External reviews
453 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Dell Boomi make integrating applications far easier than ever before.
What do you like best about the product?
Dell Boomi removes all the headaches associated with integration. It is very fast and good tool to develop the EDI/API based integration.
Dell Boomi has almost all the connector available as per the industry need.
Debugging and monitoring the integrations is simple and easy to use in Dell Boomi.
The Boomi interface is simple and easy to develop and Test the processes.
Boomi provides multiple Data Security features.
Dell Boomi has almost all the connector available as per the industry need.
Debugging and monitoring the integrations is simple and easy to use in Dell Boomi.
The Boomi interface is simple and easy to develop and Test the processes.
Boomi provides multiple Data Security features.
What do you dislike about the product?
After every release few functionality are not working properly for example: In recent release I notices that the previous Atom selection in test mode is not working but it fixed in next release.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am working on SAP SuccessFactors and EDI integrations. The benefit is that the development is quite fast and easy with minimal bugs.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Please try Dell Boomi it's very good tool for all type of integration on Cloud and on Premises.
Dell Boomi - The best iPaaS
What do you like best about the product?
The best as per Gartner - https://www.informatica.com/sg/ipaas-magic-quadrant.html
Easy to use for Novice user also.
Simple and lightweight still can fulfill all complex integration needs.
Availability of inbuilt connectors (Not many iPaaS vendors provides connectors for Anaplan, Workday etc.(only SoftwareAG has it as of today.)
Very reasonable pricing and no need to buy unnecessary add-on as bundle
No bugs in product
Easy to use for Novice user also.
Simple and lightweight still can fulfill all complex integration needs.
Availability of inbuilt connectors (Not many iPaaS vendors provides connectors for Anaplan, Workday etc.(only SoftwareAG has it as of today.)
Very reasonable pricing and no need to buy unnecessary add-on as bundle
No bugs in product
What do you dislike about the product?
Though there is a workaround for RosettaNet requests, Its good to have connector for it like EDI.
Process logs can be fine tuned. Also, User should have option to store process logs in file as well as database to the user.
User need to have option to view transaction table data for detailed analysis.
Process logs can be fine tuned. Also, User should have option to store process logs in file as well as database to the user.
User need to have option to view transaction table data for detailed analysis.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cloud to Cloud Integration
Cloud to Ground Integration
Ground to Cloud Integration
Cloud to Ground Integration
Ground to Cloud Integration
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Highly recommended for integration needs of small to middle level data/process integration. You will end up saving a lot.
Integrations made easy
What do you like best about the product?
The simplicity and ease of integrating with other systems
What do you dislike about the product?
Not too good when it comes to performance of the APIs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are integrating with multiple systems through DB connections, Netsuite, API management, HttpClient and are also exposing multiple APIs for the users to integrate with. It is so easy to add a new api.
Could be so much better
What do you like best about the product?
SOCL queries returned as XML makes it fairly plug and play and easier to work with.
What do you dislike about the product?
Finding a changed component, when the project is very complex is virtually impossible.
Storing returned data 'in memory' is way more complex than it should be.
Storing returned data 'in memory' is way more complex than it should be.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Linking silo-ed applications.
ETL between disparate systems is useful.
Hosting Atoms on own infrastructure appears to be bad, very flaky, writing GBs of log files even when all endpoints are set to low latency.
Overall quite frustrating.
ETL between disparate systems is useful.
Hosting Atoms on own infrastructure appears to be bad, very flaky, writing GBs of log files even when all endpoints are set to low latency.
Overall quite frustrating.
Good Product, with stable updates
What do you like best about the product?
1. Good UI features,
2. The updates are mostly stable(as per my experience for past 1 year).
2. The updates are mostly stable(as per my experience for past 1 year).
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Some features of configuration can be optimized, i.e. the credentials from the environment can be sourced on connectors while executing in Test mode.)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
1. Integration with various application
2. Data sync.
3. EDI communication
2. Data sync.
3. EDI communication
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Although the support is active in community blog, would suggest to produce more documentation on EDI development
Boomi Product Review
What do you like best about the product?
