We use Trend Vision One for our endpoint protection in our data center, mostly focused around our server assets, and we do anti-malware, intrusion prevention, as well as firewall, host-based firewall capabilities.

The ease of configuration, customization, and organization are what I appreciate the most about Trend Vision One. 

It is a bit slow to implement kernel support on the Linux side. When doing patching and upgrades on our Linux servers, we often find that the Trend agent doesn't support the kernel version. It's usually not far behind, but we often are in a position where we may not be properly protected for a period.

We started using Trend Deep Security, which was the product prior to Trend Vision One, seven or eight years ago, and then we transitioned to Trend Vision One two years ago. While we have been using Trend Vision One proper for two years, we had essentially the same product in an on-prem version for seven or eight years.

We've had performance issues with the agents of Trend Vision One at odd times, but I wouldn't say it's been a widespread issue or a common issue. Once in a while, there have been things that we've attributed to Trend.

The scalability of Trend Vision One seems infinite. We're not a huge organization, so we haven't really run into any limitations, but it appears it can scale to accommodate and serve any of our purposes.

The quality of support for Trend Vision One is generally very good. If we have any issues with support, we can leverage our sales engineer for support or escalation. I really haven't had any concerns. I have contacted the technical support or customer support via phone number or ticket.

Positive

We have used Microsoft Defender, Sophos, as well as McAfee as alternatives to Trend Vision One. I prefer Trend Vision One more compared to those alternatives.

We transitioned from our on-premises Deep Security deployment to Vision One, and the process was relatively smooth. However, we encountered a few challenges related to legacy configurations and ensuring proper connectivity to our server assets. With an on-premises software application, we didn’t have to worry about internet accessibility for some of our server nodes. Consequently, we faced issues getting non-internet-connected server endpoints to communicate with the cloud. Luckily, there is a solution for that, but it took some time to get everything functioning properly.

Trend Vision One is a large product suite. There are many features that we don't have fully deployed, but the amount of time it took for us to go from on-prem to the cloud for similar services without onboarding anything new that Trend Vision One offered was two months for 400 assets, server nodes.

It has reduced our time to detect and respond to threats, but I don’t have a way to quantify that.

I know the pricing for Trend Vision One. It's been a while, but it doesn't seem bad. They made some changes to their pricing in the past. It used to be a per-server node pricing structure, but now they do it by credits. I would say it's improved because we can, for the same investment, shift and adjust which capabilities we're leveraging within the platform. It's not super expensive. It's definitely an increased cost over leveraging Microsoft Defender, which we already have the licensing and capability for. We chose to spend money on this as opposed to leveraging a product that we already had, but the cost is fair.

The sensors we're using include the anti-malware products, and we have the EDR sensors deployed on our server endpoints. They have network sensors and other features, but we're not leveraging any of those.

We started onboarding some of our services in the last three or four months to Trend Vision One to gain more visibility, so it's early in that adoption. We haven't taken any action based on alerts or notifications from Trend Vision One, as we're still in the early stages of getting our third-party services set up and monitored.

Trend Vision One hasn't helped us consolidate use of security vendors. This product is solely used for one purpose. We're not leveraging Trend Vision One for other areas within IT or at our company, so we haven't reduced silos. We had an opportunity to go with Defender, which would have reduced the number of products we use, but instead we decided to keep using Trend because we did appreciate it. I'm not sure if Trend Vision One has helped me to reduce the noise from false positives.

I would rate Trend Vision One a nine out of ten.

Our main goal with Trend Vision One is to ensure comprehensive security coverage for all our devices and clients worldwide. We're concerned with far more than just traditional antivirus protection. With this solution, I can now see in detail which software updates have already been installed and which security vulnerabilities still exist. The comprehensive reporting and intelligent protective measures give me significantly more control than before. We can now cover all servers uniformly and completely, which is something that wasn’t possible with our previous solution at this level of quality.

The dashboard is the heart of Trend Vision One for me. What I particularly appreciate is the flexibility: each colleague can create their own dashboard, and I still maintain an overview of the big picture. This granular way of working while maintaining a holistic view motivates me to engage with the tool.

The cloud-based architecture offers considerable advantages over local, individual solutions. Previously, I had to manage patching across various Trend Micro systems manually - now, that’s centrally handled. However, I need to be cautious that updates aren't rolled out too quickly, which could impact notebooks or servers.

The global overview has definitely helped me a lot. The only drawback is the usual subscription model - unfortunately, prices tend to move upward.

Since I've been working with Trend Micro for over 20 years, we’ve been able to consolidate our security landscape and source everything from one vendor, rather than juggling multiple providers.

Trend Vision One gives us better visibility to detect and respond to threats because we can now see more than ever before. We've always made every effort to receive notifications quickly so we could act immediately. Now, I have a much clearer, centralized platform where I can manage all incidents in a structured way.

Interestingly, Trend Vision One shows us more error messages than before, not because more problems are occurring, but because I can now see them for the first time and address them systematically.

Trend Vision One helps us reduce our overall cyber risk. I've always had good experiences with Trend Micro. It gives me the confidence to recognize well-protected areas and uncover vulnerabilities that need attention. Even though I've achieved a good security level, I can't afford to relax. For security audits, the solution helps us demonstrate compliance with certain standards.

Regarding AI integration, I can't make a final judgment yet. AI has both advantages and disadvantages, and attackers are increasingly using it too. However, I believe that AI will become indispensable in security platforms.

The expansion of Phish Insight would be desirable, especially for employee training. Also, in the MDM area for mobile devices, not all functions are available that I know from on-premise or other cloud variants. There's still development potential there.

We began implementing the current Trend Vision One solution in June 2024. However, Trend Micro has been our vendor for about ten years.

I'm very satisfied with the stability. I haven't experienced any direct outages so far. Occasionally, there were connection problems with individual clients, but those were exceptions.

I think Trend Vision One offers very good scalability.

I would rate the service and technical support for Trend Vision One at nine to ten points. Of course, it depends on the specific situation, but overall, I'm very satisfied.

Positive

We didn't switch from another solution but rather implemented Trend Vision One as an evolution of our existing Trend Micro infrastructure. I had explored Microsoft solutions in recent years and attended related training, but ultimately, we stayed with Trend Micro.

The initial setup has a certain complexity that varies by area. Some areas are relatively easy to configure; others definitely require expertise and practice. Without professional support, the start would have been difficult.

We had two German partners on board for several weeks and months. In short, intensive sessions of two to four hours, they developed a structured onboarding process with us. After about three two-hour sessions, we could work independently with the product.

Our implementation strategy for Trend Vision One was three-tiered: First, we migrated from our on-premise Apex One solution to Trend Vision One in the cloud. In the second step, we migrated the servers, and finally we checked all sensors.

We worked with a Trend Micro partner for onboarding. With Trend Micro's recommendation, we also purchased the licenses through them. The partner guided us during the sessions, then we carried out the actual integration and migration ourselves.

For implementation, we needed two to three employees. A colleague and I carried the main responsibility, my colleague handled the cloud migration, agents, and clients. I brought in two additional colleagues for servers and local infrastructure, particularly for Mac systems.

From mid-June to mid-September, an average of two to three people were involved in the project.

I can't definitively evaluate the return on investment yet, since we've only been working productively for a few months. We had a very good onboarding process and worked intensively on it, but for a solid ROI evaluation, it's still too early. I plan to have meaningful numbers by year-end, particularly through patch management and sensor detections.

As usual, we work with twelve-month or multi-year licenses on a subscription basis. The subscription model is ideal for the vendor and predictable for us, but still quite expensive.

I would like more flexibility - for example, the ability to purchase individual modules separately.

For others evaluating Trend Vision One, I recommend checking whether the vendor is a pure security specialist or also active in other, non-security-related areas. That can be an important decision factor.

Overall, I rate the solution 9 out of 10 points.

Foreign language: (German)

Weltweiter Schutz der gesamten IT-Infrastruktur mit nur einer zentralen Plattform

Was ist unser primärer Anwendungsfall?

Unser Hauptziel mit Trend Vision One ist es, eine lückenlose Sicherheitsabdeckung für alle unsere Geräte und Clients weltweit zu gewährleisten. Dabei geht es uns um weit mehr als nur klassischen Antivirenschutz. Mit der Lösung kann ich nun detailliert einsehen, welche Software-Updates bereits installiert sind und welche Sicherheitslücken noch bestehen. Das umfassende Reporting und die intelligenten Schutzmaßnahmen geben mir deutlich mehr Kontrolle als früher. Wir können jetzt alle Server einheitlich und vollständig abdecken, was mit unserer vorherigen Lösung nicht in dieser Qualität möglich war.

Was ist am wertvollsten?

Das Dashboard ist für mich das Herzstück von Trend Vision One. Was ich besonders schätze, ist die Flexibilität: Jeder Kollege kann sich sein eigenes Dashboard erstellen, und trotzdem behalte ich den Überblick über das große Ganze. Diese granulare Arbeitsweise bei gleichzeitigem Gesamtüberblick motiviert mich mit dem Tool zu arbeiten.

Die Cloud-basierte Architektur bringt mir erhebliche Vorteile gegenüber lokalen Einzellösungen. Früher musste ich mich um das individuelle Patching verschiedener Trend Micro Systeme kümmern, das ist jetzt zentral verwaltet. Allerdings muss ich aufpassen, dass Updates nicht zu schnell ausgerollt werden und dabei Notebooks oder Server beeinträchtigen.

Der globale Überblick hat mir definitiv sehr geholfen. Einziger Nachteil ist das übliche Abonnementmodell, die Preise entwickeln sich leider nur in eine Richtung und das ist nach oben.

