Overview

Product video
Services are driving economies around the world. Recent global events have put into focus how service creation, delivery, and management can impact every facet of our lives. Enterprises are finding new ways to be more agile and adapt faster to the changing needs of the global services economy. These new ways include supporting a distributed, hybrid workforce, managing supply chains to fulfill demand, assessing risk, and meeting escalating, always-on customer and user expectations. Enterprise service management - ESM, solutions ensure that all facets within enterprise lines of business - LOBs, come together to work smoothly, reduce risk, and prevent points of failure. Everywhere. Every time. For every use.
Enterprise service management - ESM, extends relevant IT service management - ITSM best practices and technologies to non-IT LOBs. The LOBs benefiting from ESM can span across human resources, customer service, workplace and facilities, security, and more. ESM can also unify leading-edge intelligence, automation, large language models, and ChatGPT.
Your employees sit at the center of ESM success The ability of your enterprise to create and deliver superior employee experiences is based on the underlying ESM solution, and the breadth of the available digital employee experience - DEX solutions. DEX encompasses every aspect of your employees interaction with ESM technology, including quality, ease of use, accessibility, security, reliability, inclusivity, and more, all contributing to the end-user experience.
ESM quality of experience is compromised when your employees face difficult-to-navigate internal channels of support, redundant and manual processes across LOBs, out-of-date information, cumbersome fulfillment workflow, and an inability to get back to work with minimal disruption. The adverse impact on the enterprise is low productivity, additional toil, and staff turnover. BMC Helix ESM solutions are designed to fuel employee productivity by empowering all of your employee, wherever they are, with the experiences they need for success and improved job satisfaction, including
A transparent, seamless employee onboarding experience to accelerate time to value
Automated workflows to save time across LOBs, data, and processes
A unified service catalog for the speed and convenience of employee self-service
Actionable insights, powered by AI & ML, accessible in real time, to resolve inquiries from customers and other internal teams
Collaboration and communication tools, with ease of multichannel access on employee devices of choice
Proactive resolution of problems and cases, even before they happen
For BMC Helix custom pricing, configuration, and terms please contact cloud_sales@bmc.com for private offers.
Highlights
- Personalized User Experiences - Develop any experience and custom page designs quickly through flexible, drag-and-drop tools. Build user journeys designed for the unique needs of your LOBs accessible anytime, anywhere, on any device
- Automated Workflows - Harness AI/ML to offload repetitive, manual effort spanning events, processes, tasks, and business functions. Integrate all infrastructure domains, assets, applications, and data into a single user interface.
- Integrated ServiceOps - Realize cross-platform economies of scale, removing silos across LOBs. Identify, isolate, and prevent incidents before they occur.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Unit | BMC Helix ESM SaaS Credit | $10,000.00 |
Vendor refund policy
BMC Does not provide refunds
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
BMC provides documentation and general support at our BMC DOCs site. We also offer direct support plans and support from BMC Partners. Support email: customer_support@bmc.com Support URL:
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Improved ticket tracking has increased SLA performance and supports detailed asset management
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is for ticketing and asset management, as well as for change management requests. I have also been optimizing other features on BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management .
For example, I use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management when there is an issue from the user's point of view, whether on the user's side, the store, or the headquarters. Users will create a ticket and log it, and then I follow up on the issue using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management to track it. For assets, I use it to track asset movement and to correlate any tickets if they are regarding the asset.
What is most valuable?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has positively impacted my organization so far, especially for ticketing. In fact, for ticketing, I am still using it as a point of benchmark on how I service the user, whether in the stores or in the headquarters. For assets, I am still populating the data and ensuring that the asset is being properly logged and monitored.
I have seen changes in response time, efficiency, and user satisfaction since I started using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management. I can monitor my tickets and services, and I am currently trying to minimize breaches in my SLA. I get a lot of benefits from the platform.
Almost more than ninety percent of the tickets are properly within my SLA. That is not good, as I expect ninety-nine percent of SLA, but I am slowly improving.
What needs improvement?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management can be improved because it has a legacy system that needs enhancement. The interface needs improvement because it is not very user-friendly. I have access to so many interfaces that sometimes it is confusing. Additionally, the AI needs to be improved as well.
The AI is still new, and how it can monitor the whole system is not as advanced as I expected. I take note mostly on the interface, because there are so many front-ends, especially for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management. The company needs to improve it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for more than two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management's scalability is very scalable, and I can add more as needed.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is adequate and within their set SLA, but they need to be more communicative and quicker in responding to my queries.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used a different solution, but it was a small one. I switched because I needed more capabilities on IT service management.
