We primarily use Radware Alteon for load balancing our servers to ensure there are no bottlenecks and to have resiliency in place.

The most valuable features include the availability with an optional high-availability mode ensuring service continuity because of the resiliency. The interface is really good and easy to navigate, which makes configuring and managing settings quick. The support from Radware is consistently excellent and always available. It has helped reduce troubleshooting time by fifty percent, given everything is in the interface.

Integration with cloud services could be improved. Every now and then, we need engagement to address challenges with cloud integrations.

I have used the solution for two years.

I would rate its stability as nine point five out of ten. There is minimal downtime, and the solution is quite stable.

Alteon is a scalable solution. We have it deployed across multiple geographic locations, benefiting from load balancing resiliency.

The customer service and support are excellent. Radware always goes a step beyond to make their products stand out.

Neutral

I have had previous experience with other products, and Radware's support stands out as always available and willing to make products superior.

The time taken to troubleshoot issues has improved by fifty percent.

The implementation and running costs are quite high.

I would rate Alteon nine out of ten. The main reason I would recommend it is Radware's excellent support. I rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

Its use case involves protecting our external services in the business.

It is a necessity because of the different security standards that our company has to comply with.

Our services are protected, and I have not seen any breaches that would impact our systems. The systems are stable, and I can very clearly see all of the malicious actors outside trying to access our systems.

It helps with troubleshooting immensely because the solution protects not only from threat actors outside of our business but also from internal actors or partner clients accessing our systems. Those requests are also validated inside Radware Alteon. I can see client partners or users accessing some systems in the wrong way or any misconfiguration inside our systems. Radware Alteon prevents our systems from breaking down because of those wrong requests. It has saved at least 40% to 50% time.

The integrated application protection on the other side of the load balancer is great. There is the caveat that it is not easily pre-configurable on that side, but everything after that is easy. When the services are up and running, the feedback, the insight, and the forensics of the happenings inside are very easy to understand and work with. The system automatically suggests what needs to be configured and what can be mitigated or refined in configuration. All of those are making my day easier.

Its implementation time took about half a year, and it took us about a year and a half to realize its benefits.

I find the best features to be the flexibility and ease of use. The configuration is very straightforward. 

In my experience, Alteon is very dynamic software. They keep integrating new features that sometimes break our production, but we use clustered systems, so we can test those software releases. However, sometimes they take a while to reach us. We have had to work with Radware to remedy issues on their side that they have verified. On the other hand, they have been very proactive in remedying those problems. We have solved some critical issues within a month, but the release verification channel requires some updates. 

The support channel is also an issue. Moving through tiered support can be challenging at times. Even when I go through the authenticated portal where I have registered my devices with their serial numbers and all known details, they ask to verify the specified device. I have already included that in the ticket support system.

I have been using Alteon since around 2018. It has probably been five years.

We have experienced some issues. I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.

It is hard to tell, but I have had some performance issues. I cannot say whether they were because of Radware. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

We have a hybrid environment. It is very spread out. In terms of its users, we have tiered access. We have solution appliance administrators, and then there are users who monitor their services inside the clients. So, we have a couple of administrators and the rest are application admins. Overall, we have less than ten people.

In general, I would rate their support a nine out of ten because the first level of support sometimes requires re-verification. We have to escalate a bit to have some momentum. However, local third-party support is reachable for us at any moment. There is a dedicated expert answering even the toughest questions. If needed, he re-routes us to the Radware support, and he takes care of the support communication for us.

Positive

In the current scope of systems, I have not used any other solution. I have used different systems in different projects but not in this context.

The setup is local, not cloud-based. The deployment time to fully implement was half a year. 

In terms of implementation strategy, we are very step-based when it comes to infrastructure. We evaluate and point out our needs. We rely heavily on third-party support. Radware is not directly supporting us in Latvia. We have third-party support locally, and they help us very much in this regard. 

Radware provides free training on their site, but we heavily rely on third-party support. They do not hide anything from us. For every task and request, they freely advise us on how to perform better. The online portal also supports that motion.

After we established our requirements such as what we wanted to protect and where we wanted to deploy it, moving services to the solution took up to half a year.

Our implementation is not very advanced. There is an option to include very heavily scripted environments, but our use case is very straightforward. We have some customizations, but new team members require a month or maybe two to get onboarded. This is generally the time a user requires to get familiar with any system.

In our field of work, maintenance is almost a must. We do quarterly updates and health checks to verify that systems are working as intended. Maintenance is very fast, but the preparation work is the worst. We have to read all the changes and what is affecting us or not. Sometimes these releases or software updates break something, but in general, the maintenance tasks are very easy. They take about 15 minutes.

Our team consisted of two people. I was not the one who did the deployment.

It is not the priciest and it is not the cheapest. For our solution, it was right in the middle of price performance. 

We have reviewed others. We actually have a solution with support from another vendor, but we are not utilizing them or paying for another solution.

We are using Alteon's Integrated WAF. We are in the process of evaluating moving to the cloud for more distributed protection from DDoS attacks and other threat actors.

I would definitely recommend it. It is very understandable. The interfaces and descriptions of various settings are straightforward. There are some misunderstandings here and there, but the basics to get it working are great. Overall, I would rate Alteon a nine out of ten.