Da ich bereits seit über 20 Jahren mit Trend Micro arbeite, konnten wir unsere Sicherheitslandschaft gut konsolidieren und alles aus einer Hand beziehen, anstatt verschiedene Anbieter zu jonglieren.

Trend Vision One verschafft uns deutlich bessere Sichtbarkeit, um Bedrohungen zu erkennen und darauf zu reagieren, weil wir jetzt noch mehr sehen können als zuvor. Wir haben immer alles darangesetzt, Informationen sehr schnell über Benachrichtigungen zu erhalten, damit wir sofort daran arbeiten können. Aber jetzt habe ich eine wesentlich klarere, zentrale Plattform, auf der ich alle Vorfälle strukturiert bearbeiten kann.

Interessant ist, dass Vision One uns mehr Fehlermeldungen anzeigt als früher, nicht weil mehr Probleme auftreten, sondern weil ich sie jetzt überhaupt erst sehen und systematisch abarbeiten kann.

Trend Vision One hilft uns, unser gesamtes Cyber-Risiko zu reduzieren. Ich habe immer gute Erfahrungen mit Trend Micro gemacht. Es gibt mir das Sicherheitsgefühl, gut geschützte Bereiche zu erkennen, aber auch Schwachstellen aufzudecken, an denen wir arbeiten müssen. Auch wenn ich bereits ein gutes Sicherheitsniveau erreicht habe, darf ich mich nicht darauf ausruhen. Bei Sicherheits-Audits hilft uns die Lösung definitiv, bestimmte Standards nachzuweisen.

Zur KI-Integration kann ich noch nicht abschließend urteilen. KI hat Vor- und Nachteile, und auch Angreifer nutzen sie zunehmend. Ich gehe aber davon aus, dass KI in Sicherheitsplattformen unverzichtbar werden wird.

Was muss verbessert werden?

Der Ausbau von Phish Insight wäre wünschenswert, besonders für Mitarbeiterschulungen. Auch im MDM-Bereich für mobile Geräte sind nicht alle Funktionen verfügbar, die ich von On-Premise oder anderen Cloud-Varianten kenne. Da ist noch Entwicklungspotential vorhanden.

Wie lange nutze ich die Lösung schon?

Wir haben im Juni 2024 mit der Implementierung der aktuellen Vision One Lösung begonnen. Trend Micro als Anbieter begleitet uns aber bereits seit etwa zehn Jahren.

Was halte ich von der Stabilität der Lösung?

Ich bin mit der Stabilität sehr zufrieden. Direkte Ausfälle hatte ich bisher keine. Gelegentlich gab es Verbindungsprobleme bei einzelnen Clients, aber das waren eher Ausnahmen.

Was halte ich von der Skalierbarkeit der Lösung?

Ich denke, Trend Vision One bietet eine sehr gute Skalierbarkeit.

Wie sind Kundenservice und Support?

Ich würde den Service und technischen Support für Trend Vision One mit neun bis zehn Punkten bewerten. Es hängt natürlich immer von der konkreten Situation ab, aber grundsätzlich bin ich sehr zufrieden.

Welche Lösung habe ich zuvor verwendet und warum habe ich gewechselt?

Wir haben nicht von einer anderen Lösung gewechselt, sondern Vision One als Weiterentwicklung unserer bestehenden Trend Micro Infrastruktur implementiert. Ich hatte mir in den letzten Jahren zwar Microsoft-Lösungen angeschaut und entsprechende Schulungen besucht, aber letztendlich sind wir bei Trend Micro geblieben.

Wie war das initiale Setup?

Die Ersteinrichtung hat eine gewisse Komplexität, die je nach Bereich variiert. Einige Bereiche sind relativ einfach zu konfigurieren, andere erfordern definitiv Fachwissen und Übung. Ohne professionelle Unterstützung wäre der Start schwierig gewesen.

Wir hatten zwei deutsche Partner über mehrere Wochen und Monate im Boot. In kurzen, intensiven Sitzungen von zwei bis vier Stunden entwickelten sie mit uns einen strukturierten Onboarding-Prozess. Nach etwa drei zweistündigen Sitzungen konnten wir eigenständig mit dem Produkt arbeiten.

Unsere Implementierungsstrategie für Trend Vision One war dreistufig: Zunächst migrierten wir von unserer On-Premise Apex One Lösung zu Vision One in der Cloud. Im zweiten Schritt haben wir die Server migriert, und abschließend überprüften wir alle Sensoren.

Wie war das Implementierungsteam?

Wir arbeiteten mit einem Trend Micro Partner für das Onboarding zusammen. Auf Empfehlung von Trend Micro kauften wir auch die Lizenzen dort. Der Partner leitete uns während der Sitzungen an, die eigentliche Integration und Migration führten wir dann selbst durch.

Für die Implementierung benötigten wir zwei bis drei Mitarbeiter. Ein Kollege und ich trugen die Hauptverantwortung, wobei sich mein Kollege um den Cloud-Umzug, Agents und Clients kümmerte. Ich zog zwei weitere Kollegen für Server und lokale Infrastruktur, insbesondere für Mac-Systeme, hinzu.

Von Mitte Juni bis Mitte September waren durchschnittlich zwei bis drei Personen gleichzeitig am Projekt beteiligt.

Wie war unser ROI?

Den Return on Investment kann ich noch nicht definitiv bewerten, da wir erst seit wenigen Monaten produktiv arbeiten. Wir hatten einen sehr guten Onboarding-Prozess und haben intensiv daran gearbeitet, aber für eine fundierte ROI-Bewertung ist es derzeit noch zu früh. Ich plane, bis Jahresende aussagekräftige Zahlen zu haben, insbesondere durch das Patch-Management und die Sensor-Erkennungen.

Wie sind meine Erfahrungen mit Preisgestaltung, Einrichtungskosten und Lizenzierung?

Wie üblich arbeiten wir mit zwölfmonatigen oder mehrjährigen Lizenzen auf Abonnementbasis. Das Abonnementmodell ist für den Anbieter ideal und für uns kalkulierbar, auch wenn nicht ganz günstig.

Ich würde mir mehr Flexibilität wünschen – zum Beispiel die Möglichkeit, einzelne Module separat zu erwerben.

Welche weiteren Ratschläge habe ich?

Anderen, die Trend Vision One evaluieren, empfehle ich zu prüfen, ob der Anbieter ein reiner Sicherheitsspezialist ist oder ob er auch in anderen, sicherheitsfremden Bereichen tätig ist. Das kann ein wichtiger Entscheidungsfaktor sein.

Insgesamt bewerte ich die Lösung mit 9 von 10 Punkten.

My main use case for Trend Vision One is XDR security in our AWS environment for our EC2 instances, and I'm hoping to accomplish effective security measures with it.

The best features Trend Vision One offers are the dashboard, reporting, and the customer service experience, specifically the customer service experience.

What makes the customer service experience stand out is that the onboarding process was exceptionally smooth. John, our account manager, was able to coordinate us with a technical resource to help with a white-glove onboarding process to ensure that our migration from Trend Micro Cloud One to Vision One was smooth and successful.

Trend Vision One has impacted my organization positively, and it's our XDR solution, so it works as intended.

Having Trend Vision One as my XDR solution has helped my team significantly. The Sentinel integration is a huge help for allowing us to detect and respond to events in our AWS environment.

I cannot think of anything that Trend Vision One can be improved.

I have been using Trend Vision One for about a week.

Trend Vision One is stable. I have experienced minimal issues with reliability or downtime.

Trend Vision One's scalability is excellent. It can handle my organization's growth and changing needs.

The customer support is exceptional. Working with their technical resource, Victor, was fantastic, and I am very happy with the customer service that we experienced from both Victor and John.

I would rate the customer support exceptionally high on a scale of one to ten.

I did not previously use a different solution before Trend Vision One.

I have seen a return on investment. I have been a Trend Micro customer for years and I continue to see value in their platform and have used it at several jobs.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very easy. Our enterprise account manager, John, made all of that very easy, as he was able to send me the private offer, walk us through accepting it inside of the AWS Marketplace, and helped us cancel our existing subscription.

Before choosing Trend Vision One, I evaluated other options. I considered Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender.

The advice I would give to others looking into using Trend Vision One is to try it.

I rate Trend Vision One an 8 out of 10.

We use Trend Vision One as our primary security solution on all endpoints, servers, and clients in our environment. Through third-party integrations, we’ve also connected solutions from other vendors (including VMware and Fortinet).

Trend Vision One has increased our endpoint visibility and reduced attack vectors. We can now identify and respond to vulnerabilities and threats faster. This has reduced our response time by an estimated 25–30%. Vision One provides notifications about specific risks and helps us understand where the general risks lie, enabling proactive mitigation.

With other vendors, we’ve had to manually check for vulnerabilities in products and assess whether those vulnerabilities were relevant. Now, Vision One handles much of that process. It provides detailed information for each user and endpoint about existing risks and how to mitigate them.

I often compare patching vulnerabilities in Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) to playing a game — the goal is to collect as few points as possible. The lower our score, the more secure our environment is. And like in real life, there are ups and downs because new risks arise daily. Vision One is an important tool for communicating risk assessments to management while also helping operational staff understand what risks mean and how to reduce them.

The feature I find most valuable in Vision One is CREM. CREM helps our company identify blind spots. It provides detailed information about the actions and improvements we should take to secure our environment, and gives concrete recommendations about how to resolve vulnerabilities.

