less technical or are not sure how to best structure their data. Although Snowplow is powerful, getting value from this granular event data does require strong SQL skills and knowledge of the underlying data model. Therefore, making the data more accessible to less technical users could enhance intuitive self-service exploration, funnel visualization, and easier debugging of tracking issues, allowing product teams to gain insights without relying heavily on analysts.

    Snowplow could also automate most processes and implement smarter monitoring alerts for fallback. Better documentation and easier debugging when event tracking or schemas change would help, given that managing event definitions centrally can be a hassle when there is a breaking change. Having automated systems to inform users about changes in events or properties would make things smoother across teams.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Snowplow for the past four or five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Snowplow is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Snowplow's scalability is pretty robust and fast. The Snowplow team handles a large volume of event-level data across multiple markets and user journeys, and I have not experienced significant scalability issues in our day-to-day analysis. It reliably accommodates increases in data volumes during major events when the traffic spikes by ten times, handling it smoothly without hiccups or data failures.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support is diligent and proactive, always trying to come up with better solutions. They help us optimize our current instrumentation processes and understand how we want to use this data based on different organizational needs, providing amazing solutions or quick workarounds.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We previously used Google Analytics as our solution before switching to Snowplow, as we were unable to achieve the granularity in event tracking we desired and needed more flexibility in defining custom events while maintaining control over raw behavioral data.

    What was our ROI?

    Snowplow is a much cheaper tool compared to Google Analytics. While I do not have access to financial ROI, I have seen ROI in terms of time saved and faster decision-making. Now, when we see a conversion drop, the event data allows us to quickly identify the exact funnel step, platform, or user segment affected, which could otherwise take several days to narrow down. Now it takes just a few hours, allowing the product team to respond much faster and fix problems quickly.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would advise those looking to use Snowplow to ensure that if it is a small organization, they can rely on tools such as Google Analytics or Apps Analytics for smaller use cases since they may not have a lot of data. I recommend being very clear about their tracking strategy before implementing it, properly defining key user journeys, events, and properties. Initially, it is better not to track everything—being focused and clear about needs is essential. Investing in a strong and consistent event taxonomy and schema from the beginning is crucial, as Snowplow offers much flexibility, but the quality of insights depends on the design of instrumentation. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Private Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    reviewer2845992

    Gained customer 360 insights and now make better decisions using validated event tracking

    Reviewed on May 25, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    I use it for product analytics such as tracking clicks and page views, as well as providing a customer 360.

    How has it helped my organization?

    We have gained a lot more insight into our user behavior and can now make the correct decisions.

    What is most valuable?

    The scheme registry and validation layer are valuable features because they tell us exactly what a valid event looks like.

    What needs improvement?

    The setup process is an area for improvement because getting the pipeline infrastructure right is hard.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using this solution for four years.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I did not use any previous solutions.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The setup cost is very fair and reasonable.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I did not consider any alternate solutions.

    What other advice do I have?

    I really enjoy using it.

    Diaan Diaan

    Real-time user behavior tracking has improved journeys but pricing still needs to be lower

    Reviewed on May 14, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Snowplow is event tracking. I track all events that occur on our website and mobile app and conduct analytics on them.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Snowplow offers include event tracking. What makes Snowplow's event tracking stand out for me compared to other tools is the real-time data. Snowplow has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to see user behavior in real time. Seeing user behavior in real time has helped our product team improve the user journey.

    What needs improvement?

    Snowplow can be improved by reducing the pricing, as it is currently too high.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Snowplow for 12 months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Snowplow is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Snowplow's scalability is good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We previously used PostHog and switched because it was cheaper and easier to connect and move data from PostHog to our GCP with the direct connector instead of going through Fivetran. Before choosing Snowplow, we evaluated PostHog and moved away from it to Snowplow.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is expensive.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to others looking into using Snowplow is that it depends on the use case. I would rate this review a 6.

    Neil Rajurkar

    Event tracking has provided deep customer insight but now demands lower overhead and faster access

    Reviewed on May 04, 2026
    Review provided by PeerSpot

    What is our primary use case?

    I have used Snowplow for almost three to four years, focusing exclusively on event tracking. Beyond event tracking, I used Snowplow to track consumer behavior as well, which definitely helped us leverage the business.

    What is most valuable?

    I used flexible schema-driven tracking with Iglu schemas, which allowed us to maintain good governance over heavy environments. The warehouse-first approach works well with tools like Google BigQuery and Looker, making it easier for deep analytics and modeling.

    The primary strengths are full data ownership, where you can control collection, storage, and processing. There is no vendor lock-in. Snowplow offers flexible schema-driven tracking using Iglu schemas with a strong data structure, providing good governance over heavy environments. The warehouse-first approach works well with Google BigQuery and Looker, making it suitable for deep analytics and modeling. The highly customizable pipeline supports complex event enrichment and transformation.