The easy to follow layout for building complex processes. Good support when things don't make sense. Flexibility to fallback on javascript or groovy if pre-defined shapes aren't doing enough. Good pre-built logging.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some error responses are hard to understand. No efforts made to upgrade QB SDK for a QB integration so you lose functionality with key fields like SKU and item types. No work around either as QB is really specific how you connect with it. I guess I should be glad they have an option to connect to QB at all.
But by and large, I've never had an integration that I could accomplish with Boomi. Every single integration I've done (about 100 different EDI messages to a wild array of systems) have all been made extremely efficient because of this tool.
But by and large, I've never had an integration that I could accomplish with Boomi. Every single integration I've done (about 100 different EDI messages to a wild array of systems) have all been made extremely efficient because of this tool.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Connecting an extremely wide variety of different systems together within days rather than weeks. Having a ton of flexibility with mapping fields and updating processes to handle more or less within hours instead of days. Every EDI team I come across seems way less organized and their development times are always at least double. I didn't know a thing about EDI before I started working with this tool and now I feel like an absolute Pro, ready to dictate how an integration needs to go, rather than react to what a business may need. I can create extremely robust processes that send detailed messages as to why data might have failed a test. This makes for great communication between Vendor and Customer and ultimately helps planning and doing business.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you want the ability to build complex data integration but still have it be flexible and easy enough to use that multiple people can work on the same thing without confusing or breaking pre-existing work, then Boomi is the perfect product. You want reliable logging, easy troubleshooting, and good support then Boomi is for you.
A useful, but sometimes frustrating tool to assist with complex system integrations
What do you like best about the product?
Boomi saves a lot of time when attempting to send or share data between multiple existing on-premise and cloud hosted applications. It's easy enough to get data from point A to point B with an acceptable amount of development effort. Also, Boomi makes it possible for non-developer types to create data integrations without too much learning or overhead.
What do you dislike about the product?
Boomi executions are slow and there seem to be issues with web server services process that only get executed occasionally being offline temporarily. Boomi is the typical enterprise solution to the common problem of too many applications. But instead of fixing that problem by refactoring code or consolidating applications, Boomi is a tool to use on top of everything and make all the legacy apps play (somewhat) nicely together.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have way too many applications. Instead of refactoring and consolidating, the powers that be have decided to use Boomi to make sure we keep using every one of our outdated applications for a long time to come.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Firstly, consider redesigning your architecture so that you don't need a path-tool like Boomi. If you absolutely can't spend the time or money to refactor, reconsider. Because Boomi still takes a lot of time and costs a lot of money. If you absolutely aren't allowed to change your in-house apps, then ya I suppose I'd recommend using Boomi to get your data back and forth. Or build something yourself if you're a competent developer, which I know you are ;)
Boomi Great if Your Not a Developer
What do you like best about the product?
Mapping objects to another objects are made very easy in boomi. All you need to do is drag a line from one name to another and your done. I do like that there are many connectors to choose from that allow you to quickly connect to different products without learning those products apis.
What do you dislike about the product?
As a developer I find this tool a hindrance.
Debugging is a nightmare as I am in the dark of what is happening in most of the steps.
Boomi goes quite a bit down on our dev boxes which causes lost time
I find also the documentation lacking.
Debugging is a nightmare as I am in the dark of what is happening in most of the steps.
Boomi goes quite a bit down on our dev boxes which causes lost time
I find also the documentation lacking.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have many different system that need to share data between each other but with different names. We use boomi for it's mapping capabilities to map between these different objects and different systems(ie SalesForce)
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you can't afford developers, or your developers are lacking skills or you need something done quickly or you have very complex objects that you need to map then boomi is a product to use.
I've found it easy to use and intuitive, real time saver
What do you like best about the product?
It's really easy to develop complex integration processes with visual tools. The GUI really helps make sense of complex jobs.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance problems and debugging can be more difficult due to abstraction from the lower layers...
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Too many to list, we've done dozens of integrations between many different systems.
Integrations that work
What do you like best about the product?
The ability to schedule and track the completion statuses of our integrations. Ability to audit processes for success and failure.
What do you dislike about the product?
Licensing for ftp seems excessive when many of our connections are simple file dumps.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of EDI delivery and Invoice processing has save lots of manual work. The logging and documentation of these integrations has allowed for improved efficiencies and improved auditing.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Review licensing of ftp connections.
showing 371 - 380