As part of our Service One Complete service agreement, we have bi-weekly meetings with a Technical Account Manager (TAM) who advises us on improving security settings and informs us — even between meetings — about new attack scenarios and how to counter them.

It’s hard to pinpoint areas where Vision One could be improved or where additional features are needed. I’ve been working with the solution for three years, and Trend Micro is constantly developing. Sometimes, it’s hard to keep track of all the updates and added features.

I feel that Trend Micro is now better at identifying my needs than I am at recognizing them myself.

Vision One has been in use at the company for three years.

The stability is excellent. In my opinion, performance and availability are both very good.

The scalability of the solution is very good. We have not encountered any limitations as our environment has grown.

I would rate customer service extremely positively. Support responds quickly, and together we’ve been able to solve all challenges in our day-to-day operations. On a scale from 1 to 10, I would rate customer service and technical support a 9 — there should always be room for improvement.

Before Trend Vision One, we used a solution from Kaspersky. The switch was prompted by the German BSI’s security warning regarding Kaspersky's antivirus products.

I was heavily involved in the rollout and deployment of the solution. Implementation was relatively quick and smooth. We used a deployment script distributed to endpoints through our software distribution system.

Our rollout strategy started with a small number of endpoints being configured with antivirus and policies. After reviewing and refining the policies, Vision One was rolled out in phases to the remaining endpoints.

We needed only one staff member for the implementation of Trend Vision One, and that was me.

The investment in Trend Micro Vision One has paid off, although ROI is difficult to calculate. A security solution is like a good insurance policy — ideally, you never need to use it. We haven’t had any incidents so far, and hope it stays that way.

I’ve noticed that the continuous visibility of potential risks has made our environment more secure and has enabled colleagues to respond faster, saving valuable working time.

Before we decided on Vision One, we also evaluated solutions from other vendors, including Microsoft and Fortinet. The differences between the products were not significant — they were more in the details. But since we had already been a Trend partner for 15 years (12 of them inactive), we ultimately decided to return to Trend Micro.

Three years ago, we followed a different concept: two independent security solutions with separate management and reporting. Migrating to Vision One and consolidating everything into one interface gave us a 365° view of our IT infrastructure.

Central visibility of endpoints and vulnerabilities, as well asunified management, brought a new level of focus to IT security and boosted employee awareness.

If you're evaluating Trend Micro, don’t limit yourself to antivirus functionalities. Consider other features as well — especially the Managed Services, (strong technical support), and Cyber Risk Exposure Management capabilities, which I find highly valuable.

Create a centralized view of your IT infrastructure.

Define which features are important or necessary for you.

Get a comprehensive overview when evaluating different security vendors in terms of features and costs — so you’re not comparing apples to oranges.

Foreign Language: (German)

Ermöglicht Teams, Cyberrisiken schnell zu erkennen und zu managen – durch detaillierte Einblicke und kontinuierliche Unterstützung

Was ist unser primärer Anwendungsfall?

Trend Vision One kommt als primäre Sicherheitslösung auf allen Endpunkten (Server und Clients) in unserer Umgebung zum Einsatz. Darüber hinaus sind über die Third-Party Integration auch die von uns eingesetzten Lösungen weiterer Hersteller (u. a. VMware, Fortinet) eingebunden.

Wie hat es meiner Organisation geholfen?

Trend Vision One hat uns geholfen, die Sichtbarkeit der Endpunkte zu erhöhen und den Angriffsvektor zu verringern. Wir können schneller Schwachstellen/Bedrohungen identifizieren und darauf reagieren. Dadurch konnte unsere Reaktionszeit um schätzungsweise fünfundzwanzig bis dreißig Prozent gesenkt werden. Mit Vision One wird man über konkrete Risiken benachrichtigt und lernt, wo die Risiken im Allgemeinen liegen. So kann man aktiv daran arbeiten, diese zu beheben.

Früher mussten wir aus eigener Initiative heraus überprüfen, welche Schwachstellen bei bestimmten Herstellern bestehen und einschätzen, ob diese Schwachstellen für uns relevant sind. Das wird jetzt bereits zu einem großen Teil von Vision One erledigt. Herunter gebrochen bis auf jeden einzelnen Benutzer und Endpunkt wird dediziert angegeben, welche Risiken bestehen und wie diese verringert werden können.

Ich vergleiche die Behebung von Schwachstellen im Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) mit einem umgekehrten Spiel. Es geht darum, so wenige Punkte wie möglich zu sammeln. Je niedriger unser Score ist, desto sicherer ist die Umgebung. Und wie im echten Leben gibt es Höhen und Tiefen, weil es täglich neue Risiken gibt.

Letztendlich ist Vision One ein wichtiges Tool, um einerseits eine allgemeine Risikobewertung für Führungskräfte/ Manager durchzuführen, und andererseits für operative Mitarbeiter, um zu wissen, was dieses Risiko tatsächlich beinhaltet und wie es sich reduzieren lässt.

Was ist am wertvollsten?

Die Funktion, die ich in Trend Vision One besonders wertvoll finde, ist Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM). CREM hilft unserem Unternehmen, blinde Flecken zu identifizieren. Diese wichtige Funktion zeigt sehr detailliert und umfassend auf, wo Handlungsbedarf oder Verbesserungspotenzial besteht. Gleichzeitig bietet es den Kollegen konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen, wie Schwachstellen geschlossen werden können.

Ein Bestandteil unseres Service One Complete Service-Vertrages sind zwei wöchentliche Meetings mit einem TAM (Technical Account Manager), der uns berät, wo Verbesserungspotenzial bei den Sicherheitseinstellungen besteht und uns regelmäßig – auch zwischen den Meetings – informiert, wenn es neue Angriffsszenarien gibt und wie diesen entgegengewirkt werden kann.

Was muss verbessert werden?

Bereiche, in denen Vision One verbessert werden könnte oder wo zusätzliche Funktionen erforderlich sind, sind schwer zu bestimmen. Ich arbeite jetzt seit drei Jahren mit der Lösung und Trend Micro arbeitet ständig an deren Weiterentwicklung. Stellenweise ist man gar nicht in der Lage, alle Änderungen zu erfassen oder welche zusätzlichen Funktionen eingebunden werden.

Ich glaube, Trend Micro ist derzeit schneller dabei, meine Bedürfnisse zu identifizieren, als ich sie überhaupt selbst erkenne.

Wie lange verwende ich die Lösung bereits?

Vision One ist seit drei Jahren im Unternehmen im Einsatz.

Was denke ich über die Stabilität der Lösung?

Die Stabilität der Lösung ist sehr gut. Meiner Meinung nach sind Leistung und Verfügbarkeit sehr gut.

Was denke ich über die Skalierbarkeit der Lösung?

Die Skalierbarkeit der Lösung ist sehr gut. Wir sind bisher auf keine Einschränkungen beim Wachstum unserer Umgebung gestoßen.

Wie sind Kundendienst und Support?

Ich würde die Erreichbarkeit und Kompetenz von Service und Support von Trend Micro als sehr hoch bewerten, ich bin sehr zufrieden. Antworten und Lösungen kommen prompt, das Personal ist professionell und auf einem sehr hohen Kommunikationsniveau.

Wie würden Sie Kundendienst und Support bewerten?

Äußerst positiv. Kundendienst und Support reagieren zeitnah. Gemeinsam konnten bisher alle Herausforderungen unseres Tagesgeschäftes gelöst werden.Auf einer Skala von eins bis zehn würde ich den Kundendienst und den technischen Support für Trend Vision One mit einer Neun bewerten. Es muss ja noch Luft nach oben bleiben.

Welche Lösung habe ich vorher verwendet und warum bin ich gewechselt?

Vor Trendmicro Vision One war die Lösung von Kaspersky im Einsatz. Der Auslöser für den Wechsel war die vom BSI ausgesprochene Sicherheitswarnung vor den Virenschutzprodukten des Herstellers.

Wie war die anfängliche Einrichtung?

An der Einführung und Bereitstellung der Lösung war ich maßgeblich beteiligt. Die Implementierung erfolgte relativ schnell und problemlos mit einem Deployment-Skript, welches über das Software-Verteilungssystem auf die Endpunkte gebracht wurde.

Unsere Implementierungsstrategie sah vor, dass zunächst eine kleine Anzahl von Endpunkten mit Virenschutz und Richtlinien versorgt wurde. Dann wurden die Richtlinien noch einmal überprüft und verfeinert. Abschließend wurde Vision One in mehreren Etappen auf die restlichen Endpunkte ausgerollt.

Wie war unser ROI?

Die Investition in Trend Micro Vision One hat sich rentiert, aber der ROI ist schwer zu berechnen. Eine Sicherheitslösung ist wie eine gute Versicherung, die man hoffentlich nicht braucht. Wir hatten bisher keine Vorfälle und hoffen natürlich, dass wir auch in Zukunft keine haben werden.

Ich stelle fest, dass unsere Umgebung durch die permanente Sichtbarkeit von potentiellen Risiken sicherer geworden ist und dass die Kollegen schneller auf diese reagieren können. Das spart vor allem Arbeitszeit.

Welche anderen Lösungen habe ich evaluiert?

Bevor wir uns für Vision One entschieden haben, haben wir auch die Lösungen anderer Hersteller evaluiert, unter anderem die von Microsoft und Fortinet. Die Unterschiede bei den jeweiligen Produkten waren nicht so gravierend, sie lagen mehr im Detail. Aber da wir auch schon seit fünfzehn Jahren Trend Micro Partner sind (zwölf Jahre davon ruhend), sind wir schließlich wieder zu Trend Micro zurückgekehrt.