How was the initial setup?
I think the experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is quite easy. The pricing is quite fair, but perhaps because I actually buy the whole module, I think for the starter, it is quite expensive. I think the company needs to separate the modules as I need them. Setup cost is acceptable, and licensing is quite easy.
What was our ROI?
I have not seen a return on investment yet because I am still in development, so I do not see any return on investment. However, I do see some monitoring capabilities. I can monitor my performance, which is quite important for me.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management. I tried to use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is to first know what you need from BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, and then it is better to learn about the features so that you can optimize it. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Integrated service workflows have unified enterprise support and have improved digital experiences
What is our primary use case?
We are a partner for OpenText and BMC, and this is our main professional service delivery. We are the professional service delivery arm for both of them.
I am responsible for the ITSM products, such as OpenText SMAX, Helix ITSM , and others.
It is not only ITSM, it is an ESM as well.
It is mainly the DWP. And the ITSM modules, IAM , incident, request, change, and others. Mainly for the ESM, the most beneficial layer is the interfacing layer of the DWP, the Digital Workplace. And actually the advanced service catalog.
The underlying work orders and workflows of the service catalog are a mainly critical point for the ESM and even the interface for the ITSM tool as well.
What is most valuable?
Recently, it is good. It is promising. It is still not totally amazing. Even for BMC, for OpenText, for ServiceNow , for all the vendors, it is a booming technology. And all vendors are trying to integrate it inside their ITSM tools. Still, there are some limitations, especially related to the Arabic language, especially for the Middle East. The LLM language model and LLM models are not supporting Arabic for most of the tools. So this is a weakness. However, I can see some vendors are still working on this point right now because there are LLM models in the market supporting Arabic.
For automation, you have multiple tools depending on the vendor. For example, for OpenText, we have an OO integration, Operation Orchestration with SMAX. For BMC, we have Control-M as well, and can automate some items. All vendors as well inside their portfolio are considering the automation. It is not a native function inside the tool, but actually within the portfolio with seamless integration. It fits for purpose.
What needs improvement?
It is perfect, unless there is the support of the Arabic language. Supporting the Arabic language is the critical point, especially for ESM more than ITSM. Because for the ITSM, most of the IT staff can handle the English or any language besides Arabic. But when you are targeting the ESM, you are targeting the HR team, the finance team, the maintenance team. Not all these teams treat with English terminologies or report their cases with English. At this moment, the Arabic language or their native Arabic language should be considered and it will be more important inside the chatbots. I would prefer to chat with my own language.
Enhancing AI support for the Arabic languages, enhancing the automation of the ticket, and automation of the ticket workflows would make it simpler for implementation and simpler for enhancements. Adding more capabilities for adding more flexibility of the customization is important. This is not only for BMC, even for OpenText, even for ServiceNow . As long as you are moving to a low-code platform, you are limiting my capability to customize. The solution will be fit for purpose perfectly for a low-customization environment. However, it is a limitation for the low-code environments. All low-code environments have limitations when customizing. When you compare, for example, in OpenText, when you compare SMAX to the legacy Service Manager, Service Manager has more capabilities for customization, more than SMAX. This is the same between Helix and Remedy . Overall, BMC still has a very powerful way to customize. It still has a very good customization capability.
For how long have I used the solution?
For the last 10 years.
How are customer service and support?
All vendors have several plans for support, for supporting models. From premium to standard, advanced. It depends on the supporting package you purchased. For example, if you are talking about premier support in OpenText or BMC or whatever, and you have a dedicated resource, the response time will be much better. The initial phases of investigation will be very short because you have a dedicated, assigned resource who is understanding your environment, already knows your environment, already knows your understanding and your needs, so it will be much better.
Also, for the support of BMC, especially for BMC Helix on cloud as a software-as-a-service, the support will be faster than the response in investigating an on-prem solution. This is crucial for the troubleshooting of the infrastructure or a bug. For example, if a system is down totally, I am not talking about software enhancements or an issue inside the tool itself, but talking about if a system is down or if you have a critical ticket, BMC Helix SaaS is very good for support, more than support for on-prem. This is the same for ServiceNow, same for OpenText, same for everything. It is about the SaaS supporting model because the resource is already understanding or well-understanding the infrastructure deployment that happened on the cloud, on their cloud.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
All vendors can compete with their pricing. All vendors for the same class, for example, if you are talking about the world-class such as BMC, ServiceNow, OpenText, all of them can compete in front of each other. I am not talking about the same price for medium-scale such as ManageEngine or smaller tools. But for the same scale of the vendors, almost all of them are near to each other.
What other advice do I have?
