
Overview
High customer expectations and increasingly distributed systems mean disruptions to digital service can have catastrophic effects on sales, brand loyalty, and operating costs. The PagerDuty Operations Cloud deflects unnecessary work from teams and subject matter experts so they can focus on delivering business value. Urgent work is escalated to the right teams and routine work is made self-service. Teams can automate and accelerate issue resolutions with minimal human interruption -and improve system resilience and team capacity while reducing the strain of operational complexity and the unexpected.
With more than 700 integrations, APIs, and apps for customer service, the PagerDuty Operations Cloud empowers rapid responses in any environment. And thanks to more than 10 years of data ingestion, its machine learning-powered AIOps functionality can reduce alert noise by up to 98% and drive down MTTR with critical context for faster triage and effective automation.
PagerDuty integrates with various AWS services, including AWS CloudWatch, Amazon GuardDuty, AWS CloudTrail, AWS Personal Health Dashboard, Amazon EventBridge, AWS Security Hub, Amazon DevOps Guru, AWS Control Tower, AWS Outposts, and AWS S3 Storage Lens.
AIOps PagerDuty AIOps helps teams reduce noise, triage efficiently to drive the right actions towards resolution, and remove manual, repetitive work from the incident response process. Noise reduction baked in with an ML model that learns and adapts based on user behavior means teams see fewer incidents overall. And automating toil from manual event processing results in greater efficiency, saving teams valuable time for innovating.
Process Automation PagerDuty Runbook Automation is a managed cloud service that enables DevOps teams and SREs to create and delegate operational tasks in automated runbooks to other stakeholders such as developers, NOC personnel, and incident responders. Runbook Automation provides automated workflows and task automation focused on IT and developer process automation. Examples include service provisioning, CI/CD, configuration management, incident diagnosis and remediation, and more. With PagerDuty Runbook Automation, you can resolve requests in minutes, rather than days, optimize security and compliance, and give your engineers more time to spend on innovation rather than firefighting.
Incident Response PagerDuty helps you save time and money by bringing together the right teams with the right information to resolve incidents faster. Replace manual processes with automation to streamline incident response, freeing up time and resources for more innovation. Orchestrate end-to-end incident response with a service ownership model that only brings in the teams you need. Over 21K organizations trust PagerDuty to help them adopt DevOps best practices and build more resilient operational practices to minimize costly downtime and protect the customer experience.
Custom Private Offer We can create a custom offer tailored to your needs. Please contact us at aws-sales@pagerduty.com
Highlights
- Incident Response - Manage incidents end-to-end
- Process Automation - Automate and delegate business and IT processes
- AIOps - Maximize IT capacity with fewer incidents and faster resolution
Get personalized pricing in minutes - New
Details
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Professional | On-call and incident response for growing teams | $252.00 |
Business | Streamlined incident response for the enterprise | $492.00 |
CustomerServProfessional | Bi-directional comms between CS & Dev, protect SLAs, & lower MTTR | $252.00 |
CustomerService Business | Bi-directional comms between CS & Dev, protect SLAs, & lower MTTR | $492.00 |
Runbook Automation | Automate manual procedures in runbooks | $1,500.00 |
Automation Actions | Add-on: Automate steps to diagnose & remediate incidents | $240.00 |
Live Call Routing | Add-on: For on-call schedules & escalations (by line) | $1,890.00 |
Runbook Auto Job Runner | Add-on: For Runbook Automation | $750.00 |
Stakeholder Users | Bundle of 50 Stakeholder users | $1,800.00 |
PagerDuty Status Pages | 1000 User Pack | $1,068.00 |
The following dimensions are not included in the contract terms, which will be charged based on your usage.
Dimension | Cost/unit |
|---|---|
Additional events over contracted value | $0.06 |
Vendor refund policy
All fees are non-cancellable and non-refundable except as required by law.
Custom pricing options
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Support
Vendor support
Our team provides multiple resources for customers to find answers to questions and get help with our product. Users may browse our integration guides (pagerduty.com/integrations) to integrate with partner tools, our knowledge base (support.pagerduty.com) to learn more about using PagerDuty, and our developer docs (developer.pagerduty.com) to use our APIs. Additionally, anyone can interact with other PagerDuty users and PagerDuty employees via the PagerDuty Community (community.pagerduty.com). Our Support team is available during regular business hours around the globe, Monday through Friday, and can be contacted at: Email: support@pagerduty.com or via a ticket submitted at tickets.pagerduty.com
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.


