We have a bot called Marjorie that fetches all the requests in ServiceNow, distributes the request, reads the description, decides whether it's SAP or an Oracle request, downloads the attachments, and processes it for fixed assets. With Automation Anywhere, we were able to control and scale it up based on the demand, especially since quarterly, the requests are huge, resulting in saving two FTEs.

The best feature of Automation Anywhere is the IQ Bot option, which is excellent for document processing and can process almost all types of invoices with great accuracy.

We conducted a pilot for invoice processing with IQ Bot in the same finance team, and it performed exceptionally well, achieving strong accuracy compared to the earlier simple Microsoft OCR that we used.

Automation Anywhere has had a huge impact in my organization, especially in saving time and compliance-related process automation by reducing errors drastically and ensuring quick processing of requests with proper logs available for the audit team.

Compared to other RPA tools, the UI of Automation Anywhere is not that great and is not that easy to pick up for people, which takes more time for a newbie.

The UI needs to be more user-friendly, and similarly, debugging and logging should also be more friendly.

In the current field, it has been about eight years.

Automation Anywhere is stable.

The scalability is amazing with Automation Anywhere since we can scale it up based on demand, which is why we prefer it for finance-related use cases.

The customer support team is excellent; if there is a technical issue we cannot solve, we create a ticket, and they help us very quickly.

We have evaluated Blue Prism, UiPath, and Power Automate in the market before making our choice.

I cannot provide the exact figure, but we have a strong automation COE team that evaluates the ROI, and only if it is good will they approve the automation.

We are in a hybrid setup with Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Power Automate Desktop, making it a hyper-automation environment.

I am not familiar with the pricing, but I feel the licensing is a little bit complex compared to other tools.

I would recommend not relying on one single RPA tool; it is better to have a multi-view approach with two to three or four tools instead of relying on one single vendor.

I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

My usual use cases for this solution are banking use cases, including fraud detection, KYC, loan, and loan servicing use cases.

The features and capabilities of Automation Anywhere that I have found most valuable include excellent support. As enterprise customers, we benefit from strong support for our needs.

My experience with the technical support of Automation Anywhere is great. Whatever issues we encounter are resolved within the defined TAT and SLAs, and their technical expertise ensures quick response times.

Automation Anywhere is easy to use for business users who do not have technical skills. We have citizen developers, and there are features available for non-technical or business users to create bots and automate their use cases.

The learning curve for Automation Anywhere is good, particularly with Agent AI. We have completed all our deployments using Agent AI with different GenAI features, and the experience has been excellent.

Currently, Agent AI is the best feature of Automation Anywhere. I value the Agent AI feature because previously all automation was achieved through RPA. Now, with AI advancement, we have RPA plus Agent use cases where Agent AI handles everything without human intervention in the loop.

The positive impact and benefits I have experienced from using Automation Anywhere include ROI through FTE reduction on the business side, which depends on the specific use case. We have benefited significantly from converting our manual efforts into automation and reducing our FTEs.

Automation Anywhere could benefit from more in-person support, as they currently maintain only a virtual presence. I would value this improvement because it provides real connection and facilitates better understanding of use cases and expectations.

I have been working with Automation Anywhere for the last five to seven years.

I rate the stability and reliability of Automation Anywhere as nine since we do not experience any major application downtimes.

I rate the scalability of Automation Anywhere as nine because over the five to seven years I have been using it, I have observed that it has already scaled well and will continue to be scalable in the future.

My experience with the technical support of Automation Anywhere is great. Whatever issues we encounter are resolved within the defined TAT and SLAs, and with their technical expertise, the response time is quick and effective.

I rate the technical support as eight.

Before Automation Anywhere, I was using Automation Edge and UiPath. I decided to switch from UiPath because of cost considerations, and with Automation Edge, we did not have sufficient technical support from that team.

The initial setup and deployment of Automation Anywhere were straightforward, with no major challenges during the setup process.

I participated in the initial deployment and setup of Automation Anywhere, including regular deployments and upgrades.

Automation Anywhere has helped me save both time and costs, with savings of approximately eight million in the last two to three years.

