OneLogin Workforce Identity

My main use case for OneLogin  at the university is that it helps me access the institutional email with a single sign-on. This makes it easier to access the virtual classroom, the digital library, and other platforms that the university provides.

A specific example of how OneLogin  has made it easier for me to access these platforms in my academic day-to-day is that sometimes since I have multiple passwords for each resource that the university gives me, I might forget them. With OneLogin I just log in once with everything already saved, and it makes it easier and saves me time.

I find it really great that I no longer have to remember all the passwords to access the resources. Instead, with a single click or a single login I can access everything.

I consider the best features that OneLogin offers to be the single sign-on feature, which provides me with unified access to cloud applications and reduces how complex the sign-in process is.

I found integrating single sign-on with the different university platforms to be very easy.

OneLogin can also integrate with directories. For example, it integrates with Google Workspace , and that helps me since I use Google Workspace .

OneLogin has had a positive impact on my academic experience by helping me reduce the time spent on authentication. I estimate that I save around five to six minutes using OneLogin, and I have noticed other concrete improvements in my day-to-day academic life.

I think OneLogin could improve by providing more features that make everything more unified.

I have been using OneLogin for just three months.

I consider OneLogin to be a stable solution.

I think OneLogin's scalability is good because it helps organizations accelerate their journey to the cloud. This includes migrating workloads and building cloud-native processes.

OneLogin does indeed adapt easily if the number of users or services increases.

I have not had any issues with OneLogin, so I have not used customer service or technical support.

Before using OneLogin, I did not use another tool for access management.

I perceive the benefits of identity and access management for external clients in OneLogin to be very important, for example, in the work and employability aspect, to connect with different software that might exist that gives you access.

I do not know about the pricing, implementation cost, and OneLogin licenses because that is handled by the university, but the implementation is quick.

I have noticed a lot of time saved as a return on investment.

I do not know about the pricing, implementation cost, and OneLogin licenses because that is handled by the university, but the implementation is quick.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing OneLogin.

I really appreciate OneLogin's capability to offer a smooth end-user experience when logging in and authenticating into the needed applications. It allows doing multiple tasks more quickly.

I have not used the single sign-on feature to integrate external applications other than the university's because I have only limited myself to using it for the university.

My advice to other people who are considering using OneLogin is that they really should use it because it is a very complete tool. It saves you a lot of time, and especially in the university environment that is important. With OneLogin you can create and delete accounts automatically, since they synchronize with the student information system, for example. It can also synchronize with the tools you use academically.

I think OneLogin is a very complete and pleasant platform that is easy to use. I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

OneLogin  is primarily used for privileged access to applications. OneLogin  enables access to applications without needing to use a single sign-on, as it connects seamlessly between systems.

For the end user, the experience with OneLogin is transparent. Previously, users had to log in to Office and then log in again to another application such as Monday. When synchronizing or running OneLogin together with those applications, the user only needs to be redirected to OneLogin by the application itself, and with that single sign-on they can then connect to other applications.

OneLogin offers the ability to update role permissions, which makes the task easier when disabling a user or changing their role or lowering their privileges. This is straightforward to manage from the same console.

OneLogin offers dynamic MFA, where the platform can decide, based on user behavior, whether or not to ask for MFA. This helps significantly. Additionally, intelligent flows, known as Smart Flows, help create highly customized authentication flows all from within OneLogin itself.

Another relevant feature of OneLogin is role assignment, which allows us not only to create the user in the final application, but also for OneLogin to assign the roles, groups, and permissions of those apps, attributed or associated with Active Directory.

OneLogin helps improve security posture. We base ourselves on ISO 27001, and they require us to have controls for secure access control, which OneLogin has helped us with. Another benefit is user productivity, because users do not have to enter multiple passwords in different applications to access them. One password is sufficient, and if OneLogin detects that the user is benign or not malicious, it makes it easier for them to access the other applications. There was also a reduction in support tickets. Although initially there were quite a few as a result of the tool's implementation, the reduction became clear as users fully learned how to use the tool, so there are no issues from that point of view.

OneLogin could benefit from additional dynamic security enhancement. The solution itself can decide whether or not to require MFA from users based on the user's behavior, where they are connecting from, their IP, what device, and what time. It allows us to identify and automatically trigger an MFA flow or simply deny access due to the dynamic risk that the user may present.