Consistent incident tracking has improved communication and maintained strong user relationships
What is our primary use case?
Over three jobs, I have used BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for seven years. My main use case for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is incident management. I work on tickets created by users, create tickets for users, keep the users up to date, conduct investigations, log information, and perform similar tasks in my day-to-day work.
What is most valuable?
The best features BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management offers are making comments visible to users and multiple fields that can be customized. I find myself relying on the public comment feature for all users the most, as it is very effective.
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has positively impacted my organization by helping us maintain a good relationship with end users. Communication has become easier to conduct and maintain, which has improved our relationships.
What needs improvement?
I have not identified any features that would be required at the moment for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for twelve months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is stable. We did not experience problems with the application itself, but rather with our network.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management demonstrates good scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I have not accessed customer support for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, as we have not encountered that need.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used HPSM and switched because that solution was outdated and no longer satisfied our needs.
What was our ROI?
I have not observed a return on investment, but we manage incidents much better in BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is to trust the application because it will serve you well. I would rate this product ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Service teams have improved incident tracking and now seek better in-app implementation guides
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is service management. We have different OEMs and platforms to manage their services, and we are using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for our OEMs.
A specific example of how I use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management with my OEMs includes incident management and change management in RPA . Whatever incidents are raised on a day-to-day basis involve incident management and change request management for whatever changes are required in the current existing production bot to get them up and running. These two use cases are what we are currently using.
I have another team also building the production bot, and we are looking forward to using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for project and process management.
What is most valuable?
In my experience so far, the best features BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management offers are its ease of implementation and user-friendliness. No past experience is required, and one person new to the platform can start using it from scratch.
What makes BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management user-friendly is its UI and overall design; it is very user-friendly and self-explanatory. That is a key strength of it.
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has positively impacted my organization due to our incident management tracking, which has been quite impressive so far. We can analyze our incidents, such as which particular area has more incidents coming in, and we can drive our data analysis from the incidents that arrive day-to-day to manage the area where these incidents are occurring, trying to reduce their counts.
Regarding the data analysis part, we submitted incidents from around the last six months, and from that data we discovered that approximately 50 percent of incidents are related to infrastructure. We managed our infrastructure more effectively by setting up DR and HA in place for production support, and that is how it reduced from 50 percent to 40 percent at the initial stage. We are looking forward to reducing it to 0 percent in a couple of years because infrastructure is key to executing any RPA bots.
What needs improvement?
An improvement needed for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management would be to have assisted guides or templates on how to use the application or the best-suited applications to carry out the use cases, which would help other teams implement BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have recently started using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, so it is quite new to me.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is quite stable, and we do not face any challenges or issues while using it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is scalable in terms of managing four OEMs now; if we have to use it for 10 OEMs, it would be scalable for us.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is great; we receive time-to-time responses, and we get responses within 24 hours.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we were using Snow Service Now, and we switched to BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management because it was difficult to manage all four OEMs in that platform, which was not user-friendly and easy to use.
What was our ROI?
In terms of return on investment, managing production bots allowed us to reduce our 20 to 30 L1 team members managing the production bot down to 10 resources, focusing on RCA, the root cause of the incident, and how we can reduce incidents while also reducing the FTE count in managing production bots.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is that it is manageable, and we are comfortable onboarding vendors; it is not significant in terms of cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, we did not evaluate other options since this was the only one for us to evaluate.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is to start managing their services, especially if they have multiple services, with the help of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management since it offers ease of use and requires no training. It is user-friendly and self-explanatory. I rate this product a 7 out of 10.
Automation workflows have improved validation speed and now support complex enterprise testing
What is our primary use case?
I am involved in designing and maintaining the automation frameworks, validating the end-to-end enterprise scale workflows, and ensuring the quality and reliability of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management across different environments.
Overall, I mostly interact with BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management as a part of quality validation and automation, making sure real-world customer workflows work as expected. I work closely with different teams to test new features, validate fixes, and ensure integrations and automation rules are stable before releases. My focus is on catching the issues early and improving the overall reliability and providing a very good user experience of the platform to the end customer.
In my day-to-day work, I mainly use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for validating and testing ITSM workflows, automating test scenarios, and verifying the integrations across different modules. I also work with the incident, change, and service request flows, check API-based integrations, and ensure the platform behaves reliably across different environments and configurations.
What is most valuable?
The most important features of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management that stand out to me are the automation and workflow capabilities, along with how well it supports enterprise-scale ITSM processes. I especially appreciate the incident and change management workflows because they offer flexibility to integrate with external tools through APIs and overall scalability from a quality and automation point of view. These features make it easier to validate complex real-world customer scenarios.