Welche anderen Ratschläge habe ich?

Wir hatten vor drei Jahren ein Konzept, das einen anderen Ansatz verfolgte. Zwei voneinander unabhängige Sicherheitslösungen, mit jeweils eigenem Management und Reporting. Die Migration zu Vision One mit der Konsolidierung in eine Oberfläche hat zu einer 365°-Sicht auf die IT-Infrastruktur geführt.

Die zentrale Sichtbarkeit von Endpunkten und Schwachstellen und das Management über alle Ebenen hinweg hat noch einmal einen ganz anderen Fokus auf das Thema IT-Sicherheit gelegt und das Bewusstsein der Mitarbeiter für dieses Thema gestärkt.

Wenn Sie Trend Micro evaluieren, beschränken Sie sich bitte nicht nur auf den reinen Virenschutz, sondern beziehen Sie auch die anderen Funktionen in die Betrachtung ein. Insbesondere die Managed Services, der Technical Account Manager und die Cyber Risk Exposure Management Funktionen haben für mich einen hohen Mehrwert.

Schaffen Sie eine zentralisierte Sicht auf Ihre IT-Infrastruktur.

Definieren Sie im Vorfeld, welche Funktionen für Sie wichtig sind bzw. Sie benötigen.

Verschaffen Sie sich einen umfassenden Überblick bei der Evaluierung verschiedener Sicherheitsanbieter hinsichtlich Funktionen und Kosten, damit Sie nicht Äpfel mit Birnen vergleichen.

Welches Bereitstellungsmodell verwenden Sie für diese Lösung?

Private Cloud

Falls öffentliche Cloud, private Cloud oder Hybrid-Cloud, welchen Cloud-Anbieter verwenden Sie?

Verschiedene.

Our use cases for Trend Vision One are monitoring and alerts.

The biggest challenges we wanted to address with Trend Vision One were securing endpoints and enabling us to quickly respond to incidents or threats. This is the main goal for using this solution.

Trend Vision One has improved the way our organization functions by acting as both a monitoring tool and an antivirus, giving us insight on potential threats and enhancing our response time to security incidents. It is hard to measure the time savings but we save a significant amount of time in responding to potential threats. For example, we don't expect employees to respond to emails, chat, or calls outside of working hours. Trend Vision One has a feature where we can block all access to the laptop or endpoints. It allows us to take immediate action without waiting for the user to respond.

In terms of reducing noise from false positives, unfortunately, some behaviors can be mistaken for bad behaviors, but that isn't the fault of the software itself. It largely depends on how the developers of other applications implement their software and how it is run. We encountered an issue with another software called Rapid7, which periodically runs a command on MacBooks or Apple operating systems. This command, which is quite lengthy, searches for any unsecured credentials or API keys related to GitHub on the laptop. The way the application triggers is significant: it runs under root privileges, executing that command in the terminal for the user. Trend Vision One picks this up as a suspicious command, interpreting it as an attempt to find unsecured credentials. Despite having whitelisted the entire command in Rapid7, Trend Vision One still flagged it. We went back and forth on this issue, but ultimately we decided that it wasn't worth further troubleshooting to silence this alert due to the potential for actual malicious use of such commands. While we could whitelist it, we did not want to risk it being exploited maliciously. In the end, we chose to ignore the alert. They helped us reduce some other noise, but there was some noise that we weren't able to reduce.

Vision One AI has been very useful. All IT people stay up to date with security risks, exposures, alerts, or attacks. Vision One AI helps us explain or understand the alerts and what actions are recommended.

The workbench alerts are something we find very useful, as they help us stay informed about various activities. Not all alerts are positive, but they provide valuable insights into the detection methods and help us understand how certain issues arise. For example, if someone attempts to run a piece of software that encrypts a file, one of our tools, which is used for evidence gathering in surveillance systems, may encrypt the file too quickly. As a result, Trend Vision One may trigger an alert. Although this is a false positive, it still gives us insight into the behavior involved. This allows us to investigate the alert further and provide feedback to the user or development team, letting them know that similar triggers are likely to occur with other security systems or software.

Other useful features include intrusion and mailbox alerts, suspicious unauthorized access, tracing logs, website clicks, and email filtering for bad attachments.

The improvement I have been asking for is an easier way to create MDR requests. Not all alerts that come through Trend Vision One receive an investigation, and we would like the ability to easily request an investigation on lower-scored alerts without logging into the support portal to create a ticket.

I would like to see Trend Vision One and OfficeScan consolidated into one platform. Currently, it is the same space but two different layers. It would be nice to have both combined instead of having two clients.

There is room for improvement when it comes to support.

I've been working with Trend Vision One for three years.

Trend Vision One is stable enough. We don't see many performance impacts on our endpoints, except for when our weekly scheduled scans happen. Our developers express that it limits how freely they can develop, but I personally appreciate the insight it gives us and the actions that allow us to take on our devices.

I would rate their support a six out of ten. We encountered an issue with one of our tools—specifically, Visual Studio. One of our developers faced difficulties debugging code because Trend Vision One was blocking the debugging application or causing it to crash. This problem stemmed from a Windows update, and it took us a month and a half to identify the root cause. After we opened a ticket either at the end of March or early April, we waited several more weeks for a solution. Although the Windows update occurred back in February, we didn’t receive the fix until the end of May. The interaction between Windows and the application played a significant role in the issue, as the debugging application starts the code and injects itself into the running application, which Trend Micro flagged as problematic after the latest Windows update. Fortunately, this issue has now been resolved, but it was indeed a painful experience. Our developers were understandably frustrated that they couldn’t debug code for a month and a half, which impacted our project timelines.

Neutral

The company previously had SentinelOne before my time, and I can say that SentinelOne was not effective. 

We currently use Rapid7 as our Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service. In my experience, both Rapid7 and Trend Vision One serve similar purposes, but they have distinct differences. There are times when Rapid7 provides us with more detailed information, while at other times, Trend Vision One offers greater insights. This is partly because Trend Vision One collects more data from the devices, allowing it to better identify the root causes of alerts compared to Rapid7. 

Additionally, I find that the MDR team at Trend is generally more responsive than that of Rapid7. However, there are some disadvantages as well. For instance, we haven't yet set up cloud monitoring capabilities with Trend Vision One. Rapid7 currently handles our cloud infrastructure monitoring and manages services like Office and Okta. While Rapid7 is equipped to monitor these services, Trend Vision One is not yet at that level. We are exploring ways to enhance its capabilities, and if it can provide the same level of service as Rapid7, we might consider discontinuing our use of Rapid7 altogether.

We use the SaaS solution. I was not involved in the initial setup and deployment process, which occurred prior to my time here, but I have readjusted some policies.

Previously, it was difficult to understand some alerts. However, as time goes by, we differentiate better between them, and the AI feature is an extremely good tool that explains things that are gibberish to the regular user. The learning curve is quite steep.

It has helped us understand some of the alerts that we did not comprehend.

It is an all-around solution that includes various modules for comprehensive security monitoring and alerting. This solution is particularly effective when integrated with other hardware or on-premises solutions, such as Deep Discovery Inspector, which monitors your network.

The interface is adequate, but it is constantly changing. New features are being added, and items are being rearranged almost daily. We might have missed some announcements regarding these frequent updates. As it is an evolving solution, such changes are to be expected. However, there are still features that are buried within menus, which previously required extensive searching to locate. For instance, until last year, isolating endpoints was only possible through the search function. Now, they have added a feature within the endpoint inventory that allows you to select devices and isolate them immediately, rather than having to jump through multiple hoops to access that option.

The application has also become slightly more responsive. Regarding its functionality, the insights it provides are quite useful. The application displays various actions, and you can drill down into alerts to view the execution path associated with them. For example, if an application triggers an alert, you can right-click on that alert and select "Check Execution Profile." This feature shows you where the process started, what actions it took, and where it ended. This improvement is beneficial for understanding how tasks are executed.

I would rate Trend Vision One an eight out of ten.

My use cases for Trend Vision One are typically reactive, letting it scan and monitor our environment, and we typically respond quickly to any workbenches that come up. 

We also try to adapt to the Cyber Risk Index or the security score, keeping that at the lowest amount possible on a weekly or bi-weekly basis as we push out updates and do maintenance.

My favorite features in Trend Vision One include the Cyber Risk Index, which breaks down various pieces of info into one easily digestible score. I appreciate the workbenches. They provide a visual of how they operate for the most part, and I value the in-depth details they offer since we can mostly operate off of that, giving us enough info to crunch and figure out what's happening.

While it's not an actual feature of the application, I appreciate the clinics and seminars that Trend provides, as I went to one last year that got me from zero to beginner, and I hope to advance to intermediate with another seminar series this year.

Trend Vision One helps reduce my mean time to detect and respond to threats as without it, we would be scrambling and confused with not much information to go off of for threat hunting. I'm not sure what we were using previously. As long as I've been here, it's been Trend Vision One, and we're very happy with it. We're hesitant to shop around for any other provider since we think it's a very good product, and we appreciate the speed and breadth of data we receive from it.

I sometimes see noise from false positives with Trend Vision One. One clear instance involved the AI deep fake feature, which would throw up false positives whenever someone had a Teams meeting with a blurred background, leading us to turn it off as it activated for every meeting. Additionally, there were minor false positives throughout the year related to Microsoft update files and certain DLLs, however, they don't clutter Trend Vision One much and have essentially gone away in recent months.

I am very happy with Trend Vision One's platform ability to provide centralized visibility and management across protection layers. The platform extends into various categories, offering oversight over email and even flagging suspicious activities that occur on a server, despite not having a Trend Vision One agent on it. For instance, an admin setting up remote access on that server was flagged as suspicious, and I appreciate the reach that Trend Vision One has across different scattered categories it monitors.