Standard contract
Customer reviews
Centralized alerting has streamlined on-call workflows and reduced incident response times
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is part of our daily operational workflow. It sits between monitoring tools and response teams, ensuring alerts reach the right people without delay. We use it for on-call scheduling, incident escalations, and coordinating responses across teams. Having everything centralized has reduced alert fatigue and helped us respond to issues more consistently, especially during off-hours and high-priority incidents.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers intelligent alerting, on-call scheduling, automated escalations, and incident management as its best features. The platform makes it easy to ensure alerts reach the right person, and escalation policies prevent critical issues from being missed. We also rely heavily on its integration with monitoring and collaboration tools and its real-time visibility into operations. Together, these features help our team respond faster, stay organized during an incident, and reduce service disruptions for our customers.
What needs improvement?
While PagerDuty Operations Cloud is strong overall, there are a few areas for improvement. The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for teams managing multiple services, escalation policies, and integrations. Some reporting and analytics features could offer more customization without requiring additional configurations. The mobile app works well for alerting, but managing more advanced settings is generally easier from the web interface. It would also be helpful to have more out-of-the-box workflow templates and automation recommendations to simplify onboarding for new teams.
To make the daily workflow smoother, simplifying the user interface for certain administrative tasks would be a significant improvement. Sometimes, navigating the settings to adjust on-call schedules or escalation policies can take a few extra steps, particularly for large environments. More customizable dashboards and easier reporting for non-technical stakeholders, along with additional guided recommendations for alert tuning, could help teams get even more value from the platform. These are relatively minor points, but addressing them would make an already great tool even more user-friendly.
I did not give PagerDuty Operations Cloud a perfect rating because there is still room for improvement in areas such as reporting flexibility, dashboard customization, and simplifying certain administrative tasks. Overall, it is a mature and dependable platform that positively impacts our work.
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
What was our ROI?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
On-call automation has reduced critical incident impact and ensures faster production responses
What is our primary use case?
As a cloud operation team, I was a user who set the alerts, and whatever important incidents or anomalies were detected that needed to be immediately taken care of were bifurcated through our APM tools that we integrated with PagerDuty Operations Cloud . As a cloud operation team, we supported the platform for rotational shifts. My roles involved setting the person in the shift according to the shift roster, so whenever any incidents triggered, they would get the call. The primary use was supporting production operations and cloud activities.
Our multi-environment consists of AWS infrastructure, Linux servers, Kubernetes clusters, and customer-facing applications. PagerDuty Operations Cloud was mainly used for incident management and alerting. We integrated it with AppDynamics, Instana, and CloudWatch, where it would monitor the patterns and platform, and then PagerDuty Operations Cloud would generate the critical alerts that the appropriate support team who was working in that present shift would get notified of immediately. This platform really helped us manage production incidents beyond service outages, mostly high CPU utilization where we set alerts, application failures, pod issues in Kubernetes , and infrastructure-related alerts. We configured all kinds of alerts, which ensured that alerts were routed to the correct on-call person, helping us reduce response time in critical situations.
What is most valuable?
One of the best features I would mention about PagerDuty Operations Cloud is its on-call rotational scheduling support and escalation management practices. If an engineer did not acknowledge the alert within a defined time frame, the incident was automatically escalated to the next person, support team, or manager of that specific team. Another useful feature was its integration capability. We were able to integrate PagerDuty Operations Cloud with monitoring and observability tools that allow alerts to generate automatically whenever issues were detected in the environment within a fraction of time. We also had the mobile application that was very helpful because the engineer could receive calls, notifications, and acknowledge the incident and track the updates even when they were away from their laptop.
I also valued the centralized incident management dashboard that provides visibility into active incidents, response status, escalation history, and overall operational health. I used to get all the data accumulated there through the dashboard.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud helps us manage production incidents beyond service outages, mostly high CPU utilization where we set alerts, application failures, pod issues in Kubernetes, and infrastructure-related alerts.
What needs improvement?