I am using Radware Alteon as a load balancer. It's used to simplify balancing connections between servers for a larger application in my organization. This allows me to manipulate many applications to better serve my organization.

It provides us with logs about all of our application's transactions, enabling us to trace problems. The analytics help us pinpoint the root cause of issues like TLS problems and trace previously unanswered requests, enabling solutions with given analytics abilities.

The simplicity of the GUI is what I like the most about Radware Alteon. It provides logs about all of our application's transactions, which allows us to trace problems and identify issues such as TLS problems. The analytics help us pinpoint the root cause of various issues, enabling solutions with given analytics abilities.

I know they are working on it, however, I would like to see an improved community presence, similar to the one for their main competitor, F5. There are forums with questions and answers from customers, which is currently lacking for Alteon. More materials are difficult to find in the network, so increasing community and documentation would be beneficial.

I've been using Radware Alteon for several years.

The stability of the solution is good. There have been no notable issues related to downtime or bugs.

I rate the scalability of the product at a seven.

The technical support deserves an eight out of ten. Their customer service is quite reliable.

Positive

The initial setup was easy and not so complex. It took a couple of days with three people involved.

The implementation was handled by our internal team with three individuals involved.

I would recommend Radware Alteon. If someone wants an effective product with good capabilities, they should consider this solution. 

I rate the product eight out of ten.

We use Alteon to secure our main web applications against web-based attacks such as SQL injections and DDoS attacks. We have around 36 VIPs on Radware, and we protect all our published sites, including those for FNU.

Alteon’s analytics has helped us save time when troubleshooting. It has given us greater visibility for troubleshooting the issues that cropped up in our environment.

Alteon has definitely helped reduce our maintenance overhead.

The best thing about Alteon is its automated threat detection and blocking. The university has resource limitations. I am the only one working for the security section, looking after seven products, including Alteon. The automatic blocking of threats and detections is crucial for us. Because there are a lot of things going on, we sometimes miss or do not see the detections on time. So, the most useful thing for us is to have a WAF that automatically blocks anything unusual or suspicious.

It is efficient and low maintenance. Once you set it up, you do not have to go back and look into it. It gives us peace of mind that if something comes up, it will block that.

There is room for improvement in reducing the number of false positives I receive. We could benefit from more configuration options to avoid these false positives, which can be overwhelming for a security analyst. It can be a bit difficult for a security analyst to go back and understand why a particular service was stopped. The false positives that I received can be a bit complex in nature.

We have been using Alteon for our web applications for four years.

We have not seen many issues with lagging or crashing. The box works well, and it either denies or allows traffic as expected. We have been using the same box since 2020. The boxes are quite robust.

I interacted with their support while applying our security policies. I was finding it challenging because we had false positives and some of the genuine university services were getting blocked. We have some legacy services. They were showing up as a threat. With the help of their support, we whitelisted those services.

The support is quite helpful. We do remote sessions and address issues timely. I would rate their support an eight out of ten considering the time difference challenges.

Positive

This is the second WAF that our organization is using. We used Barracuda WAF from 2018 to 2020. From a security perspective, Alteon has aggressive measures for security. At the end of the day, it gives you peace of mind.

Alteon has a better way of managing misconfigurations from the administrator's point of view. If I am creating a security policy, a VIP, or a new service and doing something wrong or misconfiguring something, it does not allow me to do that. That is one of the greatest advantages of Alteon, whereas Barracuda does not verify if your configuration is correct.

Price was the main reason for switching to Alteon. Barracuda charged us triple for the renewal, prompting the shift.

It was a bit difficult for us because Radware is quite aggressive in terms of configuration. We did not have the resources and training at the time. We were trying to implement a new product, and we found it to be a bit difficult.

The initial setup took about a month, but fully integrating services that were in Barracuda took us until last year. It took us a while to migrate all the services that were there.

It took us some time to realize its benefits. When we set up Alteon, we had a separate team of people looking after it. I was not the main person at that time. We had the initial setup done in 2020, and after that, the responsibility was shifted to me. I could see that there were certain things that we could do for better security of our web applications. We did have to do some fine-tuning to get the complete benefits of Alteon.

The trainings were purchased early last year, and I am now trained in using Radware Alteon services. The training did not take long. It took about five to seven days, but these days were not fully dedicated to the training. I was doing my work, and whenever I had free time, I would start the video and get trained. The training videos that are provided are quite straightforward and easy to understand.

The Radware team we work with always gives us the best price. As a university, our budget is limited. We need something that is the best solution but with a low or economical pricing. We are getting a better price than competitors. The shift from Barracuda to Alteon was primarily due to cost efficiency.

It is very economical, and the price fits our business needs.

I would recommend switching to Alteon but ensure training is completed before migration. This will ease the learning curve.

I would rate Alteon a nine out of ten.

We're an agency of a state government in India, and our primary use case of Radware Alteon in our organization is for load balancing and application protection.

We have to load-balance among multiple departments within the state government. Around 12 people manage Alteon, and the solution covers roughly 20 departments. 

Our agency launched several programs recently. For example, they're encouraging people to plant trees, and they need to upload a picture of the tree to the portal within a given window. Our previous load-balancing system failed to overcome that challenge. 