In terms of improving Trend Vision One, it might sound silly, yet it seems notoriously uncooperative with middle clicks and opening sections in new tabs. I'm a big tab browser, and it feels hitting a brick wall when I have to refresh in a new tab or make a copy of a tab to move forward. If we can enable middle clicks to open sections in new tabs, it would greatly benefit me personally.

I've been using Trend Vision One for a few months, approximately eight to ten months at this point.

Regarding stability, I don't think Trend Vision One has ever caused any lagging, crashing, or downtime. There was one situation where we may have misconfigured something, forgetting a checkbox, and Trend Vision One's scheduled scans might have used some CPU resources, however, that's on our end. Besides that, Trend Vision One works exactly as intended and has never hindered our operations, feeling more a collaborator than a roadblock.

I don't think I've encountered any issues with scalability; we're growing steadily, and I believe Trend Vision One can keep up with our demand. Our company has about 200 employees in Canada, and I can foresee that if we doubled in size, Trend Vision One would accommodate that very easily.

I have contacted the technical support before. We're very happy with the technical support from Trend Vision One, feeling we have our own dedicated technician who knows the entire suite of applications. They are very intelligent and responsive, and as we submit feature requests, they seem to make it into the actual list of features in Trend Vision One, so we maintain a good relationship with their technical support and development teams.

Positive

I'm not sure what we were using previously. As long as I've been here, it's been Trend Vision One, and we're very happy with it. We're hesitant to shop around for any other provider as we consider it a very good product.

The experience of first using Trend Vision One is really difficult due to the steep learning curve. Thankfully, I attended a Trend Vision One seminar that got me from zero to beginner, as without that, it involves a lot of guesswork with little grounding to go off of. I really recommend their seminars and tutorials.

I do not know much about the pricing of Trend Vision One. My understanding is it's expensive. We pay for it anyway, and there's always sticker shock. Still, we feel it's necessary as this product covers all our needs.

We're hesitant to shop around for any other provider. Trend Vision One is a very good product, and we appreciate the speed and breadth of data we receive from it.

I'm not sure if I use the cyber risk exposure management capabilities. Trend Vision One requires very little maintenance on my end, mostly just keeping up with refreshing the license, which is about all I hear related to Trend Vision One maintenance.

Some top security challenges in my industry include securing anything exposed to the internet, especially since we were previously hit with ransomware. The ability of Trend Vision One to detect and cut off threats early, clean up files before they execute, and address phishing emails helps us significantly. We also have their email and collaborative security, which is crucial along with having zero-day protections to receive early warnings of threats, allowing us to act immediately outside our maintenance windows.

I'm not completely sure where we use the Trend Vision One sensors, as I didn't set them up. However, we do have a DDI that we paid a lot for, which is one of our biggest data sources and populates much of the information in Trend Vision One. We also have a network sensor at our different location in the United States, which is a temporary holdover until we can upgrade to something more robust.

It's not critical for my company that Trend Vision One has AI built into its platform in terms of needing a language model to explain things, however, AI is actually critical for threat detection and behavioral analysis. That aspect of behavior monitoring and action based on behavior is very important.

Trend Vision One has helped my organization reduce its cyber risk. For instance, even prior to acquiring the DDI, the DDI's presence on our network found a threat actively in progress, and we were able to act on it, demonstrating its effectiveness from day zero.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Trend Vision One a nine overall.

Our use case for Trend Vision One is for our security platform. We use it for antivirus, XDR, and network telemetry purposes.

Trend Vision One helped us to consolidate our use of security vendors and reduce silos. We had three or four consoles from different products, and we consolidated them into one console with this product. 

Trend Vision One helped reduce the time to detect and respond to threats by 70% to 80%.

Trend Vision One has helped us reduce noise from false positives.

We have been using cyber risk exposure management for 2 months since upgrading in April. It helps us identify blind spots by providing more visibility and insights into our environment, making it a valuable feature. 

We use the network sensor, and its coverage is critical. With SIEM, we gain substantial insights into our environment, and having a complete 360 view is necessary in today's security world. It reduces the risk by 50%.

Having AI built into the Trend Vision One platform is important for our organization. It reduces many manual steps, resulting in more and quicker detections and advanced automation for remediation, improving efficiency by 60% to 70%. The solution aims to reduce risks and enhance detection.

I like how easy it is, and there is a single pane of glass. We have one console for everything. 

Trend Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across protection layers. It has the functionality of different products and management of a single pane of glass. We have one console for everything. As a security engineer, it's easier to check the alerts and find everything. It consolidates a lot of consoles into one, and that's what we like most about it.

Vulnerability scanning could be improved. They need to see more CVEs and scan products for known vulnerabilities, allowing for better display and review of potentially exploitable servers by hackers or through configuration settings.

We have been using Trend Vision One for approximately 18 months.

We haven't experienced any stability issues. It has proven to be stable.

The scalability of Trend Vision One is good.

I have contacted technical support from Trend Micro. The quality and speed of support are good.

Positive

It was easy. It took us one day to fully deploy Trend Vision One.

Some maintenance is required for updating agents on the servers.

The deployment involved just one person working with the vendor in one day.

Trend Vision One has reduced risks by 50%. We have reduced the response time by approximately 70%-80%.

When we have a good product such as Trend Vision One, the price is fine.

We have used Trend Micro products for many years, and we upgraded to Trend Vision One. We didn't test any alternatives, staying with what we've used for years.

I would rate Trend Vision One an eight out of ten.

We're in the retail business, we sell bicycles in physical stores, and our branches are our biggest attack surface. These locations are covered by our overall solution, including sensors and other protection.

We have 49 branches, a headquarters, and a central warehouse. That's about 1,200 users and 1,000 computers. Trend Vision One is used primarily by our IT team. We also integrate with Office 365, Azure, and our on-prem data center.

We use Trend Vision One for consolidated security in hybrid environments. We have both on-premise and cloud data centers, particularly in Azure. The platform consolidates all of that into one view.

Since we started using Trend Vision One, we've been able to enhance our security posture significantly.

Trend Vision One has improved significantly over time in providing centralized visibility and control. It started as a set of individual products, but now it feels like one integrated solution. This reduces the need for interfaces or multiple analysis tools. That's why we pursued the one-platform strategy. 

Trend Vision One has definitely helped consolidate our use of security vendors. We previously used standalone products for endpoint and email protection that weren't integrated. Now, we get the benefits of an integrated solution. I'd estimate we're 50–70% better in security now than we were two years ago.

The Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)feature is absolutely essential. Even though we're not critical infrastructure, the NIS2 directive gives us security guidelines. CREM helps us meet these requirements.

It is very important to our organization that Trend Vision One integrates AI into the platform. Pattern recognition in forensic data is no longer manageable by humans due to the volume of events. Machine learning is essential to process these and filter what needs human attention.

Trend Vision One has improved our organization significantly. Security tasks used to be manual. Now, technology prevents issues or supports staff in detecting them. This shift from manual to technical solutions greatly increased our security.

Trend Vision One has reduced the time we spend detecting and responding to threats. I'd say we're 80% faster than before. The platform gives us consolidated data upfront, so we don't have to search for event clues manually.

Trend Vision One has helped reduce false alarms. I'd estimate a 50–60% time saving. We have more alerts now than years ago, but also better systems to handle them, making the whole process more efficient. Trend Vision One has helped reduce our cyber risk overall. We now know where gaps are before they become problems, whereas in the past we had to guess. That's a massive improvement.

When it comes to operations, the CREM solution helps us identify vulnerabilities in systems. If we patch them, they disappear from the reports—this gives us actionable insights, which is incredibly helpful.

It took about half a year to realize the benefits of Trend Vision One after implementation.

The features of Trend Vision One are fine—it's the integration that needs work. Especially at the endpoint level, we still feel like we're using an older product that just got plugged into Trend Vision One. A fully integrated endpoint client is the next step.

My impression of the solution's stability is an eight out of ten. 

I'd rate the scalability of Trend Vision One a nine.

The platform scales well. Our growth over the past three years has never caused performance or expansion issues.

The service support for Trend Vision One works well. The service desk and escalations function smoothly.

We used Kaspersky before Trend Vision One and switched due to BSI recommendations.

It took about half a year to realize the benefits of Trend Vision One after implementation. Migration processes took some time, but we quickly started seeing positive results.

A return on investment wasn't our goal with Trend Vision One. The goal was to achieve a high level of security at acceptable costs, not ROI calculation.

The pricing and licensing model for Trend Vision One is fair overall, especially with the good discounts we got. Currently, no extra costs—though we pay a monthly fee that gets converted into credits. I find the credit model non-transparent—you can't always tell how many licenses apply to which product. Trend Micro is working on improving this. We'll renegotiate pricing in 2026.

I joined the company in 2022 and brought knowledge of Trend Vision One with me. Our partner also recommended it, and the pricing and offers were so good that we didn't seriously consider alternatives.

We cover all areas of security with Trend Vision One, except for edge security—we use other firewalls there.

We deploy Trend Vision One sensors at the endpoint and for email, including Office 365, and we're expanding this further. We believe that having all data in one central system gives us better insight than using isolated solutions. That's why we initially looked for a one-platform solution.

In 2025, we can finally recognize risks effectively, especially in Azure, where we previously had to rely solely on Microsoft. With Trend Vision One's support, we can now detect and mitigate risks, especially with our core ERP system running in Azure starting this November.