My experience with PagerDuty Operations Cloud has been positive overall. One area where I believe improvement can be made is reporting and dashboard customization to make it more user-friendly. The operations team often requires different views compared to the management team. Having more flexibility in generating custom reports would be helpful. Another improvement could be providing more advanced AI-driven collaboration capabilities to reduce unnecessary noise alerts and help the team focus on the most critical issues. Apart from these areas, the platform is very reliable and effective for managing production incidents and on-call operations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud for almost five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has been stable and performing well wherever our incident management or alerting was configured for production support. Timely notifications and incident responses were critical. PagerDuty Operations Cloud delivers alerts immediately through multiple channels which we configured, including mobile on-call notifications, email, SMS, and phone calls. Since PagerDuty Operations Cloud was integrated with our monitoring and observability tools, it helped ensure that critical incidents were captured and routed to the appropriate on-call team. During my usage, I did not encounter any significant outages or stability issues that impacted our operations due to PagerDuty Operations Cloud.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is highly scalable and works well with small and large environments. The project I worked on was integrated with multiple application servers and cloud resources for monitoring. PagerDuty Operations Cloud handles all the alerts from different resources and routes them to the appropriate teams. As the infrastructure grows, new services get implemented, escalation policies get defined, and schedules and teams are easily available without requiring major changes in our existing setup. This makes it suitable for an organization to manage large cloud infrastructure and multiple team supports.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
When I joined this project, they had already implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud. When I joined, the SOPs and testing were already in process. After a few days, when I was actually onboarded, many of the alerts were configured in PagerDuty Operations Cloud. I did not get the chance to work on different tools besides PagerDuty Operations Cloud.
How was the initial setup?
During the initial setup of PagerDuty Operations Cloud, when I joined the project, I got a Jira ticket listing a few of the servers where I needed to install PagerDuty agents so it could trigger any alerts or integrate with the server. I was mostly involved in the configuration part.
The setup was straightforward. PagerDuty Operations Cloud also helped us in this process. It was not directly integrated on the individual servers, but we integrated our monitoring tools and observability with PagerDuty Operations Cloud. The servers and applications were monitored through application monitoring tools such as Instana, Zabbix , and Splunk. Whenever critical alerts were generated, they would automatically forward to PagerDuty Operations Cloud through the configured integrations we set up with the application. PagerDuty Operations Cloud would notify the on-call engineers and follow different escalation policies if the alerts were not acknowledged within a specific time. Our flow was that we had EC2 instances, AWS servers, and CloudWatch alarms, and if any alert triggered, it would send through SNS, AWS Simple Notification Service, and then to PagerDuty Operations Cloud and the on-call engineer.
What about the implementation team?
We followed the documentation provided by PagerDuty Operations Cloud for the configuration part.
The documentation is full-fledged with proper details on how to configure it depending on the integration with any application monitoring tool. They specify what steps need to be followed. If integrating with servers, they mention which type of server, whether it is Windows or Linux, and accordingly, they have provided all the documents. The documentation is comprehensive and easy to understand, such that even a layperson can do the configuration part with the way they have provided the documentation.
What other advice do I have?
We are not mostly focused on utilizing PagerDuty's autonomous AI agents because we are working on cloud infrastructure where we do the deployments. We have not implemented AI in our cloud to that extent. Going forward, if our infrastructure is AI-based, then we will definitely explore where PagerDuty Operations Cloud can help in that.
As of now, we do not use generative AI capabilities of PagerDuty Operations Cloud. Our infrastructure is huge, and there is a dedicated developer team working on AI-related things. They are still in two POCs, and the POC is being evaluated. If it looks good, then only we can roll this out into production because my application is customer-facing, and we do not want anything to go wrong or if the alert triggers unnecessarily due to some AI alert that did not notify us. That would ultimately cause us to lose our SLAs and SLOs, and all the other escalation matrices would come into the picture. That is why we are still in POCs as it is critical.
