Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Awesome easy to see builds and stages in real time
What do you like best about the product?
Build steps, easy configuration files and implementation
What do you dislike about the product?
SSO Login with other button and without to say to push it
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Builds for code review and testing
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Easy build steps, configuration and implementation
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Codefresh enabled us to be very flexible and adaptable with our pipeline setup and processes.
What do you like best about the product?
Codefresh doesn't have a single way of setting up the CI. You can set it up and get it running how you want, you can run steps in parallel, or you can run them synchronously, or you can do both. You can trigger other pipelines from the current pipeline and act on their success or failure status.
What do you dislike about the product?
The only self-hosted runner option requires kubernetes.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We're solving our need for a robust and flexible CI/CD pipeline. We got this happily from using codefresh.
Fabulous experience
What do you like best about the product?
High-quality support service with an extremely professional attitude
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to see more features like support for custom manifests on Kubernetes or Ingress support
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
CI, CD container registry, helm charts as well as Kubernetes management. Friendly UI and "one-stop-shop in general".
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Best choice for modern Devops engineers
Fun to Use
What do you like best about the product?
The ease in building and using containers.
What do you dislike about the product?
The web interface is a little too fast to push you to upgrade to larger instances.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We needed to build and test containers for a Kubernetes environment. We implemented easy to understand build scripts.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Read the documentation on how to structure builds.
Love CodeFresh for our CI/CD!
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of use, setup, and simple integration with our AWS ECR Docker containers. Deployment is simplified across our environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far everything has worked very well, no dislikes to mention at this time.
The only question we have might be cost vs Github Actions.
The only question we have might be cost vs Github Actions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Simple Git Ops type of flow that allows us to deploy when we push to specific branches and also allows steps for approval before deployment is triggered.
Codefresh solves one of the most challenging issues with running CI/CD pipelines - usability.
What do you like best about the product?
Apart from a stunning and easy to use UI and packed with tons of features, we liked how Codefresh works with containerization and Kubernetes in mind. Another helpful capability was the ability to define custom steps that can be reused in numerous pipelines. That significantly simplifies building custom pipelines (especially if following GitOps like pattern).
Even though Codefresh was very well documented, we also got tremendous help from support. The team was very responsive, both for the free and paid plans.
Even though Codefresh was very well documented, we also got tremendous help from support. The team was very responsive, both for the free and paid plans.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hard to answer. Codefresh was the choice for CI/CD pipelines for two of my projects.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Running end-to-end CI/CD pipeline to build, run automation tests, deploy product versions.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Definitely worth a try! Works well for us.
Most Streamlined CI/CD Platform for Containerised Applications
What do you like best about the product?
After searching and evaluating a number of different platform for CI/CD we discovered Codefresh to be the most cost effective, easy to use and customisable for all our workflows. With a direct Kubernetes API integration, we can control each cluster directly from the Codefresh dashboard. This has provided us with a faster feedback on making some quick changes like increasing replicas. The Helm Dashboard that allows for easy Helm control such as visibility of which revision is deployed to managing rollbacks makes Codefresh a far superior platform to work with.
When running the workflows it is important that we have an easy and flexible system to manage environment variables. Codefresh not only allow easy pipeline editing the variables but also the ability to share variables among projects and pipelines.
Some of the best features are -
- Multiple Environment Workflows
- Shared Environment Variables
- Exportable Variables
- Customisable Steps
- Kubernetes API integration
- Unified Log Output
- Easy rollbacks with Helm dashboard
When running the workflows it is important that we have an easy and flexible system to manage environment variables. Codefresh not only allow easy pipeline editing the variables but also the ability to share variables among projects and pipelines.
Some of the best features are -
- Multiple Environment Workflows
- Shared Environment Variables
- Exportable Variables
- Customisable Steps
- Kubernetes API integration
- Unified Log Output
- Easy rollbacks with Helm dashboard
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be nice to be able to split the users into teams with better granular RBAC settings. At present all users have access to all projects. Having user groups attached to projects would give more security control to team leaders.