We needed improved application performance and availability during peak traffic. Traffic needed to be distributed evenly across data centers to prevent overloading and provide visibility into real-time performance and metrics. The government agency chose Alteon for its advanced load-balancing and application optimization features. There were immediate benefits in load-balancing and application performance.

Valuable features of Radware Alteon include global server load balancing, SSL offloading, Layer 7 load balancing, automation and traffic scaling, real-time analytics, and reporting.

Alteon's integrated application protection has helped us. As a state government agency, we face increasing threats and need to secure our critical web applications. 

Our finance websites are the primary targets for DDoS, SQL injections, and other sophisticated attacks. Traditional security is insufficient to defend against the volume and complexity of the attacks. We need protection against attacks on the application and infrastructure layers and DDoS attacks. Alteon offers visibility and actionable insights into each security event. 

Radware has free training available on their website. I've completed a few training courses and found them very helpful for me in my daily work. The basic course covering the UI takes a week, and it was easy to understand. When we're troubleshooting a scenario, we can check the Alteon knowledge base articles. The combination of training and the knowledge base shortens the learning curve. 

Alteon's user interface and usability can be improved by providing a more modern and streamlined design and focusing on simplifying workflows in the UI.

We have been using Radware Alteon for nearly four years.

I rate Radware Alteon's stability nine out of 10. We recently faced a GUI bug that disabled some options, but it was resolved by updating the device to a higher version. In the latest version, we had fewer GUI options, but it wasn't a major issue. We can still access those features from the command line. 

I rate Alteon's scalability 10 out of 10. It scales well within our organization.

I rate Radware support 10 out of 10. The Radware support team is very knowledgeable and quick in providing assistance.

Positive

Before Radware Alteon, the organization used a Windows server load-balancing solution that came with the operating system. Previously, those who worked faced time-consuming processes and reporting.

Alteon's initial setup was straightforward, and the UI was easy to understand. We had a few challenges integrating features, but Alteon's support helped us resolve them quickly. The only maintenance is regular updates. 

Using Radware Alteon has reduced the time we spend implementing load-balancing by about 70 to 80 percent. Setting up reporting and load-balancing on our previous solution took much more time. 

Our government agency opted for Radware Alteon due to its affordability and efficiency. While I can't say precisely how much it costs the organization, the price per device. In India, we always look for affordable products, so I assume Alteon is cost-effective because the government chose it.

I rate Radware Alteon nine out of 10. I recommend Radware Alteon because it offers comprehensive features for optimizing application delivery, improving network performance, and enhancing security. The basic training can be accessed through the Alteon website, which is user-friendly and helpful.

Alteon is used in our environment for the application traffic from the customers. The traffic is coming from outside the network. It then comes to the firewall. From the firewall, it goes to the load balancer which sends the traffic to different application servers in a distributed environment.

There is no lack of connectivity. The traffic is going smoothly. The handshake is happening. SSL offloading is happening perfectly on the device, and it is going to the application server. The response is being sent to the customers within milliseconds. We have done a hardware refresh. Earlier, we were using the 6 GB memory box, and we are now using a 12 GB memory box with the same features.

The downtime is minimal. The product is robust, and there are no issues that we have faced. We are running N-1 releases or the latest releases. The support from Radware is fantastic.

The downtime is very little. We have not faced any issues. Because we are using it in a cluster environment, we have redundancy built in there, so we do not face any issues.

Alteon’s analytics have saved us time when troubleshooting. We understand the traffic coming from various customers and analyze it. It has saved about 15% to 20% of our time.

SSL offloading feature is one of the most important features. Traffic distribution is also done very well by Radware.

Radware should work on the vulnerabilities part. There are third-party security solutions that do the security vulnerability assessment (VA). The assessment part needs to be worked on and improved. There should be more solutions. If any issue comes up and if any vulnerability is reported, the Radware team should do an R&D on that and work on that. They should give the solution to the customer.

Everything else is perfect. We are not facing any issues with the product.

We have been using Alteon in our environment for almost seven to eight years. We have done a hardware refresh. Earlier, we were using the 5208 XL model, and now, we are using the 5208S model.

The stability of the box is a ten out of ten.

The solution is scalable. There is no problem. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.

It is being used at multiple locations. About three to four people are working with Alteon, but for the application, we have a big team. Our customers are enterprises.

Their technical support from India is very good. However, when it is nighttime in India, it is a bit challenging because their support comes from outside India, most probably Israel. Sometimes, we face a challenge when the support is given by the team out of India. It takes time. Due to the language issues, it takes time for them to understand the issue, so the time to resolve the issue or work on an issue increases.

Positive

We were previously using the F5 load balancer, and then we switched to Alteon. Alteon is working fine for us, and we have not faced any issues with it.

We switched because of the features and pricing. Pricing plays the most important role in procurement. Alteon's pricing is competitive, and that is why we have moved on from F5 to Alteon. F5 is also not as flexible as Alteon.

It is an on-prem solution. Its deployment was straightforward. It was not complex.

We were able to migrate from old devices to new devices in minutes. We just copied the configuration from the old box and replicated it to the new box. It does not take much time. The releases and the patches that we deploy are also very efficient.

Replicating to a box took 20 to 30 minutes. Putting the operating system and replicating the configuration does not take more than 30 minutes.