That part is taken care of by a different team or mostly the clients themselves. My main role is to keep the environment always up and running, and all alerts should be properly centralized and customized accordingly.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is basically where we get the alert, and we can integrate through Slack and on-call rotational shifts on cell phones. Prior to this, we were mostly relying on application monitoring tools only and emails and Slack notifications. If an on-call shift person is not at their desk and if any alert has been triggered and no one is there to acknowledge it or look into it and take necessary action, then ultimately there will be customer impact. That is why we implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud. Even if the on-call person is not near their laptop, they will get the call and can immediately acknowledge and report to the team that we have received a P1 call for this specific environment or that the alert is regarding a production issue. Another team member will immediately take action, so there will not be any miss.
I did not encounter any issues that required contacting support for PagerDuty Operations Cloud. This review represents an overall rating of 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Automation has improved incident workflows and response times but still offers unexplored features
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for PagerDuty Operations Cloud involves working in the AIOps team, which is an operations team. We have a monitoring tool called Checkmk , and we have integrated it with PagerDuty for incident management. We monitor many servers across different teams, including the Linux team, network team, Windows teams, and database team. All of these servers are monitored in Checkmk , tracking live CPU, memory, and file systems. Upon reaching certain thresholds, Checkmk generates events, which we integrate into PagerDuty Operations Cloud console. There, we set conditions so that if an event is critical or a warning, it converts into an incident. We then route the incidents to respective teams, who handle the details.
A specific example of an incident where PagerDuty Operations Cloud played a key role involves automations we created within PagerDuty. Rundeck is a job workflow tool where we can implement scripts or schedule jobs. If a server meets its threshold, it triggers PagerDuty Operations Cloud. We create scripts in Rundeck to handle issues, such as clearing a full file system. We utilize a feature called Automation Actions in PagerDuty Operations Cloud, and whenever an incident comes that matches specific conditions, that job will automatically run in Rundeck. This incident management cycle is effectively managed in PagerDuty Operations Cloud, allowing jobs to run and resolve incidents automatically, ensuring the server is healthy again.
What is most valuable?
The best features PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers include Incident Workflows, which we use frequently to ease our team's work. These workflows trigger jobs in Rundeck based on certain conditions when incidents occur. We can create flows in Incident Workflow features and utilize Automation Actions, which allow us to run individual jobs in Rundeck. Additionally, Event Orchestration enables us to integrate various tools using integration keys with multiple applications. These features significantly simplify our daily operations within the team.
Integrations with other tools have been beneficial for our team as we receive requests from different teams to integrate their tools with PagerDuty Operations Cloud, enabling them to manage incidents. We have integrated AWS CloudWatch and Azure for monitoring, as well as CyberArk and Guardicore. If teams have specific requirements for integrating their tools, they approach us to create the necessary flows.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has positively impacted our organization significantly. The response time has improved, and the team responds more quickly now. The PagerDuty Operations Cloud mobile application allows team members to acknowledge incidents via their mobile devices, where they can also receive calls when incidents trigger. The response time has become very quick.
I do not have precise numbers regarding the improvement in response time since using PagerDuty Operations Cloud, but I can share a story about a major incident with Checkmk. After we upgraded our Checkmk console, everything crashed, causing random events to be sent to PagerDuty Operations Cloud. We fixed the event flow from Checkmk using PagerDuty Operations Cloud's features. Furthermore, we have automated the restart of systems through PagerDuty Operations Cloud. If any server requires a restart, we trigger that job with just one click using Ansible , completing the task efficiently.
What needs improvement?
I do not see immediate improvements for PagerDuty Operations Cloud because there are numerous features we have yet to explore. As a product, it is continually upgrading its features, so we are focusing on how we can incorporate those into our use case.
Concerning PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI capabilities, I am not certain as we currently do not use advanced AI-related features since our package offers limited access in that area. However, regarding governance and security, it appears very secure.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud for three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud appears to be quite stable. I have not encountered any downtime or reliability issues, and it has consistently operated successfully.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Regarding scalability, I think there is demand for PagerDuty Operations Cloud as we have been striving to mitigate manual tasks within our organization. We conduct demonstrations to illustrate how we can reduce manual work through our automations.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is excellent. They have been very responsive. We have standing weekly calls to discuss any doubts, and there is a dedicated team, including an engineer and a PagerDuty Relations Manager, assigned to support us. They have been excellent in following up on the features we need to use.
What was our ROI?
I believe a return on investment is occurring because we are promoting PagerDuty Operations Cloud within our organization, aiming to involve more people and teams in using it. We continuously explore new features to facilitate ease of use among many people.