    Full data ownership combined with flexible schema-driven tracking made collection and storage easier without vendor locking, which facilitated individual company storage. Since Snowplow uses flexible schema-driven tracking with Iglu schemas, I could name components differently for tracking particular components. This approach was one of the best use cases for our implementation.

    What needs improvement?

    There are numerous limitations. I have now moved to Avo Segments from Snowplow due to these constraints. The limitations can be categorized into operational overheads, maintenance risk, slow time to value, low accessibility for product teams, and adoption issues.

    Operational overhead requires managing collectors, enrichers, pipelines, and Iglu schemas constantly. Debugging and deployment become engineering-heavy because whenever shipping any product or feature, we must ensure the schema exists and Snowplow is properly used or written.

    Maintenance risk is significant because I was on Snowplow self-hosted community edition, which was unmaintained with heavy security risk due to outdated dependencies. The slow time to value stems from Snowplow's workflow where data goes from Snowplow to BigQuery to Looker, which is not ideal for quick product insights. For non-technical people on product or sales teams wanting to access data, they must contact data or engineering teams. When data is hard to access, it simply does not get used.

    The security risk was definitely a reason for moving since Snowplow self-hosted is no longer maintained. Engineering efforts are substantial because we must manage pipelines and Iglu schemas constantly. While this is an advantage, it adds complexity. Every time we release anything, we must ensure we add Snowplow for that particular feature, component, or page. This is the reason adoption rates for non-technical teams are lower.

    Overall, Snowplow is quite powerful if you want full control over your data pipeline and a warehouse-first setup. It works well for teams with strong data engineering support and flexible schema-driven tracking needs. However, in my case with a legacy self-hosted setup, I faced several challenges. Maintenance overhead was high, debugging and schema management were time-consuming, and there were increasing security concerns due to it no longer being actively maintained. The pipeline from Snowplow to BigQuery to Looker made it slower for product teams to get insights, limiting adoption significantly. Only engineering teams could access the data.

    I have now moved to Segment with Avo, which is also evolving toward a type-safe internal analytics layer, and I am using Mixpanel for analysis. This has significantly improved implementation speed, data consistency, and made analytics much more accessible for product and growth teams. Snowplow is still a solid choice for organizations prioritizing data ownership and having resources to manage infrastructure, but for fast-moving product teams, a lighter and more self-serve solution tends to work better.

    Regarding scalability, technical scalability is very strong at nine out of ten. Snowplow handles high event volumes in the billions per day via streaming systems like Pub/Sub and Kafka with parallel enrichment and warehouse scalability. The horizontal scalability includes load-balanced collectors, distributed enrichment jobs, auto-scaling storage and warehouses, and stream-based processing, making it suitable for large products, multi-region systems, and heavy traffic. However, operational scalability presents challenges: more events mean more Iglu schemas, which increases governance complexity. More data makes debugging harder, and more infrastructure requires more maintenance. With my self-hosted Snowplow setup with Iglu custom pipeline, while scalability handled higher event volumes, maintenance overhead increased practically, debugging became harder, schema management did not scale well, and team adoption did not scale at all.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Snowplow is stable and very reliable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Technical scalability is very strong at nine out of ten because Snowplow handles high event volumes in the billions per day via streaming systems like Pub/Sub and Kafka, with parallel enrichment and warehouse scalability. Regarding horizontal scalability, the collectors are load-balanced, enrichment uses distributed jobs, storage and warehouse auto-scale, and processing is stream-based. This makes Snowplow suitable for large products, multi-region systems, and heavy traffic.

    Operational scalability presents challenges because more events require more Iglu schemas, more schemas mean more governance complexity, more data makes debugging harder, and more infrastructure requires more maintenance. In my case with self-hosted Snowplow with Iglu custom pipeline, while scalability handled higher event volumes, maintenance overhead increased practically, debugging became harder, schema management did not scale well, and team adoption did not scale at all.

    What was our ROI?

    There is no direct ROI involved. However, the costs associated with Snowplow include engineering time and slow event deliveries, which result in low adoption rates.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Unfortunately, I was not present when the company chose Snowplow. After I joined, my data engineer and I decided to move from Snowplow to Avo Segments.

    What other advice do I have?

    Snowplow is not plug and play. Depending on team maturity, I would recommend using it only if you have strong data engineering capabilities, an ownership mindset for infrastructure, and the capacity to maintain the pipeline long-term. Otherwise, you will spend more time maintaining than gaining value.