It requires maintenance. When a new patch comes, we implement it. We plan a downtime and implement it. Even though we have a redundant node, we take downtime to be on the safer side. 

The solution has a minimum downtime, and the maintenance window is also short. It is not big.

We did not receive training from Radware on how to use Alteon. We are doing it by ourselves. It is an on-the-job kind of training.

Overall, two to three people were involved.

It is difficult to calculate the ROI because the Alteon load balancer is one part of the investment. There is the whole network and server infrastructure. We have not calculated the ROI, but it plays a very key role. The traffic is seamlessly distributed to the application servers. The application processes it and gives a response.

It is cost-efficient. That is why we have gone with Alteon. As a product, it is efficient and robust. We have not faced any issues with the device.

I would recommend Radware Alteon because it is a very smooth solution. Someone who wants to deploy an application load balancer in their environment can go for this box without any thoughts or concerns. The box is very scalable. It is a very smooth system. It handles the traffic very comfortably. You will not face any issues with the box.

Our application is an in-house application. It does not go over the Internet. We do not have any cloud connectivity. We also do not have out-of-the-box application integrations in our environment. Alteon is supporting the SNMPv3 standard for sending the SNMP trap to the outside box. That is the only integration we have done, and it is working fine. We have not integrated with OpenShift, Ansible, etc.

I would rate Radware Alteon a nine out of ten. There are only two areas of improvement. The vulnerability part needs improvement and the support given at night time from outside the country needs improvement. It takes longer to get an issue resolved with the support team located out of India.

Radware technology ensures the availability of all our applications. I represent a government institution that administers elections, so we have several critical systems that must stay online. In addition to Alteon, we use CloudWAF, CloudDDoS, and FireProof. 

We began seeing benefits immediately. This technology is necessary for availability in IT. Alteon helps us troubleshoot issues. It provides us statistics on application, server, and load balancer response that we can use to identify problems or latency. 

Alteon's integrated application protection helps us to protect our endpoints and our systems. CloudWAF is user-friendly and can be deployed with ERT. The learning time and processes you need to pass through are easy with CloudWAF.

Alteon's user interface could be improved. F5's user interface is more user-friendly than Radware's, but Radware's hardware performs better. 

I have used Alteon since 2008.

I rate Radware Alteon 10 out of 10 for stability. 

I rate Radware Alteon nine out of 10 for scalability. 

I rate Radware support nine out of 10. They're high quality and work fast. 

Positive

I've also used F5, but Alteon is better. It also has better bandwidth, failover, and overall performance. Alteon is also more stable and requires fewer updates. 

Deploying Alteon was easy because I have experience in the load balancer world. It takes two engineers about four hours to deploy fully. We had help from a partner at the platform.

Alteon is priced competitively with F5, but F5 does much more marketing in this country. 

I rate Radware Alteon nine out of 10. 

I use Radware LinkProof to optimize our network by balancing multiple WAN links. It ensures uninterrupted access to applications by automatically redirecting traffic from failed or congested links.

The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability. Similar to Linux's feature for managing DNS requests, LinkProof can dynamically redirect traffic by responding to DNS queries with the appropriate IP addresses. This ensures seamless access to applications even if the primary server fails, improving overall reliability and customer experience.

Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market.

I have been working with Radware LinkProof for about three years.

I find Radware LinkProof to be extremely stable, rarely encountering technical issues or downtime among my clients in Sri Lanka and elsewhere. Its reliability helps minimize network downtime by swiftly redirecting traffic during attacks or overload situations, ensuring uninterrupted connectivity and smooth operations.

Radware LinkProof is technically sound and scalable, capable of handling increased loads of traffic by adjusting licensing.

Radware's support is excellent, with knowledgeable sales engineers who go above and beyond to assist. Their technical guides are helpful and their support team is responsive. I would rate the support as a ten out of ten.

Positive

Configuring and managing Radware LinkProof is straightforward and efficient. With its user-friendly interface, configuration can typically be completed within days, depending on the customer's requirements. The process is intuitive, making it easy to set up and manage network settings, including rate management features, to meet specific needs. The initial setup and configuration of can typically be completed within a day, including overall integrations.

I would say Radware LinkProof falls into the mid-range pricing category. It is not cheap, but it is also not overly expensive.

Among similar tools, Radware LinkProof stands out as the best on the market for WAN load balancing. While some companies use firewalls or other solutions for load balancing, LinkProof offers a more comprehensive and competitive solution, especially for WAN balancing.

Radware LinkProof improves WAN traffic management by optimizing application traffic across multiple WAN links. It automatically monitors the health of these links and redirects traffic to ensure uninterrupted connectivity, enhancing reliability and performance.

For disaster recovery, I configure Radware LinkProof with its global load-balancing feature. This involves setting up two or three appliances in different locations. They communicate via health checks, and if one data center goes down, traffic is automatically redirected to the available center.

I highly recommend Radware LinkProof, especially for data centers. It is a comprehensive solution that combines load balancing, application load balancing, and more in a single appliance, making it cost-effective and efficient. For enterprise-level customers, it is worth considering.

Overall, I would rate the product as a nine out of ten.

We use it as a source for the delivery of services and we have many applications. It is the core of our business in terms of supporting those applications.

It has improved our organization in terms of the availability of our critical systems by increasing the level of protection for those systems. We are a critical-infrastructure company, and the services have many internal clients that have experienced that improvement.