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has had a positive impact on my organization by improving consistency and reliability across workflows. Having standardized processes makes it easier for teams to work together and reduces errors that can happen with manual handling. From an engineering and quality perspective, it has helped us catch issues earlier, validate changes faster, and improve overall product stability. This ultimately benefits customers by delivering more reliable releases and smoother upgrades.
One small but useful detail I really appreciate in BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is how configurable the workflows and rules are without needing heavy custom code. Even small changes such as assignment logic or notification behavior can be tested and adjusted quickly. From a testing and automation point of view, this flexibility makes it easier to validate different edge cases and customer-specific configurations, which is not always possible with more rigid ITSM tools.
What needs improvement?
Overall, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is a strong platform, but there are a few areas that could be improved. The user interface and overall usability could be more intuitive, especially for new users. We are working on creating a custom dashboard for the end customer. Some configurations and workflows take time to understand, so simplifying setup and improving documentation would help speed up adoption. From a testing and automation perspective, clearer visibility into configuration changes and better built-in validation or debugging tools would also make it easier to troubleshoot complex scenarios.
Another area that could use improvement in BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is performance consistency, especially in highly customized or large-scale environments. The platform is stable overall, but better out-of-the-box performance tuning guidance would help customers avoid trial and error. Additionally, simplifying integrations and providing more readymade connectors or clearer API examples would make it easier for teams to onboard faster. Improved observability, such as clear logs or diagnostics around workflow execution, would also help both customers and engineering teams troubleshoot issues more efficiently.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for around two years now as part of my role at BMC Software.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In my experience, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is stable and reliable. It handles enterprise-scale workflows well and performs consistently once properly configured. We have not seen frequent crashes or major downtimes, and I would say the system experiences zero downtime most of the time, even in complex environments with heavy automation and integrations.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is designed to handle large enterprise environments, making it very highly scalable with many users, workflows, and integrations without significant performance degradation. It effectively manages growth, whether it involves scaling up to more services, more automated processes, or more concurrent users, making it a good fit for organizations that need to support complex, distributed teams and hybrid infrastructure.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is solid. Support teams are generally responsive and knowledgeable, especially when issues are well documented. When complex problems come up, the escalation path works effectively, and product teams are usually involved in resolving deeper technical issues. Overall, support contributes positively to stability and customer confidence.
I would rate customer support for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management nine out of ten because it is generally responsive and knowledgeable with effective escalation for complex issues. The support team has a very good design for escalation navigation, so we get responses as soon as possible when we raise issues, although there is still some room to improve response time in certain cases.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had experience with other traditional ITSM tools in different contexts. We moved to BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management after recognizing its cloud-native architecture, stronger automation capabilities, and better support for enterprise-scale workflows. The flexibility to integrate with external systems and the focus on automation made it a better fit for a modern hybrid IT environment compared to older and more rigid solutions.
How was the initial setup?
Licensing for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is typically subscription-based, and the cost depends on the modules, user types, and scale of usage. For standard implementation, setup is fairly straightforward, but more complex environments may require additional configuration effort. Overall, it is not the cheapest option, though the pricing aligns with the depth of the features and the enterprise support it provides.
What was our ROI?
We have definitely seen a return on investment with BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, mainly in terms of time saved and improved efficiency. Automation and standardized workflows have reduced the amount of manual effort needed for validation and support activities, which has translated into a faster release cycle and fewer repeat issues. The reduction in manual effort and quicker turnaround has clearly delivered measurable value.
Since using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, we have seen a faster validation cycle and fewer workflow-related issues reaching later stages. Automation has helped reduce manual testing effort and improved overall test coverage. This has meant quicker turnaround during releases, better consistency across environments, regression identification, and a noticeable reduction in repeat or configuration-related defects. The improvement in efficiency and stability has been clear, even without exact numbers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, we evaluated ServiceNow and some more traditional ITSM solutions. BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management stood out because of its automation capabilities, flexibility with integrations, and ability to scale in complex enterprise and hybrid environments.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management would be to plan the implementation carefully and clearly define workflows and integration requirements upfront. It is a very powerful platform, but it delivers the most value when configured with a clear understanding of business processes. Investing time in automation and standardization early and making use of documentation helps avoid complexity later and ensures smoother scaling as usage grows.
Overall, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is a mature and powerful enterprise platform that works well for organizations with complex IT environments. Its strengths in automation, scalability, and especially in integrations make it a solid choice. With continued improvements in usability and performance tuning, it has the potential to deliver even more value to both customers and engineering teams. I give this platform an overall rating of eight out of ten.