Sold by: ATH InfosystemsÂ
Deployed on AWS
Free Trial
AWS Free Tier
This product has charges associated with it for seller support. GitLab is a web-based platform that offers a complete set of tools for version control, continuous integration, code review, and collaboration, enabling teams to manage the entire software development lifecycle in one place.
4.2
Overview
Gitlab 16.8.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 with maintenance support by ATH.
This is a repackaged open source software product wherein additional charges apply for support. GitLab is a robust and versatile web-based platform designed to streamline and enhance the software development process. At its core, GitLab serves as a centralized hub for version control, allowing teams to efficiently manage their source code repositories using the Git version control system. However, GitLab goes beyond basic version control, offering an extensive suite of features that cover the entire software development lifecycle. This includes built-in continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, enabling automated testing and deployment.
Highlights
- GitLab provides built-in CI/CD pipelines, allowing for automated testing, code quality checks, and deployment.
- GitLab is built on the Git version control system, providing robust source code management capabilities.
- The platform supports collaborative code reviews, enabling teams to maintain code quality through peer review.
Details
Sold by
Delivery method
Delivery option
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Latest version
Operating system
Ubuntu 22.04
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide
Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Free trial
Try this product free for 5 days according to the free trial terms set by the vendor. Usage-based pricing is in effect for usage beyond the free trial terms. Your free trial gets automatically converted to a paid subscription when the trial ends, but may be canceled any time before that.
Pricing is based on actual usage, with charges varying according to how much you consume. Subscriptions have no end date and may be canceled any time.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
If you are an AWS Free Tier customer with a free plan, you are eligible to subscribe to this offer. You can use free credits to cover the cost of eligible AWS infrastructure. See AWS Free Tier for more details. If you created an AWS account before July 15th, 2025, and qualify for the Legacy AWS Free Tier, Amazon EC2 charges for Micro instances are free for up to 750 hours per month. See Legacy AWS Free Tier for more details.
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
m4.large Recommended | $0.08 |
t2.micro | $0.001 |
t3.micro | $0.08 |
m5.large | $0.08 |
t2.small | $0.08 |
r5.large | $0.08 |
m3.large | $0.08 |
t2.xlarge | $0.08 |
m3.medium | $0.08 |
c3.large | $0.08 |
Vendor refund policy
No Refund
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA)Â .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
Try one unit of this product for 5 days. There will be no software charges for that unit, but AWS infrastructure charges still apply. Free Trials will automatically convert to a paid subscription upon expiration and you will be charged for additional usage above the free units provided.
Additional details
Usage instructions
( Port - 22 and Username - ubuntu) Connect to your Virtual Machine via SSH and run the following command to update the package list: ubuntu sudo su sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure
To access your web server : http://your_ip- login info: root Ath@1234
Support
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products
This product has charges associated with it for seller support. The Ubuntu 18.04 AMI provides a robust and reliable operating system for your cloud applications, leveraging the latest Ubuntu 18.04 benefits. It offers long-term support with security updates and a vast repository of packages, ensuring your deployments are secure and up-to-date. Ideal for developers and enterprises alike, this AMI is well-suited for web hosting, software development, and creating scalable applications in the cloud. With the ease of integration with popular DevOps tools, Ubuntu 18.04 streamlines your workflow and enhances productivity. Whether you're building microservices or deploying containerized applications, this AMI equips you with the stability and performance needed for demanding workloads, making it the perfect choice for your EC2 cloud environment.
The official Ubuntu Linux, optimized for AWS with five years of security maintenance.
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS - Jammy (Arm)
This product has charges associated with it for seller support. Discover the power and reliability of Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, a long-term support version designed for cloud environments. With its robust performance, this AMI is perfect for deploying web applications, databases, and development environments in the EC2 cloud. Benefit from advanced features such as seamless updates, enhanced security, and a vast ecosystem of open-source tools. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is optimized for performance and scalability, ensuring that your critical applications are supported on a stable platform for up to five years. Experience easy integration with DevOps processes and leverage extensive community support for troubleshooting and development. Choose Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for a dependable, secure, and efficient cloud solution that powers your business forward.
