My main use case for Imperva Application Security Platform involves using it in more than a couple of organizations where I was employed.

We used Imperva Application Security Platform for web application firewall and API security in one of those organizations.

Since we integrate a number of external vendor products in our environment, most of these integrations occur via API, and hence we use Imperva Application Security Platform for API security.

Imperva Application Security Platform offers features such as Attack Analytics.

Attack Analytics has helped us understand what traffic is being received by our applications, and based on that, we have created the policies. The false positives have been reduced, saving a lot of time for us to work on other important tasks rather than wasting time on addressing those false positives.

Imperva Application Security Platform has considerably improved our web application security posture and it has also helped us design our applications with security as the primary concern. Before using Imperva Application Security Platform, we received many attacks, such as command injection attacks, SQL injection attacks, and even though we were using a niche web application firewall, we were not able to tackle those attacks. After moving to Imperva Application Security Platform, these attacks have been prevented significantly, and the attacks on the initial level have been considerably reduced.

We have not yet encountered any issues with Imperva Application Security Platform until now; however, improvements are always expected from the vendor. No major improvements are required, but it should still work on reducing the false positives. Although we do not receive that many false positives, some improvement is still required regarding learning the traffic while using Imperva Application Security Platform.

Nothing as of now because we have still not used all the features of Imperva Application Security Platform, but we are exploring it and in the future, maybe we will understand what improvements are required.

I have been using Imperva Application Security Platform on-prem as well as in the cloud for almost four years.

Imperva Application Security Platform is quite stable.

I do not have much experience with respect to the scalability of Imperva Application Security Platform because a different infrastructure team manages all these aspects; we, as a security team, are just using it for protecting our applications and APIs.

I had an experience reaching out to customer support for an issue with Imperva Application Security Platform, and it was quite good; they addressed the issue effectively.

If anyone is concerned about API security, then Imperva Application Security Platform is definitely a good choice.

Imperva is a trusted brand, and I have been using Imperva Web Application Firewall on-prem and also as SaaS, but Imperva Application Security Platform is a next-generation cloud-based service that is quite helpful and powerful. Based on current attacks and the latest AI-based attacks, some improvement is required, but it remains a promising product that I would recommend to others.

I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Imperva Application Security Platform is generally used for legacy-type applications that cannot be migrated to the cloud. A specific example of how I use this tool to protect legacy applications in my organization is that we have an intranet which has not been fully developed or technologically advanced enough to run in the cloud, so by having this, we secure it effectively.

Imperva Application Security Platform allows you to enhance your application security posture. Among the best features that Imperva Application Security Platform offers, the policies are very dynamic, and it also has profiling at the application level that allows you to work in this mode.

I would like to highlight especially the ThreatRadar feature, which is an additional subscription, and ThreatRadar helps with threat intelligence by allowing you to block advanced attacks as well as mitigate risks more effectively.

Imperva Application Security Platform positively impacts us because we have a critical website, so by placing a WAF of Imperva's quality, it allows us to have visibility and granular control over the various attacks that can occur on the website.

A concrete improvement I have seen thanks to Imperva Application Security Platform is that it has decreased the level of connections to the final server. The specific improvement is that the connections that reach the server are fewer because Imperva is already filtering them at the WAF stage.

Imperva Application Security Platform could be improved if it allowed integration with Active Directory in the cloud, or if it provided visibility of user roles and permissions.

I have been using Imperva Application Security Platform for a little more than three years.

I consider Imperva Application Security Platform to be a stable solution.

I would rate the scalability of Imperva Application Security Platform as very good since it adapts well and you can grow independently because the interfaces support one and ten gigs.

Imperva Application Security Platform customer support has been very good; the ticketing platform allows us to have visibility of the case, and the staff makes the effort to respond quickly.

I did not previously use any other solution before Imperva Application Security Platform.

The advice I would give to others who are considering using Imperva Application Security Platform is to start with learning mode and then move to blocking mode slowly for approximately one week so that Imperva can identify the website and the connections that are made to it.

I have seen a return on investment with Imperva Application Security Platform, as it is generally associated with time savings, because the review of alerts and the visibility it gives saves us significant operational time. The clarification on time savings is that it refers to the time spent on alerts.

My experience with the pricing, implementation cost, and licenses of Imperva Application Security Platform is that it is high compared to a traditional WAF solution, but it meets expectations.

Before choosing Imperva Application Security Platform, I did not evaluate other options, as we went directly with Imperva due to recommendations.