In terms of OneLogin, integrations or the integration list could be improved. There are applications that perhaps do not use the REST API, so providing the ease of being able to integrate more applications would be beneficial.

OneLogin has been used for approximately a year and a half.

The idea of implementing OneLogin was also to keep users under control and also to protect the applications they access with OneLogin by protecting them from the identity side. Though exact figures are not available, this impact can be described as positive for our organization.

The main reason we use OneLogin  is to securely manage employee access to different applications from a single platform. It helps us streamline logins through single sign-on, so users do not have to remember multiple passwords. At the same time, it strengthens security with features like multi-factor authentication. Overall, it is a combination of improving user convenience and ensuring secure access to all internal applications.

One specific example of how OneLogin  helped with this was during employee onboarding. Earlier, when a new employee joined, we had to manually create accounts for multiple applications and share separate login credentials. It was time-consuming and sometimes led to delays or errors. After implementing OneLogin, we streamlined this process using centralized user provisioning. Now, when a new employee is added, they automatically get access to all the required applications through single sign-on. It made onboarding much faster and more efficient.

Apart from onboarding, offboarding is another area where OneLogin has been really useful. When an employee leaves, we can instantly revoke their access to all applications from a single dashboard. This is critical from a security standpoint. It removes the risk of any leftover or unauthorized access.

The best feature of OneLogin is definitely its single sign-on. It makes a big difference in day-to-day work because employees can access multiple applications using just one login, which improves both productivity and the user experience. Another feature that stands out is multi-factor authentication. It adds an extra layer of security, especially for sensitive applications, and helps protect against unauthorized access.

OneLogin's integration and user management features have been very useful for us.

OneLogin has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of efficiency and security. From a time-saving perspective, it has significantly reduced the effort required for managing user accesses. Tasks like onboarding, offboarding, and updating permissions are now much faster because everything is handled from a single platform instead of multiple systems. In terms of security, features like multi-factor authentication and centralized access have helped reduce the risk of unauthorized access. We have better visibility over who is accessing what, which makes monitoring and compliance easier. It has also improved employee experience. With single sign-on, users do not have to remember multiple passwords, so login issues have reduced and productivity has improved.

Overall, OneLogin is a strong solution, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. One area is the user interface. It is functional, but at times, it can feel a bit less intuitive, especially for new users or administrators who are just getting started. Another is integration customization. While it offers many pre-built connectors, for some custom or less common applications, the setup can require additional effort and technical understanding. Making that process simpler would be helpful. Also, reporting features could be more flexible.

A couple of additional areas come to mind. In terms of support, while the overall experience is good, sometimes response times for more complex issues can be a bit slow. Faster resolution for critical cases would definitely improve the experience. Regarding documentation, most basics are covered, but for more advanced configurations or troubleshooting, the documentation could be more detailed and easier to follow. That would help teams implement and manage the solution more independently. Pricing is another aspect. While it offers strong features, it can feel a bit on the higher side for smaller teams or organizations, especially when scaling up users. More flexible pricing options would make it more accessible.

Apart from the points mentioned earlier, there are a few smaller improvements that could make a difference. One thing that would help is if the admin experience could be more customized. For example, having more flexibility in dashboards or quicker access to frequently used settings would improve day-to-day efficiency. Another small improvement could be more granular control or easier configuration for certain policies like conditional access or role-based rules to make them quicker to implement without too many steps.

I have been using OneLogin for the last two years.

Overall, OneLogin has been quite stable and reliable for our organization. Since it is a core identity platform, reliability is critical, and in our experience, it has performed consistently well for day-to-day operations.

OneLogin has scaled quite well with our organization's needs. As we have grown both in terms of users and number of applications, it has handled the expansion smoothly. Since it is a cloud-based IAM  platform, scaling is much easier compared to traditional systems. We have been able to onboard more users, integrate new applications, and manage access across departments without any major performance issues.

Overall, my experience with OneLogin's customer support has been mostly positive, but with some challenges. For standard issues or basic inquiries, the support team is generally responsive and helpful. They have been able to resolve common configuration or access-related issues without much difficulty.