My advice to others evaluating Trend Vision One is to understand the full value across all modules. Just using endpoint protection doesn't show the platform's real strength. The full benefits come when multiple modules are used together.

My overall rating for Trend Vision One is 8 out of 10.

Foreign Language: (German)

Die CREM-Funktion ist eine absolut Funktion, die uns hilft, Sicherheitsanforderungen zu erfüllen

Was ist Ihr primärer Anwendungsfall für diese Lösung? 

Wir sind im Einzelhandel tätig und verkaufen Fahrräder in stationären Geschäften. Unsere Filialen stellen dabei unsere größte Angriffsfläche dar. Diese Standorte sind durch unsere umfassende Sicherheitslösung geschützt – inklusive Sensoren und weiteren Schutzmaßnahmen.

Insgesamt haben wir 49 Filialen, eine Zentrale und ein zentrales Lager. Das entspricht etwa 1.200 Nutzer und 1.000 Computer. Trend Vision One wird hauptsächlich von unserem IT-Team genutzt. Wir integrieren auch Office 365, Azure und unser lokales Rechenzentrum.

Wir nutzen die Trend Vision One Plattform für konsolidierte Sicherheit in hybriden Umgebungen. Wir haben sowohl lokale als auch Cloud-Rechenzentren, insbesondere in Azure. Die Plattform konsolidiert all das in einer Ansicht.

Was ist am wertvollsten?

Seit der Implementierung von Trend Vision One haben wir unser Sicherheitsniveau signifikant erhöht.

Trend Vision One hat sich im Laufe der Zeit stark verbessert, insbesondere bei zentraler Sichtbarkeit und Steuerung. Es begann als eine Sammlung einzelner Produkte, fühlt sich jetzt aber wie eine integrierte Lösung an. Das reduziert den Bedarf an Schnittstellen oder mehreren Analysetools. Deshalb haben wir die One-Platform-Strategie verfolgt. Trend Vision One hat uns definitiv dabei geholfen, den Einsatz verschiedener Sicherheitslösungsanbieter zu konsolidieren. Früher verwendeten wir eigenständige Produkte für Endpunkt- und E-Mail-Schutz, die nicht integriert waren. Jetzt profitieren wir von einer integrierten Lösung. Ich würde schätzen, dass wir jetzt 50–70 % sicherer sind als vor zwei Jahren.

Die Funktion „Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)“ ist absolut essenziell. Auch wenn wir nicht unter die Definition der kritischen Infrastruktur fallen, bietet uns die NIS2-Richtlinie wichtige Sicherheitsvorgaben. CREM hilft uns, diese Anforderungen zu erfüllen.

Es ist für unsere Organisation sehr wichtig, dass Trend Vision One KI in die Plattform integriert. Aufgrund der hohen Anzahl an Ereignissen ist die Mustererkennung in forensischen Daten für Menschen nicht mehr zu bewältigen. Maschinelles Lernen ist unerlässlich, um diese Daten zu verarbeiten und die relevanten Informationen für den Menschen herauszufiltern.

Durch den Einsatz von Trend Vision One konnte unsere Organisation deutlich optimiert werden. Früher wurden Security-Tasks manuell durchgeführt. Heute verhindert Technologie potenzielle Sicherheitsvorfälle oder unterstützt die Mitarbeitenden bei deren Erkennung. Dieser Wandel von manuellen zu technischen Lösungen hat unsere Sicherheitsniveau erheblich verbessert.

Trend Vision One hat unseren Zeitaufwand für die Erkennung und Reaktion auf Bedrohungen deutlich reduziert. Ich würde sagen, wir sind heute etwa 80% schneller als früher. Die Plattform stellt konsolidierte Daten proaktiv bereit, sodass wir nicht mehr manuell nach Hinweisen suchen müssen.

Trend Vision One hat dazu beigetragen, Fehlalarme zu reduzieren. Ich schätze eine Zeitersparnis von 50–60 %. Es gibt zwar mehr Alarme als früher, aber auch bessere Systeme, um damit umzugehen – das macht den Prozess effizienter. Trend Vision One hat unser Cyberrisiko insgesamt reduziert. Wir wissen jetzt, wo Schwachstellen sind, bevor sie zum Problem werden - früher mussten wir oft raten. Das ist eine enorme Verbesserung.

In Bezug auf den Betrieb hilft uns die Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) Lösung, Schwachstellen in Systemen zu identifizieren. Wenn wir sie patchen, verschwinden sie aus den Berichten – das liefert konkrete, umsetzbare Erkenntnisse, was unglaublich hilfreich ist.

Etwa ein halbes Jahr nach der Implementierung von Trend Vision One konnten wir die Vorteile der Lösung voll realisieren.

Was muss verbessert werden?

Die Funktionen von Trend Vision One sind gut – Verbesserungsbedarf besteht bei der Integration. Besonders auf Endpunkt-Ebene haben wir noch das Gefühl, ein älteres Produkt zu nutzen, das lediglich an Trend Vision One angebunden wurde. Ein vollständig integrierter Endpunkt-Client ist aus unserer Sicht der nächste notwendige Schritt.

Wie bewerte ich die Stabilität der Lösung?

Meine Einschätzung der Stabilität liegt bei acht von zehn.

Wie bewerte ich die Skalierbarkeit der Lösung?

Ich würde die Skalierbarkeit von Trend Vision One mit neun bewerten.

Die Plattform skaliert zuverlässig – unser Wachstum der letzten drei Jahre verlief ohne Leistungs- oder Erweiterungsprobleme.

Wie sind Kundenservice und Support?

Der Service-Support für Trend Vision One funktioniert gut. Service Desk und Eskalationen laufen reibungslos.

Wie bewerte ich Kundenservice und Support?

Positiv.

Welche Lösung haben wir vorher verwendet und warum sind wir umgestiegen?

Wir haben zuvor Kaspersky verwendet und sind aufgrund von BSI-Empfehlungen auf Trend Vision One umgestiegen.

Wie war die Ersteinrichtung?

Es dauerte etwa ein halbes Jahr, bis wir nach der Implementierung die Vorteile realisierten. Die Migrationsprozesse brauchten Zeit, aber wir sahen schnell positive Ergebnisse.

Wie sieht unser ROI aus?

Ein Return on Investment war nicht unser Ziel mit Trend Vision One. Ziel war es, ein hohes Sicherheitsniveau zu akzeptablen Kosten zu erreichen, nicht eine ROI-Berechnung.

Wie sind meine Erfahrungen mit Preisen, Setup-Kosten und Lizenzierung?

Das Preis- und Lizenzmodell von Trend Vision One ist insgesamt fair. Derzeit fallen keine zusätzlichen Kosten an – wir zahlen eine monatliche Gebühr, die in Credits umgewandelt wird. Ich finde das Credit-Modell als wenig transparent – man kann nicht immer eindeutig erkennen, wie viele Lizenzen welchem Produkt zugeordnet sind. Trend Micro ist bereits dabei, das Modell zu optimieren. 

Welche anderen Lösungen habe ich evaluiert?

Ich bin 2022 ins Unternehmen gekommen und habe Wissen über Trend Vision One mitgebracht. Unser Partner hat es ebenfalls empfohlen, und die Preise und Angebote waren so gut, dass wir keine Alternativen ernsthaft in Betracht gezogen haben.

Welche weiteren Ratschläge habe ich?

Wir decken mit Trend Vision One alle Bereiche der IT-Sicherheit ab – außer der Edge-Sicherheit, dort nutzen wir andere Firewalls.

Wir setzen Trend Vision One-Sensoren an Endpunkten und für E-Mail (einschließlich Office 365) ein und bauen das weiter aus. Wir glauben, dass die zentrale Erfassung aller Daten in einem einzigen System uns bessere Einblicke bietet als isolierte Lösungen. Deshalb haben wir ursprünglich nach einer Lösung auf einer einzigen Plattform gesucht. 

Ab 2025 können wir Risiken endlich effektiv erkennen, besonders in Azure, wo wir uns vorher nur auf Microsoft verlassen konnten. Mit der Unterstützung von Trend Vision One können wir jetzt Risiken erkennen und eindämmen– insbesondere da unser zentrales ERP-System ab November in Azure läuft.

Mein Rat an andere, die Trend Vision One evaluieren: Man sollte den vollen Nutzen aller Module verstehen. Wenn man nur die Endpoint-Schutz-Funktion nutzt, erkennt man nicht die eigentliche Stärke der Plattform. Die vollen Vorteile kommen erst, wenn mehrere Module gemeinsam verwendet werden.

Meine Gesamtbewertung für Trend Vision One: 8 von 10.

Our usual use cases for Trend Vision One involve the detection of any kind of threat. We are getting alerts from the workbench on Trend Vision One and we perform threat hunting. If there are false positives, we close them, and in the case of true positives, we take action toward remediation and closure. Predominantly, we use it for threat management.

Trend Vision One is an integrated platform where I can get all the information about all the endpoints, whether it be a server, laptop, or desktop. Everything is integrated, allowing me to see everything within one console; that is one of the greatest advantages of Trend Vision One.

In terms of centralized visibility and management across protection layers, Trend Vision One provides protection across all attack vectors. It allows us to manage threats in all phases. We can even perform forensics where we can collect suspicious files remotely to submit to Trend Micro.

Trend Vision One helps reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. We get alerts in real-time. We receive notifications as email alerts, as well as alerts in the console. Through the workbench, we can monitor the console 24/7 with real-time information; there is not much delay.

Trend Vision One has helped us reduce noise from false positives, thanks to the SOAR functionality. We are able to configure automatic responses, and in case any false positives are identified, the Vision One console takes care of them automatically. This helps us reduce a lot of false positives.