Our Alteon system is configured in high availability and it helps us have a very productive system. We have it on one device that is in contingency for when we want to apply changes. For example, we can do new parameterization that can be applied to the device that has Alteon in backup, do tests there, and almost automatically synchronize the changes with our main Alteon. In other words, we have a very versatile and high-availability solution.

In addition, the health status information, with its highly detailed reporting, has saved us time on troubleshooting. We have the precise information needed that helps us find different types of situations. It has saved us about 50 percent of our time when troubleshooting.

At the corporate level, it is a very effective tool and it’s very simple. It shows us reports on the state of health of the services that we have configured, in terms of load balancing.

It really seems to us that Alteon meets expectations. It is not a solution that needs a high level of expertise. Although certain functions can become complex, only a minimum level of knowledge is needed.

Recently, our team was talking about the things you can customize in Alteon and the level of programming that doing so demands. I would like to see more information on how to customize the programming and troubleshoot.

I am new to the company and have been using Radware Alteon for six months, but the tool has been in use for about five years.

It is completely stable.

In our company, it is implemented in multiple services, multiple applications, and multiple physical sites.  Alteon functions in high-availability mode, in separate data centers.

We always have plans to expand our use of it for new applications and services.

In the time I have been with this company we have had to open one customer service ticket. It was handled well and immediately. They serve you quickly.

Positive

I wasn't involved in the initial deployment, but I received virtual training from someone at Radware when I started working with this company. A month later, I did the basic Alteon certification. It took me about two months to understand the magnitude of the benefits we have from using the Alteon load balancers.

My colleagues who were here before Alteon told me that it took them five or six months before they received any formal training, and when they received the training, they became more familiar with and had a deeper understanding of the Alteon operating model.

If you are thinking of switching to Alteon but worry about the learning curve, Alteon's management is very simple and intuitive after you acquire a certain level of basic knowledge. The most complex part is the configuration, but that is usually done by the supplier, so I don't think that that would be part of the learning curve. Overall, the platform is easy to learn when it comes to managing it.

The solution doesn't require almost any maintenance on our side. It is not constantly in preventive maintenance, so it has reduced our maintenance overhead. There might be some version update scheduling, but there is not much to do.

I am not in the financial area where I can talk about the return on investment in numerical terms, but from a technological point of view, we believe that the investment made in Alteon can be justified. I believe that investment was recovered in the first year. Its service is so satisfactory that the new budgets are being pre-approved for Alteon's renewal. The fact that we continue to use it also says something about the benefits from our investment.

The price conforms to what the tool provides. It is not an inexpensive tool and not all companies can afford an ADC solution such as Alteon. However, it justifies its price with the options it offers. And there are no additional costs other than the standard rates, renewal, and maintenance.

Although I wasn't working for this company at the time, they told me that they evaluated F5. From what I understand, the differences were in the functionality and accessibility of Alteon’s assets. I don't know about the cost comparison and value, but after doing the proofs of concept, our company was happier with the functionality of Alteon.

If you are evaluating Alteon, it is because you are thinking about having an ADC for service delivery. It's a tool that is essential for increasing the availability and performance of critical systems and the delivery of critical tools. Alteon definitely balances performance between applications.

The greatest lesson I have learned from using it has been discovering that it is essential for the availability and performance that applications require. It is not only simply about looking at the disks; you also need to deliver load balancing and increase availability, and that is what tools such as Alteon deliver.

Alteon has met the expectations we had for it. In fact, we are already thinking of an update, a renewal for next year. It is a solution of critical importance for us. It is effective and complies with what we need when it comes to the protection and balancing of the systems.

Foreign Language:(Spanish)

¿Cuál es nuestro caso de uso principal?

Lo usamos como fuente para prestar servicios y tenemos muchas aplicaciones. Es el núcleo de nuestro negocio en términos de soporte para esas aplicaciones.

¿Cómo ha ayudado a mi organización?

Ha mejorado nuestra organización en términos de disponibilidad de nuestros sistemas críticos al aumentar el nivel de protección para esos sistemas. Somos una empresa de infraestructura crítica y los servicios tienen muchos clientes internos que han experimentado esa mejora.

Nuestro sistema Alteon está configurado en alta disponibilidad y nos ayuda a tener un sistema muy productivo. Lo tenemos en un dispositivo que está en contingencia para cuando queramos aplicar cambios. Por ejemplo, podemos hacer una nueva parametrización que se puede aplicar al dispositivo que tiene Alteon en la copia de seguridad, hacer pruebas allí y sincronizar los cambios casi automáticamente con nuestro Alteon principal. En otras palabras, tenemos una solución muy versátil y de alta disponibilidad.

Además, la información del estado de salud, con sus informes muy detallados, nos ha ahorrado tiempo en la resolución de problemas. Tenemos la información precisa necesaria que nos ayuda a encontrar diferentes tipos de situaciones. Nos ha ahorrado alrededor del 50 por ciento de nuestro tiempo en la resolución de problemas.

¿Qué es lo más valioso?

A nivel corporativo es una herramienta muy efectiva y muy sencilla. Nos muestra informes sobre el estado de salud de los servicios que tengamos configurados, en cuanto a balanceo de carga.

