
Overview
Mux Data is a Quality of Experience real-time analytics platform that measures the performance metrics that actually matter to viewers: rebuffering, startup time, video quality, and errors.
Our intuitive dashboard quickly gives users the insight to find issues and make improvements through features like A/B testing, industry-wide scores, alerts, and detailed information about every single video view.
The product works out of the box across all HTML5-compatible video players, iOS, Android, and major OTT platforms. Integration is easy - just initialize the Mux SDK, pass in some metadata, and you're up and running in minutes.
All data is available via exports and APIs, making it easy to integrate Mux Data into other systems.
Monitor performance of CDNs and video infrastructure Compare and optimize video performance across devices Find playback issues before your customers call you For a complete feature breakdown by pricing plan, please visit https://mux.com/data/#DataPricing .
For custom pricing or a private contract, please contact sales@mux.com , for a private offer.
Highlights
- Monitoring Client-side Video QoE for the largest events & SVOD/AVOD services in the world
- Real-time insights in seconds, Full data portability and ownership
- Observability that helps teams resolve issues quickly, Access to deep team of video experts
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
Mux | Custom pricing available through our Sales team (sales@mux.com) | $50,000.00 |
Custom Configuration | Pricing, commitments, & duration consistent with applicable order form | $50,000.00 |
The following dimensions are not included in the contract terms, which will be charged based on your usage.
Dimension | Description | Cost/unit |
|---|---|---|
Encoding | Encoding | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form. | $0.01 |
Storage | Storage | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form. | $0.01 |
Streaming | Streaming | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form. | $0.01 |
Mux Data | Mux Data | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form. | $0.01 |
Real-Time | Real-Time | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form. | $0.01 |
Simulcasting | Simulcasting | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form | $0.01 |
Auto-Generated Live Captions | Auto-Generated Live Captions | Pricing defined on the Mux website or in an order form. | $0.01 |
Vendor refund policy
There are no refund policies in our base packages - please contact sales@mux.com for more information.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Our engineers provide hands-on support via email and chat for everyone. We offer Advanced Customer Success Packages at additional cost, with Shared Slack Channel Access, Dedicated Support and CSM Teams, Live Event Support and extended SLAs. Contact sales@mux.com for more information. Contact help@mux.com for any support requests, and sales@mux.com for Advanced Customer Success Packages available.
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.

Standard contract
Customer reviews
Powerful API-First Video Platform with Solid Streaming and Analytics
From a UI/UX perspective, it’s solid. Since Mux is very API-oriented, it doesn’t put as much emphasis on the UI, but you can still create video assets and set up live streams through the Mux portal. It also surfaces metrics. They provide a player and player wrappers for different mobile app platforms as well, which helps with analytics and with understanding video playback on client devices.
On the content delivery side, they serve video in an adaptive streaming format, and it works well without issues. I do use it in production. For live streaming, though, there’s a bit more delay than with other services. I’m seeing around 30 seconds of delay, and I’ve used other services with lower latency.
Pricing feels okay and reasonable for companies that want a stable solution and don’t want to maintain a CDN delivery network themselves. That said, if you go with open-source or other cheaper options, you can reduce costs. You can also reach out to them for an enterprise deal.
Support is the main area where I’d like to see improvement. It often takes more than 24 hours for them to respond to me. I might be in a different time zone, which could be part of it, but I still expect faster responses to support tickets. On weekends, it can take around 48 to 72 hours to get a reply.
Also they support auto genaration of subtitle as well. I am not sure those thing they implemented using ai or not. But they market it as ai feature.
On one project, I faced issues while streaming. Since the live streaming feature was on the app side, the live stream kept disconnecting multiple times on moderate network speeds, and I even faced the same issue on 5G as well.
Pricing-wise, it feels a bit heavy for a startup.
Streamline video processing with seamless integration and high-quality encoding
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case of Mux is as a middleman to process video. They handle the encoding, storage, and serving of videos. We use their built-in video player which includes analytics. We are currently using the platform to integrate it with our product.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Mux include the ease of integration and the high-quality video encoding. Using Mux saves a lot of development time. If we were to build our own encoding and all of this, it would have taken probably a year from our development. Mux reduced this by a lot.
What needs improvement?
The documentation could be improved, specifically keeping it updated to match what the product is now. Currently, there is a lack of information about customizing the video player.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Mux for the last year, around February until now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Mux is very stable, and we have never experienced any downtime. The app responds in good time and is pretty fast.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Mux handles a lot of the heavy lifting such as storage and serving. However, the main concern is the pricing once we reach a large number of users, which at that point might not be a viable option.
How are customer service and support?
There has been no need to communicate with technical support for Mux so far.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup process was rated a seven out of ten since of some challenges with documentation during updates. Overall, it was not too difficult.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment was done in-house by a small team of four. No third-party assistance was used.
What was our ROI?
By using Mux, we have saved a lot of development time, which is very valuable.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Currently, we are using the development tier, which is free. It has limitations such as only being able to use ten-second videos, but it is sufficient for our current needs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Mux a nine out of ten. I recommend new users to install it and get started as it has a lot of community support that makes it easy to resolve any issues. I would definitely recommend Mux to others.
Create robust APIs with helpful context package but needs to be faster
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
In Mux , there is a context package that helps delay responses for third-party integrations. Using different features, we create robust APIs with GorillaMux.
What needs improvement?
There isn't anything specific that could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Mux for 2.8 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I initially used Mux and then switched to the GIN framework since it is faster. However, during my use of Mux, stability wasn't a significant issue.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I initially used Jumex Mux and then switched to the GIN framework which I find faster.
How was the initial setup?
GorillaMux syntax is very easy and not complex. If you're new to Golang or GorillaMux, you can start creating APIs within a month.
What other advice do I have?
Mux is better when using the GOM function or inbuilt object-relational mapping. It should be better than the GIN framework.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