Customer reviews
R Pranavan
Supports daily deployments with streamlined workflows and could improve pipeline startup time
Reviewed on Nov 25, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
GitLab serves as my main DevOps platform for managing our repository and code base, as well as for pipeline integration of our system.
We maintain all our projects in GitLab with separate folders for project files, and we use GitLab to manage our projects. We also use GitLab pipeline to deploy in our dev environment, QA environment, and production, as well as for creating patches.
How has it helped my organization?
GitLab has positively impacted my organization by being faster than other platforms and providing the best user interface and features. Creating merge requests is easy, and it makes it simple to use for new joiners.
What is most valuable?
GitLab's best features are its built-in CI/CD and pipeline integration, which can be easily connected to AWSÂ or other deployment platforms. The CI/CD pipeline integration is the most valuable aspect for me, and it also provides an easy user interface to create merge requests, merge, and create branches.
The CI/CD pipeline integration has helped my workflow by allowing us to use the .gitlab-ci.yml file to integrate and write our pipeline codes, where we include build jobs, test jobs, and deploy jobs directly with our AWSÂ for S3Â using CI/CD variables for push.
In GitLab pipelines, both manual and automatic integration are offered for the pipeline runner, and pipeline logs are provided, which are very useful for DevOps engineers and developers for debugging.
What needs improvement?
GitLab can be improved by being more responsive in the UI and offering better pricing for premium features, which would be useful for small startups. While GitLab's CI/CD is powerful, it is somewhat complex in certain aspects.
It would be better if the GitLab and Jira integration were more flexible and easier to integrate with Jira for task management in the future.
For how long have I used the solution?
Since I joined my company, we have been using GitLab for our repo maintenance, so I have been using it for more than two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In my experience, GitLab is stable; however, sometimes it takes much time to start the runner and gets stuck in a pending situation, possibly due to traffic issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
GitLab handles growing workloads and users well, and its scalability is good, but the downtime issue is a concern because it sometimes takes too long to start the runner.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Earlier, I did my personal projects using GitHub before I joined my current organization, which uses GitLab, and that is the reason for switching. I personally prefer GitLab over GitHub because it is user-friendly and easy to work with.
My current organization started with GitLab.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others looking into using GitLab that it is a perfect platform for organization-level repository management and pipeline CI/CD features are very useful and easy to use.
I have shared everything I feel and noted the pros and cons of GitLab as a user. Overall, I rate GitLab positively, giving it a seven out of ten because I have been using GitLab for more than two and a half years and have not faced many difficulties. However, in some cases, I got stuck with runners getting delayed to run, which can be annoying.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
AvdheshSharma
Basic features work well but improvements in efficiency and security are needed
Reviewed on Aug 29, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
To store the data.
What is most valuable?
Git merging allows us to track the details of how and who has done what. This is the best feature which is useful for all companies.
As we are using it in Kubernetes clusters, we don't have any issues.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
Approximately four to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Recently we had an issue where an employee left the company and their commits were erased. We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong. We restored the data from previous backups.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
GitLab is suitable for small and mid-size organizations, but not for enterprise use.
How are customer service and support?
We raised a request with GitLab support when an employee's commits were erased, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I worked with GitLab Enterprise at a previous company. GitLab Enterprise is far better than the free version. For enterprise-level customers, we can recommend GitLab Enterprise. Regarding competitors, we have explored GitHub , Bitbucket , and CircleCI . However, GitLab Enterprise has more features than any of these tools.
What about the implementation team?
I am working with Kyndryl , which is part of IBM. They have their own decision-making team who manages these aspects.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium .
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We are using Jira and Confluence , but not Bitbucket .
What other advice do I have?
We are currently using GitLab integrated with Sonar for code vulnerability checks, Jenkins , Camunda , and XL Deploy. We use Camunda to deploy folders and XL Deploy for server deployment.