¿Qué necesita mejorar?

Realmente nos parece que Alteon cumple con las expectativas. No es una solución que requiera un alto nivel de experiencia. Aunque ciertas funciones pueden volverse complejas, solo se necesita un nivel mínimo de conocimiento.

Recientemente, nuestro equipo habló sobre las cosas que puede personalizar en Alteon y el nivel de programación que exige hacerlo. Me gustaría ver más información sobre cómo personalizar la programación y solucionar problemas.

¿Por cuánto tiempo he usado la solución?

Soy nuevo en la empresa y he estado usando Radware Alteon durante seis meses, pero la herramienta ha estado en uso durante unos cinco años.

¿Qué pienso sobre la estabilidad de la solución?

Es completamente estable.

¿Qué opino de la escalabilidad de la solución?

En nuestra empresa está implementado en múltiples servicios, múltiples aplicaciones y múltiples sitios físicos. Alteon funciona en modo de alta disponibilidad, en data centers separados.

Siempre tenemos planes para expandir nuestro uso de él para nuevas aplicaciones y servicios.

¿Cómo son el servicio de atención al cliente y el soporte?

En el tiempo que llevo con esta empresa hemos tenido que abrir un ticket de atención al cliente. Se manejó bien y de inmediato. Te atienden rápido.

¿Cómo calificaría el servicio y soporte al cliente?

Positivo

¿Cómo fue la configuración inicial?

No participé en la implementación inicial, pero recibí capacitación virtual de alguien en Radware cuando comencé a trabajar con esta empresa. Un mes después, hice la certificación básica de Alteon. Me tomó cerca de dos meses comprender la magnitud de los beneficios que obtenemos al usar los balanceadores de carga de Alteon.

Mis colegas que estuvieron aquí antes de Alteon me dijeron que les tomó cinco o seis meses antes de recibir una capacitación formal, y cuando recibieron la capacitación, se familiarizaron más y tuvieron una comprensión más profunda del modelo operativo de Alteon.

Si estás pensando en cambiarte a Alteon pero te preocupa la curva de aprendizaje, la gestión de Alteon es muy sencilla e intuitiva una vez que adquieres un cierto nivel de conocimientos básicos. La parte más compleja es la configuración, pero eso generalmente lo hace el proveedor, por lo que no creo que sea parte de la curva de aprendizaje. En general, la plataforma es fácil de aprender y es muy fácil de administrar.

La solución no requiere casi ningún mantenimiento de nuestra parte. No está constantemente en mantenimiento preventivo, por lo que ha reducido nuestros gastos generales de mantenimiento. Puede haber alguna programación de actualización de versión, pero no hay mucho que hacer.

¿Cuál fue nuestro retorno de inversión?

No estoy en el área financiera donde pueda hablar del retorno de la inversión en términos numéricos, pero desde un punto de vista tecnológico, creemos que la inversión realizada en Alteon puede estar justificada. Creo que esa inversión se recuperó en el primer año. Su servicio es tan satisfactorio que ya se están pre aprobando los nuevos presupuestos para la renovación de Alteon. El hecho de que sigamos usándolo también dice algo sobre los beneficios de nuestra inversión.

¿Cuál es mi experiencia con los precios, el costo de configuración y las licencias?

El precio se ajusta a lo que ofrece la herramienta. No es una herramienta económica y no todas las empresas pueden permitirse una solución ADC como Alteon. Sin embargo, justifica su precio con las opciones que ofrece. Y no hay costes adicionales aparte de las tarifas estándar, renovación y mantenimiento.

¿Qué otras soluciones evalué?

Aunque yo no estaba trabajando para esta empresa en ese momento, me dijeron que evaluaron F5. Por lo que entiendo, las diferencias estaban en la funcionalidad y accesibilidad de Alteon. No sé acerca de la comparación de costos y valor, pero después de hacer las pruebas de concepto, nuestra empresa estaba más satisfecha con la funcionalidad de Alteon.

¿Qué otro consejo tengo?

Si tu empresa está evaluando a Alteon, es porque está pensando en tener un ADC para la prestación de servicios. Es una herramienta esencial para aumentar la disponibilidad y el rendimiento de los sistemas críticos y la entrega de herramientas críticas. Alteon definitivamente equilibra el rendimiento entre aplicaciones.

La mayor lección que he aprendido al usarlo ha sido descubrir que es esencial para la disponibilidad y el rendimiento que requieren las aplicaciones. No se trata simplemente de mirar los discos; también se necesita ofrecer equilibrio de carga y aumentar la disponibilidad, y eso es lo que ofrecen herramientas como Alteon.

Alteon ha cumplido con las expectativas que teníamos para él. De hecho, ya estamos pensando en una actualización, una renovación para el próximo año. Es una solución de importancia crítica para nosotros. Es eficaz y cumple con lo que necesitamos en cuanto a la protección y el equilibrio de los sistemas.

We implement the load balancer for everything related to the input and output of connectivity services to or from the internet. We have two channels of connectivity to the internet through which we publish services.

With load-balancing, we have the ability to receive traffic using both channels, through Alteon, and when one of them is affected, we're able to access the internet through the other. We already have that part configured.

We also use it for security issues regarding the WAF, trying and applying policies for companies, so that our web applications published to the internet are covered by that security layer.