Trend Vision One has indeed helped consolidate our use of security vendors and reduce silos. We sometimes get threat notifications from other vendor products, such as Microsoft Cloud App Security, which identifies threats, and we can trace similar traffic from the endpoints in Vision One. This correlation adds more value for our clients.

The most valuable feature of Trend Vision One is response management; when there is a malware issue, we need to isolate the endpoint, which I can do through response management. I can isolate an endpoint, restore the endpoint, and run manual malware scans, which will be very useful when performing malware remediation actions.

In future releases of Trend Vision One, I would like to see improvements regarding role-based access control, as it is important to ensure that when granting admin access to a person, their visibility is limited to only their respective markets. For example, while creating roles for countries like France, Germany, and Italy, they should only manage their own endpoints to maintain privacy and security.

I have been working with Trend Vision One for more than 2 years.

I have not encountered any issues with the stability of Trend Vision One. There have been no problems at all.

Stability is critically important for us with Trend Vision One; it is very stable, providing continuous 24/7 support, and we do not face challenges in accessing services from Trend Micro.

Regarding scalability, Trend Vision One accommodates many endpoints without any challenges, allowing easy expansion of our portfolio.

I would rate the technical support for Trend Vision One a perfect 10 out of 10, as Trend Micro supported us throughout the transition from on-prem servers or other vendors, providing top-notch service at all times.

Positive

Before using Trend Vision One, we were utilizing McAfee, and some of our clients were using Symantec. Currently, most clients have transitioned to Trend Micro.

The decision to switch from McAfee was driven by factors such as high costs and the global presence of organizations. Trend Micro has a more robust global reach and its pricing is very competitive compared to McAfee.

The initial setup of Trend Vision One is not complex; it is straightforward. We had the options in the Trend Vision One console, and we received training from Trend Micro-certified administrators. We had knowledge transfer sessions, and later, we successfully migrated our products from on-prem servers to the cloud. 

We have been using the product for more than 7 to 8 years, and we did not face any challenges during this migration.

We have seen a return on investment with Trend Vision One, primarily in terms of having more confidence in addressing any kind of suspicious activities. Any such activities will be notified to us, allowing us to take action. The return on investment is apparent in managing the endpoints and addressing suspicious activity that might otherwise go unnoticed.

It has saved about 25% to 30% of our time. The risk has been reduced by more than 25% after switching to Trend Vision One.

Its price is very decent. It suits our requirements.

I did evaluate other options, including Microsoft Sentinel, but ultimately, most vendors choose Trend Vision One.

The factors that led us to choose Trend Vision One over Microsoft or other options include costs, and since we already have Microsoft for other protections (like M365 security protection), we opted for protection with a different vendor, rather than the same vendor.

I would rate Trend Vision One a nine out of ten.

We have been in contact with Trend Micro for a very long time. We have a Domino server, which is the alternative to an Exchange server, and we have implemented their virus scanner there. Because of that, we decided to stick with the company and integrate Email Gateway Protection as well. It is important for us because we host our own mail server, and we receive a huge amount of spam. The goal was to reduce that. So far, we have reduced our email traffic by almost 50%—thanks to email filtering. This means our employees do not have to handle those emails anymore.

We receive around 1,000,000 emails per year and 500,000 of those are junk. That was a key factor in saving work time. Every email that lands in an inbox has to be handled—either deleted or responded to. We tested this with different employees and found that deciding whether an email is relevant or junk takes about 10 to 15 seconds per email. With 500,000 unnecessary emails, you can imagine how much time we are saving company-wide.

Another major reason we implemented this solution is phishing emails. This is a huge issue. Trend Micro offers phishing awareness training, but ideally, these phishing emails should not even reach our company, as they are highly dangerous. So far, Trend Micro has filtered out around 3,700 phishing emails for us.

There is another extremely dangerous issue—malicious software hidden in attachments. If an employee clicks on such an attachment, files could get encrypted. In the past year, Trend Micro has intercepted 60 such cases, meaning 60 incidents where our files did not get encrypted.

This is why we use this solution. Of course, there are other providers, but we find Trend Vision One's interface very user-friendly. We also have a dashboard where we can track everything and pull these statistics.

In Germany, such a security solution is very important. Due to a change in the law, company management is now obligated to ensure that IT security is based on best practices. If they fail to do so or are unaware of their security status and neglect it, they are now personally liable with their private assets. I also need a tool that allows my management and board to monitor our security status. One of the reasons why we chose Trend Vision One was that it provides the option for the board to check the dashboards. This means that every morning while having coffee, they can see the security status of the company on their phones. They can also ask, "Hey, why is our security score high? Is our IT department not working properly? Or do we have a real problem that requires additional software or other measures?" Additionally, negotiations become easier for the IT department, for management, and for us. If security gaps arise, we can say, "Hey, we need software or an investment of a certain amount." We now have a solid foundation for our case.

We use email security and endpoint protection. Endpoint protection is installed on every computer and server, with enhanced sensors on the servers. These security tools are crucial for us—without them, we would be blind in IT. They allow us to monitor the health of each system and user activity, including preventing access to inappropriate websites.

We have a lot of remote work, and we used to struggle because we could not properly monitor devices outside our network or firewall. Now, we can control things like applications, websites, USB sticks, and external hard drives, which was previously impossible. A key feature of our endpoint protection is that if a computer reaches a certain security risk score, it is automatically blocked by the software. This means that if an attack occurs, the affected computer is isolated from the network, preventing further spread.

Our biggest challenge is not direct hacking attacks—our company is not a high-priority target. Instead, phishing emails are the main issue. These emails attempt to trick employees into making fraudulent payments or providing access to our systems, allowing ransomware installation. Email security is our biggest focus area.

It has significantly reduced email volume, which is crucial, especially for our security team, as they do not have time to review every message. IT also receives fewer inquiries about whether emails are legitimate. Additionally, phishing training has helped—our employees recognize phishing attempts better, and our click rate on phishing simulations has dropped to zero. Previously, conducting a phishing simulation would have cost €2,500 per test, but now, we can run one or two tests per month at no additional cost. This provides great value.

It is important for us that Trend Vision One has AI built into its platform. It is essential for detecting abnormalities quickly. Humans may not notice certain threats, but AI can. However, AI is not perfect and sometimes lets suspicious emails through, which we then manually review in quarantine. AI is constantly learning, and the more it improves, the less manual intervention is needed, which is beneficial for us.

We now have visibility. Previously, we were blind and could not assess our security status.

Trend Vision One helped reduce our time to detect and respond to threats. Previously, we relied on reading security forums and websites to identify vulnerabilities. Now, we get real-time alerts and can take immediate action.

Our speed has increased significantly. We can update and patch security threats daily, whereas before, it took weeks or even months.

Trend Vision One has helped our organization reduce its cyber risk, especially through endpoint protection. For example, our field employees used to connect unknown external hard drives, which posed a risk. That is no longer possible, eliminating a major threat vector.

Trend Vision One has helped consolidate our use of security vendors. Previously, we only had basic endpoint protection from another provider, which we replaced with Trend Vision. We now have more security software, not less, because our company has grown significantly—from a small business to a mid-sized enterprise. The IT department was lagging behind, and security was not a priority. Now, we manage everything with one provider, rather than multiple vendors.

The dashboard is valuable. It provides a comprehensive view of our security status and allows us to compare ourselves with other companies using Trend Vision. We can immediately see if we need to take action when updates are released with high CVE scores, without having to check multiple websites. This saves time and enables faster decision-making.

The platform provides not only visibility but also intervention capabilities, such as blocking threats. We are operating at a high level in this regard. I would rate Trend’s Vision One platform very high in providing centralized visibility and management across protection layers.

Improving the user interface would be helpful—it can be confusing, especially if you do not use it daily. 

We do not see a need for additional features. The tool has so many capabilities that it can be overwhelming at first, which is why we implemented it step by step to avoid overwhelming our administrators.

We started with the Email Gateway Protection solution in December.

Its stability is very good. We have not had any failures so far.

Its scalability is very good as we can work with it flexibly.

We have an environment with 160 users and about 15 servers, all virtualized and running entirely on-premise.

It is very good. If we have a problem, we call Mr. Weckwert or send him an email and receive a response.

We used SonicWall’s endpoint protection before, but it had issues. For example, the endpoint protection conflicted with VPN installations, requiring us to uninstall security features before updating VPN settings—an unacceptable security risk. With Trend Vision, we feel much better protected.

SonicWall is just a basic antivirus tool, whereas Trend Vision One provides more advanced features like software firewalls and the ability to block specific applications and websites, such as preventing employees from using Telegram or WhatsApp on work computers.

A downside is that Trend Vision One requires more system resources, so we had to upgrade some computers with additional RAM. However, that is not just due to Trend Vision One but also Windows 11’s increased demands.

We use a hybrid model—Trend Vision’s cloud solution with local installations on our devices. We operate entirely on-premise.

We worked with a partner and now manage everything internally.

For the implementation, all admins were present to understand how it works. It was like a training session for us.

Fundamentally, there is one colleague responsible for it, and they spend about an hour to an hour and a half on it daily.

In terms of maintenance, it only requires updates.

We have seen an ROI through time savings. The email filtering system paid for itself within a year.

It is very good. The flexibility to temporarily exceed license limits when setting up new devices is helpful, as it allows us to ensure security before purchasing additional licenses.

