I utilize SnapLogic for data migration and data integration projects. I use it mainly as a middleware tool, working with a lot of SAP data. By transferring SAP data into more cost-effective databases, I can run analytics without the high cost associated with SAP provider analytics.

SnapLogic
SnapLogicExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Snaplogic delivers a seamless data integration experience
Organizations with very specific customization needs, tight budgets, or advanced performance requirements might face some problems.
Best tool for integration
Best tool to integrate
One of the best integration service in the market
Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.
What needs improvement?
SnapLogic is doing well in evolving with the AI landscape. However, if the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial.
Additionally, improving AI capabilities to be easily recognizable would enhance the user experience.
For how long have I used the solution?
Although my use of SnapLogic has been intermittent, I have worked with it for close to seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of SnapLogic as nearly ten out of ten. It has shown to be robust and reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the scalability of SnapLogic as eight out of ten. While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten. They are prompt in responding to inquiries or issues, providing quick solutions.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used DBT along with Airflow as part of our current cloud data integration.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of SnapLogic has become very easy, comfortable, and swift.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
SnapLogic is positioned at around seven or eight out of ten in terms of pricing. There are competitors offering competitive pricing in the market.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
DBT is a main competitor of SnapLogic. For enterprise-level solutions, I prefer DBT, yet for smaller internal projects, SnapLogic is more efficient.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate SnapLogic as nine out of ten. I recommend SnapLogic for other users due to its efficiency and user-friendly features. Medium and large-scale enterprises will benefit most from SnapLogic as small-scale businesses usually rely more on open-source options. I rated my overall experience with SnapLogic as nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Vesatile and compehensive platform with a wide range of features.
Versatile and capable, expensive and lacking some features
Time to market is very respected among the business representatives.
Very good possibilities to bridge cloud and on-premise infrastrucutures.
Stable products, having nodes which are headless is a benefit during implementation, easy to scale and move nodes if needed.
Extensibility with custom snaps is also positive where partners can expand with new functionality.
Customer support comes back in a timely manner and helps to resolve issues and provide patches.
We use the product for many different integrations continously, business critical flows are running well.
I would prefer a possibility to structure having each integration in an "agreement" which could hold together detection from input channel polling, transformation steps (pipelines) and possibly send/output steps.
In the current setup we have to construct message queue consumers, file pollers and other input channels in pipelines which are either continously running and allocating a lot of resources and slots (due to many sub pipelines in the flow) or executed on schedules.
It would be good to break out and add possibility to have lightweight input channels which can consume from all the possible sources (maybe based on pipelines) and then route the data picked up in to specific agreements/integration pipelines based on detection rules.
I would prefer to have more support for unit testing of pipelines, such as creating test cases for pipelines or parts of pipelines which could be used for validating after changes are done to further strengthen safe deployments in to production.
It is a bit slow to process and develop, we have long processing times of validations which is not very effecient during development.
Further strengthen the integration with git and other source control.
Enable support for backing up data outside snaplogic in the solution.
Connectivity support with many standard products.
Ease of development and partially for troubleshooting with the enabling of validation and possibility to analyze data in each step.