I would rate Imperva Application Security Platform an eight on a scale from one to ten. Imperva Application Security Platform is a very good platform; even though it is not in Gartner, clients request it and trust the brand. I would rate customer support on a scale from one to ten as an eight. My overall review rating for Imperva Application Security Platform is eight out of ten.

The best features Imperva Application Security Platform offers are for speed and protection. There is runtime and zero protection, and we have the sub and sub plus protection.

The speed and protection features of Imperva Application Security Platform help my team day-to-day by providing safe and clear access to the website. For example, my company is a multinational company that experiences many attacks, such as DDoS attacks, hitting the general website of the company before. The protection protects all of the websites in Imperva, so accessing the website is safer right now, not disrupted by DDoS attacks.

Imperva Application Security Platform has positively impacted my organization by making the website more secure. It reduces the DDoS attacks and reduces the attacks from threat actors, including SQL Injection and zero-day attacks, by using dynamic application profiling from Imperva. This is very helpful for my company as it reduces the incidents from the website.

I would suggest that Imperva Application Security Platform should include new features combined with AI. When I was using Imperva, it was not yet combined with AI. I believe that AI can now be used to make things easier, to track the attacks or IPs, or perhaps to determine the best configuration for each company that is using Imperva.

I would add that I have a unique observation about the features of Imperva Application Security Platform. For protection to protect more safely and restrictively, I have another use case with an internal website. This website is internal, and those people who want to access it can use the VPN or the internal network. I have encountered cases where a person from the internal company wants to access the website without using the API and got blocked by Imperva because there is a feature or configuration that allows specific IPs. I had to log all of the ways to access the web and allow only a few IPs from the internal IPs. I think Imperva is very secure, very restricted, and good for protecting websites, especially for internal websites and production servers.

Regarding improvements to Imperva Application Security Platform, I think all aspects of Imperva Web Application Firewall, including the UI/UX, are good, and I can operate it smoothly with the application. I give this product a rating of 8.5 out of 10.

Regarding my main use case, I first log into the WAF applications, then access the Alerts section. In that section, I can see different types of activity happening in the firewall. I review each alert to determine whether it is legitimate or suspicious activity. I can also view the target IP address and locations, target servers, and the payload that the attacker was using in that alert. I can see the OWASP Top 10 alerts and the event timing to identify when the attack occurred.

There are many alerts in Imperva Application Security Platform. For example, there is an OWASP Top 10 alert called SSRF, which is server-side request forgery. If someone attempts to access the server, the WAF blocks that SSRF alert, or RCE, Remote Code Execution alert, blocking immediately based on the signature, not only by the payload or the IP address. That is very effective.

Imperva Application Security Platform has positively impacted my organization because every time an attacker uses a malicious payload or malicious signature that is already included in the signature database of the WAF application or Imperva application, the application directly blocks that particular signature immediately. This capability can help any organization achieve better security outcomes.

I gave it a 10 because it is useful for private organizations and it is very safe to have WAF applications, particularly Imperva Application Security Platform.

The advice I would give to others looking into using Imperva Application Security Platform is that it is safer to use or to have it. My overall rating for this product is 10 out of 10.

Imperva Application Security Platform is used primarily for web application firewall security. My organization has a significant number of applications running through the platform, and to monitor those applications, we require firewalls. Imperva Application Security Platform's Web Application Firewall performs the deep inspection necessary for this monitoring.

Imperva Application Security Platform offers customization of security policies, allowing me to create policies tailored to my environment.

The rate limiting policy in Imperva Application Security Platform works based on usage numbers and has proven valuable for our operations.

Imperva Application Security Platform is user-friendly, and I can maintain a customized dashboard to monitor the utilization of all gateways in day-to-day operations.

Imperva Application Security Platform serves as the base pillar for applications to grant or deny access appropriately.

From a compliance perspective, Imperva Application Security Platform has been an improvement, as it has passed all compliance processes.

Imperva Application Security Platform could be improved by providing a more user-friendly dashboard.

I would recommend that support for Imperva Application Security Platform be enhanced to be more effective.

I have been using Imperva Application Security Platform for three years.

Imperva Application Security Platform is stable.

Scalability in Imperva Application Security Platform depends on the region. Imperva Application Security Platform can handle more applications or increased traffic easily as my organization grows. Currently, we are running approximately 1000 applications, and it can handle more.

Customer support for Imperva Application Security Platform is good, though it could be better. I would rate the customer support of Imperva Application Security Platform an eight on a scale of one to ten.

I did not previously use a different solution.

