I use NGINX to port our local server to a public server where people can access the URL. The main use case is for reverse proxy to support our local server, making it publicly accessible through our DNS system.

The primary valuable feature of NGINX for me is its ability to provide a reverse proxy. I have found that this feature supports our local server, and I am able to connect through our DNS system, making it accessible publicly.

Additionally, the integration with SSL certificates and the configuration capabilities make it a valuable solution for my use case. Without NGINX, users would not be able to access our application, which means there is positive ROI from using NGINX as it is crucial for the functioning of my organization.

One area of improvement could be that NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates. This would eliminate the need to use third-party software such as SaaS Boost for generating these certificates.

I have been working with NGINX for seven months.

NGINX is very stable. In my use case, I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services. I have not encountered any stability issues.

While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling. However, by adding more resources to our system, I can maintain and ensure everything runs smoothly.

Prior to NGINX, I didn't use any other similar solutions.

The initial setup of NGINX was straightforward and very easy. It was completed in about one hour.

The entire deployment process required only one person.

Without NGINX, users would not be able to access our application, which means there is positive ROI from using NGINX as it is crucial for the functioning of my organization.

My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.

I did not evaluate other options because NGINX is popular in the tech world and was an easy choice for me.

NGINX is a great product for anyone interested in reverse proxy. It is a reliable solution and has proven effective in my use case. I would recommend it to anyone considering similar needs.

The overall product rating is ten out of ten.

I primarily use NGINX Plus as a reverse proxy, and it does an excellent job.

NGINX Plus is a crucial tool that helps me tackle various problems and challenges. Its versatility and capabilities make it invaluable for implementing patches and fixes when necessary.

NGINX Plus is incredibly valuable to me because it excels at being a reverse proxy, offering seamless failover, and it works perfectly for my needs.

Improvement needed in NGINX Plus could focus on optimizing memory usage for users.

I have been using NGINX Plus for two years.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

The product is very scalable. I would give it a ten out of ten for scalability.

Technical support is very good. I have used it only once and it is great. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is very easy.

I have definitely seen ROI with NGINX Plus.

I believe NGINX Plus offers very reasonable pricing for companies. Although I didn't buy it myself, companies that did found it to be affordable, especially with free versions available for specific needs.

I would recommend NGINX Plus to others. It is a good product and it is very user-friendly. Overall, I would rate it a ten out of ten.

We are using servers as web servers, and I redirect them to NGINX.

When you use NGINX, you have more options and power. You don't need to use anything else. I have web servers that integrate with other web servers you need to use, for example, Apache, IIS, or anything else.

NGINX integrates well with your environment. It's better using NGINX than Apache.

The user interface could be improved. NGINX is also too poor with streaming. We could have a better solution for streaming besides NGINX.

I've been using NGINX Plus for about 20 years or more.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.

The initial setup is not difficult. You need to have some experience, of course. When installing the solution, you just edit some text files. It could be simpler if you have a user interface, but you must know how to edit a text file.

I have 100% seen a return on investment with NGINX Plus.

The solution is free, but you can spend a lot of money with a complex solution.

I mainly use the cloud because it's for the Internet. But I have some cases where we need to use the solution internally or locally. But we mainly deploy the solution on the cloud.

Before choosing NGINX Plus, one should ask an expert to help them. I rate NGINX Plus a ten out of ten.

NGINX Plus is a part of F5 and can be useful for customers with containers and terminals. Moreover, it's useful for businesses that need application delivery control and enterprise load balancing.

It's lightweight software that can handle heavy loads efficiently.

There is room for improvement in the pricing model.

I have been using this solution for three years.

The customer service and support is fine.

The initial setup is straightforward. It took about a week to deploy the solution.

There was an ROI. It's a very useful solution.

The licensing cost is yearly, and it can be quite expensive.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.

If you're using a container environment, I would highly recommend it. It's usually a good fit in about 58% of cases.