The two use cases I mentioned are very valuable for our port activity. We must have our applications and services running 24/7 and balance the connectivity and the applications. Also, in terms of security, using Alteon means our services are available, with high quality, to external and internal users. This is one of the reasons I give a high rating to the abilities we have with Alteon.

It has enabled us to have high availability and fault tolerance in operating our applications securely. This has created a lot of value in our IT area around the services we provide to the organization.

Time savings are another area where the solution has helped us a lot. In particular, the visualization has been important for troubleshooting and error resolution. We have been able to find clearer information or more details that are important to solving these issues when they arise. It has reduced our troubleshooting time by about 50 percent.

The time to value was practically immediate. The issues with load balancing of the applications, and the balancing of the internet service and the services provided, changed quickly. They were things that could be identified by our clients immediately. We started to see results from the implementation of the solution within a month, and in some cases, within 15 days or less. For example, the load balancer started acting immediately. We have great confidence in Radware solutions.

The integrated application protection provided by Alteon is very good. It really helps to avoid false positives in some cases. It provides important granularity to avoid a situation in which security or cybersecurity scenarios escape us. We are able to define policies and use techniques to contain these types of situations when they arise. As a security tool, it is very important.

Radware's solutions are very complete, and the integration among some of them—which, in some cases, we have not yet implemented but plan to—has given me peace of mind, knowing we have a robust tool with suitable solutions for all company cybersecurity issues.

We are in the process of updating our version of the solution, so judging what should be improved is difficult. But in some cases, the visualization takes a while, especially for mapping issues. I don't know if that issue will be corrected in the updated version, but that is an area where it could be improved.

We have been using Radware Alteon for more than two years.

It is a totally stable platform.

We are analyzing a possible integration of Alteon with another Radware product. Integrating another Radware product and being able to automate things is in line with the vision we have for the future, and we see that it can be done with Radware technology.

The solution’s customer service and technical support are very good.

The only small problem was in the implementation. We had to wait for the availability of the implementers from Radware at one point. Things were a bit complex in the region in which they were traveling, so we had to postpone the implementation a little. It was a small problem that didn't have much impact.

Positive

I have used other solutions at different companies, and there is a difference for the better with Alteon. I prefer it because of its policies, tools, and the methods it uses. It seems better from my point of view.

In my current company, we have not used any solutions other than Radware Alteon. We decided on Alteon because it offered us more granularity. Radware gives you more options when selecting the necessary features in terms of display, and allows you to fix or find bugs. Those were the big differences.

We have definitely seen ROI. The operation of the port has been a positive change. If there were a drop in internet service for one hour, we could lose quite a lot of money. Avoiding this type of situation with Radware Alteon, for a total of two or three hours, means our investment is fully recovered. Overall, in the past two years, failures have decreased.

The solution has allowed us to operate calmly and have a higher level of technological maturity with the controls it provides. It's not only we who feel that satisfaction, but our customers do too.

The pricing seems reasonable to me for what the solution provides. It is within the parameters of this type of solution.

We have two teams using the solution in separate locations. Apart from the administration that we do on the equipment, we have a support and maintenance contract for the solution. Currently, we have one person in charge of this area and another as a backup. Both are cybersecurity analysts. While it hasn't really reduced our maintenance, it has helped avoid generating additional costs.

I would advise you to focus first on service and then on important functionalities that can help your organization solve the problem of high availability of critical services. Radware Alteon can provide security for those same critical services.

Before Alteon, we believed that we had control of our security. With the implementation of its tools, we realized that we did, in fact, have a good security layer, but with the help of this tool, we have been able to go further and have a little more certainty and control in certain situations, especially around our web applications.

Foreign Language:(Spanish)

¿Cuál es nuestro caso de uso principal?

Implementamos el balanceador de carga para todo lo relacionado con la entrada y salida de servicios de conectividad hacia o desde internet. Contamos con dos canales de conectividad a internet a través de los cuales publicamos servicios.

Con el equilibrio de carga, tenemos la capacidad de recibir tráfico usando ambos canales, a través de Alteon y cuando uno de ellos se ve afectado, podemos acceder a Internet a través del otro. Ya tenemos esa parte configurada.

También lo usamos para temas de seguridad con respecto al WAF, tratando y aplicando políticas para las empresas, para que nuestras aplicaciones web publicadas en internet estén cubiertas por esa capa de seguridad.

¿Cómo ha ayudado a mi organización?

Los dos casos de uso que mencioné son muy valiosos para nuestra actividad portuaria. Debemos tener nuestras aplicaciones y servicios funcionando las 24 horas del día, los 7 días de la semana y equilibrar la conectividad y las aplicaciones. Además, en términos de seguridad, usar Alteon significa que nuestros servicios están disponibles, con alta calidad, para usuarios externos e internos. Esta es una de las razones por las que doy una calificación alta a las habilidades que tenemos con Alteon.

Nos ha permitido tener alta disponibilidad y tolerancia a fallas al operar nuestras aplicaciones de manera segura. Esto ha creado mucho valor en nuestra área de IT en torno a los servicios que brindamos a la organización.

El ahorro de tiempo es otra área en la que la solución nos ha ayudado mucho.