We have seen a return on investment with Imperva Application Security Platform, as we started with a few devices and gradually increased the number of on-premises devices for Imperva Application Security Platform.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Imperva Application Security Platform were user-friendly and good.

Before choosing Imperva Application Security Platform, I evaluated Akamai WAF.

I would recommend Imperva Application Security Platform compared to Akamai WAF. It has been good to use Imperva Application Security Platform, as I have been using it for three years. I would rate this review a nine on a scale of one to ten.

My main use case for Imperva Application Security Platform is for WAF, application firewall, which is a web application firewall. I have my company's sites, websites, and our core application runs on it as well, so all traffic must first come through Imperva Application Security Platform before it's routed to the application.

A specific example of how I use Imperva Application Security Platform for my core application involves dealing with all the unwanted bots on the internet and crawlers.

Regarding my main use case with Imperva Application Security Platform, it denies all forms of malicious attempts to the sites, including SQL injection, brute force attack, DDoS, and all of that. It denies that and provides information about it through logs that indicate which particular IP was denied and the region, so I have the location based on the IP. I can get the location of where the attacks or injections are coming from. Basically, I receive a clean request based on the rules I've set, made to the server, and then receive their request back, while the ones that are not clean are blocked.

Regarding other features, Imperva Application Security Platform has safe logging capability and, as mentioned earlier, it's primarily for my WAF, web application firewall. Any basic web filtering capabilities are there, and that's all I use it for.

The best features Imperva Application Security Platform offers include DDoS protection, anti-DDoS capabilities, and connection protection against different malicious web attacks.

Imperva Application Security Platform has positively impacted my organization, as before its introduction, I usually had a lot of logs on my router, with many foreign attempts from anonymous IPs trying to gain access, including a lot of brute force logs. The CPU of the router would struggle with what it wasn't supposed to be doing while legitimate users suffered. Since implementing Imperva Application Security Platform WAF, as mentioned earlier, only legitimate traffic reaches the server and the router to request what they need, and of course, the response is given. This allows us to accommodate more legitimate traffic, faster and more securely.

While I can't provide a specific metric at this moment as I'm not in front of my system, I can confidently say that we have significantly noticed improved performance in terms of latency, an increased number of requests we can handle, and a reduction in attack attempts.

One improvement I would like to see in Imperva Application Security Platform is the ability to fail over to different sites for my same application. I want to have my disaster recovery site, my current site, and my cloud environment, all different, about three sites so that I can load balance across those sites. It would be beneficial if that could be included as a baseline feature without needing a special license.

I also think about the ability of Imperva Application Security Platform to integrate its logs with various systems; the integration with SIEM solutions is limited to certain types of OEM. I would prefer a situation where they are more agnostic in terms of log integration with SIEM solutions, such as SentinelOne.

I have been using Imperva Application Security Platform for more than three years.

Imperva Application Security Platform is very stable.

In terms of scalability, I believe it's within their infrastructure; there has never been any downtime.

I use the channel partner for support and have never had a need to raise a ticket directly with Imperva.

Imperva Application Security Platform is deployed in a cloud solution, as I was provided with login details, logged in, and configured Imperva Application Security Platform, putting in my public IP. From Imperva, I received a certain CNAME that I placed in my DNS, so all traffic coming to my domain goes through that DNS, through the CNAME to Imperva Application Security Platform, and then Imperva Application Security Platform forwards it to my public IP. Therefore, I would classify it as a private cloud.

I have the impression that there is a return on investment; we enjoy cleaner traffic in our environment, and more requests are being served, indicating a huge return on investment.

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is not transparent to me; it's what the vendors give, or whatever the channel partner offers that you can negotiate on. The setup process is pretty easy, and the vendor is very transparent in terms of support.

Prior to choosing Imperva Application Security Platform, I did not evaluate other options in terms of a proof of concept; I only did a feedback assessment on the internet.

I would rate Imperva Application Security Platform a nine on a scale of one to ten. I choose a nine because it has not failed me since I've been using it, and I've not had any attack. My advice to others looking into using Imperva Application Security Platform is that it is highly recommended and certainly worth trying out, at least for web application firewall purposes.

I use Imperva Application Security Platform for API security, which has a cloud solution where normal traffic flows horizontally, and a copy of the traffic goes to the cloud to be inspected. If there is something suspicious, it could be blocked depending on the action configured. Imperva Application Security Platform also has a solution for Database Activity Monitoring (DAM) as well as API security. I have been working with these solutions for around one and a half years, more than one year, as a partner collaborating with the vendor. The communication from the vendor flows through us, then to the clients, particularly the financial institutions and banks.