In terms of percentage, I saved around thirty to forty percent of time compared to before using Automation Anywhere.

The pricing of Automation Anywhere is reasonable compared to other RPA tools and agentic tools, and they stand out well in the market.

Before choosing Automation Anywhere, I evaluated Microsoft Power Automate, but it was not suitable for our use cases, which is why we selected Automation Anywhere.

I do not integrate other tools or applications with Automation Anywhere.

I do not use Automation CoPilot in Automation Anywhere as I use it in the office.

I was addressing challenges related to implementing Agent AI and its components, which we are now able to deploy successfully.

Training non-technical employees on Automation Anywhere usage does not present major obstacles, as we have technical expertise available on premises, and for any technical challenges, we leverage their solution architect experience.

From my organization's perspective on automation and AI, we have already deployed the use cases we wanted and need to explore additional features that become available in AI.

My approach regarding generative AI is specific to generative AI and CoPilot. We need to evaluate these features because we have not yet explored those areas, but we plan to do so in our future roadmap.

I rate Automation Anywhere overall as eight.

A person who messaged me on LinkedIn informed me that this review concerns Automation Anywhere. In my own words, for the current client, they are in the manufacturing industry. We have various use cases including finance processes, supply chain, and vendor management. This particular client's operations are very large, spread across four continents with manufacturing plants in 12 countries and conducting business for somewhere between 400 to 600 million US dollars. We automate all these backend, mundane processes so that human resources can do something more useful.

In my previous two roles, I worked from 2019 to 2022. In that first year, I was working in Automation Anywhere version 11, which was a legacy version that existed before 2019. Initially, it was Automation Anywhere version 11, followed by 2019 and later they rebranded it as A360. I have worked in all three versions. Version 11 was in 2019-2020 for a Singapore-based energy client in the petroleum and energy sector. In 2020, I worked for a Saudi-based client in healthcare and food industries with many verticals. Currently, I am working with a huge manufacturing unit based in the United Arab Emirates.

I have been working with Automation Anywhere for two periods: one from September 2019 to March 2022 and again from November 2024 to present. The second phase from November 2024 to present is 1.3 years, and 2019 to 2021 was another two to two and a half years. In total, I have about 3.5 to four years of experience.

I just used Automation Anywhere at work today and am currently working on it. The drag and drop feature is very user-friendly in Automation Anywhere. Of course, the old version 11 was very difficult to work on, but the new A360, which has been in the market for the past two to three years, is very developer-friendly. It gives more control to the developer and is not too complicated. UiPath, the other RPA tool I worked on, is very complicated because at each step you have to put 500 inputs and 500 outputs. Nothing of that nature occurs here. It is very simple and straightforward. You have a dropdown on the left side and an actions panel where you have packages. Under each package, you have many actions. You can drag the action into the box and it works fine. The bottom line is that it is extremely simple and developer-friendly.

In the current organization, we had trouble initially because I think the documentation and support could be better than what it is now. This is one difference between Automation Anywhere and other RPA tools such as UiPath. In UiPath, if you have an issue, you go to the UiPath website and search for it, and you get lots of help materials. In Automation Anywhere, you do not get exactly what you are looking for. You get a very large number of results when you search for something, and from this large result set, you have to filter out what you need, or only partial information will be available. User handbooks are available for each product. In that regard, I would say Automation Anywhere is lagging compared to other RPA tools.

It is difficult to get hold of their customer support team. I want to clarify that it is not a matter of us building logic on Automation Anywhere and it failing. When it is a product-related issue, they have to give us support because we only know how to develop within Automation Anywhere. We do not know how to fix Automation Anywhere itself. Whenever we have an issue, trying to get in touch with them always takes three to four business days.

I have not experienced significant stability issues. I have been working for this long, and I have faced only one issue in the last year, which involved the VM. Other than that, in these three to four years of using this tool, there has been no crashing, glitches, or anything of that nature due to technical issues from Automation Anywhere. I would say one experience in a period of four years.