    Snowplow is a strong option with the right setup, but it is important to go in with the right expectations. It works well for organizations wanting full control over their data and having a mature data engineering function to support it. However, it should be treated more like infrastructure than a simple analytics tool because it requires ongoing maintenance across collectors, pipelines, and schema management. I would strongly recommend investing early in schema governance and thinking about how quickly product teams can access and use the data, as this often becomes the limiting factor. If the goal is fast iteration and self-serve analytics, then managed stacks like Segments and Mixpanel may provide better ROI with much lower operational overhead.

    Snowplow is not a bad tool. It is simply a very specific tool. Snowplow is excellent at what it is designed for: full control over data collection and processing, strong schema-driven tracking, and works really well with warehouse-first stacks like Google BigQuery. It is highly scalable for large data-mature organizations, but it comes with trade-offs including higher operational overhead requiring ongoing engineering investment, slower iteration for product analytics, and it is not naturally self-serve for non-technical teams.

    Overall, Snowplow is a very capable platform but needs the right environment to deliver value. It is best suited to organizations wanting full control over their data and having engineering resources to manage and scale the pipeline. In my case, the operational overhead and slower time to insight made it less effective, especially as I aimed for faster iteration and more self-serve analytics. I used to maintain a sheet just to track Snowplow events and where they triggered, which involved very much manual work. The main takeaway for me is that the right choice depends on team structure and priorities. Snowplow is strong technically but not always the best fit for product-led workflows. If improvements are needed, since Snowplow is an overall powerful tool, moving to a managed stack has significantly improved our situation since moving from Snowplow to Avo.

    I can say that Snowplow is great if you are building a data platform, but if your goal is fast, self-serve product analytics, simpler managed solutions usually deliver better ROI. For my use case with this product, I would rate it 6.5 out of 10.

    Karine Karine

    Data teams have gained full control over real‑time user behavior tracking for advertising insights

    Reviewed on May 01, 2026
    Review from a verified AWS customer

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Snowplow is user behavior tracking at DPG Media on all their websites and apps as well as on television streaming. We stream the data to Snowflake in real time and stitch the data as well. From there, it is used for many use cases in the company.

    For example, we tracked the scroll depth of pages and the time on pages, sending it to Snowplow. Many other use cases were developed. The data was stitched in a profile service on AWS and then utilized to segment for advertisements.

    What is most valuable?

    Snowplow offers the best features in that you are completely free to make your own data model, track the way you want to track, and control the way the data comes to Snowflake so you are the complete owner of the raw data without being forced into a certain data model.

    Having that level of flexibility impacts our team's work and projects as we needed quite a lot of people that were really good in Snowplow. However, from the moment that you completely understood the technical aspects, you were completely free to set up your own Snowplow environment and track the way you wanted to track and what you wanted to track, which is not possible with Google Analytics and Adobe Analytics, for example.

    Snowplow has impacted my organization positively, very well. For DPG Media, it is the most important data source that we have, delivering a lot of value in the company. We are making data mesh products on this data all over the company. I think for advertisement, it is really the most important source of data.

    What needs improvement?

    I do not have many improvements to deliver for Snowplow. Perhaps for smaller companies that do not need to customize so many things would be helpful. In the beginning, we also did some things wrong. The data model that we used was not as clean everywhere we were tracking. We made some mistakes, but I think we learned from them, and perhaps for smaller companies that start now, it could be made a little bit easier, although I think Snowplow has already worked on that.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working in my current field for over seven years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Snowplow is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Snowplow is very scalable.

    How are customer service and support?

    Snowplow is deployed in my organization on a private cloud managed by Snowplow on AWS.

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very good. The only issue that we had at a certain moment was that Snowplow was offering more services and asking us to pay more, but we did not use all these services. We had a discussion with them, but they were very open to discussing with us and negotiating a new contract.

    Snowplow's customer support is also very good. We had an account manager available, so the experience was very good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I previously used Google Analytics in the company, but now at the end we only use it for very small B2B websites.

    How was the initial setup?

    We did quite a lot ourselves. Snowplow's whole setup was done by ourselves. I know that Snowplow now offers a stitching service, but at DPG Media, we did that ourselves. We did the streaming ourselves and the whole data model, etc. Snowplow's whole setup was custom-made for DPG Media.

    What about the implementation team?

    We did quite a lot ourselves. Snowplow's whole setup was done by ourselves at DPG Media.

    What was our ROI?

    I have seen a return on investment, but that is difficult to quantify. I would not say fewer employees, but we saved money because Google Analytics was much more expensive. The time to deliver real-time data and value helped a lot.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very good. The only issue that we had at a certain moment was that Snowplow was offering more services and asking us to pay more, but we did not use all these services. We had a discussion with them, but they were very open to discussing with us and negotiating a new contract.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Snowplow, I evaluated other options, including Google Analytics, which was another option, but it was very expensive, along with Google BigQuery.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to others looking into using Snowplow is to learn first from others that are also using it. I would rate this review nine out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Private Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    View all reviews