The data center for the bank is usually the headquarter, where the main data center is located in our country, and there are branches at every street. For the branches, every access is through the firewall and the core banking application server, and there is an integration between banks from different institutions. In this case, every communication is done through the API, necessitating API inspection and API security.

The main benefit is the use case my clients find valuable. For the product and security, there is good API inspection. If any abnormal API appears or there are any similarities due to changes, the API security features will catch that because there is access for third-party applications from one bank to another. This setup ensures there is segmentation, and allowed APIs will get access while others will be blocked. It serves as the main channel for third-party application integration, and without API security, any similar URL related access could affect core banking, which is vital for every financial transaction.

For real-time analysis, the deployment is arranged so as not to interrupt transactions. The normal traffic flow will continue, while a copy of the API traffic will be mirrored to Imperva Application Security Platform for deep inspection. If any abnormalities are detected, even unusual behaviors for transactions, checks are done continuously, and actions are sent accordingly if any suspicious traffic is found.

For the fast response of signature-based comparisons, traffic will be matched against the solutions stored in the database to release actions if similarities occur. However, the main drawback for signature-based approaches happens when there is a new zero-day attack that is not in the database. Solutions usually include integrity with lab environments so that zero-day attack signatures are sent through subscriptions to provide the latest updates.

The comparison for API protection varies across solutions. For F5, API protection is part of WAF, and similarly for Fortinet. While Imperva Application Security Platform has basic features as part of WAF, its dedicated API protection solution is a strong point.

On the negative side, API security mainly supports cloud-based solutions, while most of my customers prefer on-prem setups, so achieving high performance with on-prem solutions would be beneficial. The attractiveness of Imperva Application Security Platform is that not all data is exposed to the cloud. Only a mirrored copy goes to the cloud and is inspected, allowing actions to be taken on-prem. To convince my clients, a purely on-prem solution would be ideal since they are financial institutions.

I have been using the solution for more than one year.

I am more than happy with the technical support from Imperva Application Security Platform regarding data security and API security. For the support, however, one notable drawback is that, unlike Fortinet, which offers fast track labs and continuous enablement, Imperva Application Security Platform lacks lab access and fast track labs for enablement and product advertising. This weakness has shifted the marketplace toward other vendors. When creating a ticket for support during deployment, the response is satisfactory, though the gaps in enablement and lab sessions are clear.

I find Imperva Application Security Platform to be a scalable product, as long as I subscribe and pay for the application I wish to use. It is scalable, and for about one and a half years, I have experienced no challenges in this area. I have not even needed support after deployment, since it has remained stable.

When creating a ticket for support during deployment, the response is satisfactory, though the gaps in enablement and lab sessions are clear. Overall, I would rate support around an eight or nine, and my overall experience with security products spans around four years, with my particular engagement with Imperva Application Security Platform mainly during project deployment and client training.

For installation, it primarily involves a cloud-based service, and I was using that as an operator. For database activity monitoring, I have deployed it, and while it is somewhat complex, there is a support channel where I communicate with vendors to resolve issues. The main challenge during installation is not unique to Imperva Application Security Platform. It is faced by many on-prem and virtual appliance products, particularly ensuring integrity with the virtualization environment and integration with third-party applications.

I am not using CyberArk, as it is only a proposal for identity and access management that I have proposed for my clients.

Apart from One Identity, I am working with SentinelOne for AI, and I was looking for that. For Purple AI, I was communicating with the vendors and the distributor, and I have considered proposing it for my clients. Currently, I am using the load balancer Radware as an application load balancer. For the on-prem WAF, I am using Fortinet, regarding the WAF and the load balancer, Radware and Fortinet.

I am not working with some email security products, some EDR, or endpoint protection as an implementation. I was just looking into it and have proposed it for my clients, and I am waiting for the financial evaluation for FortiMail. For Fortinet, I am involved more with FortiMail, WAF, ADC, FortiGate firewall, NAC, WAF, and FortiClient EMS.

Regarding Check Point and WatchGuard, I have worked with Check Point for the firewall, specifically the perimeter firewall. For Check Point, I have already worked with the firewall only, which is a next-generation firewall, using a physical appliance on-prem. Most of my customers, particularly financial institutions, even if they invest their resources in the cloud, need an on-prem solution. It could be a virtual appliance deployed on a server or a physical appliance, but they mostly need on-prem.

Regarding the price, I find Imperva Application Security Platform affordable, with moderate pricing. My overall rating for this solution is eight out of ten.