Try it out. Ultimately, everyone has to decide for themselves if it fits their admin team. What I always say is that this tool monitors you and provides insights—it exposes weaknesses in an IT department. If IT management cannot handle that level of transparency, they should avoid it. If they see value in having more insights, it is a very valuable tool.

I would rate Trend Vision One an eight out of ten.

Foreign Language: (German)

Bietet solide Sicherheit, zentrale Transparenz und flexible Lizenzierung

Was ist unser Hauptanwendungsfall?
Wir stehen schon sehr lange in Kontakt mit Trend Micro. Wir haben einen Domino-Server, der eine Alternative zu einem Exchange-Server ist, und haben dort deren Virenscanner implementiert. Aufgrund dieser positiven Erfahrung haben wir uns entschieden, dem Unternehmen treu zu bleiben und auch den Email Gateway Protection-Dienst zu integrieren. Dies ist für uns besonders wichtig, da wir unseren eigenen Mailserver hosten und eine enorme Menge an Spam erhalten. Unser Ziel war es, diesen zu reduzieren. Bisher konnten wir unser E-Mail-Aufkommen um fast 50 % reduzieren – dank der E-Mail-Filterung. Das bedeutet, unsere Mitarbeitenden müssen diese E-Mails nicht mehr manuell verwalten.

Wir erhalten etwa 1.000.000 E-Mails pro Jahr, von denen 500.000 Spam sind. Das war ein entscheidender Faktor zur Einsparung von Arbeitszeit. Jede E-Mail, die im Posteingang landet, muss entweder gelöscht oder beantwortet werden. Wir haben dies mit verschiedenen Mitarbeitenden getestet und festgestellt, dass die Entscheidung, ob eine E-Mail relevant oder Spam ist, etwa 10 bis 15 Sekunden pro E-Mail dauert. Bei 500.000 unnötigen E-Mails kann man sich vorstellen, wie viel Zeit wir unternehmensweit einsparen.

Ein weiterer wichtiger Grund für die Implementierung dieser Lösung sind Phishing-E-Mails. Dies ist ein enormes Problem. Trend Micro bietet Schulungen zur Phishing-Sensibilisierung an, aber idealerweise sollten diese Phishing-E-Mails unser Unternehmen gar nicht erst erreichen, da sie extrem gefährlich sind. Bisher hat Trend Micro für uns rund 3.700 Phishing-E-Mails herausgefiltert.

Ein weiteres äußerst gefährliches Problem ist schädliche Software in Anhängen. Wenn ein Mitarbeitender auf einen solchen Anhang klickt, könnten Dateien verschlüsselt werden. Im letzten Jahr hat Trend Micro 60 solcher Fälle abgefangen – das bedeutet 60 Vorfälle, in denen unsere Dateien nicht verschlüsselt wurden.

Deshalb nutzen wir diese Lösung. Natürlich gibt es auch andere Anbieter, aber wir finden die Benutzeroberfläche von Trend Vision One sehr benutzerfreundlich. Wir haben auch ein Dashboard, mit dem wir alles nachverfolgen und Statistiken abrufen können.

Wie hat es meinem Unternehmen geholfen?
In Deutschland ist eine solche Sicherheitslösung äußerst wichtig. Aufgrund einer Gesetzesänderung ist das Unternehmensmanagement nun verpflichtet, sicherzustellen, dass die IT-Sicherheit auf Best Practices basiert. Falls sie dies nicht tun oder sich ihres Sicherheitsstatus nicht bewusst sind und diesen vernachlässigen, haften sie nun persönlich mit ihrem Privatvermögen. Ich benötige daher ein Tool, das es meinem Management und dem Vorstand ermöglicht, unseren Sicherheitsstatus zu überwachen.

Einer der Gründe, warum wir uns für Trend Vision One entschieden haben, war die Möglichkeit, dass der Vorstand die Dashboards einsehen kann. Sie können damit morgens beim Kaffee den Sicherheitsstatus des Unternehmens auf ihren Handys überprüfen können. Sie können auch nachfragen: „Risikowert so hoch? Arbeitet unsere IT-Abteilung nicht richtig? Oder haben wir ein echtes Problem, das zusätzliche Software oder andere Maßnahmen erfordert?“

Zudem erleichtert es Verhandlungen zwischen IT-Abteilung, das dem und uns. Falls Sicherheitslücken auftreten, können wir argumentieren: „Wir brauchen Software oder eine Investition in Höhe von X.“ Dadurch haben wir nun eine fundierte Grundlage für unsere Entscheidungen.

Wir nutzen E-Mail-Sicherheit und Endpoint Protection. Endpoint Protection ist auf jedem Computer und Server installiert, mit erweiterten Sensoren auf den Servern. Diese Sicherheits-Tools sind für uns essenziell – ohne sie wären wir in der IT blind. Sie ermöglichen es uns, die Systemgesundheit und Benutzeraktivitäten zu überwachen und den Zugriff auf unangemessene Websites zu verhindern.

Wir haben viele Remote-Mitarbeitende und hatten früher Schwierigkeiten, Geräte außerhalb unseres Netzwerks oder unserer Firewall richtig zu überwachen. Jetzt können wir Dinge wie Anwendungen, Websites, USB-Sticks und externe Festplatten kontrollieren – etwas, das vorher nicht möglich war. Eine zentrale Funktion unserer Endpoint Protection ist, dass ein Computer, der eine bestimmte Risikostufe erreicht, automatisch von der Software blockiert wird. Damit wird bei einem Angriff der betroffene Computer bei einem Angriff vom dem Netzwerk isoliert wird, um eine weitere Verbreitung zu verhindern.

Unser größtes Problem sind keine direkten Hackerangriffe – unser Unternehmen ist kein priorisiertes Ziel. Stattdessen sind Phishing-E-Mails die größte Gefahr. Diese E-Mails versuchen, Mitarbeitende dazu zu verleiten, betrügerische Zahlungen zu tätigen oder unsichere Zugriffe zu gewähren, wodurch Ransomware installiert werden kann.

E-Mail-Sicherheit ist unser wichtigstesSchwerpunktthema. Die Lösung hat das E-Mail-Aufkommen erheblich reduziert, was für unser Sicherheitsteam
entscheidend ist, da es nicht die Zeit hat, jede Nachricht
zu überprüfen.

Zusätzlich hat das Phishing-Training geholfen hat unsere Mitarbeitenden erkennen Phishing-Versuche besser, und unsere Klickrate auf Phishing-Simulationen ist auf null gesunken. Früher hätte eine Phishing-Simulation 2.500 € pro Test gekostet, jetzt können wir ein bis zwei Tests pro Monat ohne zusätzliche Kosten durchführen. Dies ist ein großer Mehrwert.

Was ist besonders wertvoll?
Das Dashboard ist äußerst wertvoll. Es bietet eine umfassende Übersicht über unseren Sicherheitsstatus und ermöglicht es uns, uns mit anderen Unternehmen zu vergleichen, die Trend Vision One nutzen.

Die Plattform bietet nicht nur Transparenz, sondern auch Eingriffsmöglichkeiten, etwa zur Bedrohungsabwehr. In diesem Bereich sind wir sehr gut aufgestellt. Ich würde die Trend Vision One Plattform in Bezug auf zentrale Sichtbarkeit und Management über verschiedene Schutzebenen hinweg sehr hoch bewerten.

Was könnte verbessert werden?
Die Benutzeroberfläche könnte verbessert werden – sie kann verwirrend sein, insbesondere wenn man sie nicht täglich nutzt.

Wie lange haben wir die Lösung bereits im Einsatz?
Wir haben im Dezember mit der Email Gateway Protection-Lösung begonnen.

Wie bewerten wir die Stabilität der Lösung?
Die Stabilität ist sehr gut. Wir hatten bisher keine Ausfälle.

Wie bewerten wir die Skalierbarkeit der Lösung?
Die Skalierbarkeit ist ebenfalls sehr gut, da wir flexibel damit arbeiten können.

Unsere Umgebung besteht aus 160 Usern und etwa 15 Servern, die alle virtualisiert und vollständig On-Premise betrieben werden.

Wie ist der Kundenservice und Support?
Sehr gut. Falls wir ein Problem haben, rufen wir Herrn Weckwert an oder schicken ihm eine E-Mail und erhalten eine schnelle Antwort.

Wie bewerten wir den Kundenservice?
Positiv.

Welche Lösung haben wir vorher genutzt und warum sind wir gewechselt?
Wir haben vorher SonicWall Endpoint Protection verwendet, aber es gab Probleme, z. B. Konflikte mit VPN-Installationen.

Mit Trend Vision One fühlen wir uns deutlich besser geschützt.

Wie war die Implementierung?
Wir haben ein hybrides Modell – die Cloud-Lösung von Trend Vision mit lokalen Installationen auf unseren Geräten. Wir betreiben alles On-Premise.

Für die Implementierung waren alle Administratoren anwesend, um das System zu verstehen – es war für uns wie eine Schulung.

Eine Person ist hauptverantwortlich und verbringt täglich etwa eine bis anderthalb Stunden mit der Lösung.

Welchen ROI haben wir gesehen?
Die E-Mail-Filterung hat sich innerhalb eines Jahres amortisiert.

Wie sind Preisgestaltung und Lizenzierung?
Sehr gut. Die Flexibilität, Lizenzen temporär zu überschreiten, ist ein großer Vorteil.

Welche weiteren Empfehlungen haben wir?
Einfach ausprobieren. Jeder muss selbst entscheiden, ob es zu seinem Admin-Team passt.

Ich würde Trend Vision One mit acht von zehn Punkten bewerten.

Welches Bereitstellungsmodell nutzen wir?
On-Premises.