I use the solution in my company for general office usage purposes, including areas like emails, Excel, or PowerPoint.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that since it is the most common platform, many applications are available on it to support our company's needs. The tool is easy to use.

Sometimes, I need to reboot it when it slows down. When a patch is installed, it will have to be rebooted several times. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the tool.

I have been using Windows 10 for a couple of years.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I don't think it is a scalable solution.

My company has over 1,000 product users.

My company has no plans to increase the number of users.

My company just uses internal IT support, and I don't know whether they use some kind of Microsoft support.

The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward.

The installation usually involves some patch deployment with some kind of tools. Generally, I just use the tool by myself, and I just need a USB to install the solution.

My company has an internal IT team to take care of the tool's deployment and maintenance.

The solution can be deployed in 30 minutes.

I think my company has acquired a license from the OEM. I believe that the product is cheaply priced.

Whether I would recommend the product to others or not depends on their use cases. The security part of the product may be an issue, and it might be quite serious.

Compared to the previous version of the products, the hardware compatibility offered by Windows 10 is okay right now since I haven't faced any application issues lately.

I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

I use the solution in my company for our standard daily operations and to use client Hyper-V.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that Windows 11 has been improved lately.

With Windows 10, there is room for improvement, especially in terms of the amount of time required to update the product. The time required to update the product should be shorter.

The tool's personal area network (PAN) features or screenshot functionalities need improvement since if you take two screenshots at once, one of them disappears in Windows 10. In Windows 11, if you take screenshots at once, you can get both of them in real time.

The stability of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have been using Windows 10 since it was released.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven to eight out of ten.

There is no need to scale up the product in my company.

There are around 500 people in my company who use the product.

As my company uses Windows 10, it does not need to be increased since we use the right licenses. I believe that everything is already included in it.

There are no plans to increase the product's usage in my company.

Linux was one of the alternatives to Windows 10. I don't use Linux anymore.

My company usually opts for a server-based deployment model.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Installing from an ISO file typically takes a minute.

There is a need to make a payment towards the perpetual licensing model offered by the product.

The security framework in Windows 10 is pretty much the same as Windows 8. Currently in Windows 10, you can enroll devices in Azure AD while also having access to BitLocker.

I don't know if I can recommend the product to others since it is based on a user experience. Compatibility with most of the applications is possible, especially with the ones included in Microsoft's stack. The GUI is pretty much straightforward. The tool offers online support for the operating system.

Speaking about how the solution actually supports hardware compatibility compared to previous versions, I would say that it can pretty much work with almost any type of computer.

I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

We use Windows 10 as an operating system for endpoints.

Windows 10 wasn't a very stable solution.

I have been using Windows 10 for two years.

I rate the solution’s stability a six out of ten.

Around 450 people in our organization use the solution regularly.

The solution's technical support was quite good and reliable.

The solution's initial setup was pretty straightforward because we got it preloaded from the OEM.

The solution’s deployment took about 45 minutes.

The solution’s licensing wasn’t expensive.

We faced no security issues as we were using the ordinary Defender features. We just had two L1 people who would maintain and deploy the tool. I would not recommend Windows 10 to other users because it is not a stable solution. Windows 10 supported our hardware compatibility quite well. Windows 10 gave us good value for money.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

The solution is being used for our daily operations, for some web browsing, some learning purposes, and also documentation purposes.

Windows 10 is user friendly and is a high performing solution. The solution is compatible with the new system but it does not support outdated systems.

The security features in Windows 10 can be improved.

The pricing of the solution can be made cheaper.

I have been using Windows 10 for more than four years.

Windows 10 is a highly stable solution. I rate the stability of the solution a ten out of ten.

Almost everyone in my organisation uses Windows 10. The scalability of the solution is an eight out of ten.

Windows 10's initial setup is straightforward. The solution was deployed in a minute. For the deployment, a USB drive or a boot drive or desk is required and you need to install an operating system.

The organisation where I work provide me with the licensed version of Windows 10 but personally, I have used the pilot advance version.

I advise others to use Windows 10 because it is not complex and it is very user-friendly.

Overall I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Windows 10 is an operating system that everyone in our organization uses.

All the features are critical. The stability of the solution is better than that of its previous versions. It has been stable in most cases. The new security features are very good.

The product has some bugs. The performance must be improved.

I have been using the solution for a few years.

I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

We have up to 1500 users. All our systems have the solution installed. We do not have any plans to increase the number of users.

We’re in touch with the support team for updates, minor changes, and modifications to the operating system.

The setup is very easy. It takes about 15 minutes. To install the solution, we must plug in the USB, turn on the system, and go through the installation process. It gets installed easily. There is no technicality.

I can deploy the product myself. All it needs is a USB plug-in.

Break-even can be achieved in about a year and a half. It's a stable operating system. It allows us to use all the peripherals and accessories.