What other advice do I have?
There are many new features introduced in PagerDuty Operations Cloud. AI has been included, and specific features including Incident Workflows and Event Orchestrations have been implemented. One recent implementation in Incident Workflows is SLA tagging for incidents. We created a workflow to notify managers if an SLA has been breached beyond a certain time. This planning has helped us manage incidents more effectively.
I have not utilized PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI agents to address routine issues. However, for team productivity, we leverage escalation policies in PagerDuty Operations Cloud, assigning individual service directories to teams. Consequently, team members receive calls and messages based on their escalation hierarchy.
We have not utilized PagerDuty Operations Cloud's generative AI for decision-making, but the event analytics and operations console provide valuable insights. I can observe real-time data on incidents and alerts, which helps us address the inflow of events from integration keys. This information allows us to refine our planning and reduce event volumes from Checkmk.
I would highly recommend PagerDuty Operations Cloud as a reliable product. I do not have any negative experiences using PagerDuty Operations Cloud, and I believe it adds significant value to our environment if used properly.
When it comes to the accuracy and reliability of PagerDuty Operations Cloud's output, I find it quite reliable. It presents us with extensive data and analytics. The event flow we get from Checkmk provides much useful information, and we rely heavily on PagerDuty Operations Cloud for this analytics format.
I do not believe we have a business relationship with PagerDuty Operations Cloud beyond being a customer. We purchase memberships based on their plans and use them within our organization. I think we are not partners; rather, we simply resell their services internally.
My overall rating for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is seven out of ten.
Centralized incident workflows have reduced outage windows and improved response coordination
What is our primary use case?
PagerDuty is predominantly used for our enterprise notifications for all of the incident management processes, especially the major incident management. We have many applications and infrastructure components. Earlier, we used a solution that only provided text-based communication. When we wanted to look for something with multi-channel notification and correlation capability, that is where we leveraged PagerDuty Operations Cloud .
I am currently going through the governance process to get additional capabilities onboarded. GenAI is not yet enabled since I am from a regulated organization and had to secure approvals before enabling any AI-related components. Most probably in the next two or three months, we will be enabling both GenAI, SRE agent, and the AI capabilities of PagerDuty Operations Cloud.
What is most valuable?
The ease of use is one of the key strengths. Creating the escalation policies and notification channels per user is straightforward, and it is not a requirement that everyone has the same notification rules. Users have flexibility in getting the communication they need. Event orchestration is the other part which works well for us.
Primarily, we were able to get the right people at the right time through our escalation mechanism, which is an automated switch from level one to level two. This helped us improve the overall MTTA, and the acknowledgment rate has drastically improved. For the major incidents, we were able to triage everything with PagerDuty Operations Cloud itself instead of switching between multiple tools such as Teams or other orchestration platforms. With one solution, we are able to do the triaging, and that definitely reduced the outage window and the average outage window.
We do have automations in two main ways. One is the incoming automation where we have multiple monitoring tools and systems that generate events. We ingest them into PagerDuty Operations Cloud and then using event orchestration, we create all of the respective incidents, whether they are PagerDuty Operations Cloud-only incidents, ServiceNow incidents, or different methods we use. The other automation method is incident workflows where we are able to call out to respective endpoints for the remaining automations. This is growing at this point in time, but event orchestration is mainly what we use for the automation of the triaging.
We used to have a two-digit figure of MTTA, and now it is reduced to less than one hour.
Getting the right people on board whenever there is a major issue and dialing them individually took a longer time. Now with PagerDuty Operations Cloud, having all of the predefined rules and the orchestrations we can create, it is definitely bringing value. Bringing the right people at the right time and improving the restoration time so that we do not impact any of the business end-user services is where PagerDuty Operations Cloud definitely plays a key role in delivering the business value.
What needs improvement?