Automation Anywhere is very scalable. You have the concept of subtasks, which makes it very easy. You can highly modularize your code, and once you modularize your code, it becomes easy to scale up. This is not an issue. All the processes we are doing now, we approach from the perspective that they are scalable. We first make three business units live. The current client I am working for has 60 business units within their business. Initially, we implement the bot only for the first three business units, then we implement it for another three business units. Scalability is never an issue. If I were to provide a score, I would say 9 out of 10.

You are talking about document understanding. I am using ARI, the Automation Anywhere Robotic Interface, right now as well. I know the Co-pilot feature and have seen videos in Automation Anywhere University, but I have not personally used it in my project.

For the product, I would say eight to 8.5. For support, I would give five to six. For the overall product, I would say 8 to 8.5.

I initially worked in Blue Prism and then transitioned to Automation Anywhere. I believe if you work in one RPA tool, transitioning to another is easy. For someone working on Automation Anywhere as their first RPA tool versus someone working on Automation Anywhere as their second RPA tool, the person working on Automation Anywhere as their second RPA tool will have an easier learning phase because they already understand RPA, business cases, and why RPA is being implemented. However, someone who is a fresher working in Automation Anywhere as their first tool will have a steeper learning curve. In my organization, in 2019, I transitioned from Blue Prism to Automation Anywhere. I was part of the first team that implemented the first automation project for my organization, so the learning curve was very large for me. However, the learning curve was really good.

Initial deployment is somewhat difficult because we have to get the framework in place. It is always difficult. The first three to four processes are challenging. Once the first three to four processes go into production, you have a framework and something around which you can work. I think this is the same for all tools because the first time we put a process to production on the client side, we might encounter surprises. We have a dev environment from which we move to UAT or pre-production environment, and then to the final production environment. Whatever tool you are using, I believe that when it comes to RPA, you will find some surprises when you go to production, and it takes time. The first three to four processes are a stabilization phase. Once the first three to four processes go live, you know what to expect in the production environment when you deploy it, and it becomes easy.

I do the deployment personally. There are three to four developers in the current project, and each one does their deployment individually. They complete the development and then get on a call with the business team to test the various business scenarios. Once we get approval, we individually move it towards production. There is no one else involved. I myself, in the last year, have done 10 to 12 processes for this manufacturing client and moved everything myself to production.

We have roughly 20 to 30 GB of data every two months. Every two months, we are manually going and cleaning that folder because otherwise our VM space runs out and the machine becomes slower as the VM space gets lower. This is one thing which Automation Anywhere can address: why 20 to 30 GB of data gets created as junk or global cache data every two months. We ended up with 80 GB of data across the four VMs.

The deployment time depends on the complexity of the client environment. At times, their security requirements are more stringent, and many variables are involved, but usually when we are moving from dev to production, it does not take much time. One concern I have is that from dev, we have to take the package and move it to production. Every time, even with a minor change, if I take code from dev, export it and import it into production and later face an issue, I have to make a small change and repeat this cycle again and again. I think there should be some sort of linkage between dev and production. Actually, they have an option called promote bot, but for some reason, this is not working fine on my current client side. Promote bot is where you directly transfer your file from one environment to another environment, but for some reason on this current client side, it is not working fine.

We are their customer, and one thing we have faced multiple times in the last year in 2024 is that it is difficult to get hold of their customer support team. To clarify, it is not a matter of us building logic on Automation Anywhere and it failing. When it is a product-related issue, they have to give us support because we only know how to develop within Automation Anywhere.

In the last year, we have raised at least 12 to 15 tickets for various technical issues. Some of them are answered via email, where they provide a solution when I tell them I am facing issues ABC. They will give the solution. However, at times, that is not enough. We need to get in touch with them to show them a demo of what we are facing.

Recently, they have also implemented something where when we send emails to them, they have a chatbot or an automated mailbox that sends back the solution. I would say this is very problematic because the solution coming from this automated mailbox is not the solution we are looking for. If I am facing issue A and B, it sends the solution for issue C and D, not for A and B. This automated system they have implemented in the backend to reply to customer emails could be improved.

For the product overall, I would rate this review an 8.