We are not using the security features on the GitLab side, as we use different tools for that purpose. My team is not using the GitLab merge request process, but we work on providing GitLab access for admin activities, as developers are in different teams handling development and merge requests.
We are using basic features currently, so I cannot comment on detailed functionality comparisons. Every versioning control tool provides similar basic features, and we are not utilizing the full functionality of GitLab.
The system is easy to use.
On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates a 7.
Mehmet Beyaz
Efficient version tracking saves time and money while leaving room for potential improvements
Reviewed on Jul 18, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
We are not using the community version of GitLab, but we are using it for ticketing and publishing the tool versioning.
What is most valuable?
The best features of GitLab are versioning and keeping track of the versions.
GitLab helps me save time and provide financial benefits, as keeping track of the updated version and the changes is money and time-saving.
GitLab has CI/CD pipeline capabilities.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with GitLab for probably six to seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I am satisfied with GitLab's security, and we have not experienced any problems so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Regarding scalability, I did not face any issues with GitLab supporting my projects.
How are customer service and support?
I have not contacted GitLab's technical support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
What was our ROI?
I have seen benefits from using GitLab, since my directors and the team are using it, they must be happy with it.
What other advice do I have?
I rate GitLab seven out of ten because nothing is perfect. I think we have to finish the conversation. I have told you what I could tell you.
Sriya Sainath
Project management integration and development simplicity drive efficiency
Reviewed on Jun 23, 2025
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My most common use cases for GitLab are development and managing repositories, primarily focused on code development work.
What is most valuable?
The features that are really useful for my use case generally include pulling, merging, and ensuring the pipeline is upright, which are very intuitive.
It helped me personally and my team to save time and money.
In terms of impact from using GitLab as an all-in-one DevOps platform, it helped with my project development life cycle.
What needs improvement?
Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with GitLab for about two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
The deployment and initial setup were not difficult for me to complete. The pipeline management was easy.
The setup process took less than an hour.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In terms of project management overall, I haven't faced any issues such as downtimes or losing the repository.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't contacted technical support of GitLab.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When comparing GitLab with GitHub, I haven't really seen any noticeable difference.
What other advice do I have?
I have worked with Azure DevOps before and found it really intuitive to use.
I have used GitHub and GitLab as well, and I find that they've been fairly intuitive to use.
Regarding GitLab, I purchased an enterprise license, though I'm not aware whether I or my company bought this license from AWS Marketplace or elsewhere.
I'm not aware of any integration with other tools or third-party applications.
I haven't faced any difficulties with user interface or deployment.
On a scale of 1-10, I rate GitLab an 8.
Andrew Schetinin
Development workflows improve with effective code reviews and user-friendly interface
Reviewed on May 06, 2025
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for GitLab involves software development, such as storing sources, automation, and pipelines.
What is most valuable?
The features I find most useful for our development workflows include Git , merges, branches, code reviews, and pipelines. The code review tool is pretty good, and its general usability is commendable when compared to GitHub . It is user-friendly, easy to use, and easy to administer. GitLab handles a significant amount of repositories, sources, and users effectively without data loss, even though it may slow down occasionally.
What needs improvement?
One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we currently use. Additionally, improvements are needed for stability, as the system tends to degrade over a few days and often requires a restart.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with GitLab for approximately six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The self-hosted version of GitLab is not very stable when under load. It slows down and requires restarts every few days. The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons. While understandable, this often breaks running pipelines.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of scalability, GitLab in the cloud is easy to scale, but the self-hosted version is moderately easy, requiring some skills.
How are customer service and support?
We have contacted support in a couple of situations, and they were responsive and okay.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have used Subversion, GitHub , and GitLab.
How was the initial setup?
The cloud-based setup is straightforward and easy. However, self-hosted setup is complex, requiring good DevOps and significant orchestration.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have evaluated Subversion, GitHub, and GitLab.
What other advice do I have?
For those wanting to use GitLab, I recommend going with the cloud version as self-hosting is problematic. I rate GitLab an eight out of ten.