We store all our data in MongoDB. Our frontend application is .NET, our backend is .NET, and the database is MongoDB.
We have two products running on MongoDB: a financial expense management solution and a sustainability product.
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
We store all our data in MongoDB. Our frontend application is .NET, our backend is .NET, and the database is MongoDB.
We have two products running on MongoDB: a financial expense management solution and a sustainability product.
It can store data as a flat file, similar to a file system. It's called Atlas GridFS and it works very well.
MongoDB is a very good database. The Community Edition is free, which is cost-effective for development.
The API support is excellent for integration.
From an improvement standpoint, MongoDB can improve security.
There are some challenges from a security point of view. Since the file can be easily accessed, there should be more security features. The data should be encrypted in some form to prevent unauthorized access.
We've been using MongoDB for three to four years.
I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.
We haven't seen high volumes of data yet. Our solution is for expense management, not a full ERP solution. So far, the system has been stable with the current number of users.
It should be scalable and easily work with other databases like SQL or Oracle. We shouldn't have trouble converting the data.
I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. Some security features are still under development.
MongoDB isn't for our internal users; it's for our customers. Depending on the organization, it can go up to ten thousand or even a hundred thousand users. We have a lot of customers using our applications built on MongoDB.
We are a young company, only five years old. We recently started this product, but we know that around a hundred people are using it in one of our products for web and mobile.
We have a very strong internal technical team that manages everything. We haven't needed any support from MongoDB because our team is proficient in using it.
My team only recommended MongoDB. We haven't worked with other databases for our current projects. I have worked with SQL Server and Oracle in the past as an SAP consultant, but those were for ERP systems, not application development.
MongoDB's setup is very easy. We plan to only use MongoDB for our future database needs.
It works very well with the .NET and Angular platforms due to the flat file support. So, we went with that option.
The main benefits include cost savings and speed. The application runs fast, and accessing data is quick.
ROI is very good.
It's very easy to manage for our technical data analysts.
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I recommend using MongoDB because it's free for development, scalable, and user-friendly for connecting with frontend and backend technologies like Angular and .NET.
We primarily utilize MongoDB Atlas for tasks such as IoT integration. Additionally, it serves as a general-purpose database that aggregates analytics data before transferring it to a data lake. Its versatility allows for various applications, providing flexibility and ensuring the availability of essential data across different systems. While it is used in diverse contexts, many use it for IoT-related initiatives.
We prefer MongoDB Atlas over SQL because most of the data generated with IoT devices is unstructured. This gives you flexibility; you don't have to define specific schemas all the time, and sometimes, the structure of the object varies.
It improves data management along the same lines. MongoDB Atlas supports structured data with IoT projects.
MongoDB Atlas was explicitly designed to support IoT applications. Many databases offer features tailored for IoT use cases.
One area for enhancement is containerization. They could explore ways to facilitate deploying MongoDB containers within the platform.
I have been using MongoDB Atlas for five years.
I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.
Two people use this solution because they work with sensors and other variations of IoT.
I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.
The tool provides a forum where users can engage with experts. These experts offer assistance tailored to your specific needs, whether you're focused on product-centric queries or diving deep into particular use cases. Ultimately, the support you receive depends on your requirements and the extent of your experience with the platform.
The initial setup of MongoDB Atlas is straightforward. The user-friendly UI guides you through the setup process seamlessly. It would be beneficial if they could maintain this simplicity across different operating systems. Additionally, if they can streamline the process to easily deploy with containers, it would greatly enhance user experience and make life easier.
MongoDB Atlas offers various options based on your needs. It can accommodate both, whether you require the enterprise version with advanced features or prefer to start with an open trial version.
Security is primarily organized around organizational principles, allowing you to customize and adjust each tool according to your specific security policies. I recommend the product. Every product serves a purpose as long as it addresses the right problem. MongoDB Atlas has proven particularly effective for applications such as analytics and IoT, making it a recommended choice for those use cases.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We may use it as an application database. The application stores the data as documents in the database, which is a preference for our company because it’s a Document DB and a NoSQL database, which are preferred over traditional relational databases.
MongoDB has wrapped up the whole development lifecycle. MongoDB has multiple built-in tools such as MongoDB Shell, Compass, and other tools. It helps the developers to use that specific tool efficiently. Users do not have to worry about finding the tools and then installing and using that specific tool to communicate with their database cluster. MongoDB has a built-in option using MongoDB Shell or Compass for that purpose.
So, it has positively impacted the development speed and productivity.
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple features, including built-in backup, all under the same roof, without the need for external tools.
So, the scalability feature supported our data growth overall. The growth of the database depends on the application side. The database aids in scaling when the application requires more storage.
It’s configured to scale automatically across zones and regions, ensuring that performance doesn’t degrade even when scaling down.
The scalability aspect is quite difficult to implement. It should be much easier for the end user. You cannot use less than two nodes; you have to use at least two nodes, and they categorize their nodes, like m5, m10, and m20, according to their resource practices, which are also a bit expensive.
The end-user has to learn a bit about it. MongoDB has great content on its site. They call it MongoDB University. They actually have great content for that. Anyone can learn it, but one has to study it before diving into it or starting to use it.
I have been using MongoDB Atlas for almost three years.
The scalability is good. In my team, almost the whole development team is using it. So, there are around five end users.
I contacted customer service and support for multiple purposes while configuring. The support is quite efficient, and the guidance is quite good. Initially, when I was working on it, I had to communicate with the support team.
So, I had a good experience with the support.
Positive
The initial setup is not too difficult but can be somewhat tricky.
It is tricky mainly in terms of configuration, especially if it's not internet-accessible, configuring it to stay within the same data center while allowing developers access without network barriers.
It is worth my money at the end of the day.
The pricing is not that expensive, but it can be, especially when we have deployed it across multiple zones.
If you want to go with NoSQL, I would suggest using MongoDB.
If you are saving documents and prefer AWS services, AWS also has their DynamoDB for that purpose. I would suggest using AWS service if all of your services are already on AWS.
Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
I subscribe, then, I don't know where to manage the database or see the URI again... How this is integrated with AWS dashboard?