Before OneLogin, we were primarily relying on a more manual setup with Active Directory and basic authentication mechanisms. While it worked for internal systems, it was not very efficient for managing access to multiple cloud applications. As our organization started using more SaaS tools, we needed a centralized identity and access management solution. That is when we moved to OneLogin.

We have definitely seen a positive return on investment, mainly through time savings, reduced support effort, and improved security. For example, onboarding and offboarding access management tasks have become much faster. What used to take thirty to forty minutes per user is now down to about ten to fifteen minutes. Over multiple hires, that adds up to a significant time saving for the IT team. We have also seen a reduction in helpdesk tickets, especially related to password-related issues, roughly around thirty to forty percent fewer login-related requests.

Overall, our experience with pricing and licensing was fairly straightforward, but there were a few areas that required careful understanding. Since OneLogin follows a subscription-based model, pricing is typically based on the number of users and the features selected, like MFA or advanced security options. The structure itself is clear, but you need to plan properly to choose the right package based on your requirements.

Before finalizing OneLogin, we did evaluate a few other identity and access management solutions, mainly Okta and Microsoft Azure  Active Directory. Both are strong platforms, but our decision came down to a few factors. OneLogin offered a good balance between ease of use, required features such as SSO  and MFA, and overall cost-effectiveness for our organization.

My advice would be to first clearly understand your organization's identity and access requirements before implementing OneLogin. It is a powerful platform, but you will get the most value when your users' roles, access policies, and application needs are well-defined from the start. I would rate this review nine out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin  is managing all my logins in one place securely. It has really helped me with single sign-on, so I do not have to remember multiple passwords.

For example, earlier I had to switch between multiple tools such as email, dashboard, and internal apps. With SSO , I just log in once and get access to everything instantly, which saves a lot of time and avoids repeated logins.

Apart from SSO , I also use OneLogin  for secure access management and keeping all credentials organized in one place. It just makes things smoother and more secure without much effort on my end.

The best features OneLogin offers are single sign-on and multi-factor authentication. SSO makes access super easy and MFA adds that extra security layer so everything stays safe without feeling complicated.

The multi-factor authentication is pretty easy to use and does not take too much time. Sometimes there is a slight delay in getting the code, but overall it is smooth and reliable.

I really appreciate how OneLogin handles secure access management. It gives good control over who can access what without being complicated. The credential organization is clean, so it is easy to find and manage all logins in one place.

OneLogin has definitely saved a lot of time since we do not have to deal with multiple logins anymore. Security has improved a lot, and overall the workflows feel smoother and more efficient now.

I think the UI could be a bit more user-friendly and modern, especially for new users. Also, faster OTP delivery and a smoother mobile experience would make OneLogin even better overall.

Better integration with more third-party tools would be helpful so OneLogin can work more seamlessly. Improved reporting for access logs would make it easier to review usage and security insights.

One small thing would be better performance during peak login times because sometimes it feels slightly slower. Other than that, most of the core features already work well for my use case.

I have been using OneLogin for around a year now.

OneLogin is generally considered stable and reliable for most organizations and for us, it is stable.

OneLogin scales very well in enterprise environments, especially because it is built on a cloud-based multi-tenant architecture designed for horizontal scaling. It can handle growing users and login traffic by adding more resources instead of needing a full system redesign.

Based on my feedback and my colleague's feedback, I would rate OneLogin customer support around seven out of ten.

Before OneLogin, we were using more basic single sign-on and directory-based systems. We switched mainly because it did not have strong adaptive security and was more difficult to manage at scale.

From what I have seen and experienced, the setup and licensing feel fairly straightforward and not too heavy compared to other enterprise tools.

OneLogin is deployed as a cloud-based solution in our organization. We mainly access it over the internet, so there is no on-premises setup involved.

I am not in a role where I can measure the exact ROI numbers for Smart Factor Authentication, but from what I observed, it definitely improves both security and efficiency.

Before finalizing OneLogin, we did evaluate a few other identity platforms such as Okta, Microsoft Entra ID , and Ping Identity. In the end, OneLogin stood out mainly because it was simpler to deploy and easier for our team management compared to others.

A good way to look at OneLogin is through time savings, IT workload reductions, and security impact rather than just direct financial numbers. I would rate this review as an eight out of ten.