For CAST, I use it in cloud migration roadmap and in open source safety issues. These are my two main use cases.
CAST Highlight
CASTReviews from AWS customer
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Identifies migration blockers and boosters while facing challenges with platform-specific roadblocks
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
In cloud migration, I use CAST highlight to identify blockers, which are the negative road patterns, and also the boosters, which are positive code patterns.
What needs improvement?
The solution provides agnostic blockers for platforms as well as for containerization. Within that containerization, it offers generic blockers. However, my project might require it to provide Windows-specific blockers or Linux-specific blockers, as I often work with only one platform at a time. If I received categorization in containerization blockers, it would save time. Understanding only the OS-specific blockers means I would avoid resolving irrelevant issues, thus saving time.
Initially, I receive a response from support, however, if there is involvement from R&D or other teams, it may take longer than expected. The support team is challenging when sharing source code. As this is a static code analysis tool, it sometimes requires source code for R&D. However, CAST clients may be restricted from sharing due to business logic and nondisclosure agreements. This creates a challenge, and I may have to share pseudo code or seek client approval, risking escalation.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for almost six years.
How are customer service and support?
CAST highlight support is available. I reach out to the CAST vendor for assistance and raise a ticket, which gets assigned to the concerned POC. They could improve, as their main aim seems to be closing the ticket rather than satisfying customer requirements. Some support team members are helpful, and others lack in-depth knowledge of the tool, which might cause challenges.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
What other advice do I have?
My overall product rating is six out of ten.
Great use of the product!
Very complete product for professional use
The certification process if very easy and quick to go through and become competent in using the platform.
The process is very fast so you can run it continuously without having to wait long periods of time to get some results. It can be integrated into the CI pipeline
Comprehensive Code Quality Assessment and Risk Management Tool
Application Modernization
Cloud Risk Assessment
Thrid Party Risk Identification
Open Source Risk Elements - Deep Dive Analysis
Offers efficient portfolio management through enhanced application insights
What is our primary use case?
I have used CAST Highlight in combination with application portfolio management, application lifecycle management, going cloud-ready, and other applications. My main occupation involves software completion analysis and working with various solutions like firewalls and storage.
How has it helped my organization?
One of the advantages of using CAST Highlight is that it provides a clear overview of the entire portfolio. It allows me to see the overall quality of my environment and determine where improvements are needed. It also aids in the early detection of trends and can be useful in managing applications within the organization.
What is most valuable?
CAST Highlight offers a clear overview of the role portfolio and facilitates quick scanning, helping to determine the overall quality of the environment.
What needs improvement?
There could be potential improvements or additional features added to CAST Highlight to make it better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used CAST Highlight for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has been stable while I was using it, with no significant issues related to stability.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service and local support from CAST are quite good. They offer valuable assistance within the tool.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of CAST Highlight is simple. You need to subscribe, and then the setup involves configuring the application.
What was our ROI?
I have not specifically mentioned return on investment, but there is some time advantage involved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of CAST Highlight was not considered expensive or cheap, and no specific comment was made about the setup cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I've used some other tools with a similar set of capabilities as CAST Highlight, covering around fifty to seventy percent of the same functions.
CAST Highlight Review: Essential for Code Quality Management
2. It transforms complicated data into actionable items, enabling teams to tackle problems before they become significant.
3. Deep analysis and actionable guidelines elevate the software development process, leading to real improvements in code quality.
2. An added improvement that will enhance user experience is adding some simplicity in the setup process and adding some more intuitive onboarding resources.
Problem: Poor code quality and technical debt lead to costly maintenance, security issues, and slower development.
Benefit: CAST Highlight identifies these issues early, reducing costs and improving project efficiency with more maintainable code.
2. Development Workflow Integration:
Problem: Development tools often work in isolation, causing workflow inefficiencies.
Benefit: CAST Highlight integrates with CI/CD tools, ensuring seamless analysis and maintaining a consistent, productive development pipeline.