En particular, la visualización ha sido importante para la resolución de problemas y errores. Hemos podido encontrar información más clara o más detalles que son importantes para resolver estos problemas cuando surgen. Ha reducido nuestro tiempo de solución de problemas en aproximadamente un 50 por ciento.

El tiempo que nos tomó para ver estas funcionalidades fue prácticamente inmediato. Los problemas con el equilibrio de carga de las aplicaciones y el equilibrio del servicio de Internet y los servicios proporcionados cambiaron rápidamente. Eran cambios que nuestros clientes podían identificar inmediatamente. Empezamos a ver los resultados de la implementación de la solución en un mes y, en algunos casos, en 15 días o menos. Por ejemplo, el balanceador de carga comenzó a actuar de inmediato. Confiamos mucho en las soluciones de Radware.

¿Qué es lo más valioso?

La protección de aplicaciones integrada proporcionada por Alteon es muy buena. Realmente ayuda a evitar falsos positivos en algunos casos. Aporta una granularidad importante para evitar una situación en la que se nos escapen escenarios de seguridad o ciberseguridad. Somos capaces de definir políticas y utilizar técnicas para contener este tipo de situaciones cuando se presentan. Como herramienta de seguridad, es muy importante.

Las soluciones de Radware son muy completas, y la integración entre algunas de ellas, que en algunos casos aún no hemos implementado pero planeamos hacerlo, me han dado tranquilidad al saber que tenemos una herramienta robusta con soluciones adecuadas para todos los problemas de ciberseguridad de la empresa.

¿Qué necesita mejorar?

Estamos en el proceso de actualizar nuestra versión de la solución, por lo que es difícil juzgar qué se debe mejorar. Pero en algunos casos, la visualización tarda un poco, especialmente por problemas de mapeo. No sé si ese problema se corregirá en la versión actualizada, pero esa es un área donde podría mejorarse.

¿Por cuánto tiempo he usado la solución?

Hemos estado usando Radware Alteon durante más de dos años.

¿Qué pienso sobre la estabilidad de la solución?

Es una plataforma totalmente estable.

¿Qué opino de la escalabilidad de la solución?

Estamos analizando una posible integración de Alteon con otro producto de Radware. Integrar otro producto de Radware y poder automatizar las cosas está en línea con la visión que tenemos para el futuro, y vemos que se puede hacer con la tecnología de Radware.

¿Cómo son el servicio de atención al cliente y el soporte?

El servicio de atención al cliente y el soporte técnico de la solución son muy buenos.

El único pequeño problema fue en la implementación. Tuvimos que esperar la disponibilidad de los implementadores de Radware en algún momento. Las cosas estaban un poco complejas en la región en la que viajaban, por lo que tuvimos que posponer un poco la implementación. Fue un pequeño problema que no tuvo mucho impacto.

¿Cómo calificaría el servicio y soporte al cliente?

Positivo

¿Qué solución usé anteriormente y por qué cambié?

He usado otras soluciones en diferentes empresas y hay una diferencia positiva con Alteon. Lo prefiero por sus políticas, herramientas y los métodos que utiliza. Me parece mejor desde mi punto de vista.

En mi empresa actual, no hemos utilizado ninguna solución que no sea Radware Alteon. Nos decidimos por Alteon porque nos ofrecía más granularidad. Radware le brinda más opciones al seleccionar las funciones necesarias en términos de visualización y le permite corregir o encontrar errores. Esas eran las grandes diferencias.

¿Cuál fue nuestro Retorno de la Inversión?

Definitivamente hemos visto el retorno de inversión. La operación del puerto ha cambiado de manera positiva. Si hubiera una caída en el servicio de Internet durante una hora, podríamos perder bastante dinero. Evitar este tipo de situaciones con Radware Alteon, durante un total de dos o tres horas, significa que nuestra inversión se recupera por completo. En general, en los últimos dos años, las fallas han disminuido.

La solución nos ha permitido operar con tranquilidad y tener un mayor nivel de madurez tecnológica con los controles que brinda. No solo nosotros sentimos esa satisfacción, sino también nuestros clientes.

¿Cuál es mi experiencia con los precios, el costo de configuración y las licencias?

El precio me parece razonable para lo que ofrece la solución. Está dentro de los parámetros de este tipo de soluciones.

¿Qué otro consejo tengo?

Tenemos dos equipos que usan la solución en ubicaciones separadas. Aparte de la administración que hacemos de los equipos, tenemos un contrato de soporte y mantenimiento de la solución. Actualmente contamos con una persona a cargo de esta área y otra como respaldo. Ambos son analistas de ciberseguridad.Tal vez no ha reducido realmente nuestros costos de mantenimiento pero ha ayudado a evitar generar costos adicionales.

Les aconsejaría que se centren primero en el servicio y luego en las funcionalidades importantes que pueden ayudar a su organización a resolver el problema de la alta disponibilidad de los servicios críticos. Radware Alteon puede proporcionar seguridad para esos mismos servicios críticos.

Antes de Alteon, creíamos que teníamos el control de nuestra seguridad. Con la implementación de sus herramientas, nos dimos cuenta de que efectivamente, teníamos una buena capa de seguridad, pero con la ayuda de esta herramienta, hemos podido ir más allá y tener un poco más de certeza y control en ciertas situaciones, especialmente alrededor de nuestras aplicaciones web.