I have submitted a few enhancement requests. Dynamic scheduling is something I was waiting for almost three or four years. Finally, I believe they are coming up in a few weeks with dynamic scheduling because whenever any operations deals occur, the shift rosters will not be static. People may be rotating between different shifts, and setting up on PagerDuty Operations Cloud was a challenging task. They are in the early access stage of dynamic rosters, and I believe that will address this issue. On the reporting perspective, there is a wide variety of reports, and the out-of-the-box reports can be matured further. Though we are getting customized reports through professional services and it is beneficial, if they were out-of-the-box, then they would further help. There are plenty of reports, but still, there is maturity that can be addressed.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud for almost four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There are not many issues except during Cloudflare or major AWS issues. Otherwise, we do not have any performance issues. The platform is performing well.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is scalable, but how you will take the business model matters. We are on the user license basis, so we know how many users we can onboard to PagerDuty Operations Cloud. The rest of the things are definitely scalable, depending on how you agree with them on the contractual level. There is no challenge with that unless you have not calculated or forecasted your requirement.
How are customer service and support?
I used PagerDuty Operations Cloud support.
I would say they are pretty good, with regular support scoring eight or nine out of ten, and professional services scoring around nine out of ten. Both are pretty good for our business requirements.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using different HP tools for all of the alerting and also a solution from OnSolve, earlier called TelAlert. Those solutions were distributed and not one central solution for incident management and alerts. Now it is centralized with one of our ITSM tools and PagerDuty Operations Cloud for both alerting and incident management.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was comparatively easy. We had to train the people because it was a new solution altogether. We got professional services support, and they helped us move forward. We did not have many challenges on the system level. Only user experience took more time as the team needed to learn how to use and operate the solution.
What about the implementation team?
I used PagerDuty Operations Cloud support.
What was our ROI?
From the pricing perspective, we got a good deal. When we took the tool, we did a comparison of the competitors and evaluated, and we are satisfied with that pricing. From the ROI perspective specific to the tool, we have not had a chance to calculate it. But overall, with the end-to-end process where PagerDuty Operations Cloud is present, I think we are almost near to getting the ROI.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We verified Twilio and two other solutions at that time.
What other advice do I have?
I would definitely ask them to do a PoC and do integrations with their existing ITSM tools or wherever they are looking for and thoroughly verify one end-to-end testing. Taking a major incident as a simulation and performing comparison on what metrics they do internally and what additional could help them out with the new solution of PagerDuty Operations Cloud, I think these two things definitely should be tested.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud as a product, I would give an eight out of ten. The only reason I put eight instead of ten is the enhancement requests or any new features. The time to market has to be much faster than what they have at this point. Some flexibility on the customization should also be provided. My overall review rating for this product is eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Cloud platform has improved efficiency and time savings but still needs stronger AI integrations
What is our primary use case?
I have been using PagerDuty Operations Cloud for the past few months. My main use case is that I use it in my day-to-day applications. A specific example of how I use PagerDuty Operations Cloud in my application is that I use it for hosting my agent. Hosting my agent on PagerDuty Operations Cloud helps me with my day-to-day work by being efficient in terms of scalability and managing infrastructure. It has been pretty helpful.
What is most valuable?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud's best features include scalability, managing infrastructure, and managing other services. It helps me manage other services comprehensively, and I think it is pretty good overall. PagerDuty Operations Cloud has positively impacted my organization by being effective in terms of managing the system and in terms of scalability. A specific outcome that shows how PagerDuty Operations Cloud has helped my organization is that it has improved efficiency and helped in saving a lot of time.
What needs improvement?
I think PagerDuty Operations Cloud can be improved in terms of services, such as integration with AI.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for the past three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has been stable based on what we have used.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PagerDuty Operations Cloud's scalability has been pretty good because we are able to spin up different resources based on the use case and load.
How are customer service and support?
We have not used customer support explicitly.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment, as I mentioned earlier; there has been a lot of improvement in terms of time and cost.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been quite reasonable and cost-effective.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing PagerDuty Operations Cloud, I did not evaluate other options.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate PagerDuty Operations Cloud six out of ten because I believe you can add more features to make the platform even better. Regarding PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are pretty good, and the applications are quite secure. As for PagerDuty Operations Cloud's accuracy and reliability of output, I think the accuracy is pretty high and pretty good, and I believe it should be quite reliable, though I have not explored much on the recent AI capabilities.
I would definitely suggest PagerDuty Operations Cloud as a good platform, but it depends on your use case and the amount of scalability that you are looking for. PagerDuty Operations Cloud is pretty good and quite helpful. My overall rating for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is six out of ten.