At first we used Codefresh for both CI & CD but we discovered that Github actions was was much faster at building, running and testing our code than Codefresh was so we recently opted to use GitHub actions for all CI and just use Codefresh for CD.
At first we used Codefresh for both CI & CD but we discovered that Github actions was was much faster at building, running and testing our code than Codefresh was so we recently opted to use GitHub actions for all CI and just use Codefresh for CD.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Every application is different, every deployment has quirks and every environment should be different. Codefresh gives us the ability to configure every single application, environment and deployment to suit the project's needs while delivering a consistent workflow to the developer.
Previously we used a niche system that allowed us to build developer based development environments from a GitHub pull request. We originally wanted to locate and replicate this functionality in a new CI/CD platform and after finding Codefresh we discovered we could do way more that this. We have a custom Cloudflare step that allows us to create a new CNAME of our domain for each environment that is built from the project-branch-environment name. This provided us with a faster QA feedback loop & cleaner sharable URL's in a completely destructible environment.
Previously we used a niche system that allowed us to build developer based development environments from a GitHub pull request. We originally wanted to locate and replicate this functionality in a new CI/CD platform and after finding Codefresh we discovered we could do way more that this. We have a custom Cloudflare step that allows us to create a new CNAME of our domain for each environment that is built from the project-branch-environment name. This provided us with a faster QA feedback loop & cleaner sharable URL's in a completely destructible environment.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Highly recommend. You should at least try it and you will find it a much better system that some of the competitors.
Superior tool to modernize CI/CD
What do you like best about the product?
Docker based model which avoids the pitfalls of using Jenkins with conflicting plugins. YAML configuration is modern, readable, and easily accepted by different software development groups. Hybrid installation for on-prem runners and SaaS hosted UI allowed us to keep our data internal while getting updates and product improvements with no upgrades on our part. Docker containers with each step gives granular control of software version for the task. Integrations with Kubernetes allow for complete CI/CD with native steps and less scripting. Really liked the CLI capabilities in addition to intuitive user interface. Support has been amazingly responsive and is invested in our success.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not much to dislike. It is a growing product in the landscape of CI/CD so it not the first product to come to mind for an evaluation. With some research, it quickly moves to the top of a product comparison list with more established tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Face it, Jenkins has been around forever has not changed. Plugin collisions are a problem and as different software teams are converged into a CI tool, it becomes difficult to maintain. Codefresh has a Docker container for each step so software teams use the version they need to build and test their application. In addition, we were able to create our own runtime Docker containers to avoid constantly installing exact versions of packages to prep each build environment. Build times are shorter, teams are making pipeline changes faster, and our full pipeline of tools are all integrated: source control, CI server, artifact management, deploy targets.
Great product with great support
What do you like best about the product?
The product speaks for itself as far as reliability, name recognition and quality. What really sets them apart for me is the hasty response time from support when our company needs something. Has been nothing but a pleasure to work with.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing comes to mind in regards to negative commentary.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Their assistance in our CI/CD pipeline projects as well as help with any Docker related issues has helped a lot.
Speed and Customer Service
What do you like best about the product?
I looked far and wide for a replacement for Jenkins in an effort to update our pipelines and increase team engagement. Codefresh was the clear winner. Codefresh pipelines are easy to build and have a ton of great features with more coming out all the time. Their build optimizations help keep teams moving forward and not sitting around waiting on builds. They have been very responsive to any and all requests including technical support and feature requests. Codefresh supports our container workloads as well as serverless for both CI and CD.
What do you dislike about the product?
I dislike the Jenkins jobs we haven't migrated yet. :)
The codefresh UI used to be a bit slow, but it's improved a lot.
The codefresh UI used to be a bit slow, but it's improved a lot.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We had a real problem with a lack of reusability and engagement in messy copy-paste pipelines. Codefresh yaml is easy to grasp quickly and we can create our own reusable steps. Our development teams really like working with Codefresh and are largely self-sufficient.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Codefresh is ideal for container-based workflows. Modern pipelines run in containers and your toolset is installed via Docker build. Codefresh gives you caching to speed up your builds.
showing 31 - 40