Windows 10 is a one-time purchase.

We've dealt with Microsoft Volume Licensing and OEM licensing. It is worth using Windows 10. It is better than Windows 8. There aren't many other options. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I prioritize stability and performance, so I'm accustomed to the Windows interface. When I attempt tasks on Linux, it feels unfamiliar to me. Prolonged usage, familiarity should lead to efficiency.

Active Directory configuration for administrators makes it very easy to manage the environment in companies or universities at an enterprise level, making it possible to do everything.

The solution could improve the availability and compatibility of applications like Linux. Additionally, refining the file transfer process to ensure smoother transitions between different applications or systems would be beneficial. Lastly, ensuring seamless compatibility with common file formats like PowerPoint presentations could enhance user experience and efficiency on Windows platforms. It should have less frequent updates for the UI and threats. I started with Windows 95. Sometimes, there are changes in the user interface, so some services and tools are in different places than in the previous version. It takes some time to get used to it.

The solution should improve the Windows startup process by allowing users to customise which components launch at startup is a valid one. This would give users more control over their system's performance and resource usage. Implementing a feature that allows users to easily manage startup programs and services, perhaps through a dedicated settings menu or a startup manager tool, could address this issue. This way, users could disable or enable specific applications and services according to their preferences, optimizing their system's performance and startup time. Additionally, providing clear information about the impact of each startup item on system resources could help users make informed decisions about which components to enable or disable.

I have been using Windows for 15 years.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability eight or nine out of ten.

The solution’s scalability is good.

I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.

The IT department, specifically the ICT team, provides support for this. Several people are involved. They manage the computer rooms, including installation and updates. A new installation is required every year because students change. I manage computers, adhering to organizational rules.

The initial setup is fast.

You need to pay for a license for Windows 10 every month.

Windows Defender aims to provide users with a secure computing experience, and it's advisable to keep your system updated to take advantage of the latest security enhancements.

I use a computer with only four gigabytes of RAM. There are ten nodes in my notebook. I plan to buy a new one with a huge RAM memory, but currently, only four gigabytes work in one node, while eight gigabytes work in an external computer. The system startup is very slow because the newest version of Windows requires more memory. Many services are running. It should change how Windows starts. Some components, like Skype, start automatically with Windows.

The solution's configuration is easy.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It is an operating system. I need it to access applications and services. I use the tool for personal purposes.

The product is user-friendly. It has good features.

I get updates continuously. The product must send updates less frequently. The copy speed changes depending on the size of the file.

I have been using the solution for five years.

The product’s stability is good. I rate the stability an eight out of ten. The speed of copying depends on the size of the file.

The initial setup is easy. I am from an IT background. It is easy for me. I can configure and reboot the system myself.

I deployed the tool myself.

The product is easy to handle and reboot.

I paid for the license.

I will recommend the solution to others. It is easy to set up. Anyone can set it up. It is also easy to use. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I have used Windows 10 in my multiple roles. I used to manage the operating system from an operational point of view. Later, I used to prepare a design document for the security configuration.

Windows 10 is a user-friendly solution that has good stability and performance.

Windows 10 should provide more frequent updates.

I have been using Windows 10 for many years.

I rate Windows 10 a nine or ten out of ten for stability.

More than 2,00,000 users use the solution extensively in our organization.

The solution’s initial setup is very straightforward.

The solution was implemented through an in-house team. Normally, we have a golden image used across the organization and then implement that.

I would recommend Windows 10 to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I use the Windows Operating System. It all works for daily data operations.

It offers third-party or media environment support. I also like native environment support. Camera, microphone, multimedia instruments, browsers, and patent integrations are better than Linux.

System resource consumption is more than Linux.

I would like better RAM and better memory optimization.

I have been using it for almost a decade now.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. The memory optimization is not there yet.

This isn't an operating system for network operations. That's why a single operating system. There are around a hundred end users.

We plan to increase the further usage.

I used Linux and Solaris.

The initial setup was easy. It took an hour.

Just consultant and user. Deployment is just a few simple clicks after you attach the USB drive.

We needed around three people from the technical team to handle the installation. They were admins and IT managers.

The ROI is okay.

It is only a one-time purchase. I can use it for a lifetime.

Overall, I would rate the product an eight out of ten. I would recommend it from an end-user's operating system.

The solution makes our organization better.

The product is easy to use. I like the snipping tool and the network utility tool. The interface is nice. The configuration is easy.

Sometimes, the product hangs, and we have to restart the PC to make it work again. The interface must be made faster.

I have been using the solution since it was released.

I rate the product’s stability a seven out of ten.

I rate the product’s scalability a seven out of ten. The scalability could be improved.

I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten. The deployment took one hour.

The deployment was done in-house. We need one to five people to deploy the solution.

I rate the ROI a five out of ten.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap. There are no additional